Advertisement

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleBrain

Quantitative Measurement of Cerebrovascular Reactivity by Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MR Imaging in Patients with Intracranial Stenosis: Preoperative Cerebrovascular Reactivity Predicts the Effect of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery

D.M. Mandell, J.S. Han, J. Poublanc, A.P. Crawley, J. Fierstra, M. Tymianski, J.A. Fisher and D.J. Mikulis
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2011, 32 (4) 721-727; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2365

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CVR is a measure of cerebral hemodynamic impairment. A recently validated technique quantifies CVR by using a precise CO2 vasodilatory stimulus and BOLD MR imaging. Our aim was to determine whether preoperative CO2 BOLD CVR predicts the hemodynamic effect of ECIC bypass surgery in patients with intracranial steno-occlusive disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients undergoing ECIC bypass surgery for treatment of intracranial stenosis or occlusion were recruited. CVR was measured preoperatively and postoperatively and expressed as %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg ΔPetCO2. Using normative data from healthy subjects, we stratified patients on the basis of preoperative CVR into 3 groups: normal CVR, reduced CVR, and negative (paradoxical) CVR. Wilcoxon 2-sample tests (2-sided, α = 0.05) were used to determine whether the 3 groups differed with respect to change in CVR following bypass surgery.

RESULTS: The group with normal preoperative CVR demonstrated no significant change in CVR following bypass surgery (mean, 0.22% ± 0.05% to 0.22% ± 0.01%; P = .881). The group with reduced preoperative CVR demonstrated a significant improvement following bypass surgery (mean, 0.08% ± 0.05% to 0.21 ± 0.08%; P < .001), and the group with paradoxical preoperative CVR demonstrated the greatest improvement (mean change, −0.04% ± 0.03% to 0.27% ± 0.03%; P = .028).

CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative measurement of CVR by using CO2 BOLD MR imaging predicts the hemodynamic effect of ECIC bypass in patients with intracranial steno-occlusive disease. The technique is potentially useful for selecting patients for surgical revascularization.

Abbreviations

ACA
anterior cerebral artery
AFNI
Analysis of Functional NeuroImages
BOLD
blood oxygen level−dependent
CBF
cerebral blood flow
CO2
carbon dioxide
CTA
CT angiography
CVR
cerebrovascular reactivity
DSA
digital subtraction angiography
ECIC bypass
extracranial-intracranial bypass
FiCO2
inspiratory partial pressure of CO2
FLAIR
fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
L
left
MCA
middle cerebral artery
MRA
MR angiography
OEF
oxygen extraction fraction
PaCO2
arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide
PET
positron-emission tomography
PetCO2
end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide
PetO2
end-tidal partial pressure of oxygen
R
right
STA
superficial temporal artery
TCD
transcranial Doppler
TIA
transient ischemic attack

A large population-based study1 in the United States found that 9%–15% of ischemic strokes are due to intracranial stenosis or occlusion. The proportion is even higher in Asian populations.2 Management of intracranial steno-occlusive disease is a challenge because most etiologies lack effective medical therapy.3,4 Surgical treatment, traditionally by ECIC arterial bypass, was popular until the EC/IC Bypass Study (1985)5 found no difference in stroke incidence between patients randomized to medical therapy versus surgical bypass. A critique of the ECIC Bypass Study was that patients were included on the basis of degree of angiographic stenosis, without specifically assessing for cerebral hemodynamic compromise. Assessment of cerebral hemodynamic compromise is important: For a given degree of angiographic stenosis, some patients have adequate collateral supply, while others lack sufficient collateral flow. Subsequent advances in brain imaging have improved our ability to identify the latter group.

A recently validated6 technique for measuring CVR uses precise changes in PetCO2 as a vasodilatory stimulus and BOLD MR imaging to map the stimulus-induced changes in CBF. This technique uses an MR pulse sequence that is standard on clinical MR imaging systems, and it can be performed at the same session as routine MR imaging and MRA. Some groups7–9 have measured CO2 BOLD CVR by using the contralateral hemisphere as an internal standard and have reported quantitative right-left interhemispheric asymmetry indices. This kind of relative measure is necessarily problematic in patients with bilateral disease. It has previously been shown6 that expression of hemispheric CVR in absolute values (%ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg ΔPetCO2), rather than as an interhemispheric asymmetry index, correlates well with CVR measured by using arterial spin-labeling MR imaging.

Our aim was to determine whether preoperative CO2 BOLD CVR, expressed in absolute values, predicts the hemodynamic effect of surgical bypass in patients with intracranial steno-occlusive disease. We hypothesized that patients with normal preoperative CVR would not improve in CVR following bypass, those with reduced preoperative CVR would improve, and those with markedly reduced CVR (ie, negative or paradoxical CVR) would have the greatest improvement.

Materials and Methods

Patients

The institutional ethics committee approved the study protocol, and all patients provided written informed consent. There were no study-related adverse events. Patients scheduled for ECIC bypass surgery for treatment of intracranial steno-occlusive disease at the Toronto Western Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) were recruited. Twenty-five consecutive patients (16 women, 9 men; mean age, 39.6 years ± 14.5) were recruited between August 2006 and January 2010. Seven patients had bilateral bypass procedures during the study period, resulting in a total of 32 ECIC bypasses. Patient demographics, clinical presentations, and diagnoses are listed in the Table.

View this table:

Patient characteristics

Surgical Procedure

The most common surgical procedure (31/32) was direct ECIC bypass by end-side anastomosis of the STA to an MCA branch. In patients with small recipient MCA branches, this direct bypass was supplemented (7 procedures) with pial synangiosis, which is an indirect bypass performed by opening the arachnoid and attaching a branch of the STA to the pia mater. Two procedures consisted of indirect bypass only: 1 was a pial synangiosis and 1 was an encephalodural arterial synangiosis.

Vasodilatory Stimulus

PetCO2 and PetO2 were controlled by using model-based prospective end-tidal gas targeting.10 These algorithms are incorporated into a device (RespirAct; Thornhill Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) that consists of a computer-controlled gas blender, sensors for PCO2 and PO2, and a sequential rebreathing circuit applied to the patient. The user enters the target end-tidal gas values and their durations. The RespirAct system then uses the algorithm10 to calculate the various gas concentrations and flows it will administer to the breathing circuit to attain the target end-tidal gas partial pressures. The RespirAct system is capable of inducing precise square-wave changes in PetCO2 and PetO2, independently of each other over a wide range of minute ventilation and breathing patterns. The gas sequence for CVR was 8 minutes 20 seconds. Iso-oxia (target PetO2 of 100 mm Hg) was maintained throughout. The target PetCO2 was the following: 1) 40 mm Hg for 60 seconds (normocapnia), 2) 50 mm Hg for 60 seconds (hypercapnia), 3) normocapnia for 100 seconds, 4) hypercapnia for 160 seconds, and 5) normocapnia for 120 seconds.11 Tidal PCO2 and PO2 were monitored continuously, digitized, and recorded (RespirAct).

Imaging

MR imaging was performed on a 3T whole-body scanner (Signa HDx; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with an 8-channel phased-array head coil for signal reception. Each patient was imaged with an identical CO2 BOLD CVR protocol preoperatively and postoperatively. Each CVR session included routine clinical acquisitions (sagittal T1-weighted, axial T2-weighted, axial T2-weighted FLAIR, and diffusion-weighted), an axial T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient-echo acquisition (matrix size, 256 × 256; section thickness, 2.2 mm; intersection gap, 0) for anatomic coregistration, and an axial T2*-weighted single-shot gradient-echo echo-planar BOLD acquisition (flip angle, 85°; TR, 2000 ms; TE, 30 ms; FOV, 24 × 24 cm; matrix size, 64 × 64; section thickness, 5 mm; intersection gap, 2 mm; number of frames, 255) during controlled changes in PetCO2.

As part of their routine clinical care, all patients with direct ECIC bypasses also underwent postoperative imaging to assess bypass patency. This imaging was a combination of CT angiography (23/30 bypasses), MR angiography (12/30), and conventional angiography (10/30). Imaging to assess bypass patency was performed on the same day as postoperative CVR for 9/30 bypasses and both before and after the postoperative CVR for 13/30 bypasses. For the latter cases, one may infer bypass patency at the time of CVR if the bypass was patent on both the pre-CVR and post-CVR vascular studies. In the remaining 8/30 cases, patency was only assessed prior (mean, 4.0 ± 1.7 months) to the postoperative CVR. Mean time from assessment of vessel patency to postoperative CVR was 4.0 ± 1.7 months for these 8 patients. There was no suspicion of bypass nonpatency on clinical follow-up in any of these 8 patients.

Data Analysis

MR imaging and PetCO2 data were imported into the software AFNI (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni).12 An AFNI algorithm was used to calculate head motion for each BOLD MR imaging acquisition. Bypass procedures (4/32) with >1 voxel-width head motion on either the preoperative or postoperative CVR study were excluded from further analysis. Each patient's whole-brain BOLD MR signal-intensity dataset was temporally shifted to the point of maximum correlation with the patient's PetCO2 waveform. The BOLD MR signal-intensity-time waveform then underwent least-squares fitting to the PetCO2-time waveform on a voxel-by-voxel basis, and CVR was calculated as %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg ΔPetCO2. Anatomic images were automatically segmented into gray matter and white matter and transformed into Montreal Neurologic Institute space by using the software SPM8 (Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College, London, United Kingdom; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8). Anatomic images were further segmented into ACA, MCA, and posterior circulation (including the cerebellum) by using masks created from the atlas of Kretschmann and Weinrich.13 Mean gray matter CVR was calculated for each of these segments, for each CVR study.

The preoperative and postoperative routine T1- and T2-weighted images were reviewed to identify regions of parenchymal infarction or hemorrhage. Using AFNI, we created a mask of each region of parenchymal abnormality and generated a second set of CVR maps with these regions segmented. Clinical reports from postoperative CTA, MRA, and DSA were also reviewed, and each bypass was categorized as patent or nonpatent.

Statistical Analysis

To determine whether ECIC bypass had a significant effect on CVR, we performed a Wilcoxon 2-sample test (2-sided, α = 0.05) comparing preoperative and postoperative CVR values for each of the 6 vascular territories. Then, to determine whether preoperative stratification of patients by absolute CO2 BOLD CVR values predicts the hemodynamic effect of bypass surgery, we categorized patients on the basis of preoperative CVR in the territory of planned surgical bypass. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: 1) normal CVR, 2) reduced CVR, and 3) paradoxical CVR (that is, negative CVR). In a previous study,14 an identical CO2 BOLD CVR technique was used to study a group of 10 healthy subjects (mean age, 30.0 ± 8.2 years). In that study, mean CVR in the MCA territory was 0.30 ± 0.07 (%ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg PetCO2). Because these data were approximately age-matched with the current study population, we used 2 SDs below the mean CVR from the healthy subjects as a threshold for reduced CVR. The lower threshold CVR value was 0.16% ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg ΔPetCO2. We performed Wilcoxon 2-sample tests (2-sided, α = 0.05) to determine whether the change in CVR following ECIC bypass was significant for each of the 3 groups, and we also tested whether the change in CVR following ECIC bypass differed significantly between the healthy versus reduced CVR groups and reduced versus paradoxical CVR groups. All statistical analyses were then repeated for the CVR maps with regions of infarction or intraparenchymal hemorrhage removed. We also performed a Wilcoxon 2-sample test to look for a difference in preoperative CVR between those subjects who had direct bypass only versus those who received direct and indirect bypass.

Results

Median time from baseline CVR measurement to bypass procedure was 14.6 weeks (interquartile range, 13.5 weeks). Median time from bypass procedure to follow-up CVR measurement was 21.9 weeks (interquartile range, 9.5 weeks).

Bypass procedures excluded from the analysis were those associated with excessive head motion on a CVR study (4/32), nonpatent bypass (6/32), and a moderate-sized postoperative subdural hematoma (1 patient). The details of the 6 nonpatent bypasses are as follows: 1 bypass (patient 15) had already been excluded from the analysis due to head motion. One bypass (patient 1) was indeterminate for patency because the bypass was patent on an immediate postoperative CTA, postoperative CVR study was performed 2 months later, and the bypass was nonpatent on a CTA 2 months following the CVR. One bypass (patient 17) showed extremely delayed passage of contrast through the STA on DSA, with severe disease of the MCA M2 and M3 branches resulting in lack of retrograde flow into the MCA. Bilateral bypasses in a single patient (patient 13) showed significant stenosis at the arterial anastomoses. One bypass (patient 11) was occluded at the time of follow-up CVR.

There was no significant difference in preoperative CVR between subjects who received direct ECIC bypass only versus those who received direct and indirect bypass (mean, 0.09% ± 0.10% versus 0.09% ± 0.08%, respectively; P = .857).

Effect of ECIC Bypass on CO2 BOLD MR imaging CVR

CVR in the vascular territory of the surgical bypasses improved significantly following treatment (mean, 0.09% ± 0.10% prebypass to 0.22% ± 0.08% postbypass; 2-sided P < .001). CVR in the other vascular territories did not change significantly. Figure 1 shows these summary results, and Fig 2 is a representative case (patient 24). Repeating the analysis with regions of infarction or hemorrhage removed from the CVR maps did not significantly alter these results.

Fig 1.
Fig 1.

Graph shows the effect of ECIC bypass on CO2 BOLD CVR in gray matter vascular territories ipsilateral and contralateral to the bypass. Whiskers mark the 10th and 90th percentiles, and boxes are bounded by the 25th and 75th percentiles.

Fig 2.
Fig 2.

Gray matter CVR map overlaid on anatomic T1-weighted images for a representative patient (patient 24). Top row is before bypass, and bottom row is after bypass surgery. CVR units are %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg ΔPetCO2. Images demonstrate decreased, and in fact paradoxical (negative), CVR in the left MCA territory cortex and deep gray matter before bypass and marked improvement postbypass surgery.

Preoperative CVR as a Predictor of the Hemodynamic Effect of ECIC Bypass

Defining “reduced CVR” as 2 SDs below the mean CVR of approximately age-matched healthy subjects resulted in 5 patients with normal CVR, 12 patients with reduced (but positive) CVR, and 4 patients with paradoxical (negative) CVR. The group with normal preoperative CVR demonstrated no significant change in CVR following bypass surgery (mean, 0.22% ± 0.05% to 0.22% ± 0.01%; P = .881). The group with reduced preoperative CVR demonstrated a significant improvement following bypass surgery (mean, 0.08% ± 0.05% to 0.21 ± 0.08%; P < .001), as did those with paradoxical preoperative CVR (mean change, −0.04% ± 0.03% to 0.27% ± 0.03%; P = .028) (Fig 3 ). The differences in CVR improvement between the normal-versus-reduced preoperative CVR groups and between the reduced and paradoxical preoperative CVR groups were both significant (P = .012 and P < .001, respectively). Repeating the analysis with regions of infarction removed from the CVR maps yielded no significant change in the results.

Fig 3.
Fig 3.

Boxplots show the change in ipsilateral MCA territory CVR following ECIC bypass surgery for 3 groups: normal preoperative CVR, reduced preoperative CVR, and paradoxical preoperative CVR. Units of CVR are %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg ΔPetCO2.

Discussion

In this study, we found that CO2 BOLD CVR, expressed in absolute values, predicted the hemodynamic effect of ECIC bypass. Patients with normal preoperative CVR did not improve in CVR following bypass, those with reduced preoperative CVR did improve, and those with paradoxical preoperative CVR had the greatest improvement. These results have 2 main implications: First, they further validate the use of absolute CO2 BOLD CVR values for the measurement of cerebral hemodynamic compromise. Second, they suggest that absolute values from CO2 BOLD CVR are potentially of use in determining which patients with intracranial steno-occlusive disease should undergo surgical revascularization.

Quantitative Assessment of Hemodynamic Impairment Using CO2 BOLD CVR

We have expressed CVR in absolute values of %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg ΔPetCO2. This approach was validated in a study6 that compared BOLD MR imaging and arterial spin-labeling MR imaging measurements of CVR in 25 patients with steno-occlusive disease. This differs from much of the published CO2 BOLD CVR work7–9 that used the contralateral hemisphere as an internal standard and reported CVR as a right-left interhemispheric asymmetry index. Use of an interhemispheric asymmetry index is problematic because patients commonly have bilateral disease—that is, no normal hemisphere for normalization. We will briefly discuss a few methodologic details that may be important for obtaining absolute values of CO2 BOLD CVR.

First, is it necessary to normalize %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity to the magnitude of the vasodilatory stimulus? Goode et al8 suggested that use of a strong CO2 challenge yields near-maximal vasodilation and removes the need for normalization. Hypothetically, a CO2 stimulus sufficiently strong to cause near-maximal vasodilatory capacity in all patients could enable measurement of cerebrovascular reserve. However, the 40- to 50-mm Hg PetCO2 range typical of a CVR study is unlikely to consistently result in complete exhaustion of vasodilatory reserve. CBF continues to increase in response to incremental increases in PetCO2 well above 60 mm Hg in many subjects.15 In those patients in whom the CO2 stimulus does not result in complete exhaustion of vasodilatory capacity, %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity depends on the magnitude of the CO2 stimulus; thus, CVR must be expressed as a slope: ΔBOLD MR signal intensity / ΔPetCO2.

Second, how does one measure the magnitude of the CO2 stimulus? The independent variable affecting CBF is the PaCO2, but measurement of PaCO2 requires arterial puncture, which is uncomfortable for the patient. Instead, we have noninvasively measured its surrogate,16 PetCO2. With the end-tidal gas-targeting system that we used, PetCO2 correlates well with PaCO2.17 Some have used the FiCO2 as the independent variable, but the ventilatory response to hypercapnia varies between subjects, so FiCO2 does not have a consistent relationship with PaCO2.18

Third, if one normalizes %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity to the magnitude of the vasodilatory stimulus, is it necessary to maintain a consistent magnitude of vasodilatory stimulus for all subjects? The relationship between CBF and PaCO2 is sigmoidal. If only 2 points on the curve are taken (PaCO2 at 2 levels), then the slope (ie, the CVR) will depend on both the initial PaCO2, and the magnitude of the change in PaCO2.14,19 Therefore, to have comparable CVR measurements in 1 subject with time or between subjects, one must establish a consistent baseline PaCO2 and a consistent magnitude of change.

Finally, consider the “BOLD MR signal intensity” term. BOLD MR imaging is an indirect measure of changes in CBF. Increased CBF results in dilution of intravascular deoxyhemoglobin, generating increased signal intensity on T2*-weighted (BOLD) images. BOLD MR signal intensity also depends on cerebral blood volume, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption, PaO2, and hematocrit20 on pulse-sequence parameters such as TE and voxel size and on hardware factors such as magnetic field strength. Despite the many influences on absolute BOLD MR signal intensity, it has been shown empirically that with a tightly controlled CO2 stimulus and a single MR imaging scanner with consistent sequence parameters, hemispheric CVR measured in absolute values of %ΔBOLD MR signal intensity per mm Hg ΔPetCO2 is both precise21 and accurate.6 The technique does not provide a measure of CVR in the criterion-standard CBF units of mL/100 g/min, but it does enable quantitative intra- and intersubject comparisons.

Quantification within subjects may enable accurate follow-up of patients who are not surgically revascularized and measurement of treatment response in those who are revascularized. Quantification may allow the establishment of CVR thresholds to guide treatment decisions.

Absolute Values of BOLD CVR to Select Patients for Surgical Revascularization

To determine which patients with intracranial arterial steno-occlusive disease should undergo surgical revascularization, one aims to identify the subset of patients with cerebral hemodynamic impairment. The most widely studied imaging markers of cerebral hemodynamic compromise are increased OEF measured by PET and impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, most commonly measured by single-photon emission tomography, xenon-enhanced CT, or transcranial Doppler sonography.22 A major trial currently under way, the North American Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study,23 uses increased OEF on PET to select patients for ECIC bypass. PET measurement of OEF is accurate, and the results of this trial are highly anticipated, yet clinical translation of PET OEF may remain a challenge due to limited availability, high cost, and the requirement for an on-site cyclotron to produce the very short-lived radiopharmaceutical oxygen 15 (half-life 2 minutes). Our results suggest that absolute values of CO2 BOLD CVR are potentially useful in identifying a subset of patients with intracranial steno-occlusive disease who are most likely to have a hemodynamic improvement following surgical revascularization. The CO2 BOLD MR imaging technique is quick and nonionizing, and it can be performed at the same session as routine MR imaging and MRA.

Limitations

Several bypass procedures were excluded from the quantitative analysis: those with excessive head motion (4/32), nonpatent bypass (6/32), and a moderate-to-large postoperative subdural hematoma (1 patient). We have found that patient head motion during BOLD MR imaging acquisition is the most common reason for a failed CO2 BOLD CVR examination. In this study, we used an automated tool to exclude BOLD acquisitions with excessive head motion. Our analysis for head motion was performed after the MR imaging was complete, but it is possible to analyze BOLD MR imaging data in real-time. Analysis of head motion while the patient is in the MR imaging scanner would allow one to repeat those CVR acquisitions with head motion, potentially reducing the number of failed examinations. Nonpatent bypasses were excluded because we wanted to study the relationship between CO2 BOLD CVR and ECIC bypass, and nonpatent bypasses would confound the results. Future randomized controlled trials by using CO2 BOLD CVR as a means of selecting patients for randomization will likely require an intention-to-treat analysis, with patients in the surgical arm included regardless of whether the bypass procedure is technically successful.

An inclusion criterion for the study was the presence of intracranial stenosis or occlusion. We did not have a sufficient number of subjects to perform subgroup analyses on the various specific causes of stenosis or occlusion. There was also some variability in surgical treatments, with direct surgical bypass in 31/32 procedures and indirect bypass in 8/32. This could confound the study results if the subjects with lower preoperative CVR had a greater likelihood of receiving more extensive revascularization. However, there was no significant difference in preoperative CVR between those who received direct bypass only versus direct and indirect bypass.

A limitation was the assessment of ECIC bypass patency by using a clinically dictated schedule of CTA, MRA, and DSA. In most cases (22/30 direct bypass procedures), patency was assessed on the same day as the postoperative CVR or both before and after the postoperative CVR, enabling one to infer vessel patency if the bypass was patent on both studies. In a minority of patients (8/30 direct bypasses), patency was only assessed before the CVR study. All 8 of these latter patients had patent bypasses on imaging, and none had clinical suspicion of bypass nonpatency, but we cannot completely exclude the possibility of bypass occlusion between the time of patency assessment and the postoperative CVR study.

We have used an atlas-based segmentation of vascular territories into ACA, MCA, and posterior distributions. A limitation of this approach is that vascular territories may have altered size and geometry in patients with severe cerebrovascular disease. The atlas-based approach does still allow assessment of CVR near the region of the MCA bypass, versus farther from the bypass on the ipsilateral side, versus contralateral to the bypass.

Conclusions

CVR measured by using CO2 BOLD MR imaging identifies those patients with intracranial steno-occlusive disease who are more likely to have a hemodynamic improvement following ECIC bypass surgery. The CO2 BOLD MR imaging technique is quick and nonionizing, and it can be performed at the same session as routine MR imaging and MRA.

Acknowledgments

We thank Marat Slessarev and Alex Vesely for their contributions to the development of the breathing apparatus. We thank the Toronto Western Hospital MR imaging technologists, particularly Eugen Hlasny, David Johnstone, and Keith Ta, for their contributions to the data acquisition. We are grateful for the support of the Radiologist Scientist Training Program, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto.

Footnotes

  • D.M.M. was supported by the American Society of Neuroradiology Foundation Scholar Award in Neuroradiology Research 2010–2011.

  • Paper previously presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, May 15–20, 2010; Boston, Massachusetts.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. White H,
    2. Boden-Albala B,
    3. Wang C,
    4. et al
    . Ischemic stroke subtype incidence among whites, blacks, and Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Circulation 2005;111:1327–31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Suri MF,
    2. Johnston SC
    . Epidemiology of intracranial stenosis. J Neuroimaging 2009;19 (suppl 1):11S–16S
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI,
    2. Lynn MJ,
    3. Howlett-Smith H,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305–16
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kuroda S,
    2. Houkin K
    . Moyamoya disease: current concepts and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:1056–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke: results of an international randomized trial—The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1191–200
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mandell DM,
    2. Han JS,
    3. Poublanc J,
    4. et al
    . Mapping cerebrovascular reactivity using blood oxygen level-dependent MRI in patients with arterial steno-occlusive disease: comparison with arterial spin labeling MRI. Stroke 2008;39:2021–28
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Goode SD,
    2. Altaf N,
    3. Auer DP,
    4. et al
    . Carotid endarterectomy improves cerebrovascular reserve capacity preferentially in patients with preoperative impairment as indicated by asymmetric BOLD response to hypercapnia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;38:546–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Goode SD,
    2. Krishan S,
    3. Alexakis C,
    4. et al
    . Precision of cerebrovascular reactivity assessment with use of different quantification methods for hypercapnia functional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:972–77
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Haller S,
    2. Bonati LH,
    3. Rick J,
    4. et al
    . Reduced cerebrovascular reserve at CO2 BOLD MR imaging is associated with increased risk of periinterventional ischemic lesions during carotid endarterectomy or stent placement: preliminary results. Radiology 2008;249:251–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Slessarev M,
    2. Prisman E,
    3. Han J,
    4. et al
    . Prospective targeting and control of end-tidal CO2 and O2 concentrations. J Physiol 2007;581:1207–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mandell DM,
    2. Han JS,
    3. Poublanc J,
    4. et al
    . Selective reduction of blood flow to white matter during hypercapnia corresponds with leukoaraiosis. Stroke 2008;39:1993–98
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Cox RW
    . AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996;29:162–73
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kretschmann H,
    2. Weinrich W
    .Cranial Neuroimaging and Clinical Neuroanatomy. New York:Georg Thieme Verlag;2004
  14. 14.↵
    1. Han J,
    2. Mandell DM,
    3. Poublanc J,
    4. et al
    . fMRI measured cerebrovascular reactivity in grey matter: is it different with hypercapnic and hypocapnic stimuli?J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009;S151
  15. 15.↵
    1. Grubb RL Jr.,
    2. Raichle ME,
    3. Eichling JO,
    4. et al
    . The effects of changes in PaCO2 on cerebral blood volume, blood flow, and vascular mean transit time. Stroke 1974;5:630–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Crosby A,
    2. Robbins PA,
    3. Crosby A,
    4. et al
    . Variability in end-tidal PCO2 and blood gas values in humans. Exp Physiol 2003;88:603–10
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ito S,
    2. Mardimae A,
    3. Han J,
    4. et al
    . Non-invasive prospective targeting of arterial P(CO2) in subjects at rest. J Physiol 2008;586:3675–82
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mark CI,
    2. Slessarev M,
    3. Ito S,
    4. et al
    . Precise control of end-tidal carbon dioxide and oxygen improves BOLD and ASL cerebrovascular reactivity measures. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:749–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ide K,
    2. Eliasziw M,
    3. Poulin MJ,
    4. et al
    . Relationship between middle cerebral artery blood velocity and end-tidal PCO2 in the hypocapnic-hypercapnic range in humans. J Appl Physiol 2003;95:129–37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ogawa S,
    2. Lee TM,
    3. Barrere B,
    4. et al
    . The sensitivity of magnetic resonance image signals of a rat brain to changes in the cerebral venous blood oxygenation. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:205–10
    PubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kassner A,
    2. Winter JD,
    3. Poublanc J,
    4. et al
    . Blood-oxygen level dependent MRI measures of cerebrovascular reactivity using a controlled respiratory challenge: reproducibility and gender differences. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:298–304
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bozzao A,
    2. Fasoli F,
    3. Finocchi V,
    4. et al
    . Long term evaluation of brain perfusion with magnetic resonance in high flow extracranial-intracranial saphenous graft bypass. Eur Radiol 2007;17:33–38
    PubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Grubb RL Jr.,
    2. Powers WJ,
    3. Derdeyn CP,
    4. et al
    . The carotid occlusion surgery study. Neurosurg Focus 2002;14:e9
  • Received July 29, 2010.
  • Accepted after revision September 2, 2010.
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Bookmark this article
Quantitative Measurement of Cerebrovascular Reactivity by Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MR Imaging in Patients with Intracranial Stenosis: Preoperative Cerebrovascular Reactivity Predicts the Effect of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery
D.M. Mandell, J.S. Han, J. Poublanc, A.P. Crawley, J. Fierstra, M. Tymianski, J.A. Fisher, D.J. Mikulis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2011, 32 (4) 721-727; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2365
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Purchase

Jump to section

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

Advertisement