Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL

Transradial Approach for Diagnostic Selective Cerebral Angiography: Results of a Consecutive Series of 166 Cases

Yasushi Matsumoto, Kazuhiro Hongo, Toshihide Toriyama, Hisashi Nagashima and Shigeaki Kobayashi
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2001, 22 (4) 704-708;
Yasushi Matsumoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuhiro Hongo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toshihide Toriyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hisashi Nagashima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigeaki Kobayashi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diagnostic selective cerebral angiography is commonly performed via transfemoral and transbrachial approaches. With these approaches, however, patients occasionally suffer serious complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a transradial approach as an alternative to the transfemoral and transbrachial approaches.

METHODS: Between October 1998 and September 1999, transradial cerebral angiography was performed in 166 consecutive patients in a single center as a diagnostic procedure. Before the procedure, we confirmed the collateral blood supply to the hand from the ulnar artery using a modified Allen test. Regular catheterization techniques were practiced using our newly designed 120-cm-long 4F catheter. In 42 patients, anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy was given perioperatively.

RESULTS: Twelve of the 166 patients proved to be poor candidates for the transradial approach, owing to restlessness (n = 9), lack of collateral blood supply via the ulnar artery (n = 2), and brachial artery stenosis (n = 1). The radial artery was successfully punctured and cannulated in the remaining 154 patients. Selective catheterization of the intended vessels was obtained in all carotid and vertebral angiographic procedures with no major vascular complications.

CONCLUSION: Compared with transfemoral and transbrachial approaches, the transradial approach is a less invasive and safer technique for selective cerebral angiography and may warrant consideration as a standard procedure. Anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy need not be discontinued for this method.

Despite progress in cerebrovascular imaging methods, such as MR angiography and three-dimensional CT angiography, catheterized cerebral angiography is still a commonly used method for examining the cerebral vasculature. Diagnostic selective cerebral angiography is currently performed using transfemoral and transbrachial approaches in most institutions. Transfemoral angiography requires patients to tolerate uncomfortable compression of the groin and bed rest for hours after the examination, and the procedure may produce serious complications, such as local pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, retroperitoneal hematoma, and pulmonary embolism (1–7). The transbrachial method is an outpatient examination and causes fewer attendant serious complications; however, it sometimes results in massive local subcutaneous hematoma, pulse deficit, and median nerve palsy (12–15). The transradial approach, on the other hand, was developed as a safe technique for performing coronary angiography in the cardiovascular field (16–21), and since 1997 we have adopted this approach for cerebral angiography (22).

The purpose of this study was to establish the transradial approach as a standard method for performing cerebral angiography using a newly designed catheter, which minimizes examination-related risks, and to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this route as an alternative to the transfemoral and transbrachial approaches.

Methods

Patient Selection

Between October 1998 and September 1999, 166 consecutive patients at a single hospital underwent diagnostic selective cerebral angiography via a standardized transradial route for evaluation of cerebrovascular diseases. Patients requiring interventional procedures were excluded. The patients ranged in age from 14 to 87 years (mean age, 65 years) and included 90 women and 76 men. In 42 patients, anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy was given perioperatively. The anticoagulant effect of warfarin was kept between 2.0 to 3.0 in an international normalized ratio, and heparin was administered to obtain an activated clotting time of more than 250 seconds.

Satisfactory collateral perfusion of the hand was confirmed before the procedure by normal findings on a modified Allen test. In this modified version of the Allen test, the examiner manually occludes the patient's ulnar and radial arteries while the patient makes a fist, causing the hand to blanch. The patient is then asked to extend the fingers but to avoid hyperextension, as this may cause a decrease in perfusion to the palmer arch and result in a false interruption of the test. (If the patient has a consciousness disturbance, the examiner needs to clench the patient's fist and to extend the fingers.) Once the hand is open, the examiner releases the ulnar artery while continuing to maintain pressure on the radial artery. Adequate collateral circulation is considered to be present when the hand color returns to normal within 10 seconds after the ulnar artery is released and when no reactive hyperemia is present after release of the radial compression. We performed this procedure after obtaining informed consent from the patients.

Instruments and Techniques

Patients were prepared and draped with the right radial artery site exposed at the wrist and the right arm abducted to 70°. The wrist was fixed over a gauze roll in an extended position. To prevent mechanical spasm of the radial artery, lidocaine tape was stuck on the wrist 1 hour before the procedure, and the skin at the puncture site was infiltrated with 1% lidocaine. A small incision was made over the radial artery, and the artery was punctured at the point of maximum pulsation, near the styloid process, using a 20- or 22-gauge needle with a modified Seldinger technique. A 0.025-inch guidewire was carefully advanced into the radial artery and a 17-cm-long 4F arterial introducer sheath (Slit Super-Sheath, Medikit, Tokyo, Japan) was placed in the radial artery. This arterial introducer has 15 slits in a spiral arrangement. The use of the accessory inner sheath permitted isosorbide dinitrate to contact the radial artery directly through the slits if spasm was encountered. The introducer was removed in the same way as a conventional sheath. This introducer is 4.74F in its inner diameter and 5.65F in its outer diameter. A newly designed 120-cm-long 4F modified Simmons catheter (Shinshu '98, Medikit) (Fig 1), which is coated with special lubricant and is soft enough to be advanced over the 0.035-inch guidewire, was used for selective catheterization of the cerebral vessels. As this catheter was soft, certain techniques were required to prevent it from kinking as it was advanced into the ascending aorta (Fig 2). The guidewire was then turned over above the aortic valves and the catheter was advanced over the guidewire until the tip of the catheter formed a J shape. Then the guidewire was pulled back to the curved point of the catheter. During the process of selecting vessels, the relationship between the guidewire and catheter was carefully maintained to prevent kinking of the catheter. An angiogram was obtained with a digital subtraction angiographic system. On completing the examination, a tourniquet (Adapty, Medikit) was placed over the puncture site immediately after the introducer catheter was removed; the puncture site was not compressed manually. The compression tourniquet was placed with a moderate pressure for 6 hours for hemostasis, while the patient was permitted to move the wrist, even immediately after the procedure. The transparent acrylic plate of the tourniquet permits the immediate detection of bleeding and other complications. Bed rest was not required. Patients were questioned as to whether they felt discomfort during the procedure and were asked to compare the technique with transfemoral angiography, if they had previously undergone that procedure. The total procedure time, including the time it took to enter and leave the examination room, was recorded.

fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 1.

A newly designed 120-cm-long 4F modified Simmons catheter is covered with special lubricant coating and is soft enough to be advanced over a 0.035-inch guidewire

fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 2.

A and B, Radiographs show procedure for making a catheter tip J-shaped. The 4F catheter is advanced into the ascending aorta just above the aortic valves; a 0.035-inch guidewire is then turned over above the aortic valves (A) and the catheter is advanced over the guidewire until the tip forms a J shape (B)

Results

Twelve of the 166 patients proved to be poor candidates for the transradial approach, owing to restlessness in nine (5.4%), lack of collateral blood supply via the ulnar artery in two (1.2%), and brachial artery stenosis in one (0.6%). In the latter patient, the radial artery was successfully cannulated, but the procedure was terminated because a preexisting stenosis of the brachial artery was found, and a transfemoral approach was used to complete the examination. In the remaining 154 patients the radial artery was successfully punctured and cannulated. Selective catheterization of the intended vessels was obtained in all the bilateral internal and external carotid artery angiograms and in the bilateral vertebral artery angiograms (Table 1). No severe local arterial spasm was experienced during the procedure and no major vascular complications were encountered, such as cerebral infarction, upper limb ischemia, significant local hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or functional disability of the hand. In four (2.6%) of the 154 patients, slight ecchymosis was observed around the puncture site without clinical symptoms. One (2.3%) of the 42 patients treated with anticoagulants (warfarin potassium in 12, heparin sodium in three) and/or antiplatelets (ticlopidine hydrochloride in 34) developed slight local ecchymosis (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1:

Selective procedures performed in 154 patients undergoing transradial diagnostic selective cerebral angiography

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2:

Results of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy used in 42 of the 154 patients undergoing transradial diagnostic selective cerebral angiography

In all patients, the radial artery was pulsatile and the modified Allen test was negative immediately after and 2 weeks after the procedure. No patients had functional disability of the hand, and no complaints of discomfort were reported on the questionnaire. The mean procedure time for the transradial approach was 39 minutes (range, 15 to 106 minutes) (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 3:

Mean procedure time, depending on number of vessels studied, in 154 patients undergoing transradial diagnostic selective cerebral angiography

Discussion

Numerous publications have reported on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the transradial technique for use in the cardiovascular field, both for diagnostic and interventional procedures (16–21, 23–25). We have been using this technique for selective cerebral angiography since 1997 (22). The reported rate of vascular complications associated with the transradial approach for cardiologic procedures is lower than that for the transfemoral or transbrachial approach (16–21, 23–25).

Regarding the evaluation of the collateral circulation, the modified Allen test is the most commonly used screening study before radial artery cannulation. In our series of patients undergoing transradial cerebral angiography, only 2.4% had slight local ecchymosis, none with clinical signs or symptoms. This low rate might be the result of the smaller catheter we used in this series, rather than the larger catheter commonly used in transradial cardiac angiography. The compression tourniquet that we use also has lessened the risk of subcutaneous hematoma by allowing us to obtain more adequate and stable compression than achievable with manual compression at the puncture site just after removing the introducer catheter. Late occlusions of the radial artery are rare (26). In all our patients, satisfactory blood circulation of the hand and good pulsation of the radial artery were confirmed immediately after and 2 weeks after the procedure by modified Allen test. There were no major complications.

Currently, selective cerebral angiography is performed primarily with the transfemoral approach in most institutions, mainly because of its easy access to the entire cerebral vascular system. This approach is, however, not possible in 2% to 10% of patients (16, 21), owing to peripheral vascular disease, and it is often hazardous in patients who receive therapeutic anticoagulation or in obese patients. Although 6.6% of our patients proved to be poor candidates for the transradial approach (because of restlessness or poor collateral circulation), the radial artery has a number of advantages over the brachial artery for arterial cannulation: it is superficially located on the underlying firm tendon, relatively fixed, easily compressible, and, most important, not an end artery. Because no major nerves or veins run in the vicinity of the radial artery over the radial styloid, neuropathies or arteriovenous fistulas are less likely to occur. The reported rate of local complications with the transbrachial approach is relatively high, ranging from 2% to 21% (12–15). As long as the ulnar artery is patent, no major complications stemming from radial artery occlusion have been reported with the transradial approach. In contrast, brachial artery occlusion can produce catastrophic complications that constitute a surgical emergency (12, 15). Anatomic variations have been found in the palmer arch arrangement; for example, in one series (27), ulnar perfusion of the hand was absent in 5% of the subjects, with total perfusion being supplied by the radial artery. In the present series, two (1.2%) of 166 patients had poor collateral blood supply via the ulnar artery. Failure of radial artery cannulation occurs in 0% to 10% of cases (16, 19), with most series reporting figures of 3% to 5% (18, 21). This exceeds the reported rate of failed percutaneous brachial access procedures (25). However, in our series, the radial artery was successfully punctured and cannulated in all patients. Especially for obese patients, the radial artery is an easier and safer access site. To prevent mechanical spasm of the radial artery, local anesthetic plus lidocaine tape may be effective.

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies are crucial for treating patients with ischemic diseases of the brain and heart. For reducing the risk of serious hemorrhagic complications, it is usually necessary to discontinue the anticoagulant or antithrombotic agents before the procedure. In the present series, however, we did not discontinue such agents, and no major hemorrhagic complications were experienced, such as significant local hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, or arteriovenous fistula. In one (2.3%) of the 42 patients who received anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy perioperatively, slight ecchymosis was observed locally; however, this rate is no different from that seen in the overall patient population. It is reasonable to say, therefore, that anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies need not to be discontinued for cerebral angiography with this method.

With the transradial approach, the hours of uncomfortable groin compression and prolonged bed rest, which are required for the transfemoral approach, are not necessary. Furthermore, after the transfemoral approach, patients are usually kept in the hospital overnight for observation. If an adequate vascular closure device were used, there might be no need for either the groin compression or the overnight hospital stay (28, 29). Furthermore, after the transbrachial procedure, it is necessary to keep the arm in an extended position for several hours. In contrast, after the transradial procedure, no such special precautions are needed; this is an important advantage that relieves the patient from restriction of arm movement, especially when the examination is performed on an outpatient basis.

Achieving access in the radial artery is technically more challenging during the initial phase of learning than it is for the brachial and femoral arteries. With experience, however, the time required for the transradial approach is no longer than that required for the transfemoral procedure, because prolonged compression time is not necessary.

With efficient use of the guidewire, the new soft, smooth-surfaced catheter enables easy selection of both the external and internal carotid arteries for cannulation (see Table 1), and probably reduces the risk of local vasospasm.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that the transradial approach could become a standard technique for selective cerebral angiography. The high procedural success rate and lack of major puncture site–related complications make the radial artery a promising entry site for selective cerebral angiography. Anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy need not to be discontinued for this method.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Masanobu Hokama of Shinonoi General Hospital for advice and encouragement regarding this manuscript, and Hiroyuki Yahikozawa and Naoto Hagiwara for their assistance.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Japan Neurosurgical Society, Tokyo, October 1999.

  • ↵2 Address reprint requests to Kazuhiro Hongo, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.

References

  1. ↵
    Aburahma AF, Robinson PA, Umstot RK, et al. Complication of angiography in a recent series of 707 cases. Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7:122-129
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Owaida SW, Roubin GS, Smith RB III, Salam AA. Postcatheterization vascular complications associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:310-315
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Ruebben A, Tettoni S, Muratore P, Rossato D, Savio D, Rabbia C. Arteriovenous fistula induced by femoral artery catheterization: percutaneous treatment. Radiology 1998;209:729-734
    PubMed
  4. Altin RS, Flicker S, Naidech HJ. Pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula after femoral artery catheterization: association with low femoral punctures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:629-631
    PubMed
  5. Kim D, Orron DE, Skillman JJ, et al. Role of superficial femoral artery puncture in the development of pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula complicating percutaneous transfemoral cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;25:91-97
    PubMed
  6. Sreeram S, Lunsden AB, Millar JS, Salam AA, Dodson TF, Smith RB. Retroperitoneal hematoma following femoral arterial catheterization: a serious and often fatal complication. Am Surg 1993;59:94-98
    PubMed
  7. Kurokawa Y, Abiko S, Okamura T, et al. Pulmonary embolism after cerebral angiography: three case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1995;35:305-309
    PubMed
  8. Barnett FJ, Lecky DM, Freimen DB. Outpatient evaluation with selective carotid DSA performed via a transbrachial approach. Radiology 1989;170:535-539
    PubMed
  9. Morin ME, Willens BA, Kuss PA. Percutaneous transbrachial selective arteriography with a 4-F catheter. Radiology 1989;171:868-870
    PubMed
  10. Touho H, Karasawa J, Shishido FL, et al. Transbrachial artery approach for selective cerebral angiography in outpatients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;9:334-336
    FREE Full Text
  11. Touho H, Karasawa J, Ohnishi H, et al. The “turn-over” technique for selective cerebral angiography. Neuroradiology 1994;36:123-124
    PubMed
  12. ↵
    Gritter KJ, Laidlaw WW, Gibson M. Complications of outpatient transbrachial intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1987;162:125-127
    PubMed
  13. Heenan SD, Grubnic S, Buckenham TM, Belli AM. Transbrachial arteriography: indications and complications. Clin Radiol 1996;51:205-209
    PubMed
  14. Millward SF. Routine transbrachial angiography. Radiology 1989;172:577
    PubMed
  15. Uchino A. Local complications in transbrachial cerebral angiography using the 4-F catheter. Neuro Med Chir (Tokyo) 1991;31:647-649
  16. ↵
    Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3-7
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. Otaki M. Percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiology 1992;81:330-333
    PubMed
  18. ↵
    Lotan C, Hasin Y, Mosseri M, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:164-167
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. Hildick-Smith D Jr, Ludman PF, Lowe MD, et al. Complication of radial versus brachial approach for diagnostic coronary angiography when the femoral approach is contraindicated. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:770-772
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. Ludman PF, Stephens NG, Harcombe A, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1239-1241
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. Spaulding C, Lefevre T, Funck F, et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:365-370
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Matsumoto Y, Hokama M, Nagashima H, et al. Transradial approach for selective cerebral angiography: technical note. Neurol Res 2000;22:605-608
    PubMed
  23. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995;129:1-7
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. Benit E, Missault L, Eeman T, et al. Brachial, radial or femoral approach for elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: a randomized comparison. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;41:124-130
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van derWieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-1275
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Stella PR, Kiemeneij J, Laarman GJ, et al. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;40:156-158
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Kieffer RW, Dean DW. Complications or intra-arterial monitoring. Prob Gen Surg 1985;2:116-120
  28. ↵
    Sesana M, Vaghetti M, Albiero R, et al. Effectiveness and complications of vascular access closure devices after interventional procedures. J Invas Cardiol 2000;12:395-399
    PubMed
  29. Wetter DR, Rickli H, von Smekal A, Amann FW. Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2000;11:1033-1037
    PubMed
  • Received September 18, 2000.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 22, Issue 4
1 Apr 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transradial Approach for Diagnostic Selective Cerebral Angiography: Results of a Consecutive Series of 166 Cases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Yasushi Matsumoto, Kazuhiro Hongo, Toshihide Toriyama, Hisashi Nagashima, Shigeaki Kobayashi
Transradial Approach for Diagnostic Selective Cerebral Angiography: Results of a Consecutive Series of 166 Cases
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2001, 22 (4) 704-708;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Transradial Approach for Diagnostic Selective Cerebral Angiography: Results of a Consecutive Series of 166 Cases
Yasushi Matsumoto, Kazuhiro Hongo, Toshihide Toriyama, Hisashi Nagashima, Shigeaki Kobayashi
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2001, 22 (4) 704-708;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Transradial cerebral angiography: predicting left ICA selective angiography success using pre-diagnostic aortic arch factors
  • Intraoperative angiography via popliteal artery access for spinal neurovascular lesions: an institutional experience and systematic review
  • Intraoperative angiography via popliteal artery access for spinal neurovascular lesions: an institutional experience and systematic review
  • Transradial cerebral angiography becomes more efficient than transfemoral angiography: lessons from 500 consecutive angiograms
  • Learning curves for transradial access versus transfemoral access in diagnostic cerebral angiography: a case series
  • Predicting the degree of difficulty of the trans-radial approach in cerebral angiography
  • Is Transradial Access a Replacement Technique for Transfemoral Access in Neurointervention?
  • Transradial Approach for Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility
  • Transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral angiograms in the elderly: a comparative observational study
  • Transradial approach for neurointerventions: a systematic review of the literature
  • Transarterial and transvenous access for neurointerventional surgery: report of the SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee
  • Transradial approach for acute stroke intervention: technical procedure and clinical outcomes
  • A prospective study of the transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral arteriography
  • Transradial cerebral angiography: techniques and outcomes
  • Transradial access in acute ischemic stroke intervention
  • Cerebral Angiography
  • Routine transradial access for conventional cerebral angiography: a single operator's experience of its feasibility and safety
  • Transradial Cerebral Angiography: Technique and Outcomes
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire