Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL

Clinical Outcome and Ischemic Complication after Treatment of Anterior Choroidal Artery Aneurysm: Comparison between Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling

B.M. Kim, D.I. Kim, Y.S. Shin, E.C. Chung, D.J. Kim, S.H. Suh, S.Y. Kim, S.I. Park, C.S. Choi and Y.S. Won
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2008, 29 (2) 286-290; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0806
B.M. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.I. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y.S. Shin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.C. Chung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.J. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.H. Suh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.Y. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.I. Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.S. Choi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y.S. Won
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although coiling has been favorably comparable with clipping for treatment of most intracranial aneurysms, there is a controversy on which modality is safer for anterior choroidal artery (AchoA) aneurysm. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes and treatment-related complications after surgical clipping and endovascular coiling of AchoA aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three AchoA aneurysms were recruited from 1895 intracranial aneurysms, which were treated either by surgical clipping or by endovascular coiling in 4 institutions between May 1999 and December 2006. The AchoA aneurysms were dichotomized according to the modality of treatment, the coil group (37 patients; 38 aneurysms) and the clip group (35 patients; 35 aneurysms). Clinical outcomes and incidence of treatment-related complications between 2 groups and the factors influencing the clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS: There was no rebleeding in both groups during follow-up, for 4–72 months (mean, 27 months) in the coil group and for 3–84 months (mean, 34 months) in the clip group. In the coil group, 31 patients (83.8%) had favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score [mRS], 0–3). In the clip group, 31 patients (88.6%) had favorable outcome. The complication of coiling was transient contralateral hemiparesis in 2 patients, who recovered completely. The complications of clipping were permanent contralateral hemiparesis due to AchoA infarction in 4 patients and third-nerve palsy in 1 patient. Hunt and Hess grade 4 or 5 and AchoA infarction were significantly correlated with poor outcome (mRS, ≤4). Clipping had significantly higher incidence of AchoA infarction than coiling (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Coiling of AchoA aneurysms appears comparable with clipping in clinical outcome and prevention of rebleeding, with significantly lower incidence of AchoA infarction than clipping.

Anterior choroidal artery (AchoA) aneurysms are relatively rare and account for 2%–5% of all intracranial aneurysms.1 Because AchoA is a small branch, but supplies critical territory, including posterior limb of the internal capsule, impairment of this artery may produce debilitating postoperative AchoA syndrome, including contralateral hemiparesis. The mortality rate and the treatment-related permanent morbidity rate of surgical clipping of AchoA aneurysms range from 6% to 33% and 10% to 28.6%, respectively.2–5 To our knowledge, there has been only 1 small series focused on coiling of the AchoA aneurysms.6 The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes and treatment-related complications after surgical clipping and endovascular coiling of AchoA aneurysms.

Materials and Methods

The institutional review boards of the 4 hospitals approved this retrospective study, and informed consent was not required. Seventy-three AchoA aneurysms were recruited from 1895 intracranial aneurysms, which were treated either by surgical clipping or by endovascular coiling in 4 institutions between May 1999 and December 2006. One patient had bilateral AchoA aneurysms. The aneurysms were sorted into 2 groups according to the technique of treatment, the coil group and the clip group. The coil group (n = 38; ruptured = 23; unruptured = 15) was composed of those who underwent endovascular coiling and included 14 men and 23 women with ages ranging from 23 to 78 years (mean, 54 years). The clip group (n = 35; ruptured = 30; unruptured = 5) was composed of those who underwent surgical clipping and included 15 men and 20 women with ages ranging from 25 to 63 years (mean, 45 years). Aneurysms associated with arteriovenous malformation and aneurysms involving distal AchoA were excluded. Informed consent was obtained and preceded treatment. An interventional neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon reviewed the angiograms, operative records, and medical records to obtain the relevant clinical and angiographic information.

Coil Embolization and Surgical Clipping

Coiling was conducted under general anesthesia. Anticoagulation was initiated by injection of a bolus of 3000–5000 IU of heparin intravenously at the beginning of the procedure, followed by continuous infusion of heparin by rate of 1000 IU/h. Heparin was continued for 24–48 hours after embolization. Activated coagulation time was maintained between 2 and 3 times above the normal value. Coiling was generally performed by a standard single-microcatheter technique. Double-microcatheter technique was used in 4 aneurysms due to the wide neck and/or incorporation of the AchoA into the aneurysm (Fig 1). Stent-assisted technique was used in 2 aneurysms due to the wide neck.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Images of a 63-year-old woman who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A, 3D volume-rendering image in oblique projection reveals an anterior choroidal artery aneurysm with daughter sac. The anterior choroidal artery is incorporated into the aneurysm neck. B, Unsubtracted image in working-projection obtained during the procedure. The aneurysm is treated with the double-catheter technique. Note 2 radiopaque markers of the tip of the microcatheter near the aneurysm neck. C, Postembolization control angiography in working-projection reveals near complete occlusion of the aneurysm sac.

Surgical clipping was performed with a standard technique. In most cases, microvascular Doppler ultrasonography was used to identify the flow into the AchoA. Monitoring of intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) was not used.

Clinical and Angiographic Follow-up

The patients were clinically assessed before and after the treatment by the neurosurgeons and/or the interventional neuroradiologists. The coil group was clinically followed up for a mean ± SE of 27 ± 22 months (range, 4–72 months) and the clip group for a mean of 34 ± 25 months (range, 3–84 months).

Each patient’s outcome at the latest clinical follow-up was evaluated and graded according to the modified Rankin scale score (mRS).7 For the patients who were not followed up at our institutions, clinical outcome was evaluated with a telephone interview. If the patient’s clinical condition became worse because of causes unrelated to the procedure or the aneurysm during the follow-up, the patient’s outcome at discharge was determined as the final outcome.

In the coil group, angiographic follow-up after coiling was conducted as our routine schedule for intracranial aneurysms at the other sites. In the clip group, angiographic follow-up was not routinely performed.

Statistics

All of the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 10.0; SPSS, Chicago, Ill). The factors influencing clinical outcome and treatment-related AchoA infarction were evaluated. Univariable analyses for age, sex, aneurysm size, neck type, presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), Hunt and Hess grade, treatment modality, and treatment-related AchoA infarction were separately performed modeling poor outcome (mRS, ≥4) using a χ2 test. All of the variables with P < .2 in univariable analysis were entered into separate multivariable logistic regression models. Incidence of treatment-related complications was compared between the coil group and the clip group by using a χ2 test. Statistical significance was determined by P < .05 for a 95% confidence interval.

Results

Characteristics of the Patients and AchoA Aneurysms: Coil Group Versus Clip Group

The coil group was significantly older in age than the clip group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in sex, size of aneurysms, diameter of aneurysm neck, incidence of rupture, and Hunt and Hess grade (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Characteristics of the enrolled patients and anterior choroidal artery aneurysms

Clinical Outcome

Clinical outcomes (mRS) are summarized in Table 2 according to the Hunt and Hess grading (HH) system and the treatment modality. None of the 72 patients treated either by coiling or by clipping rebled during follow-up. Of the patients with HH 0–3, all (n = 30) of those in the coil group had favorable outcome, whereas 2 patients in the clip group (n = 32) had poor outcome (mRS, ≥4) due to treatment-related AchoA infarction to result in grade 2 contralateral hemiparesis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Clinical outcome in relation to Hunt and Hess grade on admission

HH 4 or 5 and treatment-related AchoA infarction were significantly correlated with poor outcome (P < .05). Age, sex, aneurysm size, neck type, presence of SAH, and the type of treatment modality were not significantly correlated with clinical outcome (Tables 3 and 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Univariable analyses modeling poor outcome

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4:

Multivariable logistic regression analysis modeling poor outcome (modified Rankin scale score ≤4)

Treatment-Related Complications

In the coil group, transient AchoA flow insufficiency occurred in 5 patients during the procedure. However, the patency of the AchoA was restored within 30 minutes in all 5 of the patients by using intravenous bolus injection of 5000 IU of heparin (n = 1), infusion of 5–10 mg of abciximab through the guiding catheter (n = 2), or papaverine infusion through the microcatheter (n = 2). In 2 of the 5 patients, transient contralateral hemiparesis occurred after the procedure but resolved within 1 week. Follow-up CT of the 2 patients revealed no evidence of AchoA infarction. The other 3 patients had no postprocedural adverse symptoms. In addition, there were no access related complications.

In the clip group, permanent contralateral hemiparesis due to the AchoA infarction occurred in 4 patients, and third-nerve palsy occurred in 1 patient (Table 5). All 4 of the patients with permanent contralateral hemiparesis revealed infarction in the posterior limb of ipsilateral internal capsule on CT (Fig 2). Clipping had significantly higher incidence of treatment-related AchoA infarction than coiling (Table 5).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Images of a 46-year-old man who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A, 3D volume-rendering image reveals anterior choroidal artery aneurysm with the daughter sac. B, The anterior choroidal artery is well preserved on follow-up angiography performed due to the postoperative contralateral hemiparesis. C, Follow-up CT reveals low attenuation in the ipsilateral anterior choroidal artery territory, posterior limb of right internal capsule.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5:

Treatment-related complications

Results of Follow-up Angiography

Twenty-nine aneurysms (76.3%) in 28 patients of the coil group were followed up with 1 or more angiographies. Recurrence was found in 5 (17.2%) of the 29 aneurysms in angiographic follow-up performed 6-45 months (mean ± SE, 18 ± 12) after treatment. Four recurrences were found in the first year of follow-up, and 1 in the second year. Of the 5 recurred aneurysms, a second coil embolization was performed with results of near-complete occlusion in 2 aneurysms, both of which were stable on the next 2 follow-up angiographies. The other 3 aneurysms were not retreated because of the small size of the recurrent sac.

Three patients of the clip group underwent immediate follow-up angiography on the following day after surgery due to symptoms of AchoA infarction. One patient revealed AchoA occlusion, and 2 patients revealed patent AchoA (Fig 2). No patient in the clip group underwent late follow-up angiography.

Discussion

The perforating branches of AchoA passing through the anterior perforating substance to the globus pallidus and posterior limb of the internal capsule do not receive any significant collateral supply.8 Impairment of the AchoA during treatment may result in serious clinical consequences, called the AchoA syndrome, which consists of contralateral hemiparesis, hemisensory loss, and homonymous hemianopsia. Therefore, although coiling has been favorably comparable with clipping for the treatment of most of intracranial aneurysms,9 there is a controversy on which technique is safer for the treatment of AchoA aneurysms. The surgical literature distinguishes the AchoA aneurysms from other intracranial aneurysms.2–5 Friedman et al5 reported, to our knowledge, the largest surgical series in the surgical literature. They treated 51 AchoA aneurysms in 50 patients, among whom 33 patients presented with SAH. Three (6%) of the 50 patients died, among whom 2 (4%) died from treatment-related complications. Eight (16%) of the 50 patients had postoperative clinical and CT evidence of an AchoA infarction. Of the 8 patients with AchoA infarctions, 1 patient died, and 5 patients had major neurologic deficits.

Recently, a series of 18 AchoA aneurysms treated by endovascular technique in 18 patients was reported, of which 14 patients (77.8%) presented with SAH, and 13 AchoA aneurysms (72.2%) were the source of SAH. One patient (5.5%) died due to aneurysm perforation during the procedure. Another patient (5.5%) had a transient contralateral hemiparesis.6

In our study, clinical outcome of coiling for AchoA aneurysms was comparable with clipping. However, the incidence of treatment-related AchoA infarction was significantly lower in the coil group than in the clip group. Moreover, treatment-related AchoA infarction was also significantly correlated with poor outcome. One of the advantages of coiling for the AchoA aneurysm is that we can make certain of the patency of the AchoA during the entire procedure. During surgery, it is often difficult to verify the patency of the AchoA by microscopy because of the small size of the artery and site of origin, usually behind the internal carotid artery, as viewed surgically. Although the surgeons were confident of their patency at completion of the operation, the AchoA was occluded in 2 (28.6%) of the 7 aneurysms4 and in 6 (11.8%) of the 51 aneurysms.5 Shibata et al10 reported that the use of intraoperative microvascular Doppler sonography (MDS) decreased the incidence of postoperative AchoA syndrome from 16% to 5%. More recently, Suzuki et al11 reported that intraoperative monitoring of MEPs in 108 patients with ICA aneurysms was reliable for detecting insufficiency of AchoA perfusion intraoperatively. In our study, intraoperative monitoring of MEPs was not routinely used, but intraoperative MDS was used. Intraoperative insufficiency of perfusion to the AchoA was suspected in only 1 patient, but ipsilateral infarctions in the posterior internal capsule were detected on follow-up CT in all 4 of the patents with resultant contralateral hemiparesis. Moreover, of the 3 patients who underwent follow-up angiography within 24 hours after completion of clipping, only 1 patient revealed AchoA occlusion, whereas the other 2 patients revealed patent AchoA. These suggest that postoperative AchoA infarction may result from transient insufficiency, as well as permanent occlusion. The possible mechanisms of transient or permanent insufficiency during or immediately after surgery include clipping of the parent artery, thromboembolism during manipulation of the AchoA, vasospasm, glial edema, clip torsion due to postoperative edema of neighboring structures, or a combination of those.5,6 AchoA is usually small, and its perforating branches had poor collateral supply.8 Therefore, transient insufficiency of flow for more than a certain period of time may lead to critical ischemia of the AchoA territory. Endovascular treatment has the advantage that it is possible to promptly detect insufficiency of flow in the AchoA during the procedure. In our study, prompt detection of transient AchoA flow insufficiency during endovascular treatment made it possible to restore its flow by immediate management. As a result, of the 5 patients who had transient AchoA insufficiency, none had permanent neurologic deficit.

Because follow-up angiography was seldom performed in the clip group, comparing the recurrence rates of the AchoA aneurysms between the clip group and the coil group will be difficult. However, it is probable that recurrences are more frequent after coiling than after clipping,12–14 and follow-up angiographies were more frequently performed for the coil group in this study. Therefore, it may be required to routinely follow-up with angiography after coiling the AchoA aneurysm. In addition, because there is a small but significant risk of de novo aneurysm formation or growth of remnant aneurysm after clipping, clinical follow-up should be applied to both the coil group and the clip group over an extended period of time.14,15

The results of this study suggest that coiling for AchoA aneurysms is comparable with clipping in clinical outcome and prevention of rebleeding, with significantly lower incidence of AchoA infarction, which will potentially result in poor outcome.

References

  1. ↵
    Flamm ES. Other aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS, eds. Neurosurgery. New York: McGraw-Hill;1996;2301–10
  2. ↵
    Drake CG, Vanderlinden RG, Amacher AL. Carotid-choroidal aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;29:32–36
    PubMed
  3. Yasargil MG, Yonas H, Gasser JC. Anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: their anatomy and surgical significance. Surg Neurol 1978;9:129–38
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Viale GL, Pau A. Carotid-choroidal aneurysms: remarks on surgical treatment and outcome. Surg Neurol 1979;11:141–45
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Friedman JA, Pichelmann MA, Piepgras DG, et al. Ischemic complications of surgery for anterior choroidal artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2001;94:565–72
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Piotin M, Mounayer C, Spelle L, et al. Endovascular treatment of anterior choroidal artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J of Neuroradiol 2004;25:314–18
  7. ↵
    van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–07
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Rhoton AL Jr, Fujii K, Fradd B. Microsurgical anatomy of the anterior choroidal artery. Surg Neurol 1970;12:171–87
  9. ↵
    Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu LM, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Shibata Y, Fujita S, Kawaguchi T, et al. Use of microvascular Doppler sonography in aneurysm surgery on the anterior choroidal artery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2000;40:30–37
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Suzuki K, Kodama N, Sasaki T, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of blood flow insufficiency in the anterior choroidal artery during aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 2003;98:507–14
    PubMed
  12. ↵
    Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. Iijima A, Piotin M, Mounayer C, et al. Endovascular treatment with coils of 149 middle cerebral artery berry aneurysms. Radiology 2005;237:611–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    David CA, Vishteh AG, Spetzler RF, et al. Late angiographic follow-up review of surgically treated aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1999;91:396–401
    PubMed
  15. ↵
    Edner G, Almqvist H. The Stockholm 20-year follow-up of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage outcome. Neurosurgery 2007;60:1017–24
    PubMed
  • Received June 21, 2007.
  • Accepted after revision July 12, 2007.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 2
February 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Outcome and Ischemic Complication after Treatment of Anterior Choroidal Artery Aneurysm: Comparison between Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
B.M. Kim, D.I. Kim, Y.S. Shin, E.C. Chung, D.J. Kim, S.H. Suh, S.Y. Kim, S.I. Park, C.S. Choi, Y.S. Won
Clinical Outcome and Ischemic Complication after Treatment of Anterior Choroidal Artery Aneurysm: Comparison between Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2008, 29 (2) 286-290; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0806

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Clinical Outcome and Ischemic Complication after Treatment of Anterior Choroidal Artery Aneurysm: Comparison between Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling
B.M. Kim, D.I. Kim, Y.S. Shin, E.C. Chung, D.J. Kim, S.H. Suh, S.Y. Kim, S.I. Park, C.S. Choi, Y.S. Won
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2008, 29 (2) 286-290; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0806
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical outcome after surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysms: a pragmatic meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials with short- and long-term follow-up
  • Clipping Versus Coiling for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Crossref (49)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Unruptured Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature on Safety and Efficacy
    Olivier N. Naggara, Phil M. White, François Guilbert, Daniel Roy, Alain Weill, Jean Raymond
    Radiology 2010 256 3
  • Clipping Versus Coiling for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Hui Li, Rui Pan, Hongxuan Wang, Xiaoming Rong, Zi Yin, Daniel P. Milgrom, Xiaolei Shi, Yamei Tang, Ying Peng
    Stroke 2013 44 1
  • The use of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery to predict pure motor deficits due to subcortical ischemia
    LanJun Guo, Adrian W Gelb
    Clinical Neurophysiology 2011 122 4
  • Surgical Treatment of 127 Anterior Choroidal Artery Aneurysms A Cohort Study of Resultant Ischemic Complications
    Bradley N. Bohnstedt, William J. Kemp, Yiping Li, Troy D. Payner, Terry G. Horner, Thomas J. Leipzig, Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol
    Neurosurgery 2013 73 6
  • Microneurosurgical Management of Anterior Choroid Artery Aneurysms
    Martin Lehecka, Reza Dashti, Aki Laakso, Jouke S. van Popta, Rossana Romani, Ondrej Navratil, Leena Kivipelto, Riku Kivisaari, Mansoor Foroughi, Jouji Kokuzawa, Hanna Lehto, Mika Niemelä, Jaakko Rinne, Antti Ronkainen, Timo Koivisto, Juha E. Jääskelainen, Juha Hernesniemi
    World Neurosurgery 2010 73 5
  • Discrepancy Between Voluntary Movement and Motor-Evoked Potentials in Evaluation of Motor Function During Clipping of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
    Kengo Suzuki, Takeshi Mikami, Toshiya Sugino, Masahiko Wanibuchi, Susumu Miyamoto, Nobuo Hashimoto, Nobuhiro Mikuni
    World Neurosurgery 2014 82 6
  • Clinical outcome after surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysms: a pragmatic meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials with short- and long-term follow-up
    Alberto Falk Delgado, Tommy Andersson, Anna Falk Delgado
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017 9 3
  • Microneurosurgical management of anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: a 16-year institutional experience of 102 patients
    Jin Li, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Zhigang Lan, Yi Liu, Min He
    Neurological Research 2012 34 3
  • Anterior Choroidal Artery Aneurysm Surgery: Ischemic Complications and Clinical Outcomes Revisited
    Young-Sup Lee, Jaechan Park
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2013 54 2
  • Neurosurgical Clipping versus Endovascular Coiling for Patients with Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhiqun Jiang, Yan Chen, Chunhui Zeng, Jiugeng Feng, Yilv Wan, Xuezhi Zhang
    World Neurosurgery 2020 138

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire