Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

LetterLetter

Reply

Colin P. Derdeyn, Robert L. Grubb Jr. and William J. Powers
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2001, 22 (1) 227;
Colin P. Derdeyn
M.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Grubb Jr.
M.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William J. Powers
M.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Is the deep white matter of adults more vulnerable to greater ischemia than the overlying cortex because of hemodynamic factors? Is the concept of an internal arterial borderzone valid? These important questions remain unanswered. We recently reported that structurally normal (on CT or T2-weighted MR images) white matter regions in patients with chronic carotid occlusive disease were not subject to a greater amount of ischemia than the overlying cortex (1). Yonas et al contend that this conclusion is valid for only a small group of patients, because of selection bias. In addition, they provide an anecdotal example of a patient with reduced white matter blood flow after blood pressure reduction to support their argument that the white matter is vulnerable to ischemia from hemodynamic mechanisms.

The patients included in our study were, in fact, quite representative of patients with carotid occlusion. These patients were enrolled in the St. Louis Carotid Occlusion Study, a longitudinal study of hemodynamic factors and stroke risk (2). Baseline epidemiologic and stroke risk factors for the 117 patients enrolled in this study were very similar to those reported from other studies of stroke risk, such as the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (3). Patients with atherosclerotic carotid occlusion were invited to participate, regardless of whether the occlusion was bilateral or whether ischemic ocular or cerebral events had occurred.

We limited our analysis of white matter hemodynamics to structurally normal white matter. Consequently, we excluded patients for whom no imaging studies were available for review, as well as those having regions of interest located in structurally abnormal tissue. Whereas it is true that white matter hypodensity on CT or T2 hyperintensity on MR images does not always indicate tissue infarction, it often does. Damaged tissue may have impaired autoregulation in the absence of reduced perfusion pressure. Consequently, it is not valid, as Yonas et al suggest, to analyze such white matter regions and draw firm conclusions regarding the hemodynamic status of that tissue.

The patient illustrated in the figure in Yonas et al's letter is a case in point. The significance of the low flow in the deep white matter with blood pressure reduction is unknown. There are several possible explanations for the reduced white matter blood flow that do not necessarily invoke selective white matter ischemia caused by hemodynamic factors. The tissue may be dead, with no metabolic demand (hence no need for flow), or the tissue may be injured and unable to autoregulate normally. Furthermore, even if their observation of an apparent flow reduction actually represents viable tissue and failure of autoregulation to maintain blood flow, this alone does not prove the existence of a selectively vulnerable, deep white matter region. The degree of flow reduction in the white matter may be to the same degree as the overlying cortex. Normal baseline cerebral blood flow to the white matter is a fraction of that to the cortex, reflecting inherent differences in metabolic demand.

A longitudinal study of cerebral hemodynamics documenting that selective ischemia is present in the deep white matter (requiring the establishment of normal control values), and that this is associated with future white matter infarction, may be a better approach to addressing the question of an internal borderzone. Our conclusion that structurally normal white matter regions in patients with chronic carotid occlusive disease is not subject to a greater amount of ischemia than the overlying cortex is valid. It remains to be determined if selective ischemia (greater in the deep white matter than in the overlying cortex) caused by hemodynamic factors plays a role in the pathogenesis of deep white matter infarction in patients with acute carotid occlusion. Our data suggest that if selective ischemia does exist, it is unlikely to be a common phenomenon of chronically reduced perfusion pressure. We agree that further study regarding the presence of selective deep white matter ischemia is necessary.

References

  1. ↵
    Derdeyn CP, Simmons NS, Videen TO, et al. Absence of deep white matter ischemia in chronic carotid disease: A PET study of regional oxygen extraction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:631-638
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Grubb RL Jr, Derdeyn CP, Fritsch SM, et al. The importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA 1998;280:1055-1060
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 22, Issue 1
1 Jan 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Colin P. Derdeyn, Robert L. Grubb Jr., William J. Powers
Reply
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2001, 22 (1) 227;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Reply
Colin P. Derdeyn, Robert L. Grubb Jr., William J. Powers
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2001, 22 (1) 227;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire