American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 5 977-983, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
Tectal tumors of childhood: clinical and imaging follow-up
TY Poussaint, JR Kowal, PD Barnes, D Zurakowski, DC Anthony, L Goumnerova and NJ Tarbell
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
PURPOSE: This study was done to determine which clinical and imaging findings best correlate with outcome in children with tectal tumors. METHODS: A retrospective review was done of the medical records and imaging studies of 32 children (16 boys and 16 girls; mean age, 8 years) with tectal tumors. Eight children had CT, 11 had MR imaging, and 13 had both CT and MR studies. Findings from surgical and pathologic reports as well as from follow-up examinations (mean follow- up period, 5 years; range, 3.6 months to 17 years) were included in the review. RESULTS: All patients had hydrocephalus and all but one required CSF diversion. The tectum was the center of the tumor in all cases and the majority of the tumors appeared isodense on CT scans, isointense on T1-weighted MR images, and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Twenty patients required no further treatment. In this group, the mean maximum tumor diameter was 1.8 cm and enhancement occurred in two cases. At follow-up, 18 patients had stable tumor size, one had an increase in tumor size with cyst formation but no worsening of symptoms, and one had a decrease in tumor size. Twelve patients required further treatment (excision and/or radiotherapy) because of progression as indicated by either increased tumor size or worsening of symptoms. In this group, the mean maximum tumor diameter was 2.5 cm and contrast enhancement occurred in nine cases. Further follow-up in this group showed decreased tumor size in eight and stable residual tumor in three. CONCLUSION: Tectal tumors in childhood have variable behavior. MR imaging assists in the clinical determination of which children need treatment beyond CSF diversion. Larger tumor size and enhancement are radiologic predictors of the need for further treatment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S H Wilne, R C Ferris, A Nathwani, and C R Kennedy The presenting features of brain tumours: a review of 200 cases Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 502 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|