Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL

Efficacy of Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres versus Polyvinyl Alcohol Particles in the Preoperative Embolization of Meningiomas

Martin Bendszus, Rüdiger Klein, Ralf Burger, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Erich Hofmann and Laszlo Solymosi
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2000, 21 (2) 255-261;
Martin Bendszus
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.B., M.W-M., E.H., L.S.), Neuropathology (R.K.), and Neurosurgery (R.B.), University of Würzburg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rüdiger Klein
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.B., M.W-M., E.H., L.S.), Neuropathology (R.K.), and Neurosurgery (R.B.), University of Würzburg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralf Burger
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.B., M.W-M., E.H., L.S.), Neuropathology (R.K.), and Neurosurgery (R.B.), University of Würzburg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monika Warmuth-Metz
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.B., M.W-M., E.H., L.S.), Neuropathology (R.K.), and Neurosurgery (R.B.), University of Würzburg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erich Hofmann
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.B., M.W-M., E.H., L.S.), Neuropathology (R.K.), and Neurosurgery (R.B.), University of Würzburg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laszlo Solymosi
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.B., M.W-M., E.H., L.S.), Neuropathology (R.K.), and Neurosurgery (R.B.), University of Würzburg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Trisacryl gelatin microspheres are a new, commercially available nonabsorbable embolic agent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate their efficacy in the preoperative embolization of meningiomas as compared with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles of various sizes.

METHODS: In 30 consecutive patients, trisacryl gelatin microspheres (150–300 μm) were used for the preoperative superselective embolization of meningiomas (group 1). Thirty other consecutive patients had embolization with PVA particles of 45 to 150 μm (n = 15, group 2) and of 150 to 250 μm (n = 15, group 3). Extent of devascularization, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and hemostasis at the time of surgery were recorded for every patient. The inflammatory reaction, the extent of necrotic areas, and the most distal intravascular location of the embolic agent (arterial, arteriolar, precapillary, capillary) were recorded.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the extent of angiographic devascularization among the groups. Intraoperative blood loss differed significantly between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3, but not between groups 2 and 3. The trisacryl gelatin microspheres were located more distally in tumor vessels than were the PVA particles of either size. The extent of intratumoral necrosis was not significantly different between the two embolic agents. In all groups there was a mild inflammatory tissue reaction in the vicinity of the embolic agent.

CONCLUSION: Trisacryl gelatin microspheres may be effective in the preoperative embolization of meningiomas, producing significantly less blood loss at surgery than seen with PVA particles of either size, possibly because of the significantly more distal vascular penetration of the microspheres.

Preoperative embolization of meningiomas is commonly used to reduce intraoperative blood loss (1–3). To date, many different embolic materials have been used, with PVA particles probably the most common. In one recent study (4), the smaller PVA particles (45–150 μm) were shown to be more effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss than were the larger particles (150–250 μm). Trisacryl gelatin microspheres (Embospheres, Guerbet Biomedical, Louvres, France) are a new, commercially available, hydrophilic, nonabsorbable collagen-coated embolic agent (5). In vivo and in vitro studies have shown that these particles are precisely calibrated, deformable, and tend not to aggregate (5–7). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of trisacryl gelatin microspheres in the preoperative embolization of meningiomas as compared with PVA particles of different sizes.

Methods

Sixty patients (45 women and 15 men; mean age, 58 years; range, 29–76 years) with intracranial meningiomas were included in this study. For every patient, tumor size, histologic subtype, and location were recorded. For a statistical comparison between the groups, tumor location was categorized as superficial (falx, convexity), skull base (frontobasal, sphenoid wing), or posterior fossa. In all patients, a transfemoral approach was used under local anesthesia. After diagnostic angiography, a microcatheter system (FasTracker 10 or 18, Target Therapeutics, Fremont, CA) was placed in the feeding branches of the external carotid artery. None of the patients underwent embolization of branches of the internal carotid artery (ICA).

Prior to injection, the particles were poured into a porcelain cup and mixed with a nonionic contrast medium (Imeron 250, Bracco-Byk Gulden, Konstanz, Germany). Embolization was performed by slowly injecting the embolic agent through the microcatheter under fluoroscopic control until the intratumoral perfusion became stagnant. If technically feasible, this was repeated for all tumor-supplying vessels. After embolization, the extent of devascularization was graded as complete (>95%), extensive (>60% to 95%), moderate (30% to 60%), or slight (<30%) by external carotid artery angiography. The grading was done by the neurointerventionalist and by two neuroradiologists blinded to the patient data. Moreover, the extent of ICA and external carotid artery (ECA) blood supply was recorded and, in case of an incomplete ECA embolization, the reasons (eg, vasospasm, dangerous anastomoses) were noted.

In a prospective study, 30 consecutive patients underwent embolization with trisacryl gelatin microspheres of 100 to 300 μm (group 1). Additionally, in 30 consecutive patients, PVA particles (Contour, Target Therapeutics) of 45 to 150 μm (n = 15, group 2) and of 150 to 250 μm (n = 15, group 3) were used. The median period between embolization and surgery was 6 days in group 1 (range, 1–72 days), 5 days in group 2 (range, 1–19 days), and 7 days in group 3 (range, 2–22 days). At surgery, blood loss (mL) and units of blood transfusion were recorded. Blood loss was measured as the amount of fluid in the reservoir of the sucking device minus the lavage fluid plus the net weight gain of the bloody compresses. Hemostasis was assessed by the neurosurgeon semiquantitatively as dry, moderate, or bloody. For histopathologic examination, specimens were fixed by immersion in 4% buffered formalin. In cases of smaller meningiomas, all tissue available was taken for histopathologic examination; in cases of larger tumors, representative tumor blocks from the center of the tumor, the periphery, and the adjacent dura mater were selected. After fixation, specimens were embedded in paraffin. Sections were prepared for histopathologic examination with hematoxylin-eosin and van Gieson stains.

Blinded to the patient data, we assessed all available archived sections to determine the distribution of the embolic agent and the extent of necrosis. The extent of necrosis was graded according to guidelines established by Ng et al (8) as absent (0), rare and involving less than 0.5 high-power field (HPF) (+), frequent and involving 0.5 to 1.0 HPF (++), and confluent, involving more than 1.0 HPF. Similarly, the most distal intravascular location of the embolic agent was registered in every available section (arterial, arteriolar, precapillary, capillary, or absent). Furthermore, the presence and type of inflammatory tissue reaction were recorded for every section.

Results

Patient data are shown in Tables 1 through 3. There was no significant difference in patients' ages (P > .5, Student's t-test), tumor location (P > .1, χ2 test), or ECA/ICA blood supply (P > .1, Mann-Whitney test). There was no significant difference between the groups in the extent of preoperative angiographic devascularization (P > .1, Mann-Whitney test) (Fig 1). In six patients, the ECA feeders could not be embolized completely owing to technical considerations (vasospasm, dangerous anastomoses, etc; see Tables 1–3). Tumor size did not differ significantly (23.8 ± 12.2 mL in group 1 versus 25.5 ± 14.1 mL in group 2 versus 26.5 ± 18.5 in group 3; P > .5, Mann-Whitney test). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 621 mL in group 1 (range, 160–2050 mL), 886 mL in group 2 (range, 250–1800 mL), and 917 mL in group 3 (range, 250–2550 mL) (Fig 2). It was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (P < .05, t-test for independent samples) or group 3 (P < .05, t-test for independent samples). Blood loss in groups 2 and 3 did not differ significantly (P > .1, t-test for independent samples). The mean number of blood units was lower in group 1 (1.0 U) than in group 2 (1.2 U) or group 3 (1.7 U); however, the difference was insignificant (P > .1, χ2 test). The intraoperative assessment of hemostasis by the neurosurgeon did not show significant differences between trisacryl gelatin microspheres and PVA particles (P > .05, Mann-Whitney test). For every group, a linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the effect of time between embolization and surgery and the extent of blood loss. This analysis showed no significant relationship for any of the groups (P < .1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1:

Data for patients treated with trisacryl gelatin microspheres

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2:

Data for patients treated with polyvinyl alcohol particles (45–150 μm)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 3:

Data for patients treated with polyvinyl alcohol particles (150–250 μm)

fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 1.

Extent of angiographic preoperative devascularization in groups 1 through 3 (proportional representation for every group). White bars indicate trisacryl gelatin microspheres; dark gray bars, PVA particles 45 to 150 μm; light gray bars, PVA particles 150 to 250 μm

fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 2.

Mean intraoperative blood loss (mL) and mean number of blood units in groups 1 through 3. Shaded bars indicate blood loss; black line, blood units

Histologically, trisacryl gelatin microspheres were located highly significantly more distally in tumor vessels than were PVA particles of 45 to 150 μm (P < .005, χ2 test) or those of 150 to 250 μm (P < .0001, χ2 test, Figs 3–6, 4, 5, 6). Furthermore, PVA particles of 45 to 50 μm showed a more distal location than PVA particles of 150 to 250 μm (P < .05, χ2 test). The extent of intratumoral necrotic areas revealed a tendency toward more extensive necrosis in patients in whom embolization was performed with trisacryl gelatin microspheres, although this trend was not significant (P > .05, Mann-Whitney test).

fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 3.

Most distal intravascular location of the embolic agent in groups 1 through 3 (proportional representation for every group). White bars indicate trisacryl gelatin microspheres; light gray bars, PVA particles, 45 to 150 μm; dark gray bars, PVA particles 150 to 250 μm

An inflammatory tissue reaction was observed in 25 patients, without marked differences between the embolic agents (13 patients in group 1, 12 patients in groups 2 and 3). The pattern of inflammatory response consisted of a moderate perivascular lymphocytic reaction, which was observed as early as the first day after embolization (Fig 5B). Moreover, a granulocytic inflammatory reaction was observed in the vicinity of necrotic areas, and there were few foreign-body giant cells close to the embolic material. Neither finding was related to the amount of time elapsed between surgery and embolization or to the kind of embolic agent used.

Discussion

Since the first report by Manelfe et al in 1973 (9), preoperative embolization of meningiomas has been widely performed with a variety of embolic materials, such as Gelfoam (1–3), lyophilized dura (2, 3), n-butyl cyanoacrylate (10), ethanol (11), Ethibloc (11), and PVA particles (4), the latter being perhaps the most widely used agent at present. A perfect devascularization would cause a very distal and permanent vessel occlusion in order to achieve tumor necrosis. In cases of proximal vessel occlusion, reperfusion may occur at surgery despite angiographic devascularization (1, 2, 12). To achieve a very distal penetration, an ideal embolic material should be deformable, homogeneous in size, and regularly shaped. PVA particles vary in size and have an irregular surface (13, 14), which may lead to clumping or aggregation of particles, causing catheter obstruction or large vessel occlusion with recanalization of the capillary bed (14). One recent study (4) found that very small PVA particles (45–150 μm) are more effective in preoperative devascularization than are larger particles (150–250 μm), and these authors suggested that this result was the effect of a more distal penetration of smaller particles. However, others have reported the occurrence of facial nerve palsies after ECA embolization with very small particles that were attributed to the penetration of small particles through ICA/ECA anastomoses (15, 16) or to occlusion of the vasa nervorum of cranial nerves (17). Therefore, some authors generally do not recommend the use of particles smaller than 100 μm (1, 18).

Recently, trisacryl gelatin microspheres have been introduced as nonresorbable and deformable embolic agents with calibrated sizes and uniform shapes (5). In preliminary clinical studies, these particles proved to be effective and safe in the embolization of highly vascularized tumors and vascular malformations (6). In animal studies, it has been shown that for a given vessel and particle size, Embospheres significantly penetrate deeper into the blood vessel system than do PVA particles (7). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of Embospheres in the preoperative devascularization of meningiomas as compared with the use of different-sized PVA particles. Perhaps the most important finding was the significantly more distal penetration achieved by Embospheres as compared with PVA particles of either size. PVA particles tended to aggregate and thus occlude larger vessels (Figs 4 and 5), whereas Embospheres never clustered but rather formed chains in smaller vessels (Fig 6). This difference is probably caused by the different biomechanical properties of the two materials in terms of surface structure, deformability, and regularity of shape. Moreover, we found a significantly lower blood loss at surgery in patients who underwent embolization with Embospheres, even though the angiographic extent of preoperative devascularization was not significantly different between the two groups. Intraoperative blood loss appears to be a more realistic measure of the efficacy of embolization than is the extent of devascularization on the postembolization angiogram (1, 2, 12).

fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 4.

A, Low-power magnification of large PVA particles (150–250 μm) seen in arterial vessels of a meningioma. Note the particles in a small arterial vessel and large extent of necrosis next to the embolized vessel (original magnification ×60).

B, High-power view shows the irregularly shaped large PVA particles that obliterate the lumen and lead to additional thrombosis (original magnification ×240).

fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 5.

A, Small PVA particles (45–150 μm) are found in arterial vessel, in which they nearly completely obliterate the lumen, as well as in vessels in which they do not fully obliterate the lumen but lead to intravascular thrombosis (original magnification ×60).

B, High-power view of small PVA particles in a precapillary vessel, with thrombosis surrounding the irregularly shaped PVA particle. A slight lymphocytic inflammatory reaction surrounds the vessel (original magnification ×480).

fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 6.

A, Embospheres (100–300 μm) form rolls and aggregations but do not lead to thrombosis in larger vessels (original magnification ×60).

B, High-power view of a single trisacryl gelatin microsphere that completely obliterates a precapillary vessel. A small capillary without blood particles branches from this embolized vessel (original magnification ×480).

The mean period between embolization and surgery was 5 to 7 days among the groups. To examine whether time affected the degree of devascularization, especially in the PVA group, we performed a regression analysis between time and intraoperative blood loss, which showed no significant relationship. Tumor revascularization may be caused not only by a recanalization of formerly obliterated vessels but also by a rapid opening of intratumoral anastomoses.

The histologic extent of necrosis did not reveal significant differences between the embolic agents, possibly because of intraoperative aspiration of the necrotic areas and thus an incomplete neuropathologic examination. Both trisacryl gelatin microspheres and PVA particles caused a mild inflammatory reaction, similar to that reported in previously published animal studies (7). Even though we have no long-term follow-up data, a more extensive and distal vascular occlusion in patients with meningioma might even lower the recurrence rate owing to necrosis at the site of dural attachment (19). Moreover, in selected patients, a palliative embolization without subsequent surgery has been suggested (4). In these patients in particular, permanent devascularization needs to be achieved in order to obtain tumor necrosis and prevent regrowth.

Conclusion

Trisacryl gelatin microspheres have proved to be safe and effective in the preoperative devascularization of meningiomas. In this first comparative clinical study, trisacryl gelatin microspheres significantly penetrated the intratumoral vascular bed deeper than PVA particles of 45 to 150 μm and those of 150 to 250 μm, thus yielding a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss relative to PVA particles.

Footnotes

  • 1 Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Philadelphia, May 1998.

  • ↵2 Address reprint requests to Dr. M. Bendszus, Department of Neuroradiology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

References

  1. ↵
    Manelfe C, Lasjaunias P, Ruscalleda J. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:963-972
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Teasdale E, Patterson J, McLellan D, McPherson P. Subselective preoperative embolization for meningiomas: a radiological and pathological assessment. J Neurosurg 1984;60:506-511
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Richter HP, Schachenmayer W. Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1983;13:261-268
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Wakhloo AK, Juengling FD, Van velthoven V, Schumacher M, Henning J, Schwechheimer K. Extended preoperative polyvinyl alcohol microembolization of intracranial meningiomas: assessment of two embolization techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:571-581
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Laurent A, Beaujeux R, Wassef M, Rüfenacht D, Boschetti E, Merland JJ. Trisacryl gelatin microspheres for therapeutic embolization, I: development and in vitro evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:533-540
    Abstract
  6. ↵
    Beaujeux R, Laurent A, Wassef M, et al. Trisacryl gelatin microspheres for therapeutic embolization, II: preliminary clinical evaluation in tumors and arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:541-548
    Abstract
  7. ↵
    Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Salamant MS, Rappe A. Collagen-coated acrylic microspheres for embolotherapy: in vivo and in vitro characteristics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:647-653
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Ng HK, Poon WS, Goh K, Chan MSY. Histopathology of postembolized meningiomas. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:1224-1230
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Manelfe C, Guiraud B, David J. Embolisation par catheterisme des meningiomes intracraniens. Rev Neurol Paris 1973;128:339-351
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Mironov A. Meningeomembolisation mit flüssigen Embolisaten. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1990;153:327-334
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Jungreis CA. Skull-base tumors: ethanol embolization of the cavernous carotid artery. Radiology 1991;181:741-743
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. Hieshima GB, Everhart FR, Mehringer CM, et al. Preoperative embolization of meningiomas. Surg Neurol 1980;14:119-127
    PubMed
  13. ↵
    Jack CR, Forbes G, Dewanjee MK, Brown ML, Earnest F. Polyvinyl alcohol sponge for embolotherapy: particle size and morphology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1985;6:595-597
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Derdeyn CP, Moran CJ, Cross T, Dietrich HH, Dacey RG. Polyvinyl alcohol particle size and suspension characteristics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1335-1443
    Abstract
  15. ↵
    Lasjaunas P. Nasopharyngeal angiofibromas: hazards of embolization. Radiology 1981;136:119-123
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. Handa J, Nakasu S, Matsuda I. Facial nerve palsy following therapeutic embolization. Surg Neurol 1980;14:377-380
    PubMed
  17. ↵
    Lasjaunias P. Craniofacial and Upper Cervical Arteries: Functional, Clinical and Angiographic Aspects. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1981
  18. Halbach VV, Hieshima GB, Higashida RT, David CF. Endovascular therapy for head and neck tumors. In: Vinuela F, Halbach VV, Dion JE, eds. Interventional Neuroradiology: Endovascular Therapy of the Central Nervous System. New York: Raven; 1992
  19. ↵
    Berenstein A, Kricheff II. Microembolization technique of vascular occlusion: radiologic, pathologic and clinical correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1981;2:261-267
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received March 2, 1999.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 2
1 Feb 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy of Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres versus Polyvinyl Alcohol Particles in the Preoperative Embolization of Meningiomas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Martin Bendszus, Rüdiger Klein, Ralf Burger, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Erich Hofmann, Laszlo Solymosi
Efficacy of Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres versus Polyvinyl Alcohol Particles in the Preoperative Embolization of Meningiomas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2000, 21 (2) 255-261;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Efficacy of Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres versus Polyvinyl Alcohol Particles in the Preoperative Embolization of Meningiomas
Martin Bendszus, Rüdiger Klein, Ralf Burger, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Erich Hofmann, Laszlo Solymosi
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2000, 21 (2) 255-261;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Embolization through the thyrocervical trunk: vascular anatomy, variants, and a case series
  • Augmentation of N-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization of cranial, head, and neck tumors by simultaneous infusion of 5% dextrose solution
  • Head, neck, and brain tumor embolization guidelines
  • Renal artery embolisation in the palliative treatment of renal carcinoma
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire