Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleBRAIN

Magnetization Transfer Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopy in the Evaluation of Axonal Injury: Correlation with Clinical Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury

Grant Sinson, Linda J. Bagley, Kim M. Cecil, Maria Torchia, Joseph C. McGowan, Robert E. Lenkinski, Tracy K. McIntosh and Robert I. Grossman
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2001, 22 (1) 143-151;
Grant Sinson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda J. Bagley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim M. Cecil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Torchia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph C. McGowan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Lenkinski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tracy K. McIntosh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert I. Grossman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current imaging does not permit quantification of neural injury after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and therefore limits both the development of new treatments and the appropriate counseling of patients concerning prognosis. We evaluated the utility of magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and proton MR spectroscopy in identifying patients with neuronal injury after TBI.

METHODS: Thirty patients with TBI (21–77 years old; mean age, 42 years; admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GOS) scores 3–15; mean score, 11) were studied on a 1.5-T system with magnetization transfer imaging and MR spectroscopy of the splenium. Magnetization transfer imaging was also performed in the brain stem in all patients, and other areas of the brain were sampled in one patient. The splenium of the corpus callosum and brain stem were studied because these are often affected by diffuse axonal injury. Scans were obtained 2 to 1129 days after injury (median, 41 days). MTR was considered abnormal if it was more than 2 SD below normal. Proton MR spectroscopy was used to calculate the N-acetylaspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr) ratio. GOS was determined at least 3 months after injury.

RESULTS: In 10 patients with a GOS of 1 to 4, the mean NAA/Cr was 1.24 ± 0.28; two of these patients had abnormal MTR in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM). In 20 patients with a GOS of 5, the mean NAA/Cr was 1.53 ± 0.37 (P < .05); four of these patients had abnormal MTR in NAWM. MTR abnormalities in NAWM were identified in six patients, but these changes did not correlate with GOS or MR spectroscopy changes.

CONCLUSION: MTR and MR spectroscopy can quantify damage after TBI, and NAA levels may be a sensitive indicator of the neuronal damage that results in a worse clinical outcome.

The National Health Interview Survey for 1985–1987 reports that 1,975,000 head injuries occur per year in the United States (1). Of those people seeking medical attention, approximately 373,000 are hospitalized. The approximate distribution of traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity is 80% mild, 10% moderate, and 10% severe (2); however, these categories are based on admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores (GCS) and do not always correlate with outcome. The heterogeneity of TBI has made imaging studies largely unreliable in helping to determine prognosis (3–6). Radiologic variables that correlate with outcome include the presence of blood or subarachnoid hemorrhage on CT scans, intraventricular hemorrhage, edema, midline shift, effacement of the basal cisterns, diffuse axonal injury, and location of lesions on MR images (7–18). Each of these variables relies on an anatomically based radiologic marker to assess functional neuronal injury. Consequently, these variables may correlate with crude outcomes, such as mortality (7–10, 14, 15, 18), but not with more practical measurements of functional outcome (3–5, 16, 17). Some studies have tried to overcome this limitation by combining clinical and radiologic data (7, 9, 11, 14, 15). A different approach has been to evaluate nonanatomic studies as outcome predictors. Single-photon emission CT depicts abnormalities in regional blood flow and lesions not visible on CT or MR studies, and these global blood flow measurements correlate with outcome (19). Holshouser et al (20) used proton MR spectroscopy to examine neonates, infants, and children with brain injury caused by a variety of mechanisms. In this patient population, changes in MR spectroscopy measurements in occipital gray matter correlated with outcome. Choe et al (21) found similar MR spectroscopy changes in adults after TBI when the frontoparietal white matter was studied. In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), a positive correlation has been identified between the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and N-acetylaspartate (NAA) measured by MR spectroscopy in white matter plaques (22, 23). In the present study, we sought to evaluate whether a similar association exists between MTR and proton MR spectroscopy in patients with TBI. We hypothesized that MR spectroscopy and MTR provide complementary functional information that correlates with neurologic outcome in adults with TBI.

Methods

Patients

After obtaining signed consent, as approved by our institutional review board, 30 adult patients (15 men and 15 women; 21–77 years old; mean age, 42 years) with closed TBI underwent MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Admission GCS scores (24) and mechanisms of injury were obtained from initial hospitalization records. Admission GCS scores ranged from 3 to 15 (mean score, 11). Injury mechanisms included motor vehicle accidents in 16 patients (53%), falls in seven (23%), assaults in four (13%), and bicycle accidents in three (10%). MR imaging was performed 2 to 1129 days after the injury (median, 41 days). Patients' outcomes were assessed at least 3 months after the injury by using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS): 1 = death, 2 = persistent vegetative state, 3 = severe disability (conscious but disabled), 4 = moderate disability (disabled but independent), 5 = good recovery (25). GOS scores ranged from 1 to 5 (median, 5).

MR Studies

All MR imaging and MR spectroscopy studies were performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner equipped with a spectroscopy software package. Conventional MR imaging included sagittal short-TR/TE sequences (650/11), axial spin-echo (3000/30,90) or fast spin-echo (2700/18,85) sequences, and axial multiplanar gradient-recalled echo (750/40; 10° flip angle) sequences. Two neuroradiologists who were blinded to patient outcome reviewed all images.

Magnetization transfer imaging was performed with a 3D gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (106/5; 12° flip angle) sequence. One 19-millisecond sinc-shaped off-resonance saturation pulse was used per TR: control images were obtained without the saturation pulse. Imaging parameters were chosen to minimize T1 and T2 weighting. The MTR is defined by the equation Math where M0 equals the average signal intensity in the absence of the saturation pulse and Ms equals the average signal intensity in its presence. Images were processed on a Sun Sparc station 330 (Sun Microsystems, Palo Alto, CA) using Interactive Data Language software (Interactive Data Language Systems, Boulder, CO). MTRs were calculated in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) in areas frequently subject to diffuse axonal injury (the pons within the brain stem and the splenium of the corpus callosum) (Fig 1). Owing to differences in MTRs and NAA levels in gray and white matter, evaluation of the splenium minimizes the effect of partial volume averaging that occurs if a subcortical voxel placed at the gray/white junction is used. MTRs were also obtained in the same areas in healthy control subjects (26), consisting of six men and nine women ranging in age from 26 to 61 years (mean age, 36 years). Regions with MTRs more than 2 SD below MTRs obtained in corresponding areas in the control group were classified as abnormal.

fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 1.

T2-weighted MR image (3000/90/1) at the level of the splenium. Asterisks indicate the regions of sampling for MTR acquisition; the box outlines the voxel for MR spectroscopy acquisition

Spectroscopy was initially performed with axial T2-weighted sequences to prescribe rectangular voxels of the white matter of the splenium that minimized gray matter and CSF contamination. The voxel dimensions routinely used were 9 mm (anterior/posterior) × 25 mm (right/left) × 10 mm (superior/inferior). Voxel locations were chosen by a single investigator to ensure the same location in each subject (Fig 1). The splenium was studied with a stimulated-echo acquisition mode (STEAM) localization technique to minimize contamination. Careful shimming was necessary to minimize line widths of the spectra from this region. Water suppression was achieved by using three chemical shift-selective radio-frequency pulses followed by a dephasing gradient applied to each of the three axes. The sequence parameters were as follows: 2000/31 (TR/TE), 2500 Hz spectral bandwidth, 13.7 milliseconds mixing time, 2048 complex points, eight-step phase cycling, and 128 acquisitions. Gradient shimming on the voxel and optimization of the solvent suppression were performed before the start of the acquisition. The spectral processing was performed with ProNMR (Softpulse Software, Guelph, Ontario, Canada) by using zero-filling to 8K data points, 2 Hz line broadening applied in the time domain, one-dimensional Fourier transformation, and zero-order phase correction. Areas under the peaks were estimated using a Marquardt fitting routine to lorentzian lineshapes in the frequency domain. Peak ratios were then calculated for NAA/creatine (Cr) (Fig 2). NAA/Cr was chosen as the end point because it has been shown to be a more reliable indicator of injury after TBI than NAA/choline (27).

fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 2.

Proton MR spectrum obtained from normal splenium. The NAA/Cr ratio is 1.75. All spectra were acquired using a STEAM sequence (2000/31).

Statistical Analysis

Abnormal MTRs and metabolic ratios in subjects with good outcomes (GOS = 5) were compared with those obtained in subjects with less than a good outcome (GOS = 1–4) using Student's t-test. GOS and GCS were also correlated with the NAA/Cr ratio by using Spearman's rank-order correlation. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. NAA/Cr ratios were also correlated with the time interval between injury and MR examination for both outcome groups.

Results

Abnormal MTRs in NAWM of the brain stem or splenium were detected in five patients (Fig 3). An additional patient had abnormally reduced MTR values in the NAWM of the temporal and occipital lobes and the internal capsule. Clinical data pertaining to these patients are summarized in the Table. There was no significant correlation between abnormal MTR and clinical outcomes in this group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Patients with abnormal MTR in NAWM

fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 3.

T2-weighted MR images (3000/90/1) at the level of the splenium in two different patients.

A, Despite the normal appearance of the white matter in the splenium (arrows), this patient had an MTR greater than 2 SD below normal values.

B, This patient has typical high signal in the region of the splenium (arrows), considered an indicator of severe diffuse injury.

The NAA/Cr ratio in the splenium ranged from 0.80 to 2.33. In the 20 patients with a GOS of 5, the mean (± SD) NAA/Cr was 1.53 ± 0.37. For those with a GOS of 4, the mean NAA/Cr was 1.45 (three patients); for a GOS of 3, the mean NAA/Cr was 1.24 (four patients); and for a GOS of 2, the mean NAA/Cr was 0.98 (two patients). The one patient with a GOS of 1 had an NAA/Cr of 1.15 in the splenium. For the 10 patients with less than good outcomes (GOS = 1–4), the mean (± SD) NAA/Cr was 1.24 ± 0.28, which was significantly lower than that for patients with good outcomes (GOS = 5, P < .05) (Fig 4). Overall, we noted a significant correlation between GOS and NAA/Cr levels in the splenium (Y = 0.142X + 0.819, rs = 0.4378, P < .01, Fig 5). No significant correlation was found between the presence of abnormal MTRs in NAWM and NAA/Cr values nor between GCS and NAA/Cr levels or GCS and MTR changes. In addition, no significant correlation was found when NAA/Cr ratios for both outcome groups were correlated with the time interval between injury and MR examination (Fig 6).

fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 4.

A, Proton MR spectra obtained from the splenium of two patients with head injury. The arrow identifies the methyl resonance of NAA, which is at 2.02 parts per million. The top spectrum was recorded in a patient with an initial GCS of 14 and a GOS of 5 and an NAA/Cr of 1.52. The bottom spectrum shows a lowering in the NAA peak that results in a decreased NAA/Cr ratio of 1.16 in a patient with a GCS of 4 and GOS of 2.

B, T2-weighted MR image (2700/85/1) from patient in top spectrum in A.

C, T2-weighted MR image (2700/80/1) from patient in bottom spectrum in A shows postoperative changes from evacuation of a subdural hematoma and bilateral hygromas.

fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 5.

Relationship between NAA/Cr ratio and GOS score. Spearman's rank-order correlation indicates a significant correlation between NAA/Cr and outcome (Y = 0.142X + 0.819, rs = 0.4378, P < .01).

fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 6.

Relationship between NAA/Cr ratio and time interval from injury to imaging examination in both outcome groups. There was no significant correlation in either group.

Discussion

Important treatment decisions for TBI patients are based on estimates of patient outcome. The Traumatic Coma Data Bank showed that 29% of patients with a postresuscitation GCS of 6 had a good outcome (based on the GOS), 21% died, and the remainder had some degree of disability (28). That a single category of the GCS has such a range of outcomes underscores the rather crude nature of this technique of categorizing TBI. The clinical course of a patient with multiple contusions and a GCS of 6 evolves by different pathophysiological mechanisms than that of a patient with a subdural hematoma, skull fracture, and GCS of 6. In most epidemiologic studies, these two types of injury are grouped together. Only a few studies have compiled data in such a way as to permit a more detailed characterization of this heterogeneous patient population (2, 29). Difficulties predicting outcome also occur in cases of less severe TBI. Rimel et al (30) studied patients with “mild” TBI (GCS = 13–15) and reported that two thirds of these patients had persisting neurobehavioral deficits 3 months after injury and one third of the group was unemployed. Recent epidemiologic studies have also found an association between mild TBI and the development of Alzheimer disease (31, 32), suggesting that neural damage with functional consequences often occurs after mild TBI. Most victims of mild TBI are discharged home with minimal, if any, medical follow-up because their neurologic examinations are normal. Those patients with a persisting cognitive deficit frequently have problems returning to work and reentering into normal family life. Early identification of patients at risk for either cognitive/behavioral deficits after mild TBI or poor/vegetative outcome after more severe TBI will allow an appropriate modification of how these patients are managed.

Numerous pathophysiological mechanisms have been associated with secondary or delayed injury in patients with TBI. Raised intracranial pressure, arterial hypotension, hypoxemia, and pyrexia have all been shown to be independent variables that can cause additional neural injury in the hours and days after injury (33, 34). Current animal studies are being directed at preventing the secondary neuronal damage that occurs from such known mechanisms of injury as excitatory amino acids, apoptosis, ischemia, cytoskeleton destruction, calcium toxicity, free radicals, and mitochondrial dysfunction (35). Determining which patients may benefit from a specific treatment or combination of treatments also depends on early and accurate identification of neuronal damage.

Magnetization Transfer Imaging

Magnetization transfer imaging relies on the principle that protons bound in structures exhibit T1 relaxation coupling with protons in the aqueous phase. When an off-resonance saturation pulse is applied, it selectively saturates those protons that are bound in macromolecules. These protons subsequently exchange longitudinal magnetization with free water protons, leading to a reduction in the detected signal intensity (36).

The MTR may provide a quantitative index of the structural integrity of tissue and has been most often used in areas of demyelination associated with MS (37). Lexa et al (38) studied wallerian degeneration in the feline visual pathway and found that changes in the MTR correlated with histologic changes and occurred before changes seen on T2-weighted images. In the rotational acceleration model of axonal injury in the minipig, Kimura et al (39) and McGowan et al (40) both showed magnetization transfer imaging to be more sensitive than T2-weighted imaging for detecting histologically identified axonal damage. In a study of human TBI, Bagley et al (26) reported abnormal MTR in otherwise NAWM only in patients with persistent neurologic deficits. Although we did not identify a similar trend in the current study, the patient populations are somewhat different. Bagley et al studied a lower percentage of patients with good outcome and did not find any abnormal MTRs in the NAWM of these patients. A GOS of 5 can incorporate a range of functional outcomes that may not be sensitive to lesser amounts of neuronal injury (41). Consequently, it is possible that the MTR abnormalities seen in patients with a GOS of 5 may be characteristic of a subset of patients who have sustained neuronal injury that they have been able to compensate for as they reintegrate into their preinjury activities (42). An additional example of this problem occurs in MS, where there is weak or no correlation between Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status scores and T2 lesion volume or T1-enhanced lesion volume or other such metrics (43, 44). To test functional status better, more detailed neuropsychological tests may be needed. Perhaps the MR measures are more sensitive and specific for TBI than are the current clinical assessments.

Proton MR Spectroscopy

Whereas magnetization transfer imaging provides structural information, MR spectroscopy permits the detection of in vivo neurochemical alterations, such as Cr, choline, myo-inositol, and NAA, in a selected tissue volume. Although glutamate is the only amino acid in the CNS that is more abundant than NAA, the actual role of NAA in the brain is not understood. One proposed function for NAA is that of a brain “osmolyte” (45). Osmolytes are small, nonmetabolizable molecules that would protect the brain-cell volume during recovery from metabolic disturbances of extracellular osmotic pressure (46). NAA can also act as an acetyl group donor to initiate neuronal protein synthesis (47) or lipid synthesis during myelination (48). Regardless of its function, NAA is made exclusively in the mitochondria of neurons and has been shown to be a neuronal marker that decreases in numerous disease processes that have little in common except neuronal loss (49). Examples include spinal cord injury (50), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (51), Parkinson disease (52, 53), Huntington disease (54), ischemic stroke (55, 56), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (57), epilepsy (58), and MS (23, 59–62). The widespread loss of NAA in patients with MS correlates with the recent documentation of axonal damage throughout the brains of MS patients (63). The dementia associated with Alzheimer disease (64–75), Pick disease (76), and AIDS-related dementia (77) has been correlated with decreases in brain NAA. Cheng et al (76) were able to directly correlate loss in NAA as measured by MR spectroscopy with histologic neuronal loss seen in patients with Pick disease. Direct histochemical measurements of NAA in patients with Alzheimer disease have confirmed the lower levels of NAA that have been observed with MR spectroscopy (78, 79). Despite the more widespread use of NAA as a marker of neuronal loss, there are some reports of patients who have shown reversible decreases in NAA after various brain insults (80, 81). DeStefano et al (80) used their control data from the same group of patients with the systemic diseases evaluated in the study; therefore, the NAA changes noted may be relative rather than absolute alterations.

In models of brain injury in the rat, Rubin et al (82) showed a loss of NAA in the cortex of animals 1 hour after injury, and Signoretti et al (83) showed a decrease within minutes of injury. In a swine model of rotational acceleration injury, Cecil et al (84) also found decreased NAA 1 hour after injury and this change remained stable 1 week after injury. Choe et al (21) used MR spectroscopy to examine 10 patients with head injury and found decreased NAA/Cr. The lower NAA levels were statistically significant relative to those in healthy control subjects, and there was a trend for lower NAA/Cr ratios to correlate with poor clinical outcome (21). Neonates, infants, and children with brain injuries from various mechanisms (infection, hypoxia, trauma, and metabolic disorders) were examined with proton MR spectroscopy by Holshouser et al (20), who found that NAA/Cr ratios in occipital gray matter were significantly lower in infants and children with poor outcomes but not in neonates with poor outcomes. Unfortunately, direct comparison of the data from Choe et al (21) and Holshouser et al (20) with our findings cannot be performed, since those studies sampled NAA/Cr in the left frontoparietal white matter and occipital gray matter, respectively (21). Cecil et al (27) found that in uninjured control subjects, NAA/Cr levels in the splenium are higher than those in hemispheric white matter. In the present study, the splenium was chosen to measure NAA/Cr because of the high prevalence of splenium injuries in patients with TBI (85). Given these differences, the work of Choe et al (21) and Holshouser et al (20) still supports the conclusion that NAA/Cr may be a useful indicator of outcome after TBI. Finally, Cecil et al (27) also showed decreased NAA/Cr in the splenium of head-injured patients relative to that in control subjects. Their data support the ability of MR spectroscopy to identify neuronal injury after TBI; however, no correlation between GCS and NAA/Cr was noted (27).

MR Studies after TBI

A source of error in studying this patient population is the inevitably heterogeneous nature of patient characteristics and injury types. Age has not been controlled for in this study, yet some decrease in NAA has been shown in elderly patients with chronic ischemia (86) and even in normal aging (87, 88). The spectrum of injury mechanisms present in any TBI population dilutes the power of any observations. The pathobiology and outcome after diffuse axonal injuries and focal contusions may contribute to the variability in MTR and MR spectroscopy seen in this and previous studies (89). In addition, the imaging examinations in this study were performed at a wide range of time points after injury. While DeStefano et al (80) suggest that in some disease processes declines in NAA may be reversible, Cecil et al (27) identified no such change in head-injured patients. Although we did not restudy individual patients over time after their injury, evaluation of the distribution of NAA/Cr ratios relative to the timing of the study suggests that no large changes in NAA levels occur during the time intervals in which these patients were examined (Fig 6). Recent evaluation of whole-brain NAA levels in healthy patients has shown that NAA per cubic centimeter of brain is unchanged with aging (90). Thus, it does not seem reasonable that within the interval of this study (up to 3 years) the decrease in NAA can be attributed to anything other than the traumatic incident.

Despite these concerns, our data support a theory that decreases in NAA/Cr as detected by noninvasive MR spectroscopy may be an indicator of neuronal injury and prognosis after TBI. One explanation for this observation is that MR spectroscopy findings can indicate which patients with a poor initial GCS will make a significant recovery. Two patients in our study with an initial GCS of 7 and 10, respectively, both made a moderate recovery, to a GOS of 4. The NAA/Cr in these patients was above the mean of those with a GOS of 5 (ie, 1.57 and 1.58, respectively). Further studies with such patients are indicated to evaluate this phenomenon.

The strength of the correlation between GOS and NAA/Cr does not permit accurate prognostication using only the NAA/Cr ratio in the splenium. The findings of decreased NAA/Cr in the lobar white matter after TBI by Choe et al (21) and Holshouser et al (20), combined with the changes noted in the splenium in the current study, suggest that more detailed measurements of whole-brain NAA may increase the prognostic power of MR spectroscopy in determining outcome. Additional studies may permit the stratification of patients on the basis of age. Finally, the range of NAA/Cr levels noted in patients with good outcomes (GOS = 5) raises the possibility that MR spectroscopy may be an indicator of neuronal injury that is capable of identifying a subset of patients with “good” outcomes who have persistent cognitive deficits that negatively impact their ability to return to their preinjury level of activity. Conceptually, we view NAA as a specific marker of irreversible neuronal loss, whereas MTR may provide a measure of the entire spectrum of histopathology, one end of which is neuronal loss. Evaluation of this hypothesis by further exploration of the ability of quantitative MR studies to obtain early prognostic information noninvasively in patients who have sustained a TBI is warranted.

Conclusion

This study shows that quantitative MR imaging and MR spectroscopy can be reliably obtained in patients with TBI. Proton MR spectroscopy measurement of the NAA/Cr ratio in the splenium may provide additional information that is useful in predicting clinical outcome in these patients. In the 10 patients with less than good outcomes, the NAA/Cr ratio was 1.24 ± 0.28, compared with 1.53 ± 0.37 in the 20 patients with a good neurologic outcome. An abnormal MTR in NAWM was identified in 20% of these patients and did not correlate with outcome or posttraumatic alterations in the NAA/Cr ratio.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Supported in part by grants NS-08803, NS-34353, and RR-02305 from the National Institutes of Health.

  • 2 Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Philadelphia, April 1998.

  • ↵3 Address reprint requests to Grant Sinson, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

References

  1. ↵
    Collins JG. Types of injuries by selected characteristics: United States. Vital Health Stat 1990;;10:175
  2. ↵
    Kraus JF, McArthur DL, Silverman TA, Jayaraman M. Epidemiology of brain injury. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, eds. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw-Hill 1996;13-30
  3. ↵
    Kido DK, Cox C, Hamill RW, Rothenberg BM, Woolf PD. Traumatic brain injuries: predictive usefulness of CT. Radiology 1992;;182:777-781
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. Kurth SM, Bigler ED, Blatter DD. Neuropsychological outcome and quantitative image analysis of acute haemorrhage in traumatic brain injury: preliminary findings. Brain Inj 1994;;8:489-500
    PubMed
  5. Hanlon RE, Demery JA, Martinovich Z, Kelly JP. Effects of acute injury characteristics on neurophysical status and vocational outcome following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 1999;;13:873-887
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. Narayan RK, Greenberg RP, Miller JD, et al. Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury: a comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 1981;;54:751-762
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Ong L, Selladurai BM, Dhillon MK, Atan M, Lye MS. The prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale, hypoxia and computerised tomography in outcome prediction of pediatric head injury. Pediatr Neurosurg 1996;;24:285-291
    PubMed
  8. Gaetani P, Tancioni F, Tartara F, et al. Prognostic value of the amount of post-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage in a six month follow up period. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;;59:635-637
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Fearnside MR, Cook RJ, McDougall P, McNeil RJ. The Westmead Head Injury Project outcome in severe head injury: a comparative analysis of pre-hospital, clinical and CT variables. Br J Neurosurg 1993;;7:267-279
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. Toutant SM, Klauber MR, Marshall LF, et al. Absent or compressed basal cisterns on first CT scan: ominous predictors of outcome in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1984;;61:691-694
    PubMed
  11. van Dongen KJ, Braakman R, Gelpke GJ. The prognostic value of computerized tomography in comatose head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 1983;;59:951-957
    PubMed
  12. van der Naalt J, Hew JM, van Zomeren AH, Sluiter WJ, Minderhoud JM. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in mild to moderate head injury: early and late imaging related to outcome. Ann Neurol 1999;;46:70-78
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. Lobato RD, Cordobes F, Rivas JJ, et al. Outcome from severe head injury related to the type of intracranial lesion: a computerized tomography study. J Neurosurg 1983;;59:762-774
    PubMed
  14. Signorini DF, Andrews PJ, Jones PA, Wardlaw JM, Miller JD. Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;;66:20-25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. Wedekind C, Fischbach R, Pakos P, Terhaag D, Klug N. Comparative use of magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiologic investigation for the prognosis of head injury. J Trauma 1999;;47:44-49
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. Wilson JT, Wiedmann KD, Hadley DM, Condon B, Teasdale G, Brooks DN. Early and late magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological outcome after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;;51:391-396
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. Wilson JT, Hadley DM, Wiedmann KD, Teasdale GM. Neuropsychological consequences of two patterns of brain damage shown by MRI in survivors of severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;;59:328-331
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. Kampfl A, Schmutzhard E, Franz G, et al. Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 1998;;351:1763-1767
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Newton MR, Greenwood RJ, Britton KE, et al. A study comparing SPECT with CT and MRI after closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;;55:92-94
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Holshouser BA, Ashwal S, Luh GY, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy after acute central nervous system injury: outcome prediction in neonates, infants, and children. Radiology 1997;;202:487-496
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Choe BY, Suh TS, Choi KH, Shinn KS, Park CK, Kang JK. Neuronal dysfunction in patients with closed head injury evaluated by in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Invest Radiol 1995;;30;:502-506
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Hiehle JF, Lenkinski RE, Grossman RI, et al. Correlation of spectroscopy and magnetization transfer imaging in the evaluation of demyelinating lesions and normal appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 1994;;32:285-293
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Kimura H, Grossman RI, Lenkinski RE, Gonzalez-Scarano F. Proton MR spectroscopy and magnetization transfer ratio in multiple sclerosis: correlative findings of active versus irreversible plaque disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;;17:1539-1547
    Abstract
  24. ↵
    Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1976;;34:45
    CrossRef
  25. ↵
    Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet 1975;;2:480
    PubMed
  26. ↵
    Bagley LJ, McGowan JC, Grossman RI, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging of traumatic brain injury. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;;11:1-8
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Cecil KM, Hills EC, Sandel ME, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for detection of axonal injury in the splenium of the corpus callosum of brain-injured patients. J Neurosurg 1998;;88:795-801
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Marshall LF, Gautille T, Klauber MR, et al. The outcome of severe closed head injury. J Neurosurg 1991;;75:S28-S36
  29. Kraus JF, Black MA, Hessol N, et al. The incidence of acute brain injury and serious impairment in a defined population. Am J Epidemiol 1984;;119:186-201
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, Boll TJ, Jane JA. Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery 1981;;9:221-228
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Mayeux R, Ottman R, Tang MX, et al. Genetic susceptibility and head injury as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease among community-dwelling elderly persons and their first-degree relatives. Ann Neurol 1993;;33:494-501
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. Mayeux R, Ottman R, Maestre G, et al. Synergistic effects of traumatic head injury and apolipoprotein-e4 in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1995;;45:555-557
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Bullock R, Chesnut RM, Clifton G, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. J Neurotrauma 1996;;13:639-734
    CrossRef
  34. Miller JD, Piper IR, Jones PA. Pathophysiology of head injury. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, eds. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw-Hill 1996;61-69
  35. ↵
    McIntosh TK. The neurochemical sequelae of traumatic brain injury: therapeutic implications. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1994;;6:109-162
    PubMed
  36. ↵
    Grossman RI, Gomori JM, Ramer KN, Lexa FJ, Schnall MD. Magnetization transfer: theory and clinical applications in neuroradiology. Radiographics 1994;;14:279-290
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Dousset V, Grossman RI, Ramer KN. Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: lesion characterization with magnetization transfer imaging. Radiology 1992;;182:483-491
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Lexa FJ, Grossman RI, Rosenquist AC. Wallerian degeneration in feline visual system: characterization with magnetization rate with histopathological correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;;15:201-212
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Kimura H, Meaney DF, McGowan JC, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging of diffuse axonal injury following experimental brain injury in the pig: characterization by magnetization transfer ratio with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;;20:540-546
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    McGowan JC, McCormack TM, Grossman RI, et al. Diffuse axonal pathology detected with magnetization transfer imaging following brain injury in the pig. Magn Reson Med 1999;;41:727-733
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Hannay HJ, Sherer M. Assessment of outcome from head injury. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, eds. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw-Hill 1996;723-747
  42. ↵
    McGowan JC, Yang JH, Plotkin RC, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging in the detection of injury associated with minor head trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:875-880
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Miki Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, et al. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: longitudinal analysis of MR images: lack of correlation between changes in T2 lesion volume and clinical findings. Radiology 1999;;213:395-399
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. Fulton JC, Grossman RI, Udupa J, et al. MR lesion load and cognitive function in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;;20:1951-1955
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Ross BD, Bluml S. New aspects of brain physiology. NMR Biomed 1996;;9:279-296
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Lien YH, Shapiro JI, Chan L. Study of brain electrolytes and organic osmolytes during correction of chronic hyponatremia. J Clin Invest 1991;;88:303
  47. ↵
    Clarke DD, Greenfield S, Dicker E, Tirri LJ. A relationship of N-acetylaspartate biosynthesis to neuronal protein synthesis. J Neurochem 1975;;24:479-485
    CrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Patel TB, Clark JB. Lipogenesis in the brain of suckling rats: studies on the mechanism of mitochondrial/cytosolic carbon transfer. Biochem J 1980;;188:163-168
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Birken DL, Oldendorf WH. N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid: a literature review of a compound prominent in 1H-NMR spectroscopic studies of brain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1989;;13:23-31
    CrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Falconer JC, Liu SJ, Abbe RA, Narayana PA. Time dependence of N-acetyl-aspartate, lactate, and pyruvate concentrations following spinal cord injury. J Neurochem 1996;;66:717-722
    PubMed
  51. ↵
    Gredal O, Rosenbaum S, Topp S, Karlsborg M, Strange P, Werdelin L. Quantification of brain metabolites in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neurology 1997;;48:878-881
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Federico F, Simone IL, Lucivero V, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;;62:239-242
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  53. Hu MT, Taylor-Robinson SD, Chaudhuri KR, et al. Evidence for cortical dysfunction in clinically non-demented patients with Parkinson's disease: a proton MR spectroscopy study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;;67:20-26
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Harms L, Meierkord H, Timm G, Pfeiffer L, Ludolph AC. Decreased N-acetyl-aspartate/choline ratio and increased lactate in the frontal lobe of patients with Huntington's disease: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;;62:27-30
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Federico F, Simone IL, Conte C, et al. Prognostic significance of metabolic changes detected by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in ischaemic stroke. J Neurol 1996;;243:241-247
    CrossRefPubMed
  56. Gillard JH, Barker PB, vanZijl PC, Bryan RN, Oppenheimer SM. Proton MR spectroscopy in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;;17:873-886
    Abstract
  57. ↵
    Iranzo A, Moreno A, Pujol J, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy pattern of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in AIDS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;;66:520-523
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Constantinidis I, Malko JA, Peterman SB, et al. Evaluation of 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging as a diagnostic tool for the lateralization of epileptogenic seizure foci. Br J Radiol 1996;;69:15-24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  59. Gonen O, Catalaa I, Babb J, et al. Total brain N-acetylaspartate: a new measure of disease load in MS. Neurology 2000;54:15-19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  60. Davies SE, Newcombe J, Williams SR, McDonald WI, Clark JB. High resolution proton NMR spectroscopy of multiple sclerosis lesions. J Neurochem 1995;;64:742-748
    PubMed
  61. Fu L, Wolfson C, Worsley KJ, et al. Statistics for investigation of multimodal MR imaging data and an application to multiple sclerosis patients. NMR Biomed 1996;;9:339-346
    CrossRefPubMed
  62. Matthews PM, Pioro E, Narayanan S, et al. Assessment of lesion pathology in multiple sclerosis using quantitative MRI morphometry and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain 1996;;119:715-722
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998;;338:278-285
    CrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Parnetti L, Tarducci R, Presciutti O, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy can differentiate Alzheimer's disease from normal aging. Mech Ageing Dev 1997;;97:9-14
    CrossRefPubMed
  65. Shiino A, Matsuda M, Morikawa S, Inubushi T, Akiguchi I, Handa J. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy with dementia. Surg Neurol 1993;;39:143-147
    CrossRefPubMed
  66. Heun R, Schlegel S, Graf-Morgenstern M, Tintera J, Gawehn J, Stoeter P. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in dementia of Alzheimer type. Int J Ger Psych 1997;;12:349-358
    CrossRefPubMed
  67. Klunk WE, Panchalingam K, Moossy J, McClure RJ, Pettegrew JW. N-acetyl-L-aspartate and other amino acid metabolites in Alzheimer's disease brain: a preliminary proton nuclear magnetic resonance study. Neurology 1992;;42:1578-1585
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  68. Christiansen P, Schlosser A, Henriksen O. Reduced N-acetylaspartate content in the frontal part of the brain in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;;13:457-462
    CrossRefPubMed
  69. Shonk TK, Moats RA, Gifford P, et al. Probable Alzheimer's disease: diagnosis with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1995;;195:67-72
  70. Schuff N, Amend DL, Meyerhoff DJ, et al. Alzheimer disease: quantitative H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of frontoparietal brain. Radiology 1998;;207:91-102
    PubMed
  71. Rose SE, deZubicaray GI, Wang D, et al. A 1H MRS study of probable Alzheimer's disease and normal aging: implications for longitudinal monitoring of dementia progression. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;;17:291-299
    CrossRefPubMed
  72. Lazeyras F, Charles HC, Tupler LA, Erickson R, Boyko OB, Krishnan KR. Metabolic brain mapping in Alzheimer's disease using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Psychol Res 1998;;82:95-106
    CrossRef
  73. Meyerhoff DJ, MacKay S, Constans JM, et al. Axonal injury and membrane alterations in Alzheimer's disease suggested by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Ann Neurol 1994;;36:40-47
    CrossRefPubMed
  74. MacKay S, Meyerhoff DJ, Constans JM, Norman D, Fein G, Weiner MW. Regional gray and white matter metabolite differences in subjects with AD, with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia, and elderly controls with 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Arch Neurol 1996;;53:167-174
    CrossRefPubMed
  75. Tedeschi G, Bertolino A, Lundbom N, et al. Cortical and subcortical chemical pathology in Alzheimer's disease as assessed by multislice proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Neurology 1996;;47:696-704
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    Cheng LL, Ma MJ, Becerra L, et al. Quantitative neuropathology by high resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;;94:6408-6413
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    Barker PB, Lee RR, McArthur JC. AIDS dementia complex: evaluation with proton MR spectroscopy imaging. Radiology 1995;;195:58-64
    CrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    Passani LA, Vonsattel JP, Carter RE, Coyle JT. N-acetylaspartylglutamate, N-acetylaspartate, and N-acetylated alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase in human brain and their alterations in Huntington and Alzheimer's diseases. Mol Chem Neuropathol 1997;;31:97-118
    CrossRefPubMed
  79. Jaarsma D, Veenma-van der Dunin L, Korf J. N-acetylaspartate and N-acetylaspartylglutamate levels in Alzheimer's disease post-mortem brain tissue. J Neurol Sci 1994;;127:230-233
    CrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    DeStefano N, Matthews PM, Arnold DL. Reversible decreases in N-acetylaspartate after acute brain injury. Magn Reson Med 1995;;34:721-727
    CrossRefPubMed
  81. Lee JH, Arcinue E, Ross BD. Brief report: organic osmolytes in the brain of an infant with hypernatremia. N Engl J Med 1994;;331:439-442
    CrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    Rubin Y, Cecil KM, Wehrli S, McIntosh TK, Lenkinski RE, Smith DH. High resolution 1H NMR spectroscopy following experimental brain trauma. J Neurotrauma 1997;;14:441-449
    PubMed
  83. ↵
    Signoretti S, Vagnozzi R, Lazzarino G, Tavazzi B, DiPierro D, Marmarou A. Reduction of N-acetyl-aspartate is proportional to severity of traumatic brain injury. Presented at the 17th annual National Neurotrauma Symposium, Miami Beach, October 1999
  84. ↵
    Cecil KM, Lenkinski RE, Meaney DF, McIntosh TK, Smith DH. High-field proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of a swine model for axonal injury. J Neurochem 1998;;70:2038-2044
    PubMed
  85. ↵
    Gentry LR, Thompson B, Godersky JC. Trauma to the corpus callosum: MR features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;;9:1129-1138
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    Oppenheimer SM, Bryan RN, Conturo TE, Soher BJ, Preziosi TJ, Barker PB. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and gadolinium-DTPA perfusion imaging of asymptomatic MRI white matter lesions. Magn Reson Med 1995;;33:61-68
    CrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    Charles HC, Lazeyras F, Krishnan KR, et al. Proton spectroscopy of human brain: effects of age and sex. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1994;;18:995-1004
    CrossRefPubMed
  88. Christiansen P, Toft P, Larsson HB, Stubgaard M, Henriksen O. The concentration of N-acetyl aspartate, creatine + phosphocreatine, and choline in different parts of the brain in adulthood and senium. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;;11:799-806
    CrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    Alves WM, Eisenberg HM. Head injury trials: past and present. In: Narayan RK, Wilberger JE, Povlishock JT, eds. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996;947-967
  90. ↵
    Gonen O, Catalaa I, Babb JS, et al. Total brain N-acetylaspartate: a new measure of disease load in MS. Neurology 2000;;54:15-19
  • Received January 13, 2000.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 22, Issue 1
1 Jan 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Magnetization Transfer Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopy in the Evaluation of Axonal Injury: Correlation with Clinical Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Grant Sinson, Linda J. Bagley, Kim M. Cecil, Maria Torchia, Joseph C. McGowan, Robert E. Lenkinski, Tracy K. McIntosh, Robert I. Grossman
Magnetization Transfer Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopy in the Evaluation of Axonal Injury: Correlation with Clinical Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2001, 22 (1) 143-151;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Magnetization Transfer Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopy in the Evaluation of Axonal Injury: Correlation with Clinical Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury
Grant Sinson, Linda J. Bagley, Kim M. Cecil, Maria Torchia, Joseph C. McGowan, Robert E. Lenkinski, Tracy K. McIntosh, Robert I. Grossman
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2001, 22 (1) 143-151;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Evaluation of Delayed Neuronal and Axonal Damage Secondary to Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Quantitative MR Imaging Techniques
  • Whole-Brain N-Acetylaspartate: A Marker of the Severity of Mild Head Trauma
  • Proton MR Spectroscopy and MRI-Volumetry in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
  • A review of structural magnetic resonance neuroimaging
  • Magnetization transfer imaging in focal epilepsy
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire