Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): evaluation of three different contrast agents at two different doses (0.05 and 0.1 mmol/kg) in pigs at 1.5 Tesla

Eur Radiol. 2011 Feb;21(2):337-44. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1940-2. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the image quality of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the supra-aortic vessels at 0.05 mmol/kg bw and 0.1 mmol/kg bw, between gadobutrol, Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA quantitatively and qualitatively a total of eight pigs were evaluated intraindividually at 1.5 T.

Methods: Each pig was examined using 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol, Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA on day one and 0.05 mmol/kg on day two. MRA datasets for the carotid artery and the infraorbital artery were qualitatively assessed regarding overall image quality on an ordinal four-point scale (4-excellent, 1-non-diagnostic). The signal-to noise-ratio (SNR) was measured.

Results: The qualitative assessment of the carotid artery showed a higher median image quality for the 0.1 mmol dose than for the 0.05 mmol dose for all three compounds. No difference was found for the infraorbital artery. Mean SNR of Gd-BOPTA, Gd-DTPA, gadobutrol at 0.05 mmol/kg were 36.0 ± 13.4/37.9 ± 16.3/43.7 ± 0.4 and at 0.1 mmol/kg they were 50.1 ± 12.4/46.6 ± 6.5 / 54.6 ± 10.2. Gd-BOPTA 0.05 revealed a significantly lower SNR than all other agents at normal dose.

Conclusions: Full-dose gadolinium MRA results in higher image quality and significantly higher SNR compared with the half dose. Gadobutrol and Gd-BOPTA have similar enhancement properties at full dose but at half dose, gadobutrol appears superior.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Carotid Arteries / anatomy & histology*
  • Carotid Arteries / drug effects
  • Contrast Media / administration & dosage
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Female
  • Gadolinium / administration & dosage*
  • Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography / drug effects*
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Swine

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Gadolinium