Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleBRAIN

Radiolabeled Leucocyte Imaging in Diffuse Granulomatous Involvement of the Meninges in Wegener's Granulomatosis: Scintigraphic Findings and Their Role in Monitoring Treatment Response to Specific Immunotherapy (Humanized Monoclonal Antilymphocyte Antibodies)

Joseph M. Murphy, Kottekkattu K. Balan, Andoni Toms, Beatriz Gomez-Anson and Martin Lockwood
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2000, 21 (8) 1460-1465;
Joseph M. Murphy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kottekkattu K. Balan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andoni Toms
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beatriz Gomez-Anson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Lockwood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffuse involvement of the meninges by remote granulomas in Wegener's granulomatosis is rare. This study reports the radiolabeled leucocyte imaging findings in five such patients. The diagnosis was made by MR imaging in five patients and confirmed in four by findings at meningeal biopsy. The potential role of serial radiolabeled leucocyte examinations in assessing treatment response is discussed.

METHODS: Three of the five patients underwent whole-body planar 111In-labeled leucocyte imaging. Two of these patients had serial imaging and one had, in addition, a 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte single-photon emission CT brain examination. Two of the five patients had whole-body planar 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte imaging. Of these, one patient had serial imaging. The radiolabeled leucocyte imaging findings were correlated with MR findings and with the patients' clinical course.

RESULTS: In four patients there was a midline linear area of increased tracer uptake in the brain, and in one of these, tracer uptake also extended laterally over the brain convexity. In two patients linear tracer uptake extended in an inferolateral direction from the midline. These abnormalities correlated with meningeal thickening in the falx, over the brain convexity, and in the tentorium cerebelli on MR images. Serial imaging in three patients revealed a reduction or disappearance in tracer uptake after treatment with anti-CD52, which correlated with clinical improvement.

CONCLUSION: In patients with Wegener's granulomatosis, abnormal uptake corresponding to meningeal thickening can be seen on planar radiolabeled leucocyte images. Leucocyte imaging may be useful for monitoring treatment response.

Our institution is a national and international referral center for patients with Wegener's granulomatosis (WG). Whole-body planar leucocyte imaging is commonly performed for the initial assessment of disease activity and for monitoring treatment response in various sites, including the nose, paranasal sinuses, gastrointestinal tract, and lungs. While imaging these patients we have become aware of a characteristic and hitherto unreported pattern of tracer uptake in the brain of patients with diffuse meningeal disease associated with WG. To our knowledge, these findings have not previously been reported. We describe the scintigraphic findings in this group of patients, correlate these with the MR imaging findings, and discuss the potential role of white blood cell imaging in assessing intracranial response to treatment.

Methods

The radiolabeled leucocyte imaging studies of five patients with diffuse WG of the meninges (demonstrated by MR imaging in all cases and proved by biopsy findings in four patients) were reviewed. The five patients comprised three women and two men with a mean age of 55 years (range, 43–67 years). Cerebral involvement was suspected in all patients because of severe persistent headaches.

Of the five patients, three underwent whole-body planar 111In-labeled leucocyte imaging. Two of these patients had serial imaging and one had, in addition, a 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte single-photon emission CT (SPECT) brain examination. Two of the five patients had whole-body planar 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte imaging. Of these, one patient had serial imaging.

For both the 111In-labeled and 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte whole-body examinations, in vitro labeling was performed by initial collection of 50 mL of blood into a syringe containing 6 mL of acid citrate dextrose. Leucocytes were then separated by differential centrifugation. The cells were maintained in plasma throughout the separation and labeling process to minimize leucocyte activation (1). The leucocytes were then labeled with 16 MBq 111In-tropolonate or 400 MBq of 99mTc-HMPAO using standard techniques (1, 2). Anterior and posterior whole-body images were obtained 3 and 24 hours after intravenous injection of the isotope-labeled leucocytes.

The MR examinations were performed on a 0.5-T Signa Horizon General Electric MR unit, a 1.5-T Signa Horizon General Electric MR unit, or a 1.5-T LX General Electric MR unit. Axial fast spin-echo (FSE) proton density–weighted sequences with parameters of 3000/15/1 (TR/TE/excitation), field of view = 22 × 22, section thickness = 6 mm with a 1-mm gap, and matrix = 256 × 256, and FSE T2-weighted sequences with parameters of 3000/105/1, field of view = 22 × 22, section thickness = 6 mm with a 1-mm gap, and matrix = 256 × 256 were acquired in all patients. All patients also had SE T1-weighted imaging (500–540/9–14/2, field of view = 20–22 × 20–22, section thickness = 5 mm, matrix = 256 × 256) before and after intravenous administration of 0.1 mL/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Schering, Berlin, Germany). Images were obtained in either axial or coronal planes, with or without fat suppression. The examinations were transferred to a workstation and reviewed independently by two consultant neuroradiologists; a consensus opinion was obtained when necessary. The radiolabeled leucocyte imaging findings were correlated with MR findings and with the patients' clinical course.

Results

Vertical linear midline uptake of radioisotope was seen in the brain in four of the five patients (Figs 1A and 2A). All four patients had anterior and posterior whole-body planar scintigraphy with 111In as the tracer in two and 99mTc-HMPAO as the tracer in the other two. The extent of tracer uptake varied from a small focus in one patient to widespread midline activity in the remaining three patients. In both patients imaged with 99mTc-HMPAO, tracer uptake was more marked on the 3-hour images than on the 24-hour images. In one of the patients imaged with 111In, the 3-hour images were not available for analysis. In the other patient, uptake was most marked on the 24-hour images. Abnormal midline tracer activity was seen on the posterior images in all patients but on the anterior views in only one patient. When correlated with MR images, obtained at a mean of 61 days from the radiolabeled leucocyte study (range, 12–134 days), the midline linear tracer uptake corresponded to thickening of the meninges of the falx in all four patients (Figs 1A and B, and 2A and B).

fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 1.

A, Posterior view at 24 hours from a 111In-labeled leucocyte examination shows a linear midline area of increased uptake (arrow).

B, Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (500/9/2) SE MR image shows dural thickening and enhancement in the falx (short wide arrow), tentorium cerebelli (curved arrows), and overlying the brain convexity (long thin arrow). Note how the leucocyte examination underestimates the extent of dural involvement.

C, Posterior view at 24 hours from a 111In-labeled leucocyte examination shows normal intracranial appearance after treatment with anti-CD52.

In two patients, linear tracer activity was seen extending in an inferolateral or lateral direction from the midline to the periphery (Figs 2A and 3A). In one patient, this was bilateral and extended from the caudal aspect of the associated linear midline activity when imaged with 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocytes (Fig 2A). The increased uptake was only appreciated on the posterior images and was most pronounced at 3 hours. This correlated with bilateral thickening of the tentorium cerebelli on MR images obtained 43 days previously (Fig 2B). In the other patient, abnormal right-sided linear uptake was the only abnormality on a 111In-labeled leucocyte scintigram (Fig 3A). The tracer uptake was seen on both anterior and posterior planar views and was most marked on the 24-hour images. There was thickening and enhancement of the right tentorium cerebelli on an MR examination performed 17 days after the leucocyte scan (Fig 3D). A 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte SPECT study was also performed in this patient, and this also clearly demonstrated increased uptake in the right tentorium cerebelli (Fig 3B and 3C).

fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 2.

A, Posterior view at 24 hours from a 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte examination shows abnormal uptake in the midline (open arrow), overlying the brain convexity on the left side (solid arrow), and in the tentorium cerebelli bilaterally (arrowheads).

B, Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (500/9/2) SE MR image shows dural thickening and enhancement in the falx (short wide arrow), overlying the brain convexity on the left side (long thin arrow), and in the tentorium cerebelli (curved arrows).

C, Normal intracranial appearance after treatment with anti-CD52.

fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 3.

A, Posterior view at 24 hours from a 111In-labeled leucocyte examination shows increased uptake in the right tentorium cerebelli (arrow). A focus of increased uptake is also visible in the left lung (arrowhead), which correlated with a cavitating nodule on a high-resolution CT scan.

B and C, Coronal (B) and sagittal (C) images from a 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte SPECT examination show increased uptake in the right tentorium cerebelli (arrows).

D, Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (500/9/2) SE MR image shows thickening and enhancement of the right tentorium cerebelli (arrows).

E, Normal intracranial appearance after treatment with anti-CD52. Note focus of increased uptake in the right lung (arrow).

In one patient, a 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled leucocyte examination revealed a curvilinear area of tracer uptake that extended laterally from a midline point deep to the calvaria (Fig 2A). This was best seen on the posterior view obtained at 24 hours. This area correlated with thickening of the dura overlying the brain convexity on MR images (Fig 2B). Radiolabeled leucocyte imaging underestimated the extent of involvement of the dura overlying the cortex as compared with MR imaging. Three of the other four patients had dural thickening and enhancement overlying the cortex on the MR images that was not evident on the leucocyte images (Fig 1A and B).

Three patients underwent serial radiolabeled leucocyte imaging. The leucocyte studies were labeled with indium-111 in two patients and with 99mTc-HMPAO in one patient. All patients were treated with anti-CD52 and clinically responded to treatment with resolution of severe debilitating headaches. One patient with tracer uptake consistent with inflammation of the right tentorium cerebelli showed no abnormal uptake after treatment (Fig 3A and E). Subjective evaluation of the images in the other two patients revealed a significant reduction in midline tracer activity after treatment (Figs 1A and C and 2A and C). One of these patients also showed a complete absence of tracer uptake, which had previously correlated with inflammation of the meninges of the tentorium cerebelli and brain convexity after treatment (Figs 1A and C, and 2A and C). MR images in all three patients showed reduced but persistent dural thickening and enhancement. A summary of the radiolabeled leucocyte and MR imaging findings in all five patients appears in the Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Imaging findings in five patients with Wegener's granulomatosis

Discussion

WG is a multisystem disorder characterized pathologically by necrotizing granulomata that commonly occur in the upper and lower respiratory tract, systemic arterial and venous vasculitis, and focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis (3–9). The onset of the disease usually occurs between 40 and 50 years of age, and 90% of patients have been reported to present with upper or lower respiratory tract symptoms (3, 7). Myalgia, arthralgia, deafness, painful proptosis, diplopia, and hematuria are other recognized presenting signs and symptoms.

Nervous system involvement in WG occurs in 22% to 54% of patients, and usually manifests as a peripheral neuropathy or a mononeuritis multiplex (4, 6–8). Involvement of the CNS occurs in only 2% to 8% of patients (3, 6, 8). Drachman (7) has identified three processes by which the nervous system may be affected in WG. In a review of 104 patients, vasculitis was the most common mechanism of nervous system involvement, affecting 28% of patients and resulting in cerebral hemorrhage, thrombosis, or a peripheral neuritis. In 26% of patients, there was encroachment upon the brain, meninges, or peripheral nerves from orbital, nasal, or paranasal disease. Remote isolated granulomatous lesions affecting the brain, meninges, parietal bone, and cranial nerves occurred in only 4% of patients (7). Subsequent series have confirmed these three disease mechanisms but have documented a lower prevalence of nervous system involvement since the advent of effective therapy (3, 4, 6, 8).

Diffuse meningeal involvement by remote granulomata remains an uncommon manifestation of WG. Drachman (7) documented meningeal infiltration by a necrotic and granulomatous process in only one of 104 patients. Meningeal involvement was not seen in the 85 patients reported by Fauci et al (6), and was present in only one of 324 patients, causing multiple cranial neuropathies and severe headaches, in the series reported by Nishino et al (8). The CT and MR appearances have been well documented (10–15). Diffuse symmetrical linear thickening and enhancement of the dura are usually seen, although focal and nodular thickening has also been reported. There may be associated large areas of high signal in the white matter on T2-weighted MR images. The leptomeninges are usually not involved (12, 13). Results of dural biopsy in such cases have revealed necrotizing granulomata, multinucleated giant cells, and lymphocytic infiltration (10, 11–13). Thickening and fibrosis of the pia-arachnoid with granulomata surrounding blood vessels have also been reported (12). Results of a meningeal biopsy were consistent with WG in four patients from our series. In addition to the necrotizing granulomata characteristic of WG, there was usually an infiltrate of chronic inflammatory cells, such as B and T lymphocytes, eosinophils, histiocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages. It is therefore not unexpected that radiolabeled white cell imaging should be able to detect meningeal involvement by WG.

Radioisotope-labeled leucocyte examinations have been shown to be useful, noninvasive investigations in both the diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity in WG and other systemic vasculitides (15). A significant advantage of these techniques is the ability to acquire whole-body images. Nasal uptake of radiolabeled leucocytes may help differentiate WG from microscopic polyangiitis (16). Leucocyte imaging allows an assessment of the extent of deep tissue involvement and the progression of disease activity, which is often difficult to assess clinically. Scintigraphy has indeed been shown to be superior to conventional radiography or CT for detecting and monitoring vasculitic involvement of the respiratory tract (16). It is also useful for detecting unsuspected sites of disease activity, facilitating earlier institution of specific therapy.

Headache is a particularly difficult symptom to deal with in patients with WG. The predilection of the disease for sites close to the intracranial air spaces frequently leads to concern that hitherto unsuspected intracranial disease may be responsible. Lesions may be difficult to localize, and similar symptoms may be caused by granulomatous vasculitis presenting as posterior uveitis, otitis media, retroorbital pseudotumor, sinusitis, and the meningeal involvement detailed above. The ability to image the development of intracranial inflammation by scintigraphy can be extremely useful in clarifying these differential diagnoses, which, taken individually, are otherwise difficult to elucidate once the possibility of infection has been eliminated.

Marienhagen et al (17) reported the use of 99mTc-HMPAO cerebral SPECT perfusion examinations in the diagnosis of cerebral vasculitis in patients with WG. They documented regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities not matched by abnormalities on anatomic MR images and suggested 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT perfusion imaging may be sensitive for the detection of early cerebral vasculitis in WG before irreversible structural brain damage or gross clinical symptoms appear. To our knowledge, the scintigraphic appearance of meningeal involvement by WG has not previously been reported. Reuter et al (16), in a previous report from our institution, mentioned but did not describe meningeal uptake in one patient with WG. In the evaluation of patients with WG, focal or linear uptake in the region of the brain convexity, falx, or tentorium cerebelli on planar radiolabeled leucocyte images suggests the presence of meningeal involvement. This warrants further assessment by MR imaging, because leucocyte imaging tends to underestimate the extent of involvement.

Diffuse meningeal thickening may occur in other conditions (18–24). Primary or secondary dural tumors, such as meningiomas, lymphomas, fibromas, and metastases, should not be positive on leucocyte images. Infectious meningitis (including tuberculosis) and late-stage syphilis can usually be distinguished from WG clinically. Hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis is a rare condition, characterized by thickening and fibrosis of the dura with infiltration by chronic inflammatory cells; but this condition can again usually be distinguished on clinical grounds (24). Although at MR imaging leptomeningeal thickening and enhancement constitute the most common pattern of meningeal involvement in neurosarcoidosis, dural thickening and enhancement indistinguishable from that seen in WG can occur (18, 20).

In three patients in this series treated with anti-CD52, subjective evaluation of serial leucocyte images revealed reduced or absent intracerebral tracer uptake. These findings correlated with clinical improvement. MR images in all three patients showed reduced but persistent dural thickening and enhancement. Serial MR and CT studies have been used to monitor treatment response in patients with diffuse meningeal involvement by WG treated by immunosuppression (12, 13, 14). A return of MR imaging findings to normal or a reduction in the degree of dural thickening and enhancement after treatment has been shown to correlate with clinical improvement. Residual persistent dural thickening has, however, occasionally been reported after treatment, as was seen in our patients (12, 13). It is then not clear whether this represents active disease or residual fibrosis. Radiolabeled leucocyte imaging has been shown to be useful in monitoring disease progression and response to treatment at other sites, particularly the respiratory tract and nasal cavity (16). Radiolabeled leucocyte imaging reflects abnormal migration and localization of white cells and therefore may be a useful adjunct in cases with residual meningeal thickening on MR images after treatment to determine whether this represents active disease.

Conclusion

Radiolabeled leucocyte imaging is a valuable technique in the assessment and monitoring of patients with systemic vasculitis and is commonly performed in patients with WG to evaluate disease activity in the nasal cavity, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract. Although meningeal involvement by WG is rare, it can be identified on planar leucocyte images as linear or curvilinear uptake in the falx, tentorium cerebelli, or brain convexity. Assessment for such appearances should be made when evaluating whole-body radiolabeled leucocyte examinations in patients with WG. Correlative imaging with MR is suggested, because leucocyte imaging may underestimate the extent of meningeal abnormality. Leucocyte imaging may be useful as an adjunct to MR imaging in monitoring treatment response in patients with diffuse meningeal involvement by WG, as it may better identify active inflammation.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Address reprint requests to Joe Murphy, MD, Department of Medical Imaging, Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, North York, Ontario M4N 3MS, Canada.

References

  1. ↵
    Peters AM, Saverymuttu SH, Reavy HJ, Danpure HJ, Osman S, Lavender JP. Imaging inflammation with In-111-tropolonate labelled leucocytes. J Nucl Med 1983;24:39-44
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. Fotherby KJ, Wraight EP, Garforth H, Hunter JO. Indium-111 leucocyte scintigraphy in the investigation and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Postgrad Med J 1986;62:457-462
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Hoffman GS, Kerr GS, Leavitt RY, et al. Wegener granulomatosis: an analysis of 158 patients. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:488-498
  4. ↵
    Anderson JM, Jamieson DG, Jefferson JM. Non-healing granuloma and the nervous system. Q J Med 1975;174:309-323
  5. DeRemee RA, McDonald TJ, Harrison EG Jr, Coles DT. Wegener's granulomatosis: anatomic correlates, a proposed classification. Mayo Clin Proc 1976;51:777-781
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Fauci AS, Haynes BF, Katz P, Wolff SM. Wegener's granulomatosis: prospective clinical and therapeutic experience with 85 patients for 21 years. Ann Intern Med 1983;98:76-85
  7. ↵
    Drachman DA. Neurological complications of Wegener's granulomatosis. Arch Neurol 1963;8:145-155
    CrossRef
  8. ↵
    Nishino H, Rubino FA, DeRemee RA, Swanson JW, Parisi JE. Neurological involvement in Wegener's granulomatosis: an analysis of 324 consecutive patients at the Mayo Clinic. Ann Neurol 1993;33:4-9
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. Leavitt RY, Fauci AS, Bloch DA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Wegener's granulomatosis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1101-1107
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Provenzale JM, Allen NB. Wegener granulomatosis: CT and MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:785-792
    Abstract
  11. Nishino H, Rubino FA, Parisi JE. The spectrum of neurologic involvement in Wegener's granulomatosis. Neurology 1993;43:1334-1337
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Tishler S, Williamson T, Mirra SS, Lichtman JB, Gismondi P, Kibble MB. Wegener granulomatosis with meningeal involvement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:1248-1252
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. Weinberger LM, Cohen ML, Remler BF, Naheedy MH, Leigh RJ. Intracranial Wegener's granulomatosis. Neurology 1993;43:1831-1834
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. Shiotani A, Mukobayashi C, Oohata H, et al. Wegener's granulomatosis with dural involvement as the initial clinical manifestation. Intern Med 1997;36:514-518
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Murphy JM, Gomez-Anson B, Gillard JH, et al. Wegener granulomatosis: MR imaging findings in brain and meninges. Radiology 1999;213:794-799
    PubMed
  16. ↵
    Reuter H, Wraight EP, Qasim FJ, Lockwood CM. Management of systemic vasculitis: contribution of scintigraphic imaging to evaluation of disease activity and classification. Q J Med 1995;88:509-516
  17. ↵
    Marienhagen J, Geissler A, Lang B. High resolution single photon emission computed tomography of the brain in Wegener's granulomatosis. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1828-1830
  18. ↵
    Sherman JL, Stern BJ. Sarcoidosis of the CNS: comparison of unenhanced and enhanced MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:915-923
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. Hayes WS, Sherman JL, Stern BJ, Citrin CM, Pulaski PD. MR and CT evaluation of intracranial sarcoidosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987;8:841-847
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. Seltzer S, Mark AS, Atlas SW. CNS sarcoidosis: evaluation with contrast–enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:391-397
  21. Tyrrell RL II, Bundschuh CV, Modic MT. Dural carcinomatosis: MR demonstration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:329-332
    PubMed
  22. Jazy FK, Shehata WM, Tew JM, Meyer RL, Boss HH. Primary intracranial lymphoma of the dura. Arch Neurol 1980;37:528-529
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. Philips ME, Ryals TJ, Kambhu SA, Yuh WTC. Neoplastic vs inflammatory meningeal enhancement with Gd-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:536-541
    PubMed
  24. ↵
    Martin N, Masson C, Henin D, Mompoint D, Marsault C, Nahum H. Hypertrophic cranial pachymeningitis: assessment with CT and MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;10:477-484
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received July 16, 1999.
  • Accepted after revision March 1, 2000.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 8
1 Sep 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiolabeled Leucocyte Imaging in Diffuse Granulomatous Involvement of the Meninges in Wegener's Granulomatosis: Scintigraphic Findings and Their Role in Monitoring Treatment Response to Specific Immunotherapy (Humanized Monoclonal Antilymphocyte Antibod…
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Joseph M. Murphy, Kottekkattu K. Balan, Andoni Toms, Beatriz Gomez-Anson, Martin Lockwood
Radiolabeled Leucocyte Imaging in Diffuse Granulomatous Involvement of the Meninges in Wegener's Granulomatosis: Scintigraphic Findings and Their Role in Monitoring Treatment Response to Specific Immunotherapy (Humanized Monoclonal Antilymphocyte Antibodies)
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2000, 21 (8) 1460-1465;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Radiolabeled Leucocyte Imaging in Diffuse Granulomatous Involvement of the Meninges in Wegener's Granulomatosis: Scintigraphic Findings and Their Role in Monitoring Treatment Response to Specific Immunotherapy (Humanized Monoclonal Antilymphocyte Antibodies)
Joseph M. Murphy, Kottekkattu K. Balan, Andoni Toms, Beatriz Gomez-Anson, Martin Lockwood
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2000, 21 (8) 1460-1465;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire