MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2015.01.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of the developing brain has dramatically increased over the last decade. Faster acquisitions and the development of advanced MRI sequences, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion imaging, functional MR imaging (fMRI), and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), as well as the use of higher magnetic field strengths has made MRI an invaluable tool for detailed evaluation of the developing brain. This article will provide an overview of the use and challenges associated with 1.5-T and 3-T static magnetic fields for evaluation of the developing brain. This review will also summarize the advantages, clinical challenges, and safety concerns specifically related to MRI in the fetus and newborn, including the implications of increased magnetic field strength, logistics related to transporting and monitoring of neonates during scanning, and sedation considerations, and a discussion of current technologies such as MRI conditional neonatal incubators and dedicated small-foot print neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) scanners.

Introduction

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the developing brain is well established. MRI has proven itself as a beneficial modality in the evaluation of fetal and neonatal neurological conditions due to its unsurpassed sensitivity and excellent tissue contrast.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Fetal MRI, which was first introduced in the 1980s, was not widely accepted until nearly a decade later due to long imaging times and limited availability. Even with long imaging times, MRI demonstrated improved anatomic detail, better sensitivity for white matter lesions, and consistently detected abnormalities that were not identified on prenatal ultrasound, such as cortical malformations, heterotopias, and posterior fossa abnormalities6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (Fig. 1). MRI has become an important adjunct to transcranial ultrasound in the evaluation of neonates, especially in preterm and very low-birth-weight infants. The development of faster imaging acquisitions has made imaging of the moving fetus and neonate more feasible.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 MRI conditional neonatal incubators, specially designed neonatal head coils and dedicated neonatal intensive care (NICU) MRI magnets, have increased the accessibility and feasibility of MRI in the neonatal population.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 Advanced imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion imaging, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), combined with higher clinically applicable static magnetic field strengths have provided new insights into brain development and increased sensitivity for a wider variety of pathology in the developing brain.16, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30

Section snippets

Effects of increased field strength

The utilization of 3-T static magnetic fields for clinical imaging in pediatrics has increased in recent years. Higher magnetic field strengths provide increased signal-to-noise ratios, which can be used to improve temporal and/or spatial resolution. However, 3-T MRI also increases artifacts such as susceptibility and chemical shift, which are also used to help implement advanced imaging, such as fMRI, SWI, and MRS.16, 22, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37

Conclusion

In conclusion, MRI has become an important addition in the imaging evaluation of the developing brain. The use of 3-T magnets in both neonatal and fetal brain MRI has increased the diagnostic quality of scans, improved the availability and quality of advanced imaging sequences, and allowed for better anatomic delineation of the brain, as a result of its superior signal-to-noise ratio when compared to 1.5  T. To date, no studies have demonstrated any definite risk to the fetus, mother, or neonate

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Stephan Blüml (Children׳s Los Angeles) for contributing the MRS spectra and voxel images, Mr. Ravi Srinivasan for contributing information and images relating to neonatal coils and incubators, and Mr. Vincent Kyu Lee for his help in creating and formatting the reference figures. The authors also thank Dr. Ellen Grant (Boston Children׳s) for helpful comments and advice on the final draft.

References (372)

  • B.J. Soher et al.

    A review of MR physics: 3 T versus 1.5 T

    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am

    (2007)
  • C. Dagia et al.

    3T MRI in paediatrics: challenges and clinical applications

    Eur J Radiol

    (2008)
  • L.N. Tanenbaum

    Clinical 3T MR imaging: mastering the challenges

    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am

    (2006)
  • M.C. DeLano et al.

    3T MR imaging of the brain

    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am

    (2006)
  • W.A. Willinek et al.

    3.0 T neuroimaging: technical considerations and clinical applications

    Neuroimaging Clin N Am

    (2006)
  • C.M. Hillenbrand et al.

    Imaging of the newborn: a technical perspective

    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am

    (2012)
  • R.M. Heidemann et al.

    Perspectives and limitations of parallel MR imaging at high field strengths

    Neuroimaging Clin N Am

    (2006)
  • R.A. Zimmerman et al.

    3.0 T versus 1.5 T pediatric brain imaging

    Neuroimaging Clin N Am

    (2006)
  • M.E. Moseley et al.

    Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging

    Neurol Clin

    (2009)
  • M. Rutherford et al.

    MR imaging of the neonatal brain at 3 Tesla

    Eur J Paediatr Neurol EJPN Off J Eur Paediatr Neurol Soc

    (2004)
  • S.H. Kwon et al.

    The role of neuroimaging in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm neonates

    Clin Perinatol

    (2014)
  • J.H. Gilmore et al.

    3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in newborns

    Psychiatry Res

    (2004)
  • A.C. Evans

    The NIH MRI study of normal brain development

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • C.R. Almli et al.

    The NIH MRI study of normal brain development (Objective-2): newborns, infants, toddlers, and preschoolers

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • G. Kasprian et al.

    In utero tractography of fetal white matter development

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • P. Mukherjee et al.

    Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of human brain development

    Neuroimaging Clin N Am

    (2006)
  • K. Setsompop et al.

    Improving diffusion MRI using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • R. Kreis et al.

    Absolute quantitation of water and metabolites in the human brain. II. Metabolite concentrations

    J Magn Reson B

    (1993)
  • E. Brighina et al.

    Human fetal brain chemistry as detected by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

    Pediatr Neurol

    (2009)
  • US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health....
  • R. Arthur

    Magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants

    Pediatr Radiol

    (2006)
  • O.A. Glenn

    MR imaging of the fetal brain

    Pediatr Radiol

    (2010)
  • E.F. Maalouf et al.

    Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants

    Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • A.M. Roelants-van Rijn et al.

    Parenchymal brain injury in the preterm infant: comparison of cranial ultrasound, MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome

    Neuropediatrics

    (2001)
  • S.M. McCarthy et al.

    Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: fetal anatomy

    Radiology

    (1985)
  • F.V. Coakley et al.

    Fetal MRI: a developing technique for the developing patient

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2004)
  • B. Ertl-Wagner et al.

    Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: indications, technique, anatomical considerations and a review of fetal abnormalities

    Eur Radiol

    (2002)
  • T.A.G.M. Huisman et al.

    Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: technical considerations and normal brain development

    Eur Radiol

    (2002)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Advanced MR imaging technologies in fetuses

    OMICS J Radiol

    (2012)
  • A. Lane et al.

    The MRI-compatible neonatal incubator in practice

    J Paediatr Child Health

    (2013)
  • C.L. Dumoulin et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging compatible neonate incubator

    Concepts Magn Reson

    (2002)
  • E.H. Whitby et al.

    Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of the neonate in a magnetic resonance-compatible incubator with a built-in coil

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • S. Blüml et al.

    MR imaging of newborns by using an MR-compatible incubator with integrated radiofrequency coils: initial experience

    Radiology

    (2004)
  • J.A. Tkach et al.

    An MRI system for imaging neonates in the NICU: initial feasibility study

    Pediatr Radiol

    (2012)
  • J.A. Tkach et al.

    MRI in the neonatal ICU: initial experience using a small-footprint 1.5-T system

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2014)
  • A. Panigrahy et al.

    Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging techniques in the evaluation of neonatal encephalopathy

    Top Magn Reson Imaging

    (2007)
  • M. Rutherford

    MRI of the Neonatal Brain

    (2002)
  • C. Garel

    New advances in fetal MR neuroimaging

    Pediatr Radiol

    (2006)
  • A. Panigrahy

    Advanced pediatric neuroimaging techniques: clinical and research applications

    Pediatr Radiol

    (2010)
  • T. Victoria et al.

    Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 Tesla (preliminary experience)

    Pediatr Radiol

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    Grant support: This work was supported by funding from NINDS K23063371, The Children’s Heart Foundation (Chicago), the Ian Harrison Family Neonatal Brain Injury Fund, The Twenty Five Club Preterm Brain Injury Fund, The Lemieux Foundation and the Pittsburgh Children׳s Hospital Foundation.

    View full text