Best Evidence: Comments on Meta-Analysis of Coiling versus Clipping

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. McDougall CG,
   2. Spetzler RF,
   3. Zabramski JM,
   4. et al

   . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Sellar R,
   2. Whittle I

   . The ISAT trial. Lancet 2003;361:423–33; author reply 433
4. 4.↵
   1. White PM,
   2. Lewis SC,
   3. Gholkar A,
   4. et al

   . Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Coley S,
   2. Sneade M,
   3. Clarke A,
   4. et al

   . Cerecyte coil trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:474–80

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Scott RB,
   2. Eccles F,
   3. Molyneux AJ,
   4. et al

   . Improved cognitive outcomes with endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: neuropsychological outcomes from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2010;41:1743–47

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Gade A

   . Amnesia after operations on aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery. Surg Neurol 1982;18:46–49

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Bardach NS,
   2. Zhao S,
   3. Gress DR,
   4. et al

   . Association between subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes and number of cases treated at California hospitals. Stroke 2002;33:1851–56

   Abstract/FREE Full Text