Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleHEAD AND NECK

Vascularization of Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Comparison of Three MR Angiographic Techniques with Digital Subtraction Angiography

René van den Berg, Martin N.J.M. Wasser, Adrian P.G. van Gils, Andel G.L. van der Mey, Jo Hermans and Mark A. van Buchem
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2000, 21 (1) 162-170;
René van den Berg
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.v.d.B., M.N.J.M.W., M.A.v.B.) and Otolaryngology (A.G.L.v.d.M.), Leiden University Medical Center; the Department of Medical Statistics (J.H.), University of Leiden; and the Department of Radiology (A.P.G.v.G.), Utrecht University Hospital, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin N.J.M. Wasser
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.v.d.B., M.N.J.M.W., M.A.v.B.) and Otolaryngology (A.G.L.v.d.M.), Leiden University Medical Center; the Department of Medical Statistics (J.H.), University of Leiden; and the Department of Radiology (A.P.G.v.G.), Utrecht University Hospital, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrian P.G. van Gils
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.v.d.B., M.N.J.M.W., M.A.v.B.) and Otolaryngology (A.G.L.v.d.M.), Leiden University Medical Center; the Department of Medical Statistics (J.H.), University of Leiden; and the Department of Radiology (A.P.G.v.G.), Utrecht University Hospital, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andel G.L. van der Mey
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.v.d.B., M.N.J.M.W., M.A.v.B.) and Otolaryngology (A.G.L.v.d.M.), Leiden University Medical Center; the Department of Medical Statistics (J.H.), University of Leiden; and the Department of Radiology (A.P.G.v.G.), Utrecht University Hospital, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo Hermans
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.v.d.B., M.N.J.M.W., M.A.v.B.) and Otolaryngology (A.G.L.v.d.M.), Leiden University Medical Center; the Department of Medical Statistics (J.H.), University of Leiden; and the Department of Radiology (A.P.G.v.G.), Utrecht University Hospital, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. van Buchem
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.v.d.B., M.N.J.M.W., M.A.v.B.) and Otolaryngology (A.G.L.v.d.M.), Leiden University Medical Center; the Department of Medical Statistics (J.H.), University of Leiden; and the Department of Radiology (A.P.G.v.G.), Utrecht University Hospital, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 1.

    A 38-year-old-man with a left-sided vagal paraganglioma.

    A, PC magnitude image (26/9/2/20° [TR/TE/excitations/flip angle]) shows good tumor visualization (large arrow).

    B, PC image shows feeding vessels (arrowheads), but ghost artifacts from pulsatility of vessels degrades the image.

    C, 2D TOF axial source image (28/5.1/2/60° [TR/TE/excitations/flip angle]) only shows feeding branches from the ascending pharyngeal artery (arrowheads), but the margins of the tumor are only poorly visualized (large arrow).

    D, 3D TOF axial source image (25/6.9/1/20° [TR/TE/excitations/flip angle]) shows good visualization of the tumor (large arrow) and also nicely depicts the feeding branches from the ascending pharyngeal artery (arrowheads).

  • fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 2.

    Graph of ROC curves of reader 1 for the three MR angiography techniques shows the highest area under the curve for 3D TOF MR angiography. Areas under the curves (AUC) for both readers are given

  • fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 3.

    A 38-year-old-man with a left-sided vagal paraganglioma. Slightly anteroposterior, oblique MIPs are presented. A muscular branch from the vertebral artery adds to the extensive vascularization of this tumor.

    A, 3D PCA MIP (26/9/2/20° [TR/TE/excitations/flip angle]) hardly shows a branch from the occipital artery (arrow) as tumor feeder. The muscular branch from the vertebral artery is not at all visible.

    B, 2D TOF MIP (28/5.1/2/60° [TR/TE/excitations/flip angle]) not only shows supply from the occipital artery (arrow), but a small feeding branch from the vertebral artery (arrowhead) also is depicted.

    C, 3D TOF MIP (25/6.9/1/20° [TR/TE/excitations/flip angle]) shows more clearly than the 2D TOF MIP vascularization from the occipital artery (arrow) as well as from the vertebral artery (arrowhead).

  • fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 4.

    A 53-year-old-man with bilateral carotid body tumors.

    A, Anteroposterior view of the 3D TOF MIP (25/6.9/1/20° [TR/TE/excitations/flip angle]) shows the thyrocervical trunk (arrowheads), adding to the vascularization of the carotid body tumor.

    B, On the aortic arch angiogram, showing both carotid body tumors, the vascularization from the thyrocervical trunk (arrowheads) was confirmed.

  • fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 5.

    A 49-year-old-man with a vagal paraganglioma (lateral view).

    A, 3D TOF MIP (25/6.9/1/20° [TR/TE/excitations/flip angle]) shows enlarged ascending pharyngeal artery (large arrow) as a feeder despite the fact that the cranially placed slab for saturation of venous flow obscures the descending trunk of this artery (arrowheads).

    B, On the digital subtraction angiogram, the complete course of the ascending pharyngeal artery (large arrow), including its descending trunk (arrowheads), is visible.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1:
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    TABLE 1:

    Percentage of good visibility* of 39 normal neck arteries as determined by the three different MR angiography techniques for both readers

  • TABLE 2:
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    TABLE 2:

    Number of feeding arteries as detected by the three different MR angiography techniques for both readers as compared with DSA, the standard of reference. Results were divided by putting the threshold between probably and equivocally present rankings

  • TABLE 3:
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    TABLE 3:

    Sensitivity percentage for detection of feeding arteries per tumor localization for reader 1 and 2. Results were divided by putting the threshold between probably and equivocally present rankings

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 1
1 Jan 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vascularization of Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Comparison of Three MR Angiographic Techniques with Digital Subtraction Angiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Vascularization of Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Comparison of Three MR Angiographic Techniques with Digital Subtraction Angiography
René van den Berg, Martin N.J.M. Wasser, Adrian P.G. van Gils, Andel G.L. van der Mey, Jo Hermans, Mark A. van Buchem
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2000, 21 (1) 162-170;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Vascularization of Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Comparison of Three MR Angiographic Techniques with Digital Subtraction Angiography
René van den Berg, Martin N.J.M. Wasser, Adrian P.G. van Gils, Andel G.L. van der Mey, Jo Hermans, Mark A. van Buchem
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2000, 21 (1) 162-170;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Catecholamine-secreting paraganglioma: the challenges of perioperative management
  • The management of head-and-neck paragangliomas
  • Glomus vagale presenting as chronic cough
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3T with Prognostic Parameters of Retinoblastoma
  • Parathyroid Lesions: Characterization with Dual-Phase Arterial and Venous Enhanced CT of the Neck
  • Efficacy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Differentiation between Lymphomas and Carcinomas of the Nasopharynx and Oropharynx: Correlations of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and Histologic Features
Show more HEAD AND NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire