High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the internal carotid artery: 2D vs 3D TOF in stenotic disease

Eur Radiol. 1998;8(8):1370-2. doi: 10.1007/s003300050555.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare high-resolution 2D TOF with high-resolution 3D TOF in the study of internal carotid artery disease. Sixty-four patients with clinical signs of cerebrovascular insufficiency were studied with a superconductive 1.5 T magnet using two techniques: 2D and 3D TOF. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the gold standard. The 2D TOF technique was performed using the following parameters: TR/TE/FA/MA 49 ms/9 ms/60 degrees/512 x 256; the 3D TOF was performed with the following parameters: TR/TE/FA/MA 50 ms/8 ms/20 degrees/512 x 256. The 2D TOF agreed with DSA in 116 of 128 diagnostic judgments (90%) and overestimated seven times. The 3D TOF technique agreed with DSA in 125 of 128 diagnostic judgments (97%) with one overestimation and two underestimations. There was no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two different techniques. Our study confirms the high reliability of the methodology carried out with the high-resolution 2D and 3D technique.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction
  • Carotid Artery, Internal / diagnostic imaging
  • Carotid Artery, Internal / pathology
  • Carotid Stenosis / diagnosis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement*
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results