Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
EditorialEDITORIAL

Intraoperative MR Imaging: Making an Impact on Outcomes for Patients with Brain Tumors

Mitchel S. Berger
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2001, 22 (1) 2;
Mitchel S. Berger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

There is little question that the extent of tumor removal significantly impacts outcome for the majority of patients with brain tumors, especially gliomas. Notwithstanding, it is still a considerable feat to achieve a complete (100%) or radical (> 95%) radiographic tumor resection despite the advances that have been made in the surgeon's armamentarium. Two articles in this issue of the AJNR bring us closer to achieving the desired surgical result, thanks to advances with intraoperative MR (iMR) imaging.

The study by Schneider et al (page 89), describes the utility of a 0.5-T vertical “doughnut” configuration magnet; the surgeon stands within a 58-cm space between the magnets. The main advantage of this system is that the operating table is stationary, and does not require movement into the magnet. Likewise, the magnet does not have to move into the physical space of the patient. As with any iMR imaging system, requirements for a successful procedure include MR-compatible surgical and anesthetic equipment, proper room shielding, and suitable head coils. This iMR imaging system also uses the technique of interactive, image-guided surgery to allow surgical navigation during the procedure with the Flashpoint Position Encoder and the MR Track Pointer. The disadvantages of this intraoperative imaging system include a small space to work in, a relatively long image acquisition time, and a magnetic field strength that makes intraoperative functional or metabolic imaging difficult, at best.

Despite the potential limitations, Schneider et al achieved complete, or nearly complete, resection of low-grade gliomas in 11 of 12 patients by use of the feedback they received as intraoperative images were obtained. Although this is a spectacular result, one large caveat remains; namely, the inability to avoid surgical morbidity with anatomic images alone. In other words, the use of direct physiological stimulation mapping of functional (eg, motor, sensory, language) pathways cannot be replaced with iMR imaging. iMR imaging must be used in conjunction with the fundamental principles of functional brain mapping in order to achieve radical resections with the least morbidity. Assessing intraoperative complications, such as swelling or bleeding, is also critical in achieving the best outcome possible for patients with brain tumors.

Although surgeons recognize the value iMR imaging adds to the surgical procedure, a potentially dangerous problem exists with spurious contrast enhancement leaking into the resection margin. This has made it difficult to assess adequately the true extent of resection in lesions that preoperatively enhance with contrast agents. In the study by Knauth et al (page 99), the authors report the novel use of monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles, or MIONs, to bypass this problem. MIONs are stored within glioma cells for longer periods than they circulate in the blood. This creates a window of opportunity to avoid surgically induced leakage of contrast enhancement. The result of this finding, as elegantly described by the investigators, is that intracellular storage of MIONs may yield an excellent means by which a tumor can be enhanced on preoperative imaging and at the time of surgical resection without causing false leakage during intraoperative imaging. The latter could result in unnecessary resection of tissue that does not contain tumor. Thus, MIONs may be the ideal contrast agent for high-grade gliomas. As the authors readily admit, a limitation to imaging low-grade gliomas may exist, and it is not known whether these tumors will be able to undergo endocytosis of MION particles. Because a disrupted blood-brain barrier is not essential to MION-induced enhancement of tumors, this strategy could solve the problem of spurious intraoperative MR signals simulating residual tumor caused by edema or microhemorrhage within the resection margin.

It certainly appears that iMR imaging is here to stay and will make a significant impact on patient outcome. Nonetheless, a number of issues must be resolved, including the type of magnet system (ie, low vs high field strength), ease of imaging during a complicated operative procedure, and the need to generate intraoperative functional and metabolic data. Neurosurgeons must realize that input from neuroradiologists will be as important intraoperatively for interpreting these findings as it is extraoperatively. One thing is certain—excitement and widespread optimism have been created by knowing that iMR imaging is now a reality.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 22, Issue 1
1 Jan 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intraoperative MR Imaging: Making an Impact on Outcomes for Patients with Brain Tumors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Intraoperative MR Imaging: Making an Impact on Outcomes for Patients with Brain Tumors
Mitchel S. Berger
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2001, 22 (1) 2;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Intraoperative MR Imaging: Making an Impact on Outcomes for Patients with Brain Tumors
Mitchel S. Berger
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2001, 22 (1) 2;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The No Surprises Act: What Neuroradiologists Should Know
  • Call to Action: Women in Neuroradiology’s Group (WINNERS)—Is There a Need?
  • The Z-Shift: A Need for Quality Management System Level Testing and Standardization in Neuroimaging Pipelines
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire