Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

OtherBRAIN

Feathering: Vertebral Artery Pseudostenosis with Elliptical Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography

J. Huston, M.A. Bernstein and S.J. Riederer
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2006, 27 (4) 850-852;
J. Huston III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.A. Bernstein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.J. Riederer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Elliptical centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the cervical vasculature is a well-established technique that in many practices has replaced conventional angiography for several clinical indications, including atherosclerotic disease and dissections. Occasionally blurring or loss of signal intensity occurs in the vertebral arteries, especially in young patients with rapid circulation times. This ringing artifact, which we termed “feathering,” results from rapidly changing signal intensity in small vascular structures during the sampling of the center of k-space.

Elliptical centric contrast-enhanced (CE) MR angiography is a well-established technique that in many practices has replaced conventional digital subtraction angiography for the preoperative evaluation of carotid occlusive disease and cervical arterial dissection.1 A commonly recognized artifact resulting in loss of signal intensity in the vessel is the presence of surgical clips following endarterectomy.2 The resulting magnetic field distortion may result in signal intensity loss in both the carotid and vertebral arteries. Another cause of signal intensity loss is the radio-frequency shielding of the vessel lumen by metallic stents.3 Yet another signal intensity loss mechanism is the premature initiation (ie, triggering) of the 3D examination before the contrast agent has arrived in the vessel of interest.4 Occasionally, there is poor segmental visualization or pseudostenosis of a vertebral artery, which most frequently involves imaging small vertebral arteries, while CE MR angiography of the cervical vessels is performed. This artifact, which we have termed “feathering,” can be easily recognized with review of coronal and axial reformatted source images and should not be confused with occlusive disease.

Technique

In a head and neck neurovascular coil or dedicated volume neck coil, a coronal 2D phase-contrast scout sequence is performed to identify the location of the petrous carotid arteries.5 The 2D time-of-flight (TOF) sequence with 100 sections is obtained from the level of the petrous carotid arteries inferiorly as a screening examination and to center the CE sequence. The 2D TOF uses derated gradients so that a 60%–70% carotid stenosis results in a signal intensity void.6 The minimum TE of the derated pulse sequence is 8.7 milliseconds, with the following imaging parameters: TR = 28 milliseconds; 256 × 128 matrix; ± 16k Hz receive bandwidth; 60° flip angle; 1.8–2.2-mm-thick sections overlapped so that the center-to-center section spacing is 1.5–1.8 mm; one signal intensity average; and “traveling” spatial presaturation applied superiorly.

The CE elliptical centric spoiled gradient-recalled-echo acquisition is performed by using a 22 × 15.4 cm field of view coronal slab with a 6.2-cm thickness; 48 sections 1.4 mm thick; TE of 1.4; TR of 6.6 milliseconds; flip angle of 45° and a matrix of 256 × 224; 1 excitation; and a 51-second scan time.7 Reconstruction uses zero filling in all 3 directions to double the number of sections with a resulting 0.7-mm section overlap and to provide a 512 × 512 display matrix. A bolus of 20–25 mL of gadolinium is injected at 3 mL/s followed by 20 mL of saline at 2 mL/s. Fluoroscopic triggering or test bolus timing is used to determine the time of maximal enhancement of the arteries. If a timing sequence is used, 2 mL of gadolinium is then injected at 3 mL/s followed by 20 mL of saline at 2 mL/s.

Discussion

Elliptical centric CE MR angiography has proved to be a robust and reliable method to image the carotid and vertebral arteries and is widely used for routine clinical care.2 With attention to optimizing spatial resolution, the elliptical centric technique can be an accurate clinical tool. For instance, Willinek et al8 recently reported a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99.3% for stenotic occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries. By using 2D TOF as a scout sequence, the smallest imaging volume to obtain the highest spatial resolution can be consistently placed to reproducibly include the entire course of the vertebral arteries and the carotids from their origins (or proximal portions in tall individuals) to the carotid siphons. In addition, the 2D TOF sequence with derated gradient performance serves as a screen for the presence of a high-grade stenosis. The presence of a signal intensity void indicates a stenosis of ≥70%.6

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the cervical vasculature occasionally results in segmental blurring or signal intensity loss within the vertebral arteries, especially in the upper neck. Review of source images, especially axially reformatted images, will demonstrate a characteristic pattern of multiple rings or targets. These patterns of alternating high and low signal intensity result in an interference pattern that reinforces and cancels the signal intensity within the vertebral arteries. The degree of distortion is increased as the number of opacified vessels increase and when the vertebral arteries are small in caliber (Fig 1). The 2D TOF sequence serves as an excellent problem solver in difficult cases. When patients do not move, the 2D TOF sequence can confirm the normal nature of the questionable vertebral artery.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 46-year-old man with neck pain following trauma referred for MR angiography to exclude a dissection. 2D TOF demonstrates a widely patent left vertebral artery (A). MIP subvolume of the posterior circulation (B) shows an irregular possibly stenotic midleft vertebral artery that was initially felt to represent a dissection. Review of axial reformatted source images shows multiple small ring-shaped areas of signal intensity corresponding to small cervical vessels (arrow, C). The interference pattern created by these target patterns distorts the left vertebral artery resulting in ill-defined borders when compared with the right vertebral artery.

The vessels that cause the distortion are likely small muscular arteries that opacify at the same time as the jugular vein. The distortion associated with these small vessels is similar to the target pattern seen with the jugular veins. Therefore, contrast arrives in the both the small vessels and jugular vein at nearly the same point of k-space sampling. We believe that this ringing artifact results from the modulation of k-space signal intensity in small vascular structures over the course of the bolus arrival and filling of the vessel.

Experience has shown that this artifact occurs most frequently in younger patients or patients who have a rapid circulation times determined with test injections. The feathering artifact can be reduced by using an earlier trigger time in patients with faster circulation times (Fig 2). In our practice, we typically reduce by 1 second the CE MR angiographic trigger time in patients found to have a circulation time of ≤15 seconds. With this small change in practice, it is possible to reduce or eliminate the feathering or pseudostenosis artifact that occasionally occurs with elliptical centric CE MR angiography.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A 52-year-old women with persistent neck pain. CE elliptical centric MR angiogram shows irregularity of both midvertebral arteries, right greater than left (A). Follow-up MR angiogram 1 year later with an earlier trigger time reduces the feathering artifact (B). Review of source images shows that the multiple interference patterns on the first examination (arrow, C) are less evident with the earlier triggering on the second examination (arrow, D). As a result the vertebral arteries are more clearly delineated on the second examination.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant EB00212.

References

  1. ↵
    Phan T, Huston J III, Bernstein MA, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the cervical vessels: experience with 422 patients. Stroke 2001;32:2282–86
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Okamoto K, Ito J, Furusawa T, et al. “Pseudoocclusion” of the internal carotid artery: a pitfall on intracranial MRA. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1997;21:831–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Maintz D, Kugel H, Schellhammer F, et al. In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography. Invest Radiol 2001;36:218–24
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642–51
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Huston J III, Fain SB, Riederer SJ, et al. Carotid arteries: maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering. Radiology 1999;211:265–73
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    DeMarco JK, Huston J III, Bernstein MA. Evaluation of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography in the depiction of severe carotid stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:787–93
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Huston J III, Fain SB, Wald JT, et al. Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;218:138–43
    PubMed
  8. ↵
    Willinek WA, von Falkenhausen M, Born M, et al. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 2005;36:38–43
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received June 6, 2005.
  • Accepted after revision November 30, 2005.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 4
April 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feathering: Vertebral Artery Pseudostenosis with Elliptical Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J. Huston, M.A. Bernstein, S.J. Riederer
Feathering: Vertebral Artery Pseudostenosis with Elliptical Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2006, 27 (4) 850-852;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Feathering: Vertebral Artery Pseudostenosis with Elliptical Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
J. Huston, M.A. Bernstein, S.J. Riederer
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2006, 27 (4) 850-852;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cervical Arterial Dissections and Association With Cervical Manipulative Therapy: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  • Childhood Posterior Circulation Arterial Ischemic Stroke
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire