Original contributionSonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: is power Doppler sonography routinely indicated?☆
Introduction
Assessment of cervical lymph nodes is essential for patients with head and neck carcinomas because it helps to determine the prognosis and select appropriate treatment Baatenburg de Jong et al 1989, Ishii et al 1991, Vassallo et al 1992. The presence of a metastatic node in one side of the neck reduces the 5-year survival rate to half of that of a patient without a metastatic node, and the presence of bilateral metastatic neck nodes reduces the survival rate to 25% (Som 1992).
The role of grey-scale sonography in evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy is well established. Grey-scale sonography evaluates the morphology, internal architecture, size and shape of the lymph nodes van den Brekel et al 1990, Vassallo et al 1992, Vassallo et al 1993, Ahuja et al 1997, Baatenburg de Jong et al 1998. Power Doppler sonography allows evaluation of vascular distribution of cervical lymph nodes, and estimation of vascular resistance of intranodal vessels. There are a number of reports discussing the use of Doppler ultrasound (US) in evaluation of neck nodes Adibelli et al 1998, Ariji et al 1998, Wu et al 1998a, Wu et al 2000, Dragoni et al 1999. Our previous study documented an overview of the sonographic appearances of different cervical lymphadenopathies (Ahuja and Ying 2002). The addition of power Doppler sonography of neck nodes does add to the examination time, which increases by 2 min if the use of Doppler is restricted to evaluating distribution only. However, if vascular indices are evaluated, the time taken is approximately 10 min per node. This study was, therefore, undertaken to answer a clinical problem; that is, is power Doppler sonography routinely indicated in all cases or should its use be limited to cases where grey-scale sonography was equivocal?
Section snippets
Materials and methods
We retrospectively evaluated neck node sonograms of 101 patients with known carcinoma of the head and neck or other regions, and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)-proven malignant lymph nodes in the neck. Another group consisted of 72 patients with no known carcinoma (in the head and neck or any other regions), and FNAC-proven reactive lymph nodes. These patients subsequently had follow-up in the outpatient department and remained well otherwise. The lymph nodes of these two groups of
Results
A total of 173 lymph nodes were included in the study. They ranged in size from 4 mm to 36 mm in maximum short axis diameter. There were 36 (87.8%) metastatic nodes from SCC, 25 (96.2%) metastatic nodes from NPC, 28 (82.3%) metastatic nodes from infraclavicular carcinomas and 30 (41.7%) reactive nodes with a maximum short axis diameter greater than or equal to 8 mm.
Table 1 shows the number of metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes that were correctly classified solely by grey-scale sonography,
Discussion
Sonography of neck nodes in routine clinical practice consists of two parts, grey-scale sonography and Doppler sonography. The role of grey-scale sonography in evaluation of cervical nodes is well established Bruneton et al 1984, Baatenburg de Jong et al 1989, Chang et al 1990, van den Brekel et al 1990, Ahuja et al 1997, Ying et al 1998, and power Doppler sonography has also been reported to be an imaging tool that provides further information about the vasculature of cervical nodes and helps
Conclusion
Grey-scale sonography has a high accuracy in classifying metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes. Therefore, power Doppler sonography may not be indicated in every case in routine practice, but should be used for those cases where grey-scale sonography is equivocal.
References (27)
- et al.
Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodesValue of B-mode and color Doppler sonography
Eur J Radiol
(1998) - et al.
Ultrasound in the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous adenitis
Auris Nasus Larynx
(1998) - et al.
The linear echogenic hilus in cervical lymphadenopathy—a sign of benignity or malignancy?
Clin Radiol
(1993) - et al.
US and CT evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis from oral cancer
J Cranio Max Fac Surg J
(1991) - et al.
An overview of neck node sonography
Invest Radiol
(2002) - et al.
A practical approach to ultrasound of cervical lymph nodes
J Laryngol Otol
(1997) - et al.
Lymph node hilusGray scale and power Doppler sonography of cervical nodes
J Ultrasound Med
(2001) - et al.
Power Doppler sonography to differentiate tuberculous cervical lymphadenopathy from nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Am J Neuroradiol
(2001) - et al.
Power Doppler sonography of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer
Am J Neuroradiol
(1998) - et al.
Metastatic neck disease. Palpation vs ultrasound examination
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(1989)
Ear, nose, and throat cancerUltrasound diagnosis of metastasis to cervical lymph nodes
Radiology
Ultrasonic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy
J Formosan Med Assoc
Breast diseasesColor Doppler US in differential diagnosis
Radiology
Cited by (56)
Clinical Applications of Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Superficial Tissues and Organs: A Systematic Review
2021, Academic RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Because of the vascular changes in malignant lymph nodes are thought to be related to tumor angiogenesis and the associated desmoplastic reaction or recruitment of capsular vessels (41), blood flow is also an important feature in estimating LNs. The vascularity pattern in LNs has been classified as hilar, capsular (or peripheral), mixed and avascular (42). It is reported that normal and reactive lymph nodes tend to show hilar vascularity or appear apparently avascular, the presence of peripheral vascularity, regardless of the presence of hilar vascularity or not, is highly suggestive of malignancy.
Thyroid Ultrasonography: Principal Goals and Indications
2021, Surgery of the Thyroid and Parathyroid GlandsChapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes
2017, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRIEvaluation of the role of sono-elastography in diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes
2017, Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUsefulness of Microvascular Ultrasonography in Differentiating Metastatic Lymphadenopathy from Tuberculous Lymphadenitis
2016, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyCitation Excerpt :Unlike spectral Doppler analysis including the pulsatility index and resistive index, which were reported to be useful in differentiation between metastatic and benign lymphadenopathies in previous studies (Ahuja and Ying 2004; Ahuja et al. 2001c; Na et al. 1997; Wu et al. 1998a), power Doppler ultrasonography provides additional information on the vasculature of lymph nodes on conventional gray-scale ultrasonography without a significant increase in examination time. Many prior studies have reported the usefulness of vascular pattern analysis with power Doppler ultrasonography for differentiating malignant from benign lymph nodes (Ahuja and Ying 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005; Ahuja et al. 2001a, 2001b; Chang et al. 1994; Gupta et al. 2011; Na et al. 1997; Steinkamp et al. 1998; Wu, et al. 1998a, 1998b; Ying et al. 1998, 2004). However, studies have also reported the limitations of power Doppler ultrasonography in differentiating tuberculous lymphadenitis from metastatic lymphadenopathy because of the significant overlap in the vascular patterns of these two diseases (Ahuja and Ying 2004; Na et al. 1997; Wu et al. 1998a, 1998b).
Shear Wave Elastography in Head and Neck Lymph Node Assessment: Image Quality and Diagnostic Impact Compared with B-Mode and Doppler Ultrasonography
2016, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyCitation Excerpt :To differentiate metastatic from benign HNLNs, different quantitative, qualitative and Doppler sonographic criteria have been described in the literature. A high resistive index discriminates HNLN malignancy with cutoff values ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 (Ahuja and Ying 2003; 2005), albeit with disappointing overall results (Cui et al. 2013). In this study, similar data were obtained: a calculated RI > 0.66 was associated with malignancy with mediocre sensitivity (71%) and specificity (78%).
- ☆
Dr. Ying’s present address is Department of Optometry and Radiography, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.