Surgical oncology and reconstruction
Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Accurate, Radiation-Free, Alternative to Computed Tomography for the Primary Imaging and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Bony Orbit

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.030Get rights and content

Purpose

To determine the extent to which the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based virtual 3-dimensional (3D) models of the intact orbit can approach that of the gold standard, computed tomography (CT) based models. The goal was to determine whether MRI is a viable alternative to CT scans in patients with isolated orbital fractures and penetrating eye injuries, pediatric patients, and patients requiring multiple scans in whom radiation exposure is ideally limited.

Materials and Methods

Patients who presented with unilateral orbital fractures to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital from March 2011 to March 2012 were recruited to participate in this cross-sectional study. The primary predictor variable was the imaging technique (MRI vs CT). The outcome measurements were orbital volume (primary outcome) and geometric intraorbital surface deviations (secondary outcome) between the MRI- and CT-based 3D models.

Results

Eleven subjects (9 male) were enrolled. The patients' mean age was 30 years. On average, the MRI models underestimated the orbital volume of the CT models by 0.50 ± 0.19 cm3. The average intraorbital surface deviation between the MRI and CT models was 0.34 ± 0.32 mm, with 78 ± 2.7% of the surface within a tolerance of ±0.5 mm.

Conclusions

The volumetric differences of the MRI models are comparable to reported results from CT models. The intraorbital MRI surface deviations are smaller than the accepted tolerance for orbital surgical reconstructions. Therefore, the authors believe that MRI is an accurate radiation-free alternative to CT for the primary imaging and 3D reconstruction of the bony orbit.

Section snippets

Study Design/Sample

To address the research purpose, the authors designed and implemented a cross-sectional study. The study population was composed of selected patients presenting to the maxillofacial outpatient clinic at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) for the evaluation and management of fractures involving the bony orbit from March 2011 through March 2012. To be included in the study sample, patients were required to have had a clinical CT scan that included the bony orbit as

Results

Eleven patients (9 male, 2 female; mean age, 30 ± 7.1 yr) were recruited for this study. The main outcome measurements (orbital volume, intraorbital surface deviations) of this study are presented in Table 1.

On average, the volume of the MRI-based models deviated by 0.50 ± 0.19 cm3 from the CT-based models. The volumetric differences ranged from 0.23 to 0.85 cm3. All MRI models underestimated the volume of the CT models. Statistically, there was a significant difference (P < .05) between the

Discussion

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of using MRI as an alternative to CT for the acquisition of morphologic data for subsequent virtual 3D reconstructions of the orbit. It was hypothesized that with a suitable scanning protocol the accuracy of MRI-based 3D reconstructions of the orbit could approach that of standard CT models. The specific goals of this study were to measure and compare differences in orbital volume and intraorbital surface geometry between MRI-

References (23)

  • J. Hoffmann et al.

    Orbital reconstruction with individually copy milled ceramic implants

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1998)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Dynamic three-dimensional finite element analysis of orbital trauma

      2021, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Orbital fractures represent more than 40% of midface fractures.1,2

    • Semi-automatic magnetic resonance imaging based orbital fat volumetry: reliability and correlation with computed tomography

      2021, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      A strong positive correlation has been shown between fat volume measurements on MRI and CT scan. A tendency for underestimation of fat volume in MRI is observed, which corresponds with findings by Schmutz et al. who compared the orbital volume on CT and MRI 14. The mean difference (1.3 cm3) in fat volume between MRI and CT is in agreement with earlier reports comparing the intact orbital cavity volume on CT and MRI (differences of up to 1.5 cm3), although the orbital cavity is probably easier to delineate than the fat tissue14,24.

    • Magnetic resonance imaging for three-dimensional printing of the bony orbit: is clinical use imminent?

      2020, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      A retrospective design was used, with MRI and CT data made available from a previous study6.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This project (C-09-03S) was supported by Craniomaxillofacial Specialty of the AO Foundation. Dr Schmutz received an industrial scholarship from Synthes GmbH.

    View full text