Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleHead and Neck Imaging
Open Access

MR Imaging Appearance of Ruptured Rathke Cleft Cyst and Associated Bone Marrow Enhancement

Ian T. Mark and Christine M. Glastonbury
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2023, 44 (11) 1314-1317; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8009
Ian T. Mark
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
bDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (I.T.M., C.M.G.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ian T. Mark
Christine M. Glastonbury
bDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (I.T.M., C.M.G.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christine M. Glastonbury
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY:

Rathke cleft cysts are common cystic pituitary lesions seen on MR imaging. A subset of Rathke cleft cysts can rupture within the sella and are uncommon. The imaging appearance of a ruptured Rathke cleft cyst has been previously described with nonspecific imaging findings. We present 7 cases of ruptured Rathke cleft cysts and basisphenoid bone marrow enhancement below the sella that could be used to potentially distinguish a ruptured Rathke cleft cyst from other cystic lesions.

ABBREVIATIONS:

RCC
Rathke cleft cyst
rRCC
ruptured Rathke cleft cyst

Rathke cleft cysts (RCC) are benign epithelium-lined remnants originating from the craniopharyngeal duct between the anterior and posterior pituitary lobes.1 RCCs are common, having been found in 11.3% of patients in a large cadaveric study2 and are often asymptomatic. When symptomatic, RCCs manifest most frequently with headaches, visual deficits, or hormonal abnormalities,1 often leading to a contrast-enhanced brain MR imaging. A subset of RCCs can rupture within the sella, and several prior case reports described nonspecific findings on MR imaging in this setting.3⇓⇓⇓⇓-8 We present 7 cases of pathology-proved ruptured RCC (rRCC), each of which had basisphenoid bone marrow enhancement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An internal database was reviewed from 2016 to 2022 for pathology-proved rRCC. Inclusion criteria were adults (18 years of age or older) with preoperative MR imaging that included fat-saturated postcontrast T1-weighted imaging. Pertinent patient history was reviewed, which included the following: sex, age, presenting symptoms, serum prolactin levels, presumed preoperative diagnosis, surgical approach, and postoperative follow-up.

Preoperative MR imaging was evaluated for lesion size and enhancement of the basisphenoid bone marrow directly below the sella. Additionally, the images were evaluated for lesion location (midline versus off-midline), T2 signal, T1 signal, and the presence of a T2 dark nodule. The images were reviewed by a neuroradiology instructor (I.T.M.) and a neuroradiologist with 20 years of experience (C.M.G.). Sphenoid sinus pneumatization patterns were evaluated and graded as the following: type 1 conchal, type 2 presellar, type 3 sellar, and type 4 postsellar.9

Post hoc analysis was conducted of 7 consecutive patients (2019–2022) with pathology-proved cystic adenoma for enhancing basisphenoid bone marrow. Inclusion criteria matched those of the patients with rRCC; adults (18 years of age or older) with preoperative MRI, including fat-saturated postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging.

RESULTS

Patients with rRCC

Seven patients with pathology-proved rRCC were included. Patient-specific demographics are listed in Table 1. All 7 patients were women and had an average age of 44.3 years (range, 30–72 years). The median serum prolactin level was 34.9 μg/L (range, 2.7–113.2 μg/L). Pituitary adenoma was the presumed preoperative diagnosis in 5 (71.4%) cases. The average maximum lesion diameter was 11.2 mm (range, 8.2–14.0 mm). Three patients had type 2 (presellar) pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus, and 4 patients had type 3 (sellar) pneumatization.9 Three patients had focal basisphenoid bone enhancement below the sella (Fig 1), while 4 patients had enhancement that extended diffusely in the axial plane (Figs 2 and 3). Patient-specific imaging findings are listed in Table 2.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

A 72-year-old woman who presented with fatigue and was found to have a bilobed pituitary lesion, preoperatively favored to be a pituitary adenoma. A, Precontrast T1-weighted imaging shows focal hypointense signal in the posterior basisphenoid bone marrow (arrows). Postcontrast imaging shows corresponding enhancement (B and C). Pathology confirmed an rRCC.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

A 38-year-old woman presented with headaches for 6 months. MR imaging shows a sellar/suprasellar mass with a septated cystic lesion in the posterior aspect of the sella, preoperatively favored to represent a pituitary adenoma. Postcontrast MR imaging shows basisphenoid bone marrow (arrows) enhancement (B and C) with corresponding edema (D). There was no intrinsic basisphenoid T1-hyperintense signal on the precontrast imaging (A). Pathology confirmed the cystic lesion to be an rRCC. The enlarged suprasellar lesion was biopsied and found to be mixed inflammatory infiltrate and fibrosis, thought to represent inflammatory hypophysitis secondary to the rRCC.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

A 39-year-old woman with a history of gamma knife therapy to the sella for an undiagnosed lesion at another institution presented with an enlarging cystic pituitary lesion. T2-weighted imaging (A) shows a hypointense nodule and edema of the basisphenoid bone marrow (arrows). This area has corresponding T1-hypointense signal on precontrast imaging (B) and enhancement (C). Pathology confirmed an rRCC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Demographic information of the patients with rRCC proved at surgical resection

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

MR Imaging characteristics of patients with pathologic rRCCs

Patients with Cystic Pituitary Adenoma

The average age of our patients was 40.9 years (range, 28–62 years). The average maximum adenoma diameter was 20.1 mm (range, 9–44 mm). The median serum prolactin level was 30.8 μg/L (range, 12.6–167.1 μg/L). Six patients had type 3 (sellar) pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus, and 1 patient had type 2 (presellar) pneumatization. None of the 7 patients had enhancing basisphenoid bone marrow below the sella.

DISCUSSION

Our study is the first to describe enhancing basisphenoid bone marrow below the sella as an imaging finding of rRCC. We present 7 cases of rRCC, all of which showed bone marrow enhancement. This finding is potentially important because the leading differential for an rRCC is cystic pituitary adenoma, which, in our limited experience reported here, does not have basisphenoid bone marrow enhancement.

RCCs arising from failed regression of the cleft between the adeno- and neurohypophysis are frequently incidental and asymptomatic findings.10 RCCs can become symptomatic and present with headaches, visual deficits, or hormonal abnormalities and have an overlapping imaging appearance with cystic adenoma.11 Park et al12 created a diagnostic model using MR imaging to differentiate cystic pituitary adenoma and RCC, but the model does not specifically assess rRCC. Prior case reports of rRCCs have not described specific findings to differentiate them from a cystic adenoma.

Intrasellar rupture of an RCC was described in 1988,10 with associated marked inflammation of the pituitary gland thought to be secondary to the spillage of RCC contents. Numerous additional case reports have since been presented in the literature of symptomatic patients with xanthogranulomatous changes of the pituitary gland.3⇓⇓⇓⇓-8,13 It is thought that mucin leaking out of the rRCC can trigger a cascade of surrounding inflammation.14 The abnormal bone marrow enhancement in our cases, therefore, likely represents an imaging manifestation of the adjacent inflammatory changes. This is most evident in the patient presented in Fig 2, in which the native pituitary was markedly enlarged with suprasellar extension, preoperatively thought to be an adenoma. In this case, the RCC was found to be ruptured, and the pituitary biopsy findings were thought to represent reactive hypophysitis. Further testing was not compatible with lymphocytic hypophysitis or immunoglobulin G4–related disease. Given that the bone marrow enhancement is likely secondary to the inflammatory cascade set off by the RCC rupture, we would not expect to see abnormal enhancement with nonruptured RCCs (Fig 4).

FIG 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4.

Example of a pathology-proved nonruptured RCC. The precontrast T1-weighted (left) images show normal signal of the basisphenoid bone marrow edema below the T1-hyperintense RCC. The fat-saturated postcontrasted image (right) shows normal basisphenoid bone marrow without abnormal enhancement.

Similar bone marrow imaging findings have been recently described with granulomatous hypophysitis,15 which is a noncystic inflammatory process of the pituitary gland. In that article, 100 pituitary adenomas were evaluated, none of which had basisphenoid bone marrow enhancement. Therefore, bone marrow enhancement is reflective of an inflammatory process, regardless of the cystic or solid nature of the sellar process. The current study is the first to describe bone marrow enhancement associated with an rRCC.

Differentiating between a RCC and a cystic pituitary adenoma can be challenging because they often have an overlapping imaging appearance. Pituitary adenomas have been described as off-midline in position and as having fluid levels, a hypointense T2 rim, and septations,12 while RCCs are associated with T2-hypointense nodules and are typically midline in position.11 Our study is limited by the small number of patients; however, none of our cystic adenomas had basisphenoid bone marrow enhancement, nor has this previously been described in the literature. The differential for cystic lesions of the pituitary gland extends beyond RCC and cystic adenoma, but such lesions are expected to demonstrate different imaging findings and clinical presentations. Adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas occur more frequently in children and are typically suprasellar and calcified.16 Pituitary abscess could also appear as a cystic lesion and, due to marked surrounding inflammatory changes, could also have bone marrow signal changes; however, an abscess should also present with restricted diffusion,17 whereas an RCC would not.18 Our patients did not have DWI for us to analyze. The broad category of hypophysitis has many primary and secondary causes, ranging from immunoglobulin G4–related disease to infectious causes such as tuberculosis.19 While these entities, outside of granulomatous hypophysitis,15 have not been previously described as having bone marrow enhancement, it is certainly possible, given the associated inflammation. These should present as solidly enhancing enlargement of the pituitary gland, however, rather than the cystic appearance expected for an RCC.

Diagnosing basisphenoid bone marrow inflammatory changes on MR imaging is predicated on having bone marrow below the sella (non-type 4 sphenoid pneumatization) and the correct MR imaging protocol, and this requirement limits generalization of this finding to all pituitary cases. The findings are most easily seen when the T2-weighted and postcontrast T1-weighted images are fat-saturated. Even in the absence of fat saturation, however, precontrast T1-weighted images can show dark bone marrow signal (Fig 3). We believe that the presence of MR signal abnormalities consistent with basisphenoid inflammation is an important finding that can potentially help to identify an rRCC in the appropriate clinical setting. Although the small number of patients included in this report limits its generalizability, it can serve as a starting point for future studies that include more patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RCCs are commonly seen on MR imaging as cystic pituitary lesions. Intrasellar rupture of an RCC is uncommon and without previously described imaging findings to differentiate it from other pathologies. We present 7 cases of basisphenoid bone marrow enhancement below the sella that could be used to potentially identify an rRCC before surgical exploration.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Elarjani T,
    2. Alhuthayl MR,
    3. Dababo M, et al
    . Rathke cleft cyst apoplexy: hormonal and clinical presentation. Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:504 doi:10.25259/SNI_382_2021
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Teramoto A,
    2. Hirakawa K,
    3. Sanno N, et al
    . Incidental pituitary lesions in 1,000 unselected autopsy specimens. Radiology 1994;193:161–64 doi:10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090885 pmid:8090885
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Duan K,
    2. Asa SL,
    3. Winer D, et al
    . Xanthomatous hypophysitis is associated with ruptured Rathke's cleft cyst. Endocr Pathol 2017;28:83–90 doi:10.1007/s12022-017-9471-x pmid:28120170
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gezer E,
    2. Çabuk B,
    3. Bayrak BY, et al
    . Xanthomatous hypophysitis secondary to a ruptured Rathke's cleft cyst: a case report. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2022;10:48–54 doi:10.14791/btrt.2022.10.e24 pmid:35118849
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Neidert MC,
    2. Woernle CM,
    3. Leske H, et al
    . Ruptured Rathke cleft cyst mimicking pituitary apoplexy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013;74(Suppl 1):e229–32 doi:10.1055/s-0033-1343985 pmid:23696292
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Schittenhelm J,
    2. Beschorner R,
    3. Psaras T, et al
    . Rathke's cleft cyst rupture as potential initial event of a secondary perifocal lymphocytic hypophysitis: proposal of an unusual pathogenetic event and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2008;31:157–63 doi:10.1007/s10143-008-0120-1 pmid:18253771
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sonnet E,
    2. Roudaut N,
    3. Mériot P, et al
    . Hypophysitis associated with a ruptured Rathke's cleft cyst in a woman, during pregnancy. J Endocrinol Invest 2006;29:353–57 doi:10.1007/BF03344108 pmid:16699303
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Yang C,
    2. Wu H,
    3. Bao X, et al
    . Lymphocytic hypophysitis secondary to ruptured Rathke cleft cyst: case report and literature review. World Neurosurg 2018;114:172–77 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.086 pmid:29572168
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pirinc B,
    2. Fazliogullari Z,
    3. Guler I, et al
    . Classification and volumetric study of the sphenoid sinus on MDCT images. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:2887–94 doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05549-8 pmid:31302743
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Albini CH,
    2. MacGillivray MH,
    3. Fisher JE, et al
    . Triad of hypopituitarism, granulomatous hypophysitis, and ruptured Rathke's cleft cyst. Neurosurgery 1988;22:133–36 doi:10.1227/00006123-198801000-00022 pmid:334401
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Byun WM,
    2. Kim OL,
    3. Kim D
    . MR imaging findings of Rathke's cleft cysts: significance of intracystic nodules. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:485–88 pmid:10730639
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Park M,
    2. Lee SK,
    3. Choi J, et al
    . Differentiation between cystic pituitary adenomas and Rathke cleft cysts: a diagnostic model using MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1866–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4387 pmid:26251436
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sprau A,
    2. Mahavadi A,
    3. Zhang M, et al
    . Rathke's cleft cyst with xanthogranulomatous change: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 2020;11:246 doi:10.25259/SNI_277_2020 pmid:32905293
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Oka H,
    2. Kawano N,
    3. Suwa T, et al
    . Radiological study of symptomatic Rathke's cleft cysts. Neurosurgery 1994;35:632; discussion 636–37 doi:10.1227/00006123-199410000-00008 pmid:7808605
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mark IT,
    2. Glastonbury CM
    . Diffuse basisphenoid enhancement: possible differentiating feature for granulomatous hypophysitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:1341–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7618 pmid:36007945
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sartoretti-Schefer S,
    2. Wichmann W,
    3. Aguzzi A, et al
    . MR differentiation of adamantinous and squamous-papillary craniopharyngiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:77–87 pmid:9010523
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Takayasu T,
    2. Yamasaki F,
    3. Tominaga A, et al
    . A pituitary abscess showing high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging. Neurosurg Rev 2006;29:246–48 doi:10.1007/s10143-006-0021-0 pmid:16614868
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kunii N,
    2. Abe T,
    3. Kawamo M, et al
    . Rathke's cleft cysts: differentiation from other cystic lesions in the pituitary fossa by use of single-shot fast spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007;149:759–69; discussion 769 doi:10.1007/s00701-007-1234-x pmid:17594050
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Langlois F,
    2. Varlamov EV,
    3. Fleseriu M
    . Hypophysitis, the growing spectrum of a rare pituitary disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022;107:10–28 doi:10.1210/clinem/dgab672 pmid:34528683
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received February 3, 2023.
  • Accepted after revision August 30, 2023.
  • © 2023 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 44 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 44, Issue 11
1 Nov 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Imaging Appearance of Ruptured Rathke Cleft Cyst and Associated Bone Marrow Enhancement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Ian T. Mark, Christine M. Glastonbury
MR Imaging Appearance of Ruptured Rathke Cleft Cyst and Associated Bone Marrow Enhancement
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2023, 44 (11) 1314-1317; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Third Window Dehiscence on Temporal Bone CT
Ian T. Mark, Christine M. Glastonbury
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2023, 44 (11) 1314-1317; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8009
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • SUMMARY:
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (2)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Comparison of clinical and radiological characteristics of inflammatory and non-inflammatory Rathke cleft cysts
    Shu Matsushita, Taro Shimono, Hiroyuki Maeda, Taro Tsukamoto, Daisuke Horiuchi, Tatsushi Oura, Kenichi Ishibashi, Hirotaka Takita, Hiroyuki Tatekawa, Natsuko Atsukawa, Takeo Goto, Yukio Miki
    Japanese Journal of Radiology 2025 43 1
  • Tricks and Traps in MRI of the Pituitary Region
    Jean-François Bonneville
    2024

More in this TOC Section

  • Comprehensive Review of Inner Ear Anatomy on Photon-Counting CT
  • Lipochoristomas and inner ear signal
  • FACE Coil for Occipital Nerve MR Neurography at 3T
Show more Head and Neck Imaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire