Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

ReplyLETTER

Reply:

P.C. Reinacher, M.T. Krüger, V.A. Coenen, M. Shah, R. Roelz, C. Jenkner and K. Egger
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2017, 38 (12) E106-E108; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5386
P.C. Reinacher
aDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.C. Reinacher
M.T. Krüger
bDepartment of Neurosurgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.T. Krüger
V.A. Coenen
cDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V.A. Coenen
M. Shah
dDepartment of Neurosurgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Shah
R. Roelz
eDepartment of Neurosurgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Roelz
C. Jenkner
fClinical Trial Unit
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Jenkner
K. Egger
gDepartment of Neuroradiology Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Egger
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We thank Treuer et al for their interest in our article “Determining the Orientation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Using 3D Rotational Fluoroscopy.”1 The coordinates (x, y, z) and 2 angles (pitch and yaw angles) are required to describe the position of a nondirectional deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead, and determining these is routine clinically. In directional leads, a third angle (roll) needs to be considered. We investigated the “iron sights method” to additionally determine this angle because there was no known imaging technique allowing us to do so precisely. We could demonstrate that this method allows determining a lead orientation angle with high interrater reliability.1 We are aware that this angle is determined in a plane defined by 3D rotational fluoroscopy. As used in CT scans, the rotational fluoroscopy should be aligned to the tuberculum sellae–occipital protuberance line, and head tilt must be excluded by aligning both external acoustic meatus. This line closely correlates to the anterior/posterior commissure line,2 which defines the relevant plane in clinical DBS practice. In publications, typically the orientation of directional leads is described and depicted in this plane.3

3D rotational fluoroscopy allows reconstructing a volumetric dataset that can be fused with the preoperative, stereotactic CT or MR imaging scan as shown in Fig 1. Thus, after fusion with these images, the stereotactic coordinates together with the pitch and yaw angles can be determined in a stereotactic planning system, allowing the roll angle to be calculated for any desired plane. In addition, the surrounding anatomic structures can be visualized (eg, in the preoperative MR imaging).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A, Visualization of 3D directional electrode models in a 3D reconstruction of rotational fluoroscopy imaging. The blue line (in-plane) indicates the detected orientation in the axial plane based on the iron sights method. The orange line originating out of the marker indicates the lead orientation. B, The same scene from a lateral view. The in-plane orientation and marker orientation form a rectangular triangle (red transparent) with the right angle at the marker. C, Fusion of rotational fluoroscopy 3D reconstruction and the CT scan in Brainlab Elements (Brainlab, Munich, Germany).

To address the authors' comment (additionally using ground truth and to further investigate the influence of different implantation angles on the iron sights method), we embedded a directional lead in an acrylic glass cylinder. This model was fixed in a stereotactic frame (Leksell G frame; Elekta Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden) and oriented visually with the marker exactly facing anteriorly. This orientation was confirmed by a strictly lateral x-ray in respect to the stereotactic frame. To investigate in which angles the overlap of the gaps between the electrode segments was still visible, we performed digital x-ray and 3D fluoroscopy in different settings of the stereotactic system. We systematically (in steps of 10°) changed the arc and ring angles, resulting in polar lead angles of 0°–90° (ring, rotation in the sagittal plane) and 0°–60° (arc, rotation in the coronal plane) (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A, A directional lead embedded in an acrylic glass cylinder (ground truth). This model was fixed in a stereotactic Leksell G frame (Elekta Instruments) and oriented visually and with stereotactic fluoroscopy with the marker exactly facing anteriorly. B, Fluoroscopy was aligned with the stereotactic frame. C, The arc angle (lead rotation in the coronal plane) was changed to polar angles of 0°–60° in steps of 10°. D, The ring angle (lead rotation in the sagittal plane) was changed, resulting in polar angles of 0°–90° in steps of 10°. Digital x-ray and 3D fluoroscopy were performed for each setting to investigate in which angles the overlap of the gaps between the electrode segments (iron sights) is visible.

Fluoroscopically with unchanged rotation of the lead, the overlap of the gaps between the directional contacts remained visible up to a polar angle of 50° when tilting the lead toward the observer (arc angle). It was overlaid by the other contacts at 60°. The overlap of the gaps remained visible from 0° to 90° on rotation of the electrode in a sagittal plane (ie, the ring angle of the stereotactic system). Within these ranges, the iron sights visualization was possible for combinations of lead rotations in both planes.

As long as the overlap of the gaps was visible, 3D rotational angiography allowed determining the lead rotation using the iron sights method as in our previous phantom study.1 High polar angles (in our method, >50° in the coronal plane) require an oblique 3D fluoroscopy plane.

Sitz et al4 have shown in their phantom study, evaluating the CT artifacts of the directional marker to determine the lead orientation, that “for polar angles >40°, the results became erratic and the uncertainty increased to ± 8.9° (range −23° to 34°).” They explained this with the marker anatomy, “Distal parts of the marker with the ring-shaped structures also appear within the CT-sections, giving rise to an additional nonisotropic artifact.”4

We analyzed the polar angles of all DBS implantations performed in our center in 2016. Regarding 107 DBS electrodes in 54 patients, the mean sagittal polar angle was 15.5° ± 29.8° and the mean coronal polar angle was 23.1° ± 9.9°. In 9/214 measured polar angles (4.2%), the value was >50°. In these cases, a modification of our standard 3D fluoroscopy scanning protocol (ie, alignment to the tuberculum sellae–occipital protuberance line) with an oblique scan is necessary. However, this can be precisely predicted from the stereotactic planning of the DBS procedure.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Reinacher PC,
    2. Krüger MT,
    3. Coenen VA, et al
    . Determining the orientation of directional deep brain stimulation electrodes using 3D rotational fluoroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1111–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5153 pmid:28385887
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kim YI,
    2. Ahn KJ,
    3. Chung YA, et al
    . A new reference line for the brain CT: the tuberculum sellae-occipital protuberance line is parallel to the anterior/posterior commissure line. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1704–08 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1676 pmid:19762457
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kühn AA,
    2. Volkmann J
    . Innovations in deep brain stimulation methodology. Mov Disord 2017;32:11–19 doi:10.1002/mds.26703 pmid:27400763
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sitz A,
    2. Hoevels M,
    3. Hellerbach A, et al
    . Determining the orientation angle of directional leads for deep brain stimulation using computed tomography and digital x-ray imaging: a phantom study. Med Phys 2017 Jun 22. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1002/mp.12424 pmid:28639387
    CrossRefPubMed
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 12
1 Dec 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply:
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
P.C. Reinacher, M.T. Krüger, V.A. Coenen, M. Shah, R. Roelz, C. Jenkner, K. Egger
Reply:
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2017, 38 (12) E106-E108; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5386

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Reply:
P.C. Reinacher, M.T. Krüger, V.A. Coenen, M. Shah, R. Roelz, C. Jenkner, K. Egger
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2017, 38 (12) E106-E108; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5386
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Regarding “Determining the Orientation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Using 3D Rotational Fluoroscopy”
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (1)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • DiODe: Directional Orientation Detection of Segmented Deep Brain Stimulation Leads: A Sequential Algorithm Based on CT Imaging
    Alexandra Hellerbach, Till A. Dembek, Mauritius Hoevels, Jasmin A. Holz, Andreas Gierich, Klaus Luyken, Michael T. Barbe, Jochen Wirths, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Harald Treuer
    Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 2018 96 5

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire