Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL

HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) Study: 3–6 Month Angiographic Follow-Up Results

H.J. Cloft for the HEAL Investigators
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2007, 28 (1) 152-154;
H.J. Cloft
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The HydroCoil Embolic System (HES) was developed reduce recurrences of aneurysms relative to platinum coils. This study was conducted to evaluate the recurrence rate of cerebral aneurysms 3–6 months after treatment with HES.

METHODS: We report the results in 135 cerebral aneurysms treated with HES in a prospective multicenter registry. Angiographic results 3–6 months after treatment were evaluated at a core laboratory. Wide variation in HES utilization within the HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) registry (HES representing 5% to 100% of the coil length used) allowed for subgroup analysis with regard to percentage length, last coil used, and packing attenuation in small (<10 mm) aneurysms.

RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate was 38 (28.1%) of 135, which included a number of large, giant, and previously recurrent aneurysms. When HES represented ≥75% of coil length, the recurrence rate was 0 (0%) of 18, whereas with <75% length of HES, the recurrence rate was 16 (23%) of 71 (P = .035). When the final coil deposited was a HES coil, the recurrence rate was 6 (11%) of 53, whereas when the final coil was platinum, the recurrence rate was 10 (29%) of 34 (P = .047). When the packing attenuation was ≥50%, the recurrence rate was 11 (19%) of 59, whereas for packing attenuation <50%, the recurrence rate was 5 (18%) of 28. The packing attenuation calculations were very error-prone.

CONCLUSION: Although the overall recurrence rates for small and large aneurysms in HEAL were no lower than published rates for aneurysms treated with platinum coils, patients treated in HEAL had a reduced recurrence rate when greater than 75% of the coil length used to treat an aneurysm was HES and when the final coil was HES.

A principal disadvantage of endovascular therapy of cerebral aneurysms with endovascular coils compared with surgical clipping is aneurysm recurrence.1–3 An embolic agent that improves packing attenuation might reduce the rate of aneurysm recurrence.4–7 The HydroCoil Embolic System (HES) (MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, Calif) was designed to improve packing attenuation/volumetric filling with an expansile hydrogel that should fill more of the aneurysm lumen than standard platinum coils,8,9 improve aneurysm stability and durability, and provide a scaffold to initiate neointima formation and healing.8,10 The HES is constructed as a hybrid hydrogel-platinum coil device (Fig 1). Early experience demonstrated that the HES allows substantially improved packing of the aneurysm lumen relative to standard platinum coils (72% versus 32%).11

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Schematic diagram of hybrid hydrogel-platinum coil device. White, primary platinum coil; yellow, platinum “overcoil”; pink, hydrogel; teal, delivery pusher.

The HEAL registry is a prospective registry of patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the HES; the registry has shown that HES provides initial treatment success and complication rates comparable with those reported for platinum coils.12 We report the 3–6-month angiographic follow-up results of cerebral aneurysms treated with the HES in the HEAL registry.

Methods

The HEAL registry is a nonrandomized, multicenter, prospective study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of HES in patients with intracranial aneurysms deemed appropriate for endovascular treatment. A total of 15 sites in Europe and the United States participated in the investigation. The study was approved by each participating center’s Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained for each patient enrolled in the study. The total patient enrollment for the investigation was 184 patients with 191 aneurysms. Physician training and patient enrollment criteria have been described previously.12

Embolization Procedure.

One or more platinum coils were generally used to establish the initial framework in the treatment of the aneurysm. The HES coils were generally used to provide additional filling of the aneurysm once the initial framework had been established by placement of 1 or more platinum complex coils. After placement of the HES coils, additional platinum coils (eg, very soft platinum coils) were used at the discretion of the physician to complete the procedure. Angiograms were taken after the last coil was placed. In each case, the objective of the procedure was angiographic occlusion of the aneurysm.

Data Collection and Analysis.

The following parameters were evaluated at the time of initial therapy with HES: aneurysm location; aneurysm size; aneurysm rupture status; number, type, and size of coils used in the procedure; degree of aneurysm occlusion postprocedure; and complications/adverse events.

A single interventional neuroradiologist (H.J.C.) with 8 years of experience with endovascular aneurysm therapy was the central reader who evaluated all of the angiograms. To prevent bias, the central reader did not participate as a treating physician in the study. The core laboratory conducted an analysis of the pretreatment and posttreatment angiograms, including the degree of aneurysm occlusion. The degree of aneurysm occlusion was classified as complete, nearly complete (≥95%), or incomplete (<95%). The core laboratory assessed the occlusion status of each aneurysm. The initial occlusion status was scored as either complete, nearly complete, or incomplete.

The aneurysm volume was calculated by assuming that the aneurysms were elliptical, using the formula: Aneurysm volume = 4 π(height/2 × length/2 × width/2)/3. Coil volumes were calculated by the formula: Coil volume = π (radius)2 × length. The coil packing attenuation was expressed using the following formula: Packing attenuation = (coil volume/aneurysm volume) × 100%. Finally, the percentage length of HES used was calculated with the following formula: Percentage length HES = (length of HES/length of all coils) × 100%.

Two follow-up angiographic examinations are required in this investigation. Angiographic examinations were conducted at 3–6 months after the procedure. The core laboratory conducted an analysis of the follow-up angiograms, including the degree of aneurysm occlusion, coil compaction, recanalization, and parent artery patency. Comparisons were made with the initial posttreatment angiograms. The core laboratory recorded the occlusion status of the aneurysm. The occlusion status was scored as either complete, nearly complete, or incomplete. The occlusion status at 3–6 months was also classified as better, same, or worse than the initial postprocedure angiogram.

The hypothesis of the investigation was that the recanalization rate for the treatment group will be equal to or better than the published rates for aneurysms treated with platinum coils. Because operating physicians had a lot of freedom with regard to proportions of HES and platinum coils used, there was a rather wide variation in the choice of coils. This allowed for comparisons of recurrence rates to be made between subgroups with regard to the operators choices of coils. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of packing attenuation, percentage length of HES, and last coil used on recurrence rate. Recurrence rates in aneurysms treated with a packing attenuations of ≥50% and <50% were compared. Recurrence rates in aneurysms treated with percentage lengths of HES of ≥75% and <75% were compared. Recurrence rates in aneurysms treated with HES or platinum as the final coil were compared. Recurrence rates for subgroups were evaluated for statistical significance using a 2-tailed Fisher exact test. A P value of ≤.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Aneurysms Treated.

Angiographic follow-up at 3–6 months after endovascular therapy was obtained in 135 of 191 aneurysms treated. Aneurysms included were located in a wide variety of locations in both the anterior and posterior circulation. The mean aneurysm size was 8.2 mm, and the median was 6.5 mm. The mean neck diameter was 5.4 mm, and the median was 4.4 mm. The mean dome-to-neck ratio was 2.0, and the median was 1.7. There were 46 ruptured aneurysms (34%) and 89 unruptured aneurysms (63%). Balloon remodeling was used in 9 cases, and adjunctive stent placement was used in 5 cases. Thirteen aneurysms had been previously treated with platinum coils and thus were recurrences that were being treated with HES.

Coils Used.

The mean number of HES coils per case was 5.1, and the median was 3.0. The mean number of platinum coils was 3.5, and the median was 3.0. The HES provided a relatively high packing attenuation, with a mean of 45% and a median of 44%. The mean percentage length of HES used was 40%, and the median was 46%. The range of percentage length of HES was 5%–100%.

Recurrence Rates.

The overall recurrence rates are shown in the Table. For small aneurysms (<10 mm), enough data were available for subgroup analysis. When HES represented ≥75% of coil length in an aneurysm, the recurrence rate was 0 (0%) of 18, whereas for aneurysms with <75% length HES, the recurrence rate was 16 (23%) of 71 (P = .035). When the final coil deposited was an HES coil, the recurrence rate was 6 (11%) of 53, whereas when the final coil was platinum, the recurrence rate was 10 (29%) of 34 (P = .047). Recurrence rate did not correlate with packing attenuation. When the packing attenuation was ≥50%, the recurrence rate was 11 (19%) of 59, whereas for aneurysm with packing attenuation <50%, the recurrence rate was 5 (18%) of 28. Because the packing attenuation was calculated based on assessments of aneurysm volume calculated from linear aneurysm measurements made from films from a variety of medical centers, they are prone to significant error.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Recurrence rates for aneurysms treated in HEAL registry

Discussion

The overall recurrence rates for small and large aneurysms treated in HEAL were not lower than what has been reported for aneurysms treated with platinum coils.13 However, the variety of coil combinations used by the physicians in HEAL created a natural experiment that allowed for subgroup analysis that uncovered promising trends. A relative reduction in recurrence rate was noted in aneurysms treated with percentage length of HES greater than 75%, as well as when the final coil was an HES coil. Because both an increase in percentage length of HES and the use of HES as the final coil can be expected to correlate with an increase in HES loops at the aneurysm neck, a reduction in recurrence related to these factors may reflect a biologic effect of HES at the neck of the aneurysms. Having a higher overall proportion of HES coils relative to the total length of coils in an aneurysm (ie, percentage length of HES) increases the proportion of loops covered with hydrogel everywhere in the aneurysm, including at the neck. Although it cannot be known with certainty where the final coil in each case was deposited, it is reasonable to assume that, in most cases, the final coil was deposited near the neck of the aneurysm. Thus, aneurysms treated with HES as the final coil are more likely to have more hydrogel deposited at the neck of the aneurysm than aneurysms treated with a platinum coil as the final coil. A reaction of hydrogel with tissue at the aneurysm neck might promote a healing reaction that diminishes aneurysm recurrence.10

We did not find correlation between packing attenuation and recurrence rate, but there is much error in the calculation of packing attenuation based on linear measurements in the HEAL study. The HES provides a mean packing attenuation that is higher than is achievable with platinum coils.11,12,14 The packing attenuation for individual cases is greatly error-prone because the assessment of volumes of aneurysms is error-prone. The volumes of aneurysms determined in HEAL are subject to much error because precise size measurements cannot accurately be determined based on 2-dimensional angiographic images from multiple medical centers that use various angiographic equipment and because aneurysms often have irregular shapes that do not allow for simple volume calculations. In addition, the packing attenuation calculation assumes complete expansion of the hydrogel, which may not be possible if the hydrogel is constrained by adjacent coil loops. Our finding of no relationship between packing attenuation and recurrence rate may be because packing attenuation is less important to altering recurrence rate than tissue reaction to hydrogel at the neck of the aneurysm.

The HES was generally not the only type of coil used to treat aneurysms in the HEAL registry; ie, platinum coils were generally used together with HES. Platinum coils were usually used to form a “basket” or “framework” for subsequent deposition of HES 14 coils. The HES 14 coils were then used to fill most of the aneurysm volume. The HES 14 coil is stiffer than standard platinum coils, and therefore it is often not generally used as the final, or “finishing” coil. Rather, the final coil was often a small, soft platinum coil. Smaller and softer HES 10 coils suitable for use as “finishing” coils are now available that allow for improved packing of aneurysms with hydrogel, as well as increased deposition of HES at the neck of the aneurysm.

For patients enrolled in HEAL, follow-up angiography is also being performed at 12–18 months. These later follow-up data are still being collected. A second version of the HEAL study, HEAL2, has been designed to further test the findings of HEAL. HEAL2 provides more specific operator instructions, designed to increase the percentage length of HES used, and to encourage the deposition of HES at the neck of the aneurysm. Patient enrollment for HEAL2 has already begun. In addition, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing durability of cerebral aneurysm treatment with platinum coils versus HES is currently being conducted (HydroCoil: Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study [HELPS]).

Conclusion

The overall recurrence rates for small and large aneurysms in HEAL were no lower than published rates for aneurysms treated with platinum coils. However, there was a wide variation in utilization of HES within the HEAL registry; HES represented 5%–100% of the coil length used in any given aneurysm. Patients treated in HEAL had a reduced recurrence rate when greater than 75% of the coil length used to treat an aneurysm was HES and when the final coil was HES. The HES represents a new technology that potentially can offer improved outcomes relative to platinum coils.

Appendix

Core Laboratory, Data Analysis, and Manuscript Preparation

Harry J. Cloft, MD, PhD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.

Principal Investigators at Enrolling Sites

Timothy Malisch, University of Illinois at Chicago; Alejandro Berenstein, Beth Israel Hospital; Emmanual Houdart, Hopital Lariboisier; Isabel Wanke, Universitatsklinik Essen; In Sup Choi, Lahey Clinic; Harish Shownkeen, Loyola University Hospital; Laurent Pierot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims; Frank Tong, Emory University Hospital; Soren Bakke, Rikshospitalet; Beverly Aagaard, University of Wisconsin Hospital; Jacques Moret, Foundation Rothschild; Serge Bracard, Centre Hospitaler Universitaire de Nancy; Avery Evans, Tampa General Hospital; Mary Jensen, University of Virginia; Hans Henkes, Alfred Krupp Krankenhaus.

Footnotes

  • The HEAL study was funded entirely by Microvention, Inc., Aliso Viejo, Calif. The enrolling sites and the core laboratory received funding from Microvention, Inc. for work related to HEAL.

References

  1. ↵
    Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Kehrli P, et al. Selection of cerebral aneurysms for treatment using Guglielmi detachable coils: the preliminary University of Illinois at Chicago experience. Neurosurgery 1998;43:1281–95
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Kuether TA, Nesbit GM, Barnwell SL. Clinical and angiographic outcomes, with treatment data, for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: a single-center experience. Neurosurgery 1998;43:1016–25
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Satoh K, Matsubara S, Hodoh H, et al. Intracranial aneurysm embolization using interlocking detachable coils. Correlation between volume embolization and coil compaction. Intervent Neuroradiol 1997;3:125–29
  5. Tamatani S, Ito Y, Abe H, et al. Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:762–67
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Slob MJ, et al. Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 2004;231:653–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Kawanabe Y, Sadato A, Taki W, et al. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: correlation between coil packing density and coil compaction. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001;143:451–55
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Kallmes DF, Fujiwara NH. New expandable hydrogel-platinum coil hybrid device for aneurysm embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1580–88
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Deshaies EM, Bagla S, Agner C, et al. Determination of filling volumes in HydroCoil-treated aneurysms by using three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography. Neurosurg Focus 2005;18:E5
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Yoshino Y, Niimi Y, Song JK, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: comparative evaluation in a terminal bifurcation aneurysm model in dogs. J Neurosurg 2004;101:996–1003
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Aneurysm packing with HydroCoil Embolic System versus platinum coils: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:60–62
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Cloft H. HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) study: periprocedural results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:289–92
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Deshaies EM, Bagla S, Agner C, et al. Determination of filling volumes in HydroCoil-treated aneurysms by using three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography. Neurosurg Focus 2005;18:E5
    PubMed
  • Received February 16, 2006.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 1
January 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) Study: 3–6 Month Angiographic Follow-Up Results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
H.J. Cloft
HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) Study: 3–6 Month Angiographic Follow-Up Results
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2007, 28 (1) 152-154;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) Study: 3–6 Month Angiographic Follow-Up Results
H.J. Cloft
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2007, 28 (1) 152-154;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Appendix
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms
  • Autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve healing of coiled experimental saccular aneurysms: an angiographic and histopathological study
  • Safety, immediate and mid-term results of the newer generation of hydrogel coils in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms: a multicenter study
  • Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  • HydroCoils Reduce Recurrence Rates in Recently Ruptured Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Subgroup Analysis of the HELPS Trial
  • Differences in the Angiographic Evaluation of Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms between a Core Laboratory Reader and Operators: Results of the Cerecyte Coil Trial
  • Review of 2 Decades of Aneurysm-Recurrence Literature, Part 1: Reducing Recurrence after Endovascular Coiling
  • AngioSuite: an accurate method to calculate aneurysm volumes and packing densities
  • Outcomes of Endovascular Treatments of Aneurysms: Observer Variability and Implications for Interpreting Case Series and Planning Randomized Trials
  • Neuroform Stent-Assisted Coiling of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Short- and Midterm Results from a Single-Center Experience with 68 Patients
  • HydroCoils, Occlusion Rates, and Outcomes: A Large Single-Center Study
  • Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms
  • A Second-Generation, Endoluminal, Flow-Disrupting Device for Treatment of Saccular Aneurysms
  • Endovascular Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms Using "Bioactive" or Coated-Coil Technologies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
  • Treatment of Brain Aneurysms
  • Predictors of Rehemorrhage After Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: The Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) Study
  • Molecular Indices of Apoptosis Activation in Elastase-Induced Aneurysms After Embolization With Platinum Coils
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire