Research ArticleHEAD AND NECK
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid and Vertebrobasilar Circulations
Carina W. Yang, James C. Carr, Stephen F. Futterer, Mark D. Morasch, Benson P. Yang, Stephanie M. Shors and J. Paul Finn
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2005, 26 (8) 2095-2101;
Carina W. Yang
James C. Carr
Stephen F. Futterer
Mark D. Morasch
Benson P. Yang
Stephanie M. Shors
References
- ↵Kricheff II. Arteriosclerotic ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Radiology 1987;162:101–109
- ↵Janssens E, Leclerc X, Gautier C, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of proximal vertebral artery stenosis: long-term clinical follow-up of 16 consecutive patients. Neuroradiology 2003;46:81–84
- Gupta R, Schumacher H, Mangla S, et al. Urgent endovascular revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurology 2003;61:1647–1648
- Albuquerque F, Fiorella D, Han P, et al. A reappraisal of angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of vertebral origin stenosis. Neurosurgery 2003;53:607–614
- Levy E, Hanel R, Bendok B, et al. Staged stent-assisted angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis. J Neurosurg 2002;97:1294–1301
- Jenkins J, Subramanian R. Endovascular treatment for vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2002;4:385–391
- ↵
- ↵Heiserman J, Dean B, Hodak J, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401–1407
- Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992;182:243–246
- ↵Willinsky R, Taylor S, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–528
- ↵Koelemay M, Lijmer J, Stoker J, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001;14:1338–1345
- Grist TM. MRA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:32–43
- Grist TM. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal arterial stenosis. Coron Artery Dis 1999;10:151–156
- ↵Holland G, Dougherty L, Carpenter J, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:971–981
- ↵Adamis M, Li W, Wielopolski P, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional time-of-flight sequence. Radiology 1995;196:689–695
- ↵Wutke R, Lang W, Fellner C, et al. High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective X-ray angiography. Stroke 2002;33:1522–1529
- ↵Scarabino T, Carriero A, Giannatempo GM, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). J Neuroradiol 1999;25:87–91
- ↵
- Patel M, Kuntz K, Klufas R, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation: can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography. Stroke 1995;26:1753–1757
- Polak J, Kalina P, Donaldson M, et al. Carotid endarterectomy: preoperative evaluation of candidates with combined doppler sonography and MR angiography. Radiology 1993;186:333–338
- ↵Polak J, Bajakian R, O’Leary D, et al. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color doppler sonography and arteriography. Radiology 1992;182:35–40
- ↵Scarabino T, Carriero A, Magarelli N, et al. MR angiography in carotid stenosis: a comparison of three techniques. Eur J Radiol 1998;28:117–125
- Leclerc X, Nicol L, Gauvrit J, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1021–1027
- ↵
- ↵Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke 2003;34:660–664
- Hathout G, Duh M, El-Saden S. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1747–1756
- Nederkoorn P, Elgersma O, van der Graaf Y, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 2003;228:677–682
- Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:213–219
- Sundgren P, Sunden P, Lindgren A, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2002;44:592–599
- ↵Aoki S, Nakajima H, Kumagai H, Araki T. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of the carotid artery: high-resolution sequences in different acquisition planes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:381–385
- ↵
- Carr J, Ma J, Deshpande V, et al. High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the entire carotid circulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:543–549
- ↵Phan T, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein M, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the cervical vessels: experience with 422 patients. Stroke 2001;32:2282–2286
- ↵Leclerc X, Lucas C, Godefroy O, et al. Preliminary experience using contrast-enhanced MR angiography to assess vertebral artery structure for the follow-up of suspected dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1482–1490
- ↵Hollingworth W, Nathens A, Kanne J, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for traumatic or atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid and vertebral arteries: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2003;48:88–102
- Graf J, Skutta B, Kuhn F, Ferbert A. Computed tomographic angiography findings in 103 patients following vascular events in the posterior circulation: potential and clinical relevance. J Neurol 2000;247:760–766
- Long A, Lepoutre A, Corbillon E, Branchereau A. Critical review of non- or minimally invasive methods (duplex ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) for evaluating stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:43–52
- ↵Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:21–28
- ↵Riles T, Eidelman E, Litt A, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, conventional angiography and duplex scanning. Stroke 1992;23:341–346
- ↵Huston J, Lewis B, Wiebers D, et al. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993;186:339–344
- ↵Wentz K, Rother J, Schwartz A, et al. Intracranial vertebrobasilar system: MR angiography. Radiology 1994;190:105–110
- ↵
- ↵Bhadelia R, Bengoa F, Gesner L, et al. Efficacy of MR angiography in the detection and characterization of occlusive disease in the vertebrobasilar system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:458–465
- ↵Craig D, Meguro K, Watridge C, et al. Intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1982;13:825–834
- Kappelle L, Eliasziw M, Fox A, et al. Importance of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1999;30:282–286
- Marzewski D, Furlan A, St Louis P, et al. Intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis long-term prognosis. Stroke 1982;13:821–824
- Roederer G, Langlois Y, Chan A, et al. Is siphon disease important in predicting outcome of carotid endarterectomy? Arch Surg 1983;118:1177–1181
- Rouleau P, Huston J 3rd, Gilbertson J, et al. Carotid artery tandem lesions: frequency of angiographic detection and consequences for endarterectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:621–625
- ↵Keagy B, Poole M, Burnham S, Johnson G Jr. Frequency, severity, and physiologic importance of carotid siphon lesions. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:511–515
- ↵Weimar C, Kley C, Kraywinkel K, et al. Clinical presentation and prognosis of brain stem infarcts: an evaluation of the Stroke Databank of the German Stroke Foundation. Nervenarzt 2002;73:166–173
- ↵Berguer R, Morasch M, Kline R. A review of 100 consecutive reconstructions of the distal vertebral artery for embolic and hemodynamic disease. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:852–859
- ↵Berguer R, Flynn L, Kline R, Caplan L. Surgical reconstruction of the extracranial vertebral artery: management and outcome. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:9–18
- ↵North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453
- ↵The (NASCET) North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Steering Committee. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711–720
- ↵Snidow J, Johnson M, Harris V, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996;198:725–732
- De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;205:689–695
- Hany T, Debatin J, Leung D, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357–362
- ↵Bakker J, Beek F, Beutler J, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1998;207:497–504
- ↵Carr J, Schirf B, Leloudas N, et al. Temporally-resolved pulmonary MRA with GRAPPA at 3T. ISMRM 2004;7
In this issue
Advertisement
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid and Vertebrobasilar Circulations
Carina W. Yang, James C. Carr, Stephen F. Futterer, Mark D. Morasch, Benson P. Yang, Stephanie M. Shors, J. Paul Finn
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2005, 26 (8) 2095-2101;
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Value of Contrast-Enhanced MRA versus Time-of-Flight MRA in Acute Ischemic Stroke MRI
- Introduction of a Dedicated Emergency Department MR Imaging Scanner at the Barrow Neurological Institute
- Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
- ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents
- ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents
- Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining >=70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
- High-Resolution 3T MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Manual and Semiautomated Quantification of Stenosis
- Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: Vascular Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomographic Imaging
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Intraplaque haemorrhage mimicking carotid pseudoaneurysm on magnetic resonance angiography
- Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement