Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleInterventional

Fenestrations of Intracranial Arteries

S.B.T. van Rooij, R.S. Bechan, J.P. Peluso, M. Sluzewski and W.J. van Rooij
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2015, 36 (6) 1167-1170; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4236
S.B.T. van Rooij
aFrom the Department of Radiology (S.B.T.v.R.), Medisch Centrum Alkmaar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.S. Bechan
bDepartment of Radiology (R.S.B., J.P.P., M.S., W.J.v.R.), St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.P. Peluso
bDepartment of Radiology (R.S.B., J.P.P., M.S., W.J.v.R.), St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Sluzewski
bDepartment of Radiology (R.S.B., J.P.P., M.S., W.J.v.R.), St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.J. van Rooij
bDepartment of Radiology (R.S.B., J.P.P., M.S., W.J.v.R.), St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few data are available on the frequency and location distribution of fenestrations of intracranial arteries. We used 3D rotational angiography of all intracranial arteries in a cohort of 179 patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms to assess the prevalence and location of fenestrations and the relation of fenestrations to aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 179 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted between March 2013 and June 2014, 140 had 3D rotational angiography of all cerebral vessels. The presence and location of aneurysms and fenestrations were assessed. In patients with both aneurysms and fenestrations, we classified the relation of the location of the aneurysm as remote from the fenestration or on the fenestration.

RESULTS: In 140 patients, 210 aneurysms were present. In 33 of 140 patients (24%; 95% confidence interval, 17.2%–31.3%), 45 fenestrations were detected with the following locations: anterior communicating artery in 31 (69%), A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery in 4 (9%), middle cerebral artery in 4 (9%), basilar artery in 4 (9%), vertebral artery in 1 (2%), and anterior inferior cerebellar artery in 1 (2%). Of 56 patients with anterior communicating artery aneurysms, 14 had a fenestration on the anterior communicating artery complex. The remaining 31 fenestrations had no anatomic relation to aneurysms. In 140 patients with 210 aneurysms, 14 aneurysms (7%) were located on a fenestration and 196 were not.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a suspected ruptured aneurysm, fenestrations of intracranial arteries were detected in 24% (33 of 140). Most fenestrations were located on the anterior communicating artery. Of 45 fenestrations, 14 (31%) were related to an aneurysm.

ABBREVIATION:

AcomA
anterior communicating artery

Fenestrations of intracranial arteries are segmental duplications of the lumen into 2 distinct channels, each comprising endothelial and muscular layers with or without a shared adventitia. Fenestrations are anatomic variants and can range from a small focus of divided tissue to duplication of a long vessel segment.1,2

Fenestrations result from partial failure of fusion of paired primitive embryologic vessels or from incomplete obliteration of anastomosis in a primitive vascular network.2

The association of fenestrations with aneurysms and other neurovascular disorders has been noted. Some suggest that altered flow dynamics in the presence of fenestrations may promote aneurysm development, though the exact relationship is not well-defined.

Surgical and anatomic studies suggest that fenestrations are common in intracranial arteries with the highest prevalence in the anterior communicating artery (AcomA) complex.3⇓–5 Demonstration of fenestrations with imaging is uncommon.6,7 Most fenestrations are only visible from a specific viewing angle that is often not provided by conventional angiography or reconstructed cross-sectional imaging. With 3D imaging, especially 3D rotational angiography, the detection rate of fenestrations has improved.8 Scant data are available on the frequency and location distribution of fenestrations of intracranial arteries, to our knowledge. We used 3D rotational angiography of all intracranial arteries in a cohort of 179 patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms to assess the prevalence and location of fenestrations and the relation of fenestrations with aneurysms.

Materials and Methods

Patient Population

The institutional review board approved this prospective study with a waiver for informed consent. Between March 2013 and June 2014, 179 patients with acute SAH were admitted. The diagnosis of SAH was established with a native CT scan or lumbar puncture. Of 179 patients, 177 had CTA as the first diagnostic imaging technique, and 2 patients proceeded to angiography without CTA because of poor renal function. CTA was not followed by angiography in 37 patients because of a perimesencephalic hemorrhage pattern (n = 18), a moribund clinical condition (n = 10), or trauma and SAH (n = 9). In the remaining 140 patients, CTA was followed within 24 hours by 3D rotational angiography of 3 vessels. These 140 patients form the present study group.

3D Rotational Angiography

Angiography was performed on a biplane angiographic system (Allura Xper FD20/10; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) by 1 of 3 interventional neuroradiologists (W.J.v.R., M.S., and J.P.P. with 26, 24, and 8 years of experience, respectively). In 80 (57%) uncooperative or intubated patients, angiography was performed with the patient under general anesthesia. A single 3D rotational angiographic run was acquired of both internal carotid arteries and 1 vertebral artery with a hand injection of 12–20 mL of contrast material. When the contralateral distal vertebral artery was not visualized, an additional 2D biplane run was performed of this vessel. The tube rotation arc was 240° with a rotation time of approximately 4.0 seconds. The rotational angiographic data were transferred to an independent workstation (Integris 3DRA Workstation; Philips Healthcare) for instant generation of 3D reformatted images in a 2563 matrix.

When possible, angiography was followed immediately by endovascular treatment with the patient under general anesthesia. Patients with aneurysms not suitable for coiling were scheduled for surgery.

Image Analysis

3D reformatted images were reviewed on the workstation by 2 observers in consensus (W.J.v.R. and S.B.T.v.R. with 26 and 3 years' experience in neuroradiology). Presence, location, and size of the aneurysms were recorded in a database. Other vascular disorders that might be responsible for the subarachnoid hemorrhage, such as arterial dissections, arteriovenous malformations, dural fistula, Moyamoya phenomenon, or reversible vasospasm syndrome, were separately recorded.

The presence and location of fenestrations was assessed. In patients with both aneurysms and fenestrations, we classified the relation of the location of the fenestration with the location of the aneurysm as remote from the fenestration or on the fenestration itself.

Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used for the presence, size, and locations of aneurysms and the frequency and locations of fenestrations. The sex distribution in patients with and without fenestrations was compared. In patients with and without intracranial aneurysms, the proportion of patients with a fenestration was compared with those without a fenestration. For comparison of proportions, the χ2 test was used.

Results

Patients

Of 140 patients with SAH and 3D rotational angiography of 3 vessels, 100 were women (71%) and 40 were men (29%), with a mean age of 58.0 years (median, 59 years; range, 27–84 years).

Aneurysms

In 140 patients, 213 aneurysms were detected. Twenty patients (14%) had no aneurysms; 68 patients had 1 aneurysm; 24 patients, 2 aneurysms; 16 patients, 3 aneurysms; 11 patients, 4 aneurysms; and 1 patient, 5 aneurysms. Of 120 patients with aneurysms, 52 (43%) had multiple aneurysms.

Aneurysm locations were the anterior communicating artery in 56, middle cerebral artery in 51, posterior communicating artery in 29, basilar tip in 15, carotid cavernous sinus in 12, superior cerebellar artery in 10, posterior inferior cerebellar artery in 8, internal carotid bifurcation in 7, pericallosal artery in 5, anterior choroidal artery in 4, supraclinoid carotid dissection in 4, vertebral junction in 3, posterior cerebral artery in 2, carotid ophthalmic artery in 2, anterior cerebral artery in 1, and anterior inferior cerebellar artery in 1.

Fenestrations

On 3D rotational angiography, 45 fenestrations were detected in 33 of 140 patients (24%; 95% confidence interval, 17.2%–31.3%). Examples are provided in the Figure. Eleven patients had 2 fenestrations, and 1 patient had 3 fenestrations. Location distribution was as follows: the AcomA in 31 (69%), A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery in 4 (9%), middle cerebral artery in 4 (9%), basilar artery in 4 (9%), vertebral artery in 1 (2%), and anterior inferior cerebellar artery in 1 (2%). Of 45 fenestrations, 39 (87%) were located in the anterior circulation, and 6 (13%), in the posterior circulation. Of 33 patients with fenestrations, 7 were men (21%) and 26 were women (79%). Sex distribution did not differ between patients with and without fenestrations.

Figure.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure.

Examples of fenestrations of intracranial arteries. A, Double-fenestrated anterior communicating artery with 2 small aneurysms. B, Fenestration on the anterior communicating artery (arrow). Note the aberrant origin of a duplicated middle cerebral artery from A2 (double arrow). C, A small fenestration on the middle cerebral artery. D, A proximal basilar fenestration.

Relation of Fenestrations to Aneurysms

Of 56 patients with an AcomA aneurysms, 14 (25%) had a fenestration on the AcomA complex. The remaining 31 fenestrations had no anatomic relation with aneurysms. In 140 patients with 210 aneurysms, 14 aneurysms (7%) were located on or adjacent to a fenestration and 196 (93%) were not.

Forty-one fenestrations were present in 30 of the 120 patients (25%) with aneurysms, and 4 fenestrations were present in 3 of the 20 patients (15%) without aneurysms. This difference was not significant (P = .49).

Discussion

We found that fenestrations are common anatomic variations of intracranial arteries with a frequency of 24% in a cohort of 140 patients with suspected ruptured aneurysms. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of fenestrations in 120 patients with and 20 patients without aneurysms. We used optimal 3D rotational angiography imaging of all cerebral vessels in the clinical setting of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with intended endovascular treatment of aneurysms. Most 3D angiography was performed with the patient under general anesthesia, thereby eliminating image degradation by patient motion. These 3D images acquired under optimal circumstances were scrutinized by 2 experienced readers for the presence of fenestrations. Thus, data are robust, and the assessed frequency of fenestrations is likely to be realistic.

The only limitation of the study is that the patient population is a selection of those with subarachnoid hemorrhage with a much higher incidence of intracranial aneurysms than that in the general population. The high frequency of fenestrations may, therefore, not be generalized. Postmortem studies with a large sample size may resolve this issue but are currently not available.

Although almost a third of fenestrations had an anatomic relation to an aneurysm, these were all AcomA aneurysms on AcomA fenestrations. This observation may be expected in the given patient population with suspected aneurysms because most fenestrations and most aneurysms occurred on the AcomA. A definite association between aneurysms and fenestrations on this location remains unclear from our data.

This study confirms the common occurrence of fenestrations that was found in a previous study using 3D rotational angiography in patients with intracranial aneurysms.8 In that study, 3D rotational angiography was performed in only 1 cerebral vessel territory following detection of an aneurysm with 2D angiography. In the present study, all cerebral vessels were imaged in 3D, so data are more robust. Despite this methodologic difference, fenestrations were more frequent in the previous study than in the present study (28%, 59 of 208 patients versus 24%, 33 of 140 patients). With the relatively small sample sizes of both studies, the difference might be within the confidence limits. In both studies, the AcomA complex was the most common location of fenestrations and most fenestrations occurred in the anterior circulation.

Until recently, before the era of 3D imaging, fenestrations were considered a rarity. This might be because fenestrations are only visible from specific viewing angles that are mostly not available on 2D angiograms. In a recent study of almost 11,000 angiograms, fenestrations were identified in 2.1%, with the highest prevalence in the posterior circulation, especially the basilar artery.7 Also in another recent review of intracranial fenestrations with associated aneurysms, the most common single fenestration location was the basilar artery.9 With modern 3D reconstructions of axial images of CT and MR angiography, the prevalence was somewhat higher, up to 13%.10⇓⇓⇓–14 Large-vessel fenestrations such as those on the proximal basilar artery are readily depicted with 2D angiograms or CT and MR angiography, but resolution is insufficient to detect subtle small-vessel fenestrations such as in the AcomA complex.15

Many studies have noted the presence of fenestrations in the setting of a variety of neurovascular pathology apart from aneurysms, such as dissections, arteriovenous malformations, dural fistula, and even ischemic stroke. This may not be surprising because cerebral angiography is performed exclusively in patients with suspected intracranial vascular disease. A causative relation of fenestrations with neurovascular disorders has never been firmly established. On the contrary, recent studies with more frequent depiction of fenestrations including the present study suggest that a relation to aneurysms or other vascular pathology is not very likely.7,8,10 Only large postmortem studies can provide a definite answer to this issue.

Conclusions

In patients with a suspected ruptured aneurysm, fenestrations of intracranial arteries were detected in 24% (33 of 140). Most fenestrations were located on the AcomA. Of 45 fenestrations, 14 (31%) were related to an aneurysm.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Padget DH
    . The development of the cranial arteries in the human embryo. Contrib Embryol 1948;212:207–61
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kathuria S,
    2. Gregg L,
    3. Chen J, et al
    . Normal cerebral arterial development and variations. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2011;32:242–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wollschlaeger G,
    2. Wollschlaeger PB,
    3. Lucas FV, et al
    . Experience and result with post-mortem cerebral angiography performed as routine procedure of the autopsy. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1967;101:68–87
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gomes FB,
    2. Dujovny M,
    3. Umansky F, et al
    . Microanatomy of the anterior cerebral artery. Surg Neurol 1986;26:129–41
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Serizawa T,
    2. Saiki N,
    3. Yamaura A
    . Microsurgical anatomy and clinical significance of the anterior communicating artery and its perforating branches. Neurosurgery 1997;40:1211–16
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sanders WP,
    2. Sorek PA,
    3. Mehta BA
    . Fenestration of intracranial arteries with special attention to associated aneurysms and other anomalies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:675–80
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cooke DL,
    2. Stout CE,
    3. Kim WT, et al
    . Cerebral arterial fenestrations. Interv Neuroradiol 2014;20:261–74
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. van Rooij SB,
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Sluzewski M, et al
    . Fenestrations of intracranial arteries detected with 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1347–50
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Patel MA,
    2. Caplan JM,
    3. Yang W, et al
    . Arterial fenestrations and their association with cerebral aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:2184–88
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bayrak AH,
    2. Senturk S,
    3. Akay HO, et al
    . The frequency of intracranial arterial fenestrations: a study with 64-detector CT-angiography. Eur J Radiol 2011;77:392–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bharatha A,
    2. Aviv RI,
    3. White J, et al
    . Intracranial arterial fenestrations: frequency on CT angiography and association with other vascular lesions. Surg Radiol Anat 2008;30:397–401
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tanaka M,
    2. Kikuchi Y,
    3. Ouchi T
    . Neuroradiological analysis of 23 cases of basilar artery fenestration based on 2280 cases of MR angiographies. Interv Neuroradiol 2006;12(suppl 1):39–44
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sogawa K,
    2. Kikuchi Y,
    3. O'uchi T, et al
    . Fenestrations of the basilar artery demonstrated on magnetic resonance angiograms: an analysis of 212 cases. Interv Neuroradiol 2013;19:461–65
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Uchino A,
    2. Saito N,
    3. Okada Y, et al
    . Fenestrations of the intracranial vertebrobasilar system diagnosed by MR angiography. Neuroradiology 2012;54:445–50
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Uchino A,
    2. Nomiyama K,
    3. Takase Y, et al
    . Anterior cerebral artery variations detected by MR angiography. Neuroradiology 2006;48:647–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received November 13, 2014.
  • Accepted after revision December 1, 2014.
  • © 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 6
1 Jun 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fenestrations of Intracranial Arteries
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S.B.T. van Rooij, R.S. Bechan, J.P. Peluso, M. Sluzewski, W.J. van Rooij
Fenestrations of Intracranial Arteries
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2015, 36 (6) 1167-1170; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4236

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Fenestrations of Intracranial Arteries
S.B.T. van Rooij, R.S. Bechan, J.P. Peluso, M. Sluzewski, W.J. van Rooij
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2015, 36 (6) 1167-1170; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4236
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • CTA Evaluation of Basilar Septations: An Entity Better Characterized as Aberrant Basilar Fenestrations
  • Crossref (40)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Imaging detection of cerebral artery fenestrations and their clinical correlation with cerebrovascular diseases
    Xuan Wu, Xinyuan Chen, Jiting Zhu, Qunlin Chen, Zhiwen Li, Aiyu Lin
    Clinical Imaging 2020 62
  • Recurrence and retreatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms after endovascular treatment: a retrospective study
    Chang Ki Jang, Joonho Chung, Jae Whan Lee, Seung Kon Huh, Nak-Hoon Son, Keun Young Park
    BMC Neurology 2020 20 1
  • Intracranial Arterial Fenestration and Risk of Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xiang Guo, Lingyun Gao, Zhitao Shi, Deguo Liu, Yuhong Wang, Zhanguo Sun, Yueqin Chen, Weijian Chen, Yunjun Yang
    World Neurosurgery 2018 115
  • Morphological Analysis of Cerebral Artery Fenestrations and Their Correlation with Intracranial Aneurysms
    Kamil Krystkiewicz, Bogdan Ciszek, Łukasz Szylberg, Marcin Tosik, Marek Harat
    World Neurosurgery 2021 156
  • Endovascular Therapy for Basilar Arterial Trunk Aneurysms
    Yiheng Wang, Kan Xu, Jia Song, Jinlu Yu
    Frontiers in Neurology 2021 12
  • Imaging features of vertebral artery fenestration
    Adam D’Sa, Matthew D. Alvin, Ryan Brody, Samrah Javed, Scott Faro, Rohini N. Nadgir
    Neuroradiology 2020 62 5
  • True fenestration of the anterior communicating artery diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography
    Akira Uchino, Naoko Saito, Takahiro Uehara, Hiroaki Neki, Sinya Kohyama, Fumitaka Yamane
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2016 38 9
  • CTA Evaluation of Basilar Septations: An Entity Better Characterized as Aberrant Basilar Fenestrations
    J.E. Small, M.B. Macey, A.K. Wakhloo, S. Sehgal
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2021 42 4
  • Fenestra Obscura
    Gabor Toth, Ferdinand Hui, Mark Bain
    Operative Neurosurgery 2016 12 1
  • A case of multiple Vertebrobasilar artery fenestration misdiagnosed as vertebral artery dissection
    Feng Wang, Xiaokai Wang, Xiaohua Li, Huifeng Zheng, Zhiyong Zhang
    BMC Neurology 2020 20 1

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire