EditorialEDITORIALS
CT versus MR for Acute Stroke Imaging: Is the “Obvious” Choice Necessarily the Correct One?
Michael H. Lev
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2003, 24 (10) 1930-1931;
References
- ↵Saur D, Kucinski T, Gryzyska U, et al. Sensitivity and interrater agreement of CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in hyperacute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:878–885
- ↵Gonzalez RG, Schaefer PW, Buonanno FS, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology 1999;210:155–162
- ↵Fiebach JB, Schellinger PD, Jansen O, et al. CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in randomized order: diffusion-weighted imaging results in higher accuracy and lower interrater variability in the diagnosis of hyperacute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2002;33:2206–2210
- ↵Pexman JH, Barber PA, Hill MD, Sevick RJ, Demchuk AM, Hudon ME, Hu WY, Buchan AM. Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1534–1542
- ↵Lev MH, Koroshetz WJ, Schwamm LH, Gonzalez RG. CT or MRI for imaging patients with acute stroke: visualization of “tissue at risk”? [letter] Stroke 2002;33:2736–27377
In this issue
Advertisement
CT versus MR for Acute Stroke Imaging: Is the “Obvious” Choice Necessarily the Correct One?
Michael H. Lev
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2003, 24 (10) 1930-1931;
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement