Original contribution
Disappearance of tumor contrast on contrast-enhanced FLAIR imaging of cerebral gliomas

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(00)00139-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced fluid-attentuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has shown to be a valuable diagnostic modality in the assessment of cerebral gliomas. In this study we report of a potential pitfall regarding the delineation of enhancing tumor parts on contrast enhanced FLAIR imaging. In a limited number of patients, the administration of gadolinium obscures the area of contrast enhancement on contrast enhanced FLAIR images. Therefore the delineation of the macroscopic tumor parts, which are of great importance for the treatment planning is substantially worsened.

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality in the detection and delineation of primary intraaxial brain tumors (gliomas) [1]. For detecting cerebral gliomas, T2-weighted sequences were widely accepted to be the most sensitive imaging modality [1] because as in many other pathologic conditions the prolongation of the T2 relaxation time by tumor tissue results in a high contrast between the lesion and brain tissue [2], [3]. Enhancing regions in anaplastic or malignant gliomas are generally equated with the more solid part of the tumors and histopathologic correlation has proved that enhancing areas on contrast enhanced scans largely correspond to the densely cellular, hypervascular tissue of viable tumor [4]. On non-enhanced T1-weighted images, these areas are hypointense to the surrounding normal tissue indicating a substantially prolonged T1 time. In recent studies, a fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) MR sequence has shown to be a valuable imaging sequence in the assessment of cerebral gliomas [5], [6]. FLAIR produces heavily T2-weighted and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-nulled MR images [7], [8] which allows a better delineation of tumors close to CSF filled structures. Therefore, FLAIR MR imaging is currently used as a routine sequence in most MR centers and has replaced proton-density sequences.

Due to a mild T1 weighting of the FLAIR sequence, which is induced by the long inversion time used for the CSF suppression, FLAIR images obtained after administration of i.v. gadolinium can be used to detect pathologic enhancement [9]. This effect has shown to further enhance the delineation of intraaxial tumors and other contrast enhancing CNS diseases [9], [10]. In some circumstances, e.g., radiotherapy planning or neurosurgical navigation, where only a limited number of images can be applied, contrast enhanced FLAIR may be used as a solitary sequence to save time and to avoid potential errors from e.g., image fusion.

In this report, we present a potential pitfall regarding the use of contrast enhanced FLAIR imaging alone in patients with enhancing anaplastic or malignant cerebral gliomas.

Section snippets

Patient studies

Eighty patients (49 female and 31 male, age range 21–68 years, mean age 42 years), with enhancing cerebral tumors histologically confirmed as anaplastic (WHO Grade III) or malignant (WHO Grade IV) cerebral gliomas were examined on a standard 1.5 Tesla clinical MR scanner by FLAIR and conventional MR imaging before and after contrast media application. The first 18 of these patients were previously published [10].

The imaging protocol included T1-weighted SE, PD- and T2-weighted FSE and FLAIR

Results and discussion

FLAIR imaging was found to be superior to conventional MR imaging in the delineation of the gross tumor volume and the delineation of the enhancing from the non enhancing tumor parts (Table 1 , Fig. 1). In the qualitative analysis, the tumor contrast was best on the contrast enhanced FLAIR images (Table 2). However, in ten patients (3 female and 7 male, age range 31–63 years, mean age 44 years) out of the series of 80, the gadolinium enhanced FLAIR images were rated inferior to the

References (13)

  • D.C. Shrieve et al.

    Advances in radiation therapy for brain tumors

    Neurol Clin

    (1995)
  • M. Brant-Zawadski et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of the brainthe optimal screening technique

    Radiology

    (1984)
  • T.N. Byrne

    Imaging of gliomas

    Semin Oncol

    (1994)
  • W.T.C. Yuh et al.

    Dose of contrast material in the MR imaging evaluation of central nervous system tumors

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (1994)
  • F. Earnest et al.

    Cerebral astrocytomashistopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • K. Tsuchiya et al.

    Preliminary evaluation of fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR in the diagnosis of intracranial tumors

    Am J Neuroradiol

    (1996)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (17)

  • Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in neuroimaging

    2012, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, CE FLAIR is useful in depicting the superficial abnormalities, such as leptomeningeal inflammation or carcinomatosis, cranial nerve lesion, and inner ear abnormalities (Fig. 1).28–37 CE FLAIR is also suggested as having a complementary role for detecting intracranial tumors and demyelinating disease.38–47 In stroke imaging, vascular hyperintensity on CE FLAIR in patients with acute ischemic stroke, intracranial stenosis, moyamoya disease, and transient ischemic attack represents disordered blood flow from collaterals distal to the arterial occlusion or stenosis (not an indicator of infarction but rather of tissue at risk for infarction).48–50

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text