Pseudo-occlusions of the internal carotid artery: A rationale for treatment on the basis of a modified carotid duplex scan protocol

Abstract

Purpose: We report on a modified duplex scanning technique that may be a means of detecting a patent internal carotid artery (ICA) previously believed to be occluded by means of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), standard duplex protocols, or both. In addition, we attempted to develop selection criteria for operability in this setting, on the basis of the lumen diameter and wall thickness of the post-stenotic ICA segment. Method: In the past 22 months, 17 patients (12 men; 5 women) with ICA occlusions reported by means of MRA (10 patients) or by means of duplex scanning (7 patients) were found to have patent arteries when subjected to this duplex scanning protocol: (1) the use of low pulse repetition frequency (150-350 Hz), maximal persistence, and sensitivity of color and power angiography modes; (2) the use of an 8-MHz to 5-MHz probe as a means of visualizing the most distal extracranial segment of the ICA; and (3) measurements of the lumen diameter and wall thickness of the post-stenotic ICA. The age of patients ranged from 53 to 80 years (mean age, 71 years). Seven patients (41%) had no symptoms. Results: Extremely low peak systolic and end-diastolic velocities were detected distal to the stenotic segment in the ICA in all cases, and they varied from 5 to 30 cm/s (mean, 14 ± 8 cm/s) and 0 to 8 cm/s (mean, 4.5 ± 2.0 cm/s), respectively. The luminal diameter of the post-stenotic ICA varied from 0.7 to 3.6 mm (mean, 2.0 ± 1.1 mm), and the wall thickness ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 mm (mean, 0.9 ± 0.3 mm) in all patients. Twelve patients (71%) were examined with the intent of performing an endarterectomy. Of these, eight patients (47%) underwent successful operations with patches (3 vein; 5 synthetic), and four (29%) were found to have unreconstructable disease. The ICA lumen diameter and wall thickness in all eight patients who underwent endarterectomies were 2 mm or larger and 1 mm or thinner, respectively, whereas they were smaller than 2 mm and thicker than 1 mm, respectively, in the remaining four patients (P <.01). The last five patients were observed because they had small ICAs (lumen <2 mm) with thickened walls (>1 mm). Intraoperative and early postoperative duplex scanning examinations were performed in the eight ICAs that were successfully reconstructed. In these patients, the ICA lumen diameter increased from a mean of 2.9 ± 0.4 mm preoperatively to a mean of 4.4 ± 0.3 mm 2 weeks postoperatively (P <.001). Intraoperative ICA flow volumes were also measured after the endarterectomy, and they varied from 55 to 242 mL/min (mean, 115 ± 53 mL/min) and ranged from 122 to 220 mL/min (mean, 159 ± 34 mL/min) 2 weeks postoperatively. One patient who did not undergo surgical exploration died of chronic renal failure and congestive heart failure within the first month of follow-up. The remaining 16 patients had no neurological symptoms and were alive after a follow-up period of 2 to 22 months (mean, 8 ± 5 months). Conclusion: The proposed duplex protocol appears to be an effective means of identifying some patients with patent ICAs that were believed to be occluded by means of standard examinations. In addition, such patients may be candidates for an endarterectomy if the ICA post-stenotic lumen diameter is 2 mm or larger and the wall thickness is 1 mm or thinner. (J Vasc Surg 2002;35:340-5.)