The Clinical and Radiographic Importance of Distinguishing Partial from Near-Complete Reperfusion Following Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reperfusion following intra-arterial stroke therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes. However, the degree of reperfusion needed to achieve successful outcomes is unknown. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether the degree of reperfusion has an impact on final infarct volumes and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified 88 consecutive patients who underwent intra-arterial therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke. Reperfusion was graded by using the TICI scale into none (TICI 0 or 1), partial (TICI 2a), or near-complete (TICI 2b/3). Baseline characteristics were compared. For each of these groups, we compared discharge disposition and final infarct volumes.

RESULTS: Near-complete, partial, and no reperfusion occurred in 44.3%, 26.1%, and 29.6% of patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar across all 3 groups. The median NIHSS score was 15. Significant differences in discharge disposition were seen, with 41.0% of the TICI 2b/3 group discharged home versus 17.4% of TICI 2a and 7.7% of TICI 0/1. In-hospital mortality was 12.8% for TICI 2b/3 compared with 39.1% for TICI 2a and 34.6% for TICI 0/1. Patients with near-complete reperfusion were significantly more likely to have infarct volumes ≤70 mL (OR = 12.1; 95% CI, 2.7–54.2), compared with patients with partial reperfusion (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 0.5–9.6).

CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist in outcomes and infarct volumes between partial (TICI 2a) and near-complete (TICI 2b/3) reperfusion following intra-arterial stroke therapy. Further trials should separately report these groups to facilitate comparison among treatment paradigms.