Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • AJNR Awards
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • AJNR Awards
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR at ASNR25 | Join us at BOOTH 312 and more. Check out our schedule

Research ArticleTechnical Note

Dynamic MR Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint Using a Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Sequence at 3T

P. Yen, R.W. Katzberg, M.H. Buonocore and J. Sonico
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2013, 34 (3) E24-E26; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2734
P. Yen
aFrom the Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.W. Katzberg
aFrom the Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.H. Buonocore
aFrom the Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Sonico
aFrom the Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: The aim of our project was to develop an MR imaging protocol for dynamic imaging of the TMJ. We imaged a total of 24 joints in 12 subjects. We developed an imaging protocol on a 3T system using the true FISP sequence that yielded an acceptable spatial and temporal resolution for dynamic MR imaging.

ABBREVIATIONS

bSSFP
balanced steady-state free precession
FISP
fast imaging with steady-state precession
HASTE
half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo
TMJ
temporomandibular joint

The TMJ is one of the most complex joints to image, and there has only been limited success in performing true dynamic MR imaging. The articular disk is a biconcave fibrous structure located between the surface of the condyle inferiorly and the articular eminence superiorly.1 Internal derangement is defined as an abnormal anatomic relationship between the disk and the mandibular condyle.

Functional and dysfunctional aspects of disk physiology include the following: 1) coordinated (normal) disk function; 2) disk displacement with reduction; and 3) disk displacement without reduction.2 If the disk is abnormally displaced anterior to the bony condyle yet snaps or clicks into a normal anatomic position when the jaw opens, the terminology for this condition is “disk displacement with reduction.” Clinically, this occurs with both opening and closing clicking sounds and is often associated with joint, muscular, and facial pain. Disk displacement with reduction is thus both an anatomic and a functional disorder and should be classified as early, intermediate, or late reduction of the disk, depending on the distance from the joint at which the disk re-assumes its normal anatomic relationship as the bony condyle translates forward with jaw opening. This general classification along with the anatomic location of the reciprocal displacement on jaw closing serves to stage the severity of the disk displacement and is useful in determining whether protrusive splint therapy is likely to be successful.2

An additional value of functional imaging is the ability to reliably distinguish clicking sounds that are clinically similar to disk displacement with reduction. These commonly include the clicking or popping sounds that are associated with interference of the articular eminence (“eminence clicks”) of the base of the skull when the condyle and disk move underneath and anteriorly beyond that structure. Structural deformities of the disk itself or condyle can also produce clicking sounds with jaw opening and closing, regardless of whether the disk is displaced.

The functional dynamics of TMJ internal derangement were optimally depicted by the invasive arthrographic technique in the late 1970s to late 1980s. This technique was difficult to perform and often painful to the patient. With the advent of noninvasive imaging techniques such as CT and MR imaging, the arthrographic technique has been generally abandoned. However, the obvious limitation of the noninvasive techniques of CT and MR imaging is the lack of dynamic imaging. CT has also been abandoned due to relatively poor anatomic resolution and the high radiation dose to the lens of the eye. Currently, the most popular imaging technique is MR imaging.3,4 However, the ability to distinguish the various etiologies of TMJ joint sounds or to classify the clinical degree of disk displacement with reduction is not satisfactory. Technologic advances in MR imaging, especially the relatively recent availability of ultrashort TR imaging with bSSFP magnetization dynamics and use of higher field strengths, offer the potential to re-establish the dynamic imaging component in the clinical evaluation that was lost with the abandonment of arthrography.

The aim of our study was the development of an MR imaging protocol that enables dynamic MR imaging of the TMJ.

Technique

Our study was approved by the institutional review board of our institution. After informed consent, 12 volunteer subjects (24 TMJs) with clinically normal joints, clicking joints, and long-standing TMJ pain and dysfunction were initially imaged during 1- to 1.5-hour sessions to establish optimal dynamic images. Subjects were enrolled on referral from dental clinicians made aware of the objectives of the study. Subsequent imaging sessions required only 30–45 minutes. This investigation was performed on a 3T Trio MR imaging system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) by using a bitemporal 4-channel array surface coil (Bitemporal Phased Array model NMSG003A, Nova Medical, Wilmington, Massachusetts).

The initial protocol included the acquisition of standard 3-mm-section-thickness fast spin-echo images of both TMJs, in static closed and opened jaw positions and with both proton-attenuation and T2 weighting. It also included acquisition of T1-weighted 3-mm-section-thickness coronal fast spin-echo images of the static closed jaw. In initial tests to determine optimal dynamic imaging, EPI, HASTE, and true FISP pulse sequences were evaluated. Axial and sagittal images were acquired separately during jaw motion by using 3-, 6-, and 9-mm section thicknesses, varying spatial and temporal resolution, and varying scanning times. The optimal dynamic images were chosen by consensus by coinvestigators, 1 of whom has >30 years' experience in clinical TMJ assessment, which included TMJ arthrographic dynamic imaging, having familiarity with fluoroscopically observed functional imaging and diagnosis.

The optimal imaging sequences were achieved with true FISP, which is classified in manufacturer independent terminology as a bSSFP pulse sequence, using a 3.6-ms TR, 1.8-ms TE, 150 × 150 mm FOV, 6-mm section thickness, and a 128 × 128 raw data matrix collected by using a 4/8 partial Fourier acquisition. This acquisition yielded an effective voxel size of 1.2 × 1.2 × 6 mm3. The dynamic imaging scan consisted of continuous scanning for 16.5 seconds during slow opening and closing of the jaw (approximately 6 seconds per cycle of jaw opening and closing). Each image was acquired in 267 ms for a total of 62 images during continuous scanning. Acquisitions with smaller (eg, 96 × 96; better temporal, but poorer spatial resolution) and larger (eg, 160 × 160; better spatial, but poorer temporal resolution) raw data matrices were also evaluated in comparison with the initially tested 128 × 128 raw data matrix described above. The images acquired with 128 × 128 raw data matrix and 6-mm section thickness yielded the best dynamic evaluation of the TMJ.

Disk position and dynamics were best depicted in a sagittal plane of imaging that varied between subjects and often between joints in the same subject. The axial dynamic imaging plane was essential in imaging in the actual path of condylar and disk movement in the sagittal plane with opening and closing of the jaw.

Dynamic images were acquired successfully in all joints, and repetitive imaging was rapidly feasible. Determination of the locations of the opening disk recapture (opening click) and re-displacement of the disk with jaw closing was readily accomplished. Discrimination between eminence clicks and disk displacement with reduction was possible, but our sample size was much too small for a rigorous comparison.

Discussion

Dynamic imaging of the TMJ has been performed with limited success, but prior attempts have been at 1.5T. Chen et al5 described some success with dynamic MR imaging of the TMJ by using the EPI pulse sequence. Their visualization of the disk was limited due to relatively low SNR and spatial resolution. Wang et al6 visualized the disk adequately by using the HASTE pulse sequence, but their temporal resolution was limited to 1.17 seconds by using that sequence. Abolmaali et al7 and Shimazaki et al8 reported adequate visualization of the disk by using the true FISP sequence with a reported temporal resolution of ≤255 ms.7

While we explored the EPI and HASTE sequences, the best visualization of the TMJ was obtained in images acquired with the true FISP sequence. Because the true FISP sequence creates a very large steady-state magnetization, it provides an intrinsically high SNR, and because it uses an ultrashort TR, very high spatial resolution can be obtained in reasonable scanning times.7,9 Use of a 3T system provides increased thermal equilibrium magnetization, which further improves the SNR, allowing higher spatial resolution (by decreasing the FOV) or higher temporal resolution (by reducing the FOV and raw data matrix size). Our optimized parameters allowed acquisition of 62 images during slow jaw motion during a total scanning time of 16.5 seconds, corresponding to a temporal resolution of 267 ms.

The disk and the normal mechanics of the TMJ could be visualized during the entire course of jaw opening and closing as well as the dynamics of internal derangement. For example, in a subject who reported an opening and closing click in 1 joint, we were able to identify and characterize disk displacement with subsequent reduction (Fig 1 A, -B and On-line Video). We were specifically able to identify the exact anatomic condylar position relative to the glenoid fossa and eminence at which the disk was reduced. In addition, the disk morphology just before reduction was also well-depicted. In a second subject with unilateral joint clicking, the reduction phase was not as well-depicted, but the reciprocal displacement phase was optimally visualized. In both cases, the location of the condyle from the fossa where the disk reduction occurred was readily ascertained. We also observed disk displacement without reduction in 2 TMJs, but the dynamic images did not appear to offer any additional information.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

A, A 28-year-old man with a unilateral left opening and closing joint clicking. Images acquired by using true FISP with a 3.6-ms TR, 1.8-ms TE, 150 × 150 mm FOV, 128 × 128 raw data matrix, and a 6-mm section thickness. A single frame obtained from dynamic sagittal images in a corrected plane determined from the dynamic axial images shows an anteriorly displaced disk (arrow) just before recapture. B, A single frame from the same true FISP imaging series shows reduction of the displaced disk (arrow), which is clinically manifest as the opening click. The On-line Video includes the entire dynamic series.

It has been shown that the disk can undergo rotational or sideways displacement,10 and Abolmaali et al7 reported 4 TMJs that were not visualized due to lateral displacement. Our protocol was designed to detect any potential rotational or sideways displacement by imaging a single coronal plane and 3 separate sagittal planes through the medial, mid, and lateral aspects the TMJ. While we did not observe this form of internal derangement, we intend to further evaluate the efficacy of this protocol in detecting rotational or sideways displacement.

In conclusion, our protocol provides dynamic MR imaging of the TMJ for assessment of disk and condyle relationships. Specifically, the technique could be applied in clicking joints to rule out additional causes of joint noises including those caused by disk displacement with reduction. On 3T MR imaging systems that have the bSSFP pulse sequence, this protocol is easily implemented and the required images can be acquired with only a few additional minutes of scanning time for each joint. We believe our protocol can be a valuable tool to supplement static MR imaging evaluation of the TMJ.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Richard W. Katzberg, UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Siemens.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rees LA
    . The structure and function of the mandibular joint. Br Dent K 1954;96:125–33
  2. 2.↵
    1. Katzberg RW
    . Temporomandibular joint imaging. Radiology 1989;170:297–307
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tomas X,
    2. Pomes J,
    3. Berenguer J,
    4. et al
    . MR imaging of temporomandibular joint dysfunction: a pictorial review. Radiographics 2006;26:765–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Westesson PL,
    2. Katzberg RW,
    3. Tallents RH,
    4. et al
    . CT and MR of the temporomandibular joint: comparison with autopsy specimens. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:1165–71
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chen YJ,
    2. Gallo LM,
    3. Meier D,
    4. et al
    . Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging technique for the study of the temporomandibular joint. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:65–73
    PubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wang EY,
    2. Mulholland TP,
    3. Pramanik BK,
    4. et al
    . Dynamic sagittal half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: initial experience and comparison with sagittal oblique proton-attenuation images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1126–32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Abolmaali ND,
    2. Schmitt J,
    3. Schwarz W,
    4. et al
    . Visualization of the articular disk of the temporomandibular joint in near-real-time MRI: feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1889–94. Epub 2004 Jul 29
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shimazaki Y,
    2. Saito K,
    3. Matsukawa S,
    4. et al
    . Image quality using dynamic MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint with true-FISP sequence. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007;6:15–20
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fuchs F,
    2. Laub G,
    3. Othomo K
    . TrueFISP: technical considerations and cardiovascular applications. Eur J Radiol 2003;46:28–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Katzberg RW,
    2. Westesson PL,
    3. Tallents RH,
    4. et al
    . Temporomandibular joint: MR assessment of rotational and sideways disk displacements. Radiology 1988;169:741–48
    PubMed
  • Received April 23, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision May 11, 2011.
  • © 2013 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 3
1 Mar 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamic MR Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint Using a Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Sequence at 3T
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
P. Yen, R.W. Katzberg, M.H. Buonocore, J. Sonico
Dynamic MR Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint Using a Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Sequence at 3T
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2013, 34 (3) E24-E26; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2734

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Dynamic MR Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint Using a Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Sequence at 3T
P. Yen, R.W. Katzberg, M.H. Buonocore, J. Sonico
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2013, 34 (3) E24-E26; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2734
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS
    • Technique
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (13)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Real‐Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Krishna S. Nayak, Yongwan Lim, Adrienne E. Campbell‐Washburn, Jennifer Steeden
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2022 55 1
  • Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) during Active Wrist Motion—Initial Observations
    Robert D. Boutin, Michael H. Buonocore, Igor Immerman, Zachary Ashwell, Gerald J. Sonico, Robert M. Szabo, Abhijit J. Chaudhari, François Hug
    PLoS ONE 2013 8 12
  • Imaging Approach to Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
    H. Morales, R. Cornelius
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2016 26 1
  • MRI of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: Recent Advances and Future Directions
    Xin Xiong, Zheng Ye, Hehan Tang, Yi Wei, Lisha Nie, Xiaocheng Wei, Yang Liu, Bin Song
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2021 54 4
  • Dynamic MRI for articulating joint evaluation on 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners: setup, protocols, and real-time sequences
    Marc Garetier, Bhushan Borotikar, Karim Makki, Sylvain Brochard, François Rousseau, Douraïed Ben Salem
    Insights into Imaging 2020 11 1
  • Comparing proton density and turbo spin echoT2weighted static sequences with dynamic half-Fourier single-shot TSE pulse sequence at 3.0 T in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders: a prospective study
    M Cassetta, F Barchetti, N Pranno, M Marini
    Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2014 43 3
  • High-resolution morphologic and ultrashort time-to-echo quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint
    Won C. Bae, Monica Tafur, Eric Y. Chang, Jiang Du, Reni Biswas, Kyu-Sung Kwack, Robert Healey, Sheronda Statum, Christine B. Chung
    Skeletal Radiology 2016 45 3
  • Can dynamic magnetic resonance imaging replace static magnetic resonance sequences in evaluation of temporomandibular joint dysfunction?
    Zeinab Sobhy Ahmed Sayed Ahmed Kamel, Mohammad Hassan Rashad El-Shafey, Omar Ahmed Hassanien, Hanan Ahmad Nagy
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2021 52 1
  • Added value of dynamic 3T-MRI to conventional static MRI in evaluation of internal derangement of tempromandibular joint
    Hanan Ahmed Morsi Abdel Daiem, Mohamed Ahmed Morsi Abdeldayem, Omneya Ahmed Gamal Eldin
    Clinical Imaging 2022 91
  • Comparison of T2 Weighted, Fat‐Suppressed T2 Weighted, and Three‐Dimensional (3D) Fast Imaging Employing Steady‐State Acquisition (FIESTA‐C) Sequences in the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Evaluation
    Secil Aksoy, Kaan Orhan, Luca Pio Stoppino
    BioMed Research International 2021 2021 1

More in this TOC Section

  • 3D Fast Spin-Echo T1 Black-Blood Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cervical Artery Dissection
  • The Kety-Schmidt Technique for Quantitative Perfusion and Oxygen Metabolism Measurements in the MR Imaging Environment
  • A Swine Model to Analyze Arterial Structural Changes Induced by Mechanical Thrombectomy
Show more Technical Notes

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire