Muscle-fat MRI: 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla versus histology

Muscle Nerve. 2014 Aug;50(2):170-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.24255. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated muscle/fat fraction (MFF) accuracy and reliability measured with an MR imaging technique at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T scanner strengths, using biopsy as reference.

Methods: MRI was performed on muscle samples from pig and rabbit species (n = 8) at 1.5T and 3.0T. A chemical shift based 2-point Dixon method was used, collecting in-phase and out-of-phase data for fat/water of muscle samples. Values were compared with MFFs calculated from histology.

Results: No significant difference was found between 1.5T and 3.0T (P values = 0.41-0.96), or between histology and imaging (P = 0.83) for any muscle tested.

Conclusions: RESULTS suggest that a 2-point Dixon fat/water separation MRI technique may provide reliable quantification of MFFs at varying field strengths across different animal species, and consistency was established with biopsy. The results set a foundation for larger scale investigation of quantifying muscle fat in neuromuscular disorders.

Keywords: MRI; fat; muscle; muscle fat infiltrates; muscle imaging; muscle/fat fraction.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adipose Tissue / anatomy & histology*
  • Animals
  • Biopsy
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Muscle, Skeletal / anatomy & histology*
  • Rabbits
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Swine