Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL
Open Access

Single-Layer WEBs: Intrasaccular Flow Disrupters for Aneurysm Treatment—Feasibility Results from a European Study

J. Caroff, C. Mihalea, J. Klisch, C. Strasilla, A. Berlis, T. Patankar, W. Weber, D. Behme, E.A. Jacobsen, T. Liebig, S. Prothmann, C. Cognard, T. Finkenzeller, J. Moret and L. Spelle
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2015, 36 (10) 1942-1946; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4369
J. Caroff
aFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology NEURI Center (J.C., C.M., J.M., L.S.), Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Caroff
C. Mihalea
aFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology NEURI Center (J.C., C.M., J.M., L.S.), Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
bDepartment of Neurosurgery (C.M.), University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes,” Timisoara, Romania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Klisch
cDepartment of Neuroradiology (J.K., C.S.), Helios General Hospital, Erfurt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Strasilla
cDepartment of Neuroradiology (J.K., C.S.), Helios General Hospital, Erfurt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Berlis
dDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.B.), Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Patankar
eMRI Department (T.P.), Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Leeds, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Weber
fInterventional Neuroradiology (W.W.), Ruhr University Medical Center, Bochum, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Behme
gDepartments of Radiology and Neuroradiology (D.B.), Klinikum Vest, Recklinghausen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.A. Jacobsen
hInterventional Neuroradiology (E.A.J.), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Liebig
iInterventional Neuroradiology (T.L.), Universitatsklinik Koeln, Köln, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Prothmann
jAbteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie (S.P.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Cognard
kInterventional Neuroradiology (C.C.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Finkenzeller
lInterventional Neuroradiology (T.F.), Klinikum Nürnberg Süd, Nürnberg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Moret
aFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology NEURI Center (J.C., C.M., J.M., L.S.), Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Spelle
aFrom the Interventional Neuroradiology NEURI Center (J.C., C.M., J.M., L.S.), Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety and efficiency of the dual-layer Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has already been published. However, this international multicenter study sought to evaluate the safety of single-layer devices, which are the newest generation of the WEB intrasaccular flow-disrupter family. They have been designed to offer smaller-sized devices with a lower profile to optimize navigability and delivery, which may, in turn, broaden their range of use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from all consecutive patients treated with a single-layer WEB device, in 10 European centers from June 2013 to May 2014 were included. Clinical presentations, technical details, intra- and perioperative complications, and outcomes at discharge were recorded. Clinical and angiographic data at last follow-up were also analyzed when available.

RESULTS: Ninety patients with 98 WEB-treated aneurysms were included in this study. In 93 cases (95%), WEB placement was possible. Complete occlusion at the end of the procedure was obtained in 26 instances (26%). Additional treatment during the procedure (coiling and/or stent placement) was necessary in 12 cases (12.7%). Procedure-related complications occurred in 13 cases, leading to permanent neurologic deficits in 4 patients (4.4%). Early vascular imaging follow-up data were available for 44 patients (57%), with an average time interval of 3.3 months. Treatment-related morbidity and mortality rates at last follow-up were 2.2% and 1.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the feasibility and safety of the single-layer WEB device was comparable with that of the double-layer. However, further studies are needed to evaluate long-term efficacies.

ABBREVIATIONS:

DL
dual-layer
WEB
Woven EndoBridge
SL
single-layer
SLS
single-layer sphere.

The Woven EndoBridge dual-layer device (WEB-DL; Sequent Medical, Aliso Viejo, California) is an intrasaccular flow-disruption device, initially developed to treat wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms. It has proved to be a highly feasible, safe,1⇓⇓–4 and efficient5 technique, particularly dedicated to the treatment of aneurysms challenging to treat with standard coiling.

The single-layer WEB (WEB-SL) device is the newest generation of the WEB family. Improved microbraiding technology allows a reduction in device size and profile, which optimizes navigability (through smaller catheters) and delivery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new device, which has been available in Europe since 2013.

Materials and Methods

Population

All patients with planned treatment with the WEB-SL device, in the 10 participating centers from June 2013 to May 2014, were consecutively included in this study. No exclusion criteria were used. The decision to use the WEB-single-layer device was made locally by the interventional teams and was based on aneurysm characteristics (size, wide-neck, bifurcation location, and so forth) in each case. It mostly corresponded to bifurcation aneurysms with aspect ratios of <1.2, in which adjunctive techniques to coiling would have been required.6 Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

WEB Devices

The WEB-SL and WEB-single-layer sphere (SLS) are the latest generation of WEB devices and became available for use in 2013 (Fig 1). The WEB-SL is barrel-shaped (similar to the WEB-DL) and the WEB-SLS is spheric. They are available in various diameters, from 4 to 11 mm and heights from 3 to 9 mm. Unlike the WEB-DL, the WEB-SL and SLS devices can contain from 144 wires in the 4-mm-diameter devices to 216 wires in the 11-mm-diameter devices. They present a lower profile and were designed for use with the VIA-27 and VIA-33 catheters (Sequent Medical), which are 3F and 3.4F (outer diameter), respectively. The VIA-33 is dedicated to the WEB-SL and SLS devices with diameters of 10 mm and above.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

WEB-SL device family. A, The barrel-shaped WEB-SL, similar to the WEB-DL. B, The spheric WEB-SLS.

Treatment Technique

Endovascular treatment was performed with the patient under general anesthesia and systemic heparinization. By the end of the procedure, the heparin therapy was discontinued but not reversed. Antiplatelet medications were used pre- and postoperatively, depending on local protocols and angiographic results. In 94% of cases, VIA catheters were used for WEB delivery. The use of antiplatelet agents in the pre- and postoperative periods was decided locally and for each case by the operator. Even if the use of an antiplatelet agent is not mandatory with the WEB device, depending on local habits, some patients were premedicated with aspirin and clopidogrel in case of a strategy shift to stent-assisted coiling.

Data Collection

For each aneurysm, we collected the following data retrospectively: age, sex, aneurysm location and biometry (maximum diameter, neck size, aspect ratio), rupture status, the modified Rankin Scale score at the time of admission and discharge, modalities of treatment (WEB type and size, associated medication and treatment), intraoperative complications (aneurysm rupture, thromboembolic events, deployment failure, WEB protrusion or migration), and postoperative complications (delayed bleeding, thromboembolic events). Immediate postoperative DSA, 3D rotational angiography, and VasoCT (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands)7 images were collected, along with any available follow-up imaging data (DSA, CTA, MRA).

Data Analysis

Data were self-reported by the different centers, but the principal investigators (J.C. and L.S.) performed a blinded review of the clinical and angiographic data, as an independent core laboratory not involved in patient care. Adverse events were adjudicated independently from operators. Permanent morbidity and mortality rates, subsequent to treatment, were evaluated at discharge and at follow-up when possible. Morbidity was defined as an mRS of >1. When the preoperative mRS was >1, morbidity was defined by any increase in the mRS score.

The principal investigators also independently assessed the degree of aneurysmal occlusion, by using a modified version of the Montreal 5-grade scale as previously published.8 The Beaujon Occlusion Scale Score is described as follows: 0 = no residual flow inside the aneurysm or the WEB, 0′ = opacification of the proximal recess of the WEB, 1 = residual flow inside the WEB, 2 = neck remnant, 3 = aneurysm remnant, and 1 + 3 = contrast media depicted inside and around the device (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

WEB occlusion scale. Grade 0 indicates complete occlusion. Grade 0′ is similar but with opacification of the proximal recess, which may also be considered complete occlusion. Grade 1 signifies opacification inside the WEB. Grade 2 denotes a neck remnant. Grade 3 indicates an aneurysm remnant with contrast agent inside the sac between the wall and the WEB device.

Results

Population

Ninety patients (60 women and 30 men; age range, 26–83 years; median age, 55 years) with 98 WEB-treated aneurysms were included in this study. Of these, 65 aneurysms were unruptured (66%) (Fig 3). They were treated in 10 European centers with a median of 7.5 WEB implants per center.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A 65-year-old man was admitted for the treatment of an asymptomatic aneurysm. Preoperative DSA showed a 6-mm right MCA bifurcation aneurysm (A). B, 3D rotational angiography before treatment. C, VasoCT before detachment confirmed the correct positioning of the WEB-SL. D, After WEB-SL deployment, postoperative DSA showed partial occlusion and stagnation of contrast agent inside the aneurysm. The Beaujon Occlusion Scale Score is 3.

It was determined that 38 aneurysms were located along the middle cerebral artery (38.8%); 21, along the anterior communicating artery (21.4%); 19, along the basilar artery (19.4%); and 15, along the supraclinoid internal carotid artery (15.3%). Aneurysm size varied from 3.7 to 39 mm (mean, 8.9 ± 5.5 mm), neck size varied from 2.0 to 12.3 mm (mean, 5.2 ± 2.1 mm), and the aspect ratio, defined as depth/neck, varied from 0.6 to 7.6 mm (mean, 1.6 ± 1.0 mm).

Treatment Feasibility

The WEB-SL device was successfully deployed inside the aneurysmal sac in 93 cases (95%). Deployment failures were attributed to device migration during detachment in 1 instance, while there were difficulties in achieving satisfactory positioning of the WEB before detachment in the other 4 cases. Of those 5 aneurysms, 3 were successfully treated with stent-assisted coiling, 1 case required a WEB-DL, and simple coiling was used in 1 case.

Additional Treatment

The necessity of additional coiling had been anticipated preoperatively, to manage large or giant aneurysms in 4 patients and to ensure immediate occlusion of a daughter bleb, in a fifth patient with a ruptured aneurysm. In 7 cases (8.2%), unplanned additional treatment had been required. In 5 of these cases, stent deployment was needed because of WEB protrusion into the parent artery (Fig 4). In the remaining 2 cases, additional coiling was performed to complete aneurysm occlusion after WEB deployment because of the presence of aneurysm remnants.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

A 59-year-old women was admitted for the treatment of an unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. A, Preoperative DSA. B, After WEB-SL deployment, a protrusion occurred in the right A2 segment, leading to a significant stenosis (black arrow). The proximal marker is also depicted within the parent artery. C, A laser cut Enterprise stent (Codman & Shurtleff, Raynham, Massachusetts) was then delivered to restore the caliber of the artery. The Beaujon Occlusion Scale Score is 0. D, Final VasoCT confirmed satisfactory positioning of the stent without any protrusion of the WEB (arrows show the 2 radio-opaque markers of the WEB-SL).

Protrusion

Postdelivery, major protrusion occurred in 14 cases. It required balloon remodeling in 5 and additional stent placement in 5. In 3 other cases, it led to clot formation, successfully treated with abciximab infusion in 2 cases and with mechanical thrombectomy in 1. In the last case, 1 branch occlusion occurred, resulting in an ischemic infarction. In 29 cases, a protrusion of only the proximal marker was depicted at the level of the bifurcation. In those situations, a postoperative antiplatelet regimen was prescribed at the physician's discretion.

Platelet Antiaggregation Therapy

One or 2 platelet antiaggregation agents were administered preoperatively to 27 patients (30%), while 60 patients (67%) were still given at least 1 antiplatelet therapy at discharge, mostly because of slight device protrusion in the parent artery.

Complication Rate

Procedure-related complications occurred in 13 cases. We observed 6 intraoperative thromboembolic complications, 4 of which were successfully managed (2 treated by intra-arterial infusion of abciximab; 1, by stent deployment; and another, by performing a thrombectomy by using a Solitaire stent [Covidien, Irvine, California]). The other 2 patients had arterial occlusion and hemiplegia. One recovered partially and was mRS 1 at last follow-up, and the other was rated mRS 3.

We also observed 5 hemorrhagic complications. In 1 case, an aneurysmal rupture occurred due to a wire perforation but was immediately stopped after WEB delivery, and the patient remained asymptomatic. In another case, an occipital lobe parenchymal bleed occurred 4 days after the treatment of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm, and the patient still had hemianopsia at last follow-up. The patient had a history of uncontrolled hypertension and received double-antiplatelet therapy as a premedication.

The other 3 were ruptured cases, and early follow-up showed new parenchymal or subarachnoidal bleeding, which led to severe disability in 1 patient, seizures in the second patient, and death in the last patient. In the first one, an aneurysmal bleb was occluded by 1 coil, then the aneurysm itself was treated with a WEB, stagnation was obtained inside the sac, but 6 hours later a large parenchymal hematoma was depicted. In the second one, with a multilobulated anterior communicating artery aneurysm, only partial occlusion was obtained after WEB delivery. A nonoccluded part of the aneurysm, initially misjudged as a nonpotential source of bleeding, was secondarily coiled after rebleeding was revealed by seizures. The last case was one of major and diffuse SAH. Three potential ruptured aneurysms were discovered; 1 was treated with coils, and other 2, with the WEB-SL. Massive rebleeding predominantly located in the right Sylvian fissure occurred 3 hours after treatment, leading to death. The lesions that were most likely to be the cause of the recurrent fatal hemorrhage were probably 1 of the 2 right MCA aneurysms. One was treated with coils, and 1, with the WEB-SL. After treatment, those 3 patients were kept under at least 1 antiplatelet agent because of device protrusion.

A distal migration of the WEB device during removal, due to an incomplete detachment, was noted in 1 instance. It was impossible to recapture the device in the M1 segment. While we tried to recapture it, it finally migrated into an M2 branch in a nondeployed fashion without flow repercussions. The patient remained asymptomatic under double antiplatelet therapy, and no ischemic lesions were observed on imaging follow-up.

One patient was mRS 1 at discharge due to a postoperative iliac artery occlusion.

Data from early clinical follow-ups were available for 52 patients (58%), with an average time interval of 3.8 months. Treatment-related morbidity and mortality rates at last follow-up were 2.2% and 1.1%, respectively.

Immediate Results

Immediate angiographic evaluation showed 27 cases (28%) of complete occlusion, 2 neck remnants, and a stagnation of iodine contrast agent in the aneurysm in all other cases.

Angiographic Follow-Up

Short-term vascular imaging follow-ups were available in 69 cases (70%), including DSA data in 54 cases, and the average time interval to follow-up was 3.3 months. Satisfactory results (complete occlusion or small neck remnants) were achieved in 45 patients (65%). In 8 cases, contrast opacification agent was still observed inside the device at that time.

Discussion

The work presented here is the largest WEB study undertaken to date, wherein WEB-SL devices were used to treat aneurysms that would normally be considered difficult to treat with traditional endovascular approaches. Most of the treated aneurysms were wide-neck (average, 5.1 mm), with unfavorable anatomy (average aspect ratio, 1.6). Brinjikji et al6 defined 2 thresholds based on the aspect ratio value, to define the possible strategy of endovascular treatments. They reported that in cases with a value below 1.2 (39% of cases in our study), adjunctive techniques are almost always necessary. Usually, an aspect ratio of >1.6 implied that adjunctive techniques were not required. In our study, 69% of cases presented a lower ratio than this.

Most lesions were bifurcation aneurysms (86%). Approximately 40% were middle cerebral artery aneurysms, 20% were anterior communicating artery aneurysms, and 20% were basilar tip aneurysms.

Within this study, 34% of cases were ruptured aneurysms, which is much higher than the percentage in other WEB series. In contrast to our previous observations, from investigation of a smaller cohort,8 3 patients had rebleeding after WEB treatment. At the end of the procedure, contrast agent stagnation was detected in the proximal part of those aneurysms, but complete occlusion was not yet achieved. After the endovascular treatment, those 3 patients were kept under at least 1 antiplatelet agent, and this could have influenced this relatively high rebleeding rate.

Despite the fact that aneurysm geometry was unfavorable in our study, the procedure-related complication rate was low (13%) and comparable with that obtained from the largest WEB-DL study (10.8%).1 The rupture rate during treatment was low (1%) and was, in fact, unrelated to WEB delivery but was caused by guidewire perforation during catheterization of the sac. Bleeding was controlled by rapid WEB delivery, and the patient remained asymptomatic.

Treatment-related morbidity and mortality rates at last follow-up were 2.2% and 1.1%, respectively. Finally, safety results from this WEB-SL study are similar to those in other published WEB-DL studies. Indeed those authors reported morbidity (mRS of >2) rates between 1.3% and 6.7% and mortality rates between 0% and 2.2%.1,3,5 These results are also comparable with those obtained from neurosurgical clipping of unruptured aneurysms (6.7% overall morbidity, 1.7% mortality)9 and non-WEB endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms (2.5% morbidity, 1.8% mortality).9

An antiplatelet premedication was used in 30% of cases (aspirin and clopidogrel) because if during a procedure, WEB treatment appears to be unsuitable, another alternative therapy can be stent-assisted coiling for these wide-neck aneurysms. In 67% of cases, at least 1 antiplatelet agent was still used at discharge. It was given either in cases of device protrusion in the parent artery or sometimes only because of proximal marker protrusion, though the need for antiplatelets in those situations is not mandatory.

This study was not intended for the evaluation of anatomic results subsequent to WEB-SL treatment. Early follow-up vascular imaging was available in a large number of cases (70%), and it consisted of DSA data in half of these cases. These data demonstrated a low rate of satisfactory results (65%), which could probably improve during follow-up because in some cases, stagnation was depicted inside the WEB and patients were still kept under antiplatelet therapy at that time. In a WEB-DL article5 with a short-term imaging follow-up (average length, 5.0 months), authors reported complete occlusion in 57% of cases; in our series, it was obtained in only 38% of cases. However, as with flow-diverter stents, delayed thrombosis should be expected. Therefore, results must be reviewed after longer time intervals.

This study has several limitations. First the number of treated cases for each center is low and mostly corresponds to an initial experience for the operators with this new device. The complications were self-reported. Angiographic outcome is now still limited, but it appeared important for us to report these preliminary results before analysis of long-term follow-up imaging to evaluate the efficiency of the WEB-SL device.

Conclusions

In this study, the feasibility and safety of the single-layer WEB device was comparable with that of the double-layer device. However, further studies are needed to evaluate long-term efficacies.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Francesco D'Argento from Policlinico A. Gemelli in Roma for his elegant work on the illustrations.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Joachim Klisch—RELATED: Consulting Fee or Honorarium: consultant to Sequent Medical.* Ansgar Berlis—RELATED: Consulting Fee or Honorarium: consultancy agreement for proctoring with Sequent Medical; UNRELATED: Consultancy: consultancy agreements for proctoring with Covidien and MicroVention; Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): honorarium for lectures from Penumbra and Stryker. Tufail Patankar—UNRELATED: Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: travel expense paid by Sequent Medical to present Web data in Val d'Isère 2015; Other: proctor for Sequent Medical. Werner Weber—UNRELATED: Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Sequent Medical (lectures); Other: Sequent Medical (proctoring). Daniel Behme—RELATED: Consulting Fee or Honorarium: speaking honoraria, German Society of Neurosurgery meeting in Dresden 2014; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Sequent Medical; UNRELATED: Payment for Manuscript Preparation: Penumbra, Comments: Separator 3D Series; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Penumbra, Comments: Anatomy Biology Clinical correlations – Working group in Interventional Neuroradiology (ABC WIN) meeting in Val d'Isère 2014 and 2015. Eva Astrid Jacobsen—RELATED: Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: MicroVention, Comments: registration fee to Live Interventional Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery Course (LINNC) meeting in Paris 2014. Thomas Liebig—RELATED: Consulting Fee or Honorarium: proctoring and consulting for Sequent Medical; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Sequent Medical, Comments: reimbursement of traveling and meeting admission fees; UNRELATED: Consultancy: consulting for Acandis, MicroVention, and Stryker. Sascha Prothmann—UNRELATED: Consultancy: phenox, Bochum, Germany (proctor); Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Boston Scientific, Covidien, Comments: oral presentation (workshop) at Third Munich Aortic and Carotid conference 2013 (Boston Scientific), oral presentation (workshop) at European Society of Neuroradiology Annual Meeting, Frankfurt, 2013 (Covidien). Christophe Cognard—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Stryker, MicroVention, Codman, Covidien. Jacques Moret—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Covidien; Consultancy: Covidien, MicroVention. Laurent Spelle—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Stryker, Sequent Medical, Medtronic. *Money paid to the institution.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Papagiannaki C,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Januel AC, et al
    . WEB intrasaccular flow disruptor—prospective, multicenter experience in 83 patients with 85 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2106–11
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Sychra V, et al
    . Intrasaccular flow-disruption treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1232–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Cognard C, et al
    . Endovascular WEB flow disruption in middle cerebral artery aneurysms: preliminary feasibility, clinical, and anatomical results in a multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2013;73:27–34; discussion 34–35
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Mine B,
    3. Collignon L, et al
    . WEB device for endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1209–14
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Gauvrit JY, et al
    . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: short- and midterm results in a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:432–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Kallmes DF
    . Difficult aneurysms for endovascular treatment: overwide or undertall? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1513–17
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Neki H, et al
    . Role of C-arm VasoCT in the use of endovascular WEB flow disruption in intracranial aneurysm treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1353–57
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Dargento F, et al
    . Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial wide-neck aneurysms: a single-center experience. Neuroradiology 2014;56:755–61
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kotowski M,
    2. Naggara O,
    3. Darsaut TE, et al
    . Safety and occlusion rates of surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1990 to 2011. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:42–48
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received January 6, 2015.
  • Accepted after revision February 25, 2015.
  • © 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 10
1 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Single-Layer WEBs: Intrasaccular Flow Disrupters for Aneurysm Treatment—Feasibility Results from a European Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J. Caroff, C. Mihalea, J. Klisch, C. Strasilla, A. Berlis, T. Patankar, W. Weber, D. Behme, E.A. Jacobsen, T. Liebig, S. Prothmann, C. Cognard, T. Finkenzeller, J. Moret, L. Spelle
Single-Layer WEBs: Intrasaccular Flow Disrupters for Aneurysm Treatment—Feasibility Results from a European Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2015, 36 (10) 1942-1946; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4369

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Single-Layer WEBs: Intrasaccular Flow Disrupters for Aneurysm Treatment—Feasibility Results from a European Study
J. Caroff, C. Mihalea, J. Klisch, C. Strasilla, A. Berlis, T. Patankar, W. Weber, D. Behme, E.A. Jacobsen, T. Liebig, S. Prothmann, C. Cognard, T. Finkenzeller, J. Moret, L. Spelle
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2015, 36 (10) 1942-1946; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4369
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A novel intrasaccular aneurysm device with high complete occlusion rate: initial results in a rabbit model
  • Persistent Opacification of the Woven EndoBridge Device: A Conebeam CT Analysis of the Bicetre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon
  • Comparison of Woven EndoBridge device sizing with conventional measurements and virtual simulation using the Sim&Size software: a multicenter experience
  • Impact of A1 Asymmetry on the Woven EndoBridge Device in Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms
  • WEB Device Shape Changes in Elastase-Induced Aneurysms in Rabbits
  • Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Woven EndoBridge 17 Device Including Midterm Follow-Up Results: A Retrospective Analysis
  • Factors that determine aneurysm occlusion after embolization with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB)
  • Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge Device Associated with Stenting: A Single-Center Experience
  • Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using the WEB Device: A Retrospective Analysis
  • WEB Device: Ready for Ruptured Aneurysms?
  • Initial and mid-term results from 108 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the WEB device
  • Efficacy and Safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • WEB as part of a multimodality treatment in complex, large, and partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysms: a single-center observational study of technical success, safety, and recurrence
  • Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with the WEB Device: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
  • Flow-Diverter Stents for the Treatment of Saccular Middle Cerebral Artery Bifurcation Aneurysms
  • Crossref (54)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Efficacy and Safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    S. Asnafi, A. Rouchaud, L. Pierot, W. Brinjikji, M.H. Murad, D.F. Kallmes
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 37 12
  • Flow-Diverter Stents for the Treatment of Saccular Middle Cerebral Artery Bifurcation Aneurysms
    J. Caroff, H. Neki, C. Mihalea, F. D'Argento, H. Abdel Khalek, L. Ikka, J. Moret, L. Spelle
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 37 2
  • Initial and mid-term results from 108 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the WEB device
    Christin Clajus, Christoph Strasilla, Tom Fiebig, Vojtech Sychra, David Fiorella, Joachim Klisch
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017 9 4
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of Woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms
    SBT van Rooij, ME Sprengers, JP Peluso, J Daams, D Verbaan, WJ van Rooij, CB Majoie
    Interventional Neuroradiology 2020 26 4
  • Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using the WEB Device: A Retrospective Analysis
    J. Popielski, A. Berlis, W. Weber, S. Fischer
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018 39 1
  • Systematic Review of Woven EndoBridge for Wide-Necked Bifurcation Aneurysms: Complications, Adequate Occlusion Rate, Morbidity, and Mortality
    Xianli Lv, Yupeng Zhang, Weijian Jiang
    World Neurosurgery 2018 110
  • Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with the WEB Device: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
    X. Armoiry, F. Turjman, D. J. Hartmann, R. Sivan-Hoffmann, R. Riva, P. E. Labeyrie, G. Aulagner, B. Gory
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 37 5
  • Effectiveness, Safety and Risk Factors of Woven EndoBridge Device in the Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Su-Ming Zhang, Lun-Xin Liu, Peng-Wei Ren, Xiao-Dong Xie, Jia Miao
    World Neurosurgery 2020 136
  • The Safety and Effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System (Contour) for the Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms: The CERUS Study
    Thomas Liebig, Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer, Gyula Gal, Peter Schramm, Ansgar Berlis, Franziska Dorn, Olav Jansen, Jens Fiehler, Fritz Wodarg
    Neurosurgery 2022 90 3
  • Woven Endobridge (WEB) device for endovascular treatment of complex unruptured aneurysms—a single center experience
    Stephanie Lescher, Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont, Joachim Berkefeld
    Neuroradiology 2016 58 4

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire