Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleHead & Neck
Open Access

3D Cranial Nerve Imaging, a Novel MR Neurography Technique Using Black-Blood STIR TSE with a Pseudo Steady-State Sweep and Motion-Sensitized Driven Equilibrium Pulse for the Visualization of the Extraforaminal Cranial Nerve Branches

F. Van der Cruyssen, T.-M. Croonenborghs, R. Hermans, R. Jacobs and J. Casselman
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2021, 42 (3) 578-580; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6904
F. Van der Cruyssen
aFrom the Departments of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (F.V.d.C., T.-M.C.)
cOMFS-IMPATH Research Group (F.V.d.C., T.-M.C., R.J.), Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F. Van der Cruyssen
T.-M. Croonenborghs
aFrom the Departments of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (F.V.d.C., T.-M.C.)
cOMFS-IMPATH Research Group (F.V.d.C., T.-M.C., R.J.), Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T.-M. Croonenborghs
R. Hermans
bRadiology (R.H.), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Hermans
R. Jacobs
cOMFS-IMPATH Research Group (F.V.d.C., T.-M.C., R.J.), Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
dDepartment of Dental Medicine (R.J.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Jacobs
J. Casselman
eDepartment of Radiology (J.C.), AZ St-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Bruges, Belgium
fDepartment of Radiology (J.C.), AZ St-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Casselman
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: This study investigated the feasibility of a 3D black-blood STIR TSE sequence with a pseudo steady-state sweep and motion-sensitized driven equilibrium pulse for extraforaminal cranial nerve imaging on a 3T system. Assessments of healthy volunteers showed near-perfect agreement in nerve visualization with excellent to good visualization of the extraforaminal trigeminal, greater occipital, and facial nerves. Suppression of surrounding tissues was excellent to good. 3D cranial nerve imaging can produce nerve selective imaging of extraforaminal cranial and spinal nerve branches.

ABBREVIATIONS:

3D CRANI
3D cranial nerve imaging
PSS
pseudo steady-state
MDSE
motion-sensitized driven equilibrium

Being the largest cranial nerve, the trigeminal nerve—more specifically, its inferior alveolar and lingual branches—is frequently damaged during dental, oral, and maxillofacial surgical procedures.1 Moreover, it can be subject to myriad disease entities such as inflammatory, infectious, neoplastic, and congenital pathology. MR imaging has been widely applied to the visualization of cranial nerves.2 Intracranial trajectories such as nuclear and supranuclear, as well as cisternal segments, can be well depicted on routine MR imaging sequences. The cisternal segment is typically visualized using constructive interference in steady state and 3D heavily T2WI.3 However, visualization of the extracranial peripheral branches on 3D T2WI remains a challenge because of their small diameters, tortuous courses, movement and susceptibility artifacts, and the presence of blood vessels in close proximity, which can all confound nerve visualization.4 B1 and B0 inhomogeneities further lead to poor fat suppression and low SNR, and the use of multiple echoes to improve water and fat separation increases acquisition times considerably, making patient compliance difficult. To address these problems, we developed a novel black-blood 3D STIR TSE sequence for extraforaminal cranial nerve imaging (3D CRANI) on a 3T system and here describe its assessment.

Description of Technique

The 3D CRANI is a 3D TSE STIR black-blood sequence that uses a pseudo steady-state (PSS) sweep in combination with a motion-sensitized driven equilibrium (MSDE) pulse. We used STIR in combination with MSDE to ensure that signals from fat, muscle, and blood are suppressed uniformly across the field of view. The PSS sweep is designed such that the signal is smoothly varying during a long TSE shot to keep the signal strength approximately constant. This means that the flip angle sweep is not calculated based on specific tissue parameters (T1, T2). In this manner, it helps us to reduce the T2 decay for a range of tissues, which makes the sequence less sensitive to tissue dependencies. For the PSS functionality, minimum, middle, and maximum angles need to be defined, and 4 intermediate flip angles are used to asymptotically approach the minimum flip angle defined within the sequence (Online Supplemental Data). After reaching the minimum angle, nonlinear interpolation is used to calculate an optimum sweep according to the PSS principle while trying to keep the signal constant.5 The middle angle is defined at the specified effective TE. After definition of the middle angle, the refocusing angles are increased linearly to the maximum defined angle. Finally, compressed sensing is added to reduce the acquisition time. The sequence was optimized by comparing it with existing nerve-selective sequences until satisfactory and robust results were obtained, with particular attention being paid to artifact reduction (Online Supplemental Data).

MR Imaging Procedure

After optimization, 6 healthy volunteers (3 women and 3 men; average age, 32 years; range, 23–48 years) were included in this study. Imaging was performed on a 3T MR imaging system (Ingenia; Philips Healthcare) equipped with a 32-channel head coil (Invivo) without the use of any contrast agent. After acquisition of standard T1WI, T2WI, and gradient-echo sequences, the CRANI sequence was acquired using the following parameters: TR = 2300 ms, TE = 150 ms, FOV = 200 × 200 × 100 mm, section thickness = 0.5 mm, act section gap = −0.45 mm, matrix = 224 × 222, acquired voxel size = 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 mm, reconstructed voxel size = 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.45 mm, section oversampling = 1.5, compressed sense reduction = 5, and number of slices = 200. TSE nerve STIR included TSE factor = 45 (startup echoes 2), number of acquisitions = 1, black-blood pulse = MSDE (mode: nerve), and acquisition time = 5:17 min.

Imaging Analysis

Three orthogonal planes, as well as a plane following the course of the nerve trajectory using MPR and MIP, were reconstructed using the Volume postprocessing package (Philips Healthcare). MIP images with a thickness of 5 mm and gap of −0.5 mm (4.5-mm overlap) allowed for the best demonstration of the selected nerve trajectory. The images were analyzed by 2 fixed and independent observers with expertise in cranial nerve imaging. First, a training session was held to familiarize the observers with the grading scales. Then, for the subsequent evaluations, the observers were blinded to each other’s scoring. Arterial, venous, and fat suppression were graded on a 3-point Likert scale (0 = unsuppressed and nondiagnostic; 1 = moderately suppressed but diagnostic; 2 = excellent suppression). A nerve scoring system using a 5-point Likert scale (4 = excellent; 3 = good; 2 = fair;1 = poor; 0 = none) was adopted from Fujii et al6 to evaluate the signal continuity of the following nerves over a predetermined trajectory. The evaluated trajectory of the inferior alveolar (V3) and lingual (V3) nerves starts at the oval foramen and stops at the mental foramen and the submandibular duct, respectively. The facial nerve (VII) trajectory starts in the labyrinthine portion in the temporal bone and stops at the anterior edge of the parotid. The greater occipital nerve (C2–C3) trajectory starts posterior to the axis and stops before piercing the trapezius muscle.6

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM). Inter-observer agreement on the Likert scales was tested using weighted kappa statistics with quadratic weights. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant near-perfect agreement between the 2 observers, except in the visualization of the extracranial portion of the facial nerve, for which the agreement was still considered to be very good (independent observer scores are illustrated in the Online Supplemental Data). The strength of agreement ranged from very good to excellent for all parameters (Table). Venous suppression was evaluated as excellent except in 2 cases in which it was considered “moderately suppressed.” These 2 cases also had the lowest scores for the other variables observed. When the independent nerve scoring results were evaluated, the facial nerve had the lowest scores. The visualizations of the trigeminal and greater occipital nerve branches were rated as good to excellent. The Figure illustrates the nerve-selective sequence with examples of the evaluated structures.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Weighted kappa scores, confidence intervals, and P values for the interobserver agreement for the observed variables

FIGURE.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE.

The evaluated cranial and spinal nerve branches acquired using the 3D CRANI sequence. A, Lingual nerve (arrow) on MIP after MPR. B, Inferior alveolar nerve (arrow) after MIP MPR on a coronal oblique reconstruction. C, Extraforaminal facial nerve (arrow) after sagittal oblique MIP MPR, illustrating the intraparotid nerve course. D, Greater occipital nerve (arrow) extending between the semispinalis muscles on MIP MPR.

DISCUSSION

This technical note successfully demonstrates the use of 3D CRANI, a modified black-blood STIR TSE sequence for nerve-selective imaging of peripheral cranial and spinal nerve branches. Diffusion-weighted prepulsing by MSDE for MR neurography purposes was first described by Yoneyama et al7 and further demonstrated for brachial plexus imaging by Klupp et al.8 This study is innovative in the sense that an MSDE pulse was applied in combination with a PSS sweep to further optimize nerve-enhanced imaging within clinically feasible acquisition times. The results from our study indicate excellent interobserver agreement. Moreover, the scoring of the images indicates moderate to excellent suppression of surrounding tissues. Chhabra et al9,10 published several papers on cranial nerve imaging and advocate several sequences for clinical evaluations, including a STIR TSE sequence when magnetic field inhomogeneities are expected.11,12 However, their main imaging method for MR neurography involves diffusion-weighted reversed fast imaging with steady-state free precession, which is applied using gradient-echo imaging. In the past, gradient-echo imaging was preferred because of its short acquisition times. However, with new techniques such as those illustrated in this study, STIR sequences with reasonable acquisition times, low artifact susceptibility, and excellent fat suppression have become possible. The current limitations appear to be similar signal intensities for nerve and (intraparotid) lymphoid tissue, unpredictable visualization of nerves with a diameter less than 0.9 mm, and imperfect venous suppression of the pterygoid plexus. A future large prospective study will be designed to validate this sequence in both healthy and patient populations, comparing 3D CRANI with existing protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

3D CRANI can produce nerve-selective imaging of the trigeminal, facial, and greater occipital extraforaminal nerve branches, with excellent interobserver agreement and within clinically feasible acquisition times. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate and validate its clinical use.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Marco Nijenhuis and Vermurugan Gnanaprakasam for their technical assistance and insights and Prof. Dr. Avneesh Chhabra for providing the initial PSIF sequence examination card. The authors also thank Dr. Ronald Peeters and Dr. Frederik De Keyzer for their continuous input and their work on the protocol optimization. The authors also thank Karl Embleton, PhD, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Fréderic Van der Cruyssen—UNRELATED: Employment: UZ Leuven, Comments: Resident at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium at the department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. Jan Casselman—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Philips Healthcare, Comments: Customer visits*; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Philips Healthcare, Comments: Payment for lectures; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Philips Healthcare, Comments: Reimbursement travel for lectures given for Philips Healthcare. *Money paid to institution.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Renton T,
    2. Van der Cruyssen F
    . Diagnosis, pathophysiology, management and future issues of trigeminal surgical nerve injuries. Oral Surg 2019;13:389–403 doi:10.1111/ors.12465
    CrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Romano N,
    2. Federici M,
    3. Castaldi A
    . Imaging of cranial nerves: a pictorial overview. Insights Imaging 2019;10:33 doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0719-5 pmid:30877408
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Casselman J,
    2. Mermuys K,
    3. Delanote J, et al
    . MRI of the cranial nerves—more than meets the eye: technical considerations and advanced anatomy. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2008;18:197–231 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2008.02.002 pmid:18466829
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chhabra A,
    2. Madhuranthakam AJ,
    3. Andreisek G
    . Magnetic resonance neurography: current perspectives and literature review. Eur Radiol 2018;28:698–707 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4976-8 pmid:28710579
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Busse RF,
    2. Brau ACS,
    3. Vu A, et al
    . Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:640–49 doi:10.1002/mrm.21680 pmid:18727082
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fujii H,
    2. Fujita A,
    3. Yang A, et al
    . Visualization of the peripheral branches of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve on 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1333–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4288 pmid:25836724
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yoneyama M,
    2. Takahara T,
    3. Kwee TC, et al
    . Rapid high resolution MR neurography with a diffusion-weighted pre-pulse. Magn Reson Med Sci 2013;12:111–19 doi:10.2463/mrms.2012-0063 pmid:23666153
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Klupp E,
    2. Cervantes B,
    3. Sollmann N, et al
    . Improved brachial plexus visualization using an adiabatic iMSDE-prepared STIR 3D TSE. Clin Neuroradiol 2019;29:631–38 doi:10.1007/s00062-018-0706-0 pmid:30039352
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Chhabra A,
    2. Andreisek G,
    3. Soldatos T, et al
    . MR neurography: past, present, and future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:583–91 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.6012 pmid:21862800
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chhabra A,
    2. Padua A Jr.,
    3. Flammang A, et al
    . Magnetic resonance neurography—techniques and interpretation. Magnetom Flash-Clin Neurol 2012;2:4–8
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zuniga JR,
    2. Mistry C,
    3. Tikhonov I, et al
    . Magnetic resonance neurography of traumatic and nontraumatic peripheral trigeminal neuropathies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:725–36 doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.007 pmid:29216474
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Cox B,
    2. Zuniga JR,
    3. Panchal N, et al
    . Magnetic resonance neurography in the management of peripheral trigeminal neuropathy: experience in a tertiary care centre. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3392–400 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4182-5 pmid:26795500
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received April 7, 2020.
  • Accepted after revision September 18, 2020.
  • © 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 42 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 42, Issue 3
1 Mar 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
3D Cranial Nerve Imaging, a Novel MR Neurography Technique Using Black-Blood STIR TSE with a Pseudo Steady-State Sweep and Motion-Sensitized Driven Equilibrium Pulse for the Visualization of the Extraforaminal Cranial Nerve Branches
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
F. Van der Cruyssen, T.-M. Croonenborghs, R. Hermans, R. Jacobs, J. Casselman
3D Cranial Nerve Imaging, a Novel MR Neurography Technique Using Black-Blood STIR TSE with a Pseudo Steady-State Sweep and Motion-Sensitized Driven Equilibrium Pulse for the Visualization of the Extraforaminal Cranial Nerve Branches
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2021, 42 (3) 578-580; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6904

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
3D Cranial Nerve Imaging, a Novel MR Neurography Technique Using Black-Blood STIR TSE with a Pseudo Steady-State Sweep and Motion-Sensitized Driven Equilibrium Pulse for the Visualization of the Extraforaminal Cranial Nerve Branches
F. Van der Cruyssen, T.-M. Croonenborghs, R. Hermans, R. Jacobs, J. Casselman
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2021, 42 (3) 578-580; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6904
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Visualization of the Extracranial Branches of the Trigeminal Nerve Using Improved Motion-Sensitized Driven Equilibrium-Prepared 3D Inversion Recovery TSE Sequence
  • Crossref (16)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Radiation Therapy for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
    Carlos A. Rodriguez-Russo, Jacqueline C. Junn, Sue S. Yom, Richard L. Bakst
    Cancers 2021 13 24
  • 3D CRANI, a novel MR neurography sequence, can reliable visualise the extraforaminal cranial and occipital nerves
    Jan Casselman, Fréderic Van der Cruyssen, Frédéric Vanhove, Ronald Peeters, Robert Hermans, Constantinus Politis, Reinhilde Jacobs
    European Radiology 2022 33 4
  • Technical Update on MR Neurography
    Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Paula Montesinos, Alvand Hassankhani, Dario A. Bencardino, Rafael Barousse, Antonio Luna
    Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology 2022 26 02
  • Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy: correlation between objective and subjective assessments and a prediction model for neurosensory recovery
    Jeroen Meewis, Tara Renton, Reinhilde Jacobs, Constantinus Politis, Fréderic Van der Cruyssen
    The Journal of Headache and Pain 2021 22 1
  • MR-Neurography of the facial nerve in parotid tumors: intra-parotid nerve visualization and surgical correlation
    Chiara Gaudino, Andrea Cassoni, Martina Lucia Pisciotti, Resi Pucci, Angela Palma, Nicoletta Fantoni, Patrizia Pantano, Valentino Valentini
    Neuroradiology 2024 66 10
  • Vestibular paroxysmia entails vestibular nerve function, microstructure and endolymphatic space changes linked to root-entry zone neurovascular compression
    Emilie Kierig, Johannes Gerb, Rainer Boegle, Birgit Ertl-Wagner, Marianne Dieterich, Valerie Kirsch
    Journal of Neurology 2023 270 1
  • Comparison of 3D constructive interference in steady state (CISS) and T2 sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution MR imaging of the intracranial trigeminal nerve and central skull base neuroforamina
    Nikhar P Kinger, Ling-Chen Chien, Puneet S Sharma, Ryan B Gravolet, Ashley H Aiken, Kristen L Baugnon, Xin Wu
    The Neuroradiology Journal 2022 35 6
  • Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 2 – Acceleration Methods and Implications for Individual Regions
    Benedikt Sundermann, Benoit Billebaut, Jochen Bauer, Catalin George Iacoban, Olga Alykova, Christoph Schülke, Maike Gerdes, Harald Kugel, Sojan Neduvakkattu, Holger Bösenberg, Christian Mathys
    RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren 2022 194 11
  • Visualization of the Facial Nerve with Ultra-high–Frequency Ultrasound
    Jeroen Poelaert, Renaat Coopman, Matthias Ureel, Nicolas Dhooghe, Eva Genbrugge, Tana Mwewa, Phillip Blondeel, Hubert Vermeersch
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open 2023 11 12
  • Accuracy of MR neurography as a diagnostic tool in detecting injuries to the lingual and inferior alveolar nerve in patients with iatrogenic post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy
    Mado Bangia, Iraj Ahmadzai, Jan Casselman, Constantinus Politis, Reinhilde Jacobs, Fréderic Van der Cruyssen
    European Radiology 2023 34 7

More in this TOC Section

  • Chondrosarcoma vs Synovial Chondromatosis: Imaging
  • WHO Classification Update: Nasal&Skull Base Tumors
  • Peritumoral Signal in Vestibular Schwannomas
Show more HEAD & NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire