Scientific peer review | Annual Review of Information Science and Technology skip to main
content ACM Digital Library home ACM home Google, Inc. (search) Advanced Search Browse …

This paper studies the use of knowledge for innovation purposes in start-ups. Studies at the
thematic intersection of knowledge, innovation, and start-ups are spread across different …

Biobanking is a new and very dynamic field. To achieve long term financial sustainability of
biobank infrastructures we propose that a new focus is needed on activities, products and …

Despite the surging interest in introducing lottery mechanisms into decision-making
procedures for science funding bodies, the discourse on funding-by-lottery remains …

Scientific journals must deal with the following questions concerning the predictive validity of
editorial decisions. Is the best scientific work selected from submitted manuscripts? Does …

When researchers disclose their original data, they can enhance the visibility of their
research works and gain more academic credits (credit effect). By contrast, doing so may …

In this review we investigate what the available data on the predictive validity of peer review
can add to our understanding of judgmental forecasting. We found that peer review attests to …

Publishing has become, in several respects, more challenging in recent years. Academics
are faced with evolving ethics that appear to be more stringent in a bid to reduce scientific …

This paper investigates the fate of manuscripts that were rejected from JASSS-The Journal
of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, the flagship journal of social simulation. We …

In a comprehensive research project, we investigated the predictive validity of selection
decisions and reviewers' ratings at the open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and …