Morphological and Hemodynamic Discriminators for Rupture Status in Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149906. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The conflicting findings of previous morphological and hemodynamic studies on intracranial aneurysm rupture may be caused by the relatively small sample sizes and the variation in location of the patient-specific aneurysm models. We aimed to determine the discriminators for aneurysm rupture status by focusing on only posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms.

Materials and methods: In 129 PCoA aneurysms (85 ruptured, 44 unruptured), clinical, morphological and hemodynamic characteristics were compared between the ruptured and unruptured cases. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the discriminators for rupture status of PCoA aneurysms.

Results: While univariate analyses showed that the size of aneurysm dome, aspect ratio (AR), size ratio (SR), dome-to-neck ratio (DN), inflow angle (IA), normalized wall shear stress (NWSS) and percentage of low wall shear stress area (LSA) were significantly associated with PCoA aneurysm rupture status. With multivariate analyses, significance was only retained for higher IA (OR = 1.539, p < 0.001) and LSA (OR = 1.393, p = 0.041).

Conclusions: Hemodynamics and morphology were related to rupture status of intracranial aneurysms. Higher IA and LSA were identified as discriminators for rupture status of PCoA aneurysms.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aneurysm, Ruptured* / pathology
  • Aneurysm, Ruptured* / physiopathology
  • Female
  • Hemodynamics*
  • Humans
  • Intracranial Aneurysm* / pathology
  • Intracranial Aneurysm* / physiopathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Cardiovascular*

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81301004) received by YF and by (No. 81571118) received by QH, the National Science-technology Support Plan Projects (No. 2011BAI08B06) received by JL, the Key Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (No.13411950300) received by JL, and the Key Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (No.2013ZYJB007) received by JL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.