[PDF][PDF] MR field strength: unanswered questions.

JI Wiener - AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology, 1996 - Am Soc Neuroradiology
With the increasing pressure for cost containment in health care, big-ticket items such as
magnetic resonance (MR) are getting attention. Can 0.5-T state-of-the-art systems be as …

Effect of field strength on MR images: comparison of the same subject at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T

AJ Maubon, JM Ferru, V Berger, MC Soulage… - Radiographics, 1999 - pubs.rsna.org
To assess the effect of field strength on magnetic resonance (MR) images, the same healthy
subject was imaged at three field strengths: 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T. Imaging was performed with …

The impact of field strength on image quality in MRI

BK Rutt, DH Lee - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1996 - Wiley Online Library
As clinical MRI has evolved, there have been numerous arguments for the use of different
field strengths. Those favoring high magnetic field (1.5 T and above) include higher signal …

Perspectives and limitations of parallel MR imaging at high field strengths.

RM Heidemann, N Seiberlich, MA Griswold… - … Clinics of North …, 2006 - europepmc.org
In medical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging, it is standard practice to use MR
scanners with a field strength of 1.5 Tesla. Recently, an ongoing trend towards higher field …

Field strength in neuro-MR imaging: a comparison of 0.5 T and 1.5 T

CR Jack Jr, TH Berquist, GM Miller… - Journal of computer …, 1990 - journals.lww.com
A study was undertaken comparing neurological magnetic resonance imaging at high (1.5
T) and mid (0.5 T) field strengths. Twenty-eight patients (20 head and 8 spine) from our …

[HTML][HTML] Suppl 1: High-Field fMRI for Human Applications: An Overview of Spatial Resolution and Signal Specificity

CA Olman, E Yacoub - The open neuroimaging journal, 2011 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
In the last decade, dozens of 7 Tesla scanners have been purchased or installed around the
world, while 3 Tesla systems have become a standard. This increased interest in higher field …

Low field (0.02 T) nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the brain

RE Sepponen, JT Sipponen… - Journal of computer …, 1985 - journals.lww.com
Many technical and instrumental alternatives are available to obtain good spatial and
contrast resolution in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Optimum field strength remains a …

[PDF][PDF] Optimal use of MR contrast agents: how much is enough?

KR Maravilla - AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology, 1991 - Am Soc Neuroradiology
The use of contrast agents combined with clinical MR imaging is still relatively new. While
gadolinium chelate contrast agents such as gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist) share …

Comparing real‐world advantages for the clinical neuroradiologist between a high field (3 T), a phased array (1.5 T) vs. a single‐channel 1.5‐T MR system

DB Orbach, C Wu, M Law, JS Babb… - Journal of Magnetic …, 2006 - Wiley Online Library
Purpose To evaluate signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and neuroradiologists' subjective
assessments of image quality in 3‐Tesla (3‐T) or phased‐array MR systems that are now …

Recent Developments and Prospects in High-Field MR

A Bacci, R Agati, M Leonardi - High Field Brain MRI: Use in Clinical …, 2006 - Springer
During recent years much effort has been put into detecting and classifying disease states,
and MR imaging has been a very important tool in this respect. Up to now, increasing the …