Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL
Open Access

WEB Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

W.J. van Rooij, J.P. Peluso, R.S. Bechan and M. Sluzewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2016, 37 (9) 1679-1683; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4811
W.J. van Rooij
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Sint Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W.J. van Rooij
J.P. Peluso
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Sint Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.P. Peluso
R.S. Bechan
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Sint Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.S. Bechan
M. Sluzewski
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Sint Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Sluzewski
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device was recently introduced for intrasaccular treatment of wide-neck aneurysms without the need for adjunctive support. We present our first experience in using the WEB for small ruptured aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 11 months, 32 of 71 (45%) endovascularly treated acutely ruptured aneurysms were treated with the WEB. The patients were 12 men and 20 women, with a mean age of 61 years (range, 34–84 years). The mean aneurysm size was 4.9 mm, and 14 were ≤4 mm. Of 32 aneurysms, 24 (75%) had a wide neck.

RESULTS: All 32 aneurysms were adequately occluded after WEB placement. There were no procedural ruptures and no complications related to the WEB device. No adjunctive stents or balloons were needed. In 3 patients, thromboembolic complications occurred. One patient developed an infarction, and 2 patients were asymptomatic. The procedural complication rate was 3%. Seven patients admitted in poor clinical grade conditions died during hospital admission due to the sequelae of SAH. In 18 patients with angiographic follow-up at 3 months, 16 aneurysms remained adequately occluded. Two aneurysms showed slight compression of the WEB without reopening. Clinical follow-up in the 25 patients who survived the hospital admission period revealed mRS 1–2 in 24 and mRS 4 in 1. There were no rebleeds from the ruptured aneurysms during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: WEB treatment of small ruptured aneurysms was safe and effective without the need for anticoagulation, adjunctive stents, or balloons. Our preliminary experience indicates that the WEB may be a valuable alternative to coils in the treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms.

ABBREVIATIONS:

DL
Dual-Layer
SL
Single-Layer
SLS
Single-Layer Sphere
WEB
Woven EndoBridge

Endovascular treatment with coils of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms remains a technical challenge. To prevent extrusion of coils from the aneurysmal sac, a temporary protection balloon or a stent can be used. However, this makes the procedure more complicated with a higher chance of complications.1,2 With the use of stents, periprocedural dual-antiplatelet therapy is required and has to be prolonged for 3–6 months. With this anticoagulation, stent-assisted coiling in ruptured aneurysms has a higher inherent risk for early rebleed or hemorrhage in the postoperative period.3

Recently, an intrasaccular flow disruptor, Woven EndoBridge (WEB; Sequent Medical, Aliso Viejo, California), has been developed. The primary use of the WEB is the treatment of bifurcation or wide-neck aneurysms without the need of adjunctive devices. There is a growing body of literature on the use of the WEB device with excellent safety and efficacy profiles. Most of the published series comprised wide-necked, unruptured aneurysms.4⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–16 When the WEB became available in our hospital, our initial results in unruptured aneurysms were encouraging, and we decided to expand the indications to both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms suitable for accommodating a WEB device, regardless of neck size. Our intention was to avoid using stents or balloons in ruptured aneurysms. In this article, we present our first results of the use of the WEB device in small ruptured aneurysms.

Materials and Methods

General

This observational study with prospectively collected data was compliant with institutional privacy policy. The institutional review board gave exempt status for approval and informed consent.

The WEB Device

The Woven EndoBridge system is a self-expanding, pumpkin-shaped, braided mesh of platinum cored nitinol wires that can be deployed in the aneurysm sac. The design of the WEB device has progressed from a Dual-Layer configuration (WEB-DL) into a Single-Layer version (WEB-SL) with a higher number of nitinol wires. The WEB-SL device is available in diameters ranging between 4 and 11 mm and heights ranging between 3 and 9 mm. The WEB–Single-Layer Sphere (SLS) has a spheric shape and is available in diameters ranging between 4 and 11 mm, each with a fixed height ranging between 2.6 and 9.6 mm. The WEBs with diameters of 4–7 mm can be delivered through a 0.021-inch internal-diameter microcatheter; the WEBs with diameters of 8–9 mm, through a 0.027-inch microcatheter; and the WEBs with diameters of 10–11 mm, through a 0.033-inch microcatheter. Placed in the aneurysm, the WEB modifies the blood flow at the level of the neck and induces aneurysmal thrombosis. The WEB can be fully retrieved until final detachment by an electrothermal detachment system contained in a hand-held controller. Experience of early users of the WEB indicated that slight oversizing of the device (1–2 mm oversizing depending on aneurysm size) was advisable to ensure a stable WEB position.17

General Indications in This Study

The WEB device was initially developed for the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms as an alternative to balloon- or stent-assisted treatment. After our first experiences in unruptured wide-neck aneurysms, during the study period we decided to gradually expand the indications to all aneurysms suitable for the WEB, regardless of neck size or rupture status. In general, these are aneurysms of ≤10 mm with a shape and geometry suitable for catheterization with a 0.021-inch microcatheter and with a possible fit of a pumpkin-shaped or spheric WEB device.

With the patient under general anesthesia, we advanced a microcatheter (VIA 0.021 inch or VIA 0.027 inch; Sequent Medical) into the aneurysm via a coaxial or triaxial approach. Apart from heparin in the pressure bags for flushing (1000 IU/L), no anticoagulation was used.

Patient demographics and treatment and aneurysm characteristics were collected. Clinical grading during admission was according to the Hunt and Hess scale, and clinical follow-up was classified according to the modified Rankin Scale. For surviving patients, angiographic follow-up was scheduled at 3 months, and MR imaging follow-up, at 6 months.

Patients

Between February and December 2015, 134 intracranial aneurysms in 128 patients were treated in our institution (Fig 1). Six patients had 2 treated aneurysms.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Flow chart of all treated patients with aneurysms between February and December 2015. PVO indicates parent vessel occlusion.

Of 134 aneurysms, 105 (78%, 71 ruptured and 34 unruptured) were treated with endovascular techniques and 29 aneurysms (22%) were treated surgically. Of 71 ruptured aneurysms treated endovascularly, 39 (55%) were treated with selective coiling and 32 (45%) were treated with the WEB.

The 32 patients with a ruptured aneurysm treated with the WEB were the subjects of this study. There were 12 men and 20 women with a mean age of 61 years (range, 34–84 years). Clinical condition at the time of treatment was Hunt and Hess 1–2 in 14, Hunt and Hess 3 in 9, and Hunt and Hess 4–5 in 14 patients. The timing of treatment after SAH was 0–1 day in 26, 2–4 days in 4, and >4 days in 2 patients. Aneurysm location was the anterior communicating artery in 11; middle cerebral artery in 8; posterior communicating artery in 7; pericallosal artery in 3; and basilar tip, superior cerebellar, and ophthalmic arteries, 1 in each. The mean aneurysm size was 4.9 mm (median, 5 mm; range, 3–12 mm), and 14 aneurysms were ≤4 mm (Figs 1 and 2). Of 32 aneurysms, 24 (75%) had a wide neck defined as ≥4 mm or a dome/neck ratio of ≤1.5. Three patients had 2 aneurysms treated in the same session, 1 with WEB and 2 with coils.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A 61-year-old man with a ruptured basilar tip aneurysm treated with the WEB and coils. A, CT scan with subarachnoid blood. B, 3D angiogram reveals a 13-mm basilar tip aneurysm. C, Neck measurement on a 3D angiogram. D and E, After placement of coils in the dome and a WEB-SL, 6 × 3 mm, in the neck. F, Three-month follow-up angiogram with complete occlusion.

Results

Initial Results and Complications

After WEB placement with sealing of the aneurysm neck, the position of the WEB inside the aneurysm was judged as good in 31 aneurysms without filling of aneurysm remnants. In 1 patient with a ruptured pericallosal artery aneurysm, a small aneurysm remnant was present. In 2 patients, coils were placed in the aneurysm dome through a jailed second microcatheter before detachment of the WEB (Fig 2). There were no procedural ruptures and no complications related to the WEB device. In 3 patients, thromboembolic complications occurred with occlusion of an M2 branch in 2 and a P3 branch in 1. All 3 vessels could be reopened during the procedure by mechanical thrombectomy. One patient developed a partial middle cerebral artery infarction, and 2 patients were asymptomatic. In 1 patient, catheterization caused a dissection of the internal carotid artery, which was successfully treated with a stent.

Clinical and Imaging Follow-Up

Of 32 patients, 7 died during hospital admission due to sequelae of SAH. All 7 patients were admitted with poor-grade conditions (Hunt and Hess 4–5). One of these patients had a thromboembolic complication in an M2 branch during treatment, leading to partial right frontal brain infarction (procedural mortality, 3%; 1 of 32; 95% CI, 0.01%–17%). Of the remaining 25 patients, 18 had 3-month angiographic follow-up and 6 of these 18 had 6-month MR imaging follow-up. In 7 patients, imaging follow-up is pending.

Fifteen aneurysms (83%) remained completely occluded (Figs 3 and 4). One aneurysm remained subtotally occluded. Two aneurysms showed opacification of the central recess due to slight compression of the WEB. In all 6 patients with MR imaging follow-up, the aneurysm was stable in the 3- to 6-month period. Clinical follow-up in the 25 patients who survived the hospital admission period revealed mRS 1–2 in 24 and mRS 4 in 1. There were no rebleeds from the ruptured aneurysms during follow-up.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A 57-year-old woman with a ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. A, 3D angiogram shows a small anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Note the spasm in the left A1. B, Measurement of the height (3.9 mm) and neck width (2.3 mm). C, Angiogram directly after placement of a 4-mm WEB-SLS. Note some opacification inside the WEB. D, Angiogram at 3 months demonstrates complete occlusion of the aneurysm.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

A 42-year-old man with a ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. A, 3D angiogram shows a small anterior communicating artery aneurysm with a bleb pointing upward. Angiogram before (B) and after (C) placement of a 4-mm WEB-SLS inside the aneurysm. Note complete aneurysm occlusion with slight protrusion of the WEB into the parent vessel (arrow). D, Angiogram at 3 months demonstrates persistent complete occlusion.

Discussion

Our initial experience with endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms by using the WEB device was encouraging. With growing skill and confidence, more and more, even small, ruptured aneurysms were treated with the WEB, in addition to small aneurysms with a small neck (Fig 5). During the study, 32 of 71 endovascularly treated ruptured aneurysms (45%) were treated with the WEB. Once the microcatheter was inside the aneurysm, deployment of the WEB was technically straightforward and quick in most cases. Despite aneurysms being very small, no procedural ruptures occurred. The detachment system proved fast and reliable. In most cases, the position of the WEB after deployment in the aneurysm was easily evaluated. With complicated anatomy, a 3D angiographic run proved helpful in exactly delineating the position of the WEB inside the aneurysm lumen and in relation to the parent vessels. In wide-neck aneurysms, the WEB-SL bridges the neck without the need for a stent or balloon. (Examples of WEB treatment can be found in the On-line Videos). In fact, in none of the 71 endovascularly treated ruptured aneurysms was balloon- or stent assistance necessary (Fig 1).

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

A 60-year-old woman with a ruptured small-neck posterior communicating artery aneurysm. A, CT scan shows subarachnoid hemorrhage. B, 3D angiogram reveals a 6-mm posterior communicating artery aneurysm with a small neck. Angiogram before (C) and after (D and E) placement of a 6-mm WEB-SLS shows complete aneurysm occlusion.

In our opinion based on our own and previous experience,17 the most important aspect of the WEB treatment was the sizing. Oversizing the WEB seems crucial for good immediate and long-term results. With oversizing, the WEB anchors itself against the aneurysm wall while bridging the neck completely. Oversizing the compressed WEB width results in increased height, and one has to be sure that the aneurysm can accommodate this augmented height. Oversizing protects against displacement, overturning, and compression of the WEB during follow-up. In small aneurysms, oversizing of 1 mm will usually be sufficient, while in larger aneurysms, at least 2-mm oversizing is necessary for stably securing the device in the neck.

A stable position of the microcatheter inside the aneurysm is important for WEB deployment. The WEB system is slightly more rigid than most coil systems, and negotiating slack in the microcatheter during advancement may result in unwanted forward or backward movement of the catheter tip. Therefore, advancing the WEB should be done under constant fluoroscopic control. Distal-access guiding catheters are preferably used to enhance the stability of the microcatheter.

We used the newer 0.021-inch VIA microcatheter in the treatment of small aneurysms in WEB sizes up to 7 mm. Although this microcatheter is less rigid than the 0.027-inch one used in previous studies, the system is still stiffer than most coil systems. In fact, negotiating the curve into the A1 for anterior communicating artery aneurysms proved impossible with the VIA 0.021 in 6 cases, and all 6 aneurysms were coiled with 0.017-inch microcatheters. However, the recently introduced lower profile VIA 0.017 microcatheter will probably overcome most problems encountered with the thicker microcatheters.

Our excellent clinical and imaging results are in concordance with those in previous studies.4,6⇓–8,10,15,16 Complications were low; there were no procedural ruptures, no early rebleeds, and no reopenings at short-term follow-up. However, our patient group with only ruptured small aneurysms differed from those in other series, in which mostly wide-neck unruptured aneurysms were treated.

Conclusions

In our opinion, WEB treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms is feasible and safe. The WEB can be a valuable alternative to coils in many aneurysms and reduces or eliminates the need for adjunctive devices such as stents and balloons. Anticoagulation in the periprocedural period is not necessary; this finding is a great advantage in view of possible surgical procedures that are needed in patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms. In our practice, WEB treatment has become the first choice in both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Willem Jan van Rooij—UNRELATED: Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Sequent Medical; Other: proctoring WEB cases. Jo P. Peluso—UNRELATED: Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Sequent Medical; Other: proctoring WEB cases.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Spelle L, et al
    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:110–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558114 pmid:19959540
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bartolini B,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Pistocchi S, et al
    . “Y” and “X” stent-assisted coiling of complex and wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2153–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4060 pmid:25059700
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bechan RS,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. Majoie CB, et al
    . Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: complications in acutely ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:502–07 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4542 pmid:26405089
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Gauvrit JY, et al
    . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: short- and midterm results in a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:432–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3869 pmid:24457823
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Colla R,
    2. Cirillo L,
    3. Princiotta C, et al
    . Treatment of wide-neck basilar tip aneurysms using the WEB II device. Neuroradiol J 2013;6:669–77 pmid:24355186
    PubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Moret J,
    3. Turjman F, et al
    . WEB treatment of inracranial aneurysms: clinical and anatomic results in the French Observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:655–59 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4578 pmid:26514608
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Molyneux A, et al
    . Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and French Observatory). Neurosurgery 2016;78:133–41 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001106 pmid:26552042
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Liebig T,
    2. Kabbasch C,
    3. Strasilla C, et al
    . Intrasaccular flow disruption in acutely ruptured aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective review of the use of the WEB. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1721–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4347 pmid:26138139
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bozzetto Ambrosi P,
    2. Gory B,
    3. Sivan-Hoffmann R, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of bifurcation intracranial aneurysms with the WEB SL/SLS: 6-month clinical and angiographic results. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;4:462–69 doi:10.1177/1591019915590083 pmid:26111987
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Costalat V,
    3. Moret J, et al
    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 2015 Sep 18:1–7. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:26381253
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sivan-Hoffmann R,
    2. Gory B,
    3. Riva R, et al
    . One-year angiographic follow-up after WEB-SL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2320–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4457 pmid:26294645
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Leyon JJ,
    2. Chavda S,
    3. Lamin S, et al
    . Corking the WEB and coiling through a jailed microcatheter: WEB assisted coiling, a useful technique avoiding the use of stents in treating wide-necked large intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015 May 7. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011649.rep pmid:25953859
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Gherasim DN,
    2. Gory B,
    3. Sivan-Hoffmann R, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of wide-neck anterior communicating artery aneurysms using WEB-DL and WEB-SL: short-term results in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1150–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4282 pmid:25792534
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Cognard C,
    2. Januel AC
    . Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:522–30; discussion 530 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000669 pmid:25710103
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Dargento F, et al
    . Woven Endobridge (WEB) device for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial wide-neck aneurysms: a single-center experience. Neuroradiology 2014;56:755–61 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1390-7 pmid:24930127
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Armoiry X,
    2. Turjman F,
    3. Hartmann DJ, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the WEB device: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015 Nov 19. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:26585260
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Pierot L
    . Letter: WEB aneurysm treatment—occlusion stability and “compression.” Neurosurgery 2015;77:E666–67 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000880 pmid:26132284
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received January 14, 2016.
  • Accepted after revision February 28, 2016.
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 9
1 Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
WEB Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
W.J. van Rooij, J.P. Peluso, R.S. Bechan, M. Sluzewski
WEB Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016, 37 (9) 1679-1683; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4811

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
WEB Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
W.J. van Rooij, J.P. Peluso, R.S. Bechan, M. Sluzewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016, 37 (9) 1679-1683; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4811
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Woven EndoBridge device for ruptured aneurysms: perioperative results of a US multicenter experience
  • WEB Device Shape Changes in Elastase-Induced Aneurysms in Rabbits
  • The Woven EndoBridge Finally Coming Home across the Atlantic: What to Expect?
  • Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series
  • Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: mid term and long term results
  • Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using the WEB Device: A Retrospective Analysis
  • WEB Device: Ready for Ruptured Aneurysms?
  • WEB Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Cohort of 100 Patients
  • Safety and Efficacy of Aneurysm Treatment with the WEB: Results of the WEBCAST 2 Study
  • Crossref (42)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series
    Laurent Pierot, Jacques Moret, Xavier Barreau, Istvan Szikora, Denis Herbreteau, Francis Turjman, Markus Holtmannspötter, Anne-Christine Januel, Vincent Costalat, Jens Fiehler, Joachim Klisch, Jean-Yves Gauvrit, Werner Weber, Hubert Desal, Stéphane Velasco, Thomas Liebig, Luc Stockx, Joachim Berkefeld, Andrew Molyneux, James Byrne, Laurent Spelle
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2018 10 6
  • Safety and Efficacy of Aneurysm Treatment with the WEB: Results of the WEBCAST 2 Study
    L. Pierot, I. Gubucz, J.H. Buhk, M. Holtmannspötter, D. Herbreteau, L. Stockx, L. Spelle, J. Berkefeld, A.-C. Januel, A. Molyneux, J.V. Byrne, J. Fiehler, I. Szikora, X. Barreau
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2017 38 6
  • WEB Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Cohort of 100 Patients
    S.B.T. van Rooij, W.J. van Rooij, J.P. Peluso, M. Sluzewski, R.S. Bechan, H.G. Kortman, G.N. Beute, B. van der Pol, C.B. Majoie
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2017 38 12
  • Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using the WEB Device: A Retrospective Analysis
    J. Popielski, A. Berlis, W. Weber, S. Fischer
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2018 39 1
  • Systematic Review of Woven EndoBridge for Wide-Necked Bifurcation Aneurysms: Complications, Adequate Occlusion Rate, Morbidity, and Mortality
    Xianli Lv, Yupeng Zhang, Weijian Jiang
    World Neurosurgery 2018 110
  • Update on flow diverters for the endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms
    Gary Rajah, Sandra Narayanan, Leonardo Rangel-Castilla
    Neurosurgical Focus 2017 42 6
  • Effectiveness, Safety and Risk Factors of Woven EndoBridge Device in the Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Su-Ming Zhang, Lun-Xin Liu, Peng-Wei Ren, Xiao-Dong Xie, Jia Miao
    World Neurosurgery 2020 136
  • Endosaccular Flow Disruption: A New Frontier in Endovascular Aneurysm Management
    Adam A Dmytriw, Mohamed M Salem, Victor X D Yang, Timo Krings, Vitor M Pereira, Justin M Moore, Ajith J Thomas
    Neurosurgery 2020 86 2
  • Analysis of Wide-Neck Aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial
    Justin R Mascitelli, Michael T Lawton, Benjamin K Hendricks, Peter Nakaji, Joseph M Zabramski, Robert F Spetzler
    Neurosurgery 2019 85 5
  • The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) as primary treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Sanne BT van Rooij, Willem Jan van Rooij, Jo P Peluso, Menno Sluzewski
    Interventional Neuroradiology 2018 24 5

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire