Epidural Steroid Injections for Cervical Radiculopathy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2010.10.007Get rights and content

Section snippets

General indications

ESIs have been used to treat a variety of spinal disorders. They are primarily and most widely accepted as a treatment of radicular symptoms. Patients with radicular pain that has been unresponsive to noninterventional care for 1 to 2 months including physical therapy, medications, and education are candidates for ESIs. In patients without progressive neurologic deficit or cervical myelopathy, ESIs are considered as a rational part of treatment before surgical intervention. However, the

Complications of ESIs

In general, risks of spine interventions are related to needle placement, the medications used, and patient factors. These include, but are not limited to, tissue trauma, bleeding, infection, nerve/cord injury, spinal block, medication side effects/toxicity, and allergic reaction. Minor procedural complications vasovagal reactions, nausea, transient neurologic symptoms, and increased neck or arm pain. Transient complications with ESIs can occur as a result of side effects of steroids,

Anatomy relevant to cervical ESI

Performing technically sound injections to maximize efficacy and minimize risk requires exact knowledge of the anatomy. The epidural space contains the spinal nerve roots and their dural sleeves, the internal vertebral venous plexus, loose areolar tissue, segmental blood supply, adipose tissue, and lymphatics. The location of the dura is an obvious consideration, and the vascular structures are even more important. The epidural veins form an arcuate pattern, positioned laterally at the level of

ESI approaches, evidence, and efficacy

Techniques available to access the cervical epidural space include the IL and TF approach. The TF route has become more common because it may place the medication more directly at the site of the proposed cause of pain. Prospective studies by Derby and others in the 1990s described improved outcomes using the TF route for radicular pain in the lumbar spine.15, 16 Similar studies comparing the IL and TF routes are not available for the cervical spine, although there is some evidence to suggest

ESI conclusions

Neither TF nor IL ESIs have been studied against a control for the treatment of cervical radicular pain. Retrospective and prospective series overall do suggest favorable results for short-term improvement. Patients with radiculopathy and central stenosis have been shown to have better outcomes after cervical IL ESI, but radiculopathy with disc herniation has also been shown to have better outcomes than osseous central or foraminal stenosis. For cervical TF ESIs, patients with nontraumatic

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (50)

  • N. Furusawa et al.

    Herniation of cervical intervertebral disc: immunohistochemical examination and measurement of nitric oxide production

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2001)
  • J.D. Kang et al.

    Herniated cervical intervertebral discs spontaneously produce matrix metalloproteinases, nitric oxide, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin E2

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1995)
  • A. Abbasi et al.

    Complications of interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injections: a review of the literature

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2007)
  • G.C. Scanlon et al.

    Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections: more dangerous than we think?

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2007)
  • B. Benny et al.

    Complications of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (2010)
  • Q.H. Hogan

    Epidural anatomy examined by cryomicrotome section. Influence of age, vertebral level, and disease

    Reg Anesth

    (1996)
  • R. Derby et al.

    Response to steroid and duration of radicular pain as predictors of surgical outcome

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1992)
  • D.L. Renfrew et al.

    Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (1991)
  • M.Y. Stitz et al.

    Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1999)
  • A.H. White et al.

    Epidural injections for the diagnosis and treatment of low-back pain

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1980)
  • M. Mehta et al.

    Extradural block. Confirmation of the injection site by X-ray monitoring

    Anaesthesia

    (1985)
  • M.P. Stojanovic et al.

    The role of fluoroscopy in cervical epidural steroid injections: an analysis of contrast dispersal patterns

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2002)
  • M.B. Furman et al.

    Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2003)
  • R. Cluff et al.

    The technical aspects of epidural steroid injections: a national survey

    Anesth Analg

    (2002)
  • View full text