Surgical oncology and reconstructionMagnetic Resonance Imaging: An Accurate, Radiation-Free, Alternative to Computed Tomography for the Primary Imaging and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Bony Orbit
Section snippets
Study Design/Sample
To address the research purpose, the authors designed and implemented a cross-sectional study. The study population was composed of selected patients presenting to the maxillofacial outpatient clinic at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) for the evaluation and management of fractures involving the bony orbit from March 2011 through March 2012. To be included in the study sample, patients were required to have had a clinical CT scan that included the bony orbit as
Results
Eleven patients (9 male, 2 female; mean age, 30 ± 7.1 yr) were recruited for this study. The main outcome measurements (orbital volume, intraorbital surface deviations) of this study are presented in Table 1.
On average, the volume of the MRI-based models deviated by 0.50 ± 0.19 cm3 from the CT-based models. The volumetric differences ranged from 0.23 to 0.85 cm3. All MRI models underestimated the volume of the CT models. Statistically, there was a significant difference (P < .05) between the
Discussion
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of using MRI as an alternative to CT for the acquisition of morphologic data for subsequent virtual 3D reconstructions of the orbit. It was hypothesized that with a suitable scanning protocol the accuracy of MRI-based 3D reconstructions of the orbit could approach that of standard CT models. The specific goals of this study were to measure and compare differences in orbital volume and intraorbital surface geometry between MRI-
References (23)
- et al.
Individual preformed titanium meshes for orbital fractures
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
(2006) - et al.
CAD/CAM-prefabricated titanium implants for large skull defects—Clinical experience with 166 patients from 1994 to 2000
Comput Assist Radiol Surg
(2004) - et al.
Synthesis of CAD/CAM, robotics and biomaterial implant fabrication: Single-step reconstruction in computer aided frontotemporal bone resection
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2000) - et al.
Navigation-aided reconstruction of medial orbital wall and floor contour in cranio-maxillofacial reconstruction
Injury
(2004) - et al.
Individually preformed titanium mesh implants for a true-to-original repair of orbital fractures
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2006) - et al.
Radiation dose to the lens and cataract formation
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1993) - et al.
A novel high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging microscopy coil as an alternative to the multislice computed tomography in postoperative imaging of orbital fractures and computer-based volume measurement
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2005) - et al.
High resolution magnetic resonance imaging with an orbital coil as an alternative to computed tomography scan as the primary imaging modality of pediatric orbital fractures
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2009) - et al.
Using MRI for the imaging of long bones: First experiences
J Biomech
(2008) - et al.
Quantification of the accuracy of MRI generated 3D models of long bones compared to CT generated 3D models
Med Eng Physics
(2012)
Orbital reconstruction with individually copy milled ceramic implants
Plast Reconstr Surg
Cited by (25)
Magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric ocular and orbital lesions: A pictorial review
2024, Current Problems in Diagnostic RadiologyDynamic three-dimensional finite element analysis of orbital trauma
2021, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Orbital fractures represent more than 40% of midface fractures.1,2
Semi-automatic magnetic resonance imaging based orbital fat volumetry: reliability and correlation with computed tomography
2021, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :A strong positive correlation has been shown between fat volume measurements on MRI and CT scan. A tendency for underestimation of fat volume in MRI is observed, which corresponds with findings by Schmutz et al. who compared the orbital volume on CT and MRI 14. The mean difference (1.3 cm3) in fat volume between MRI and CT is in agreement with earlier reports comparing the intact orbital cavity volume on CT and MRI (differences of up to 1.5 cm3), although the orbital cavity is probably easier to delineate than the fat tissue14,24.
Magnetic resonance imaging for three-dimensional printing of the bony orbit: is clinical use imminent?
2020, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :A retrospective design was used, with MRI and CT data made available from a previous study6.
This project (C-09-03S) was supported by Craniomaxillofacial Specialty of the AO Foundation. Dr Schmutz received an industrial scholarship from Synthes GmbH.