Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
EditorialEDITORIAL

Direct Puncture Embolization for Paragangliomas: Promising Results but Preliminary Data

Colin P. Derdeyn and John Gail Neely
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2004, 25 (9) 1453-1454;
Colin P. Derdeyn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Gail Neely
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

In this issue of the AJNR, Abud and colleagues report their experience with direct percutaneous injection of cyanoacrylate for preoperative devascularization of head and neck paragangliomas (1). They achieved impressive results in nine patients, with angiographic and clinically complete devascularization in five cervical tumors. No complications related to the embolization procedure were observed.

Paragangliomas, or glomus tumors, are uncommon neoplasms of the head and neck. They are remarkably vascular and surgical resection can be complicated by rapid and dramatic blood loss. Safe and relatively effective transarterial embolization techniques have been made possible by the same advances in imaging and catheter design that have allowed the routine endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, while transarterial embolization may be effective in reducing operative blood loss, it by no means eliminates it. This is attributable to several factors, the primary one being the frequent presence of very small feeding branches from the internal carotid or vertebral arteries that cannot be directly catheterized.

In an effort to overcome this well-recognized limitation, investigators from two different groups, including authors of the present study, developed the technique of direct injection of cyanoacrylate from a percutaneous approach. These first two reports were published 10 years ago (2, 3). While this method certainly results in more complete reduction of tumor vascularity, it has not been widely adopted. There may be several reasons for this, but a key issue is the unanswered question of whether the additional risks of this technique outweigh the benefits.

Risks specific to the direct injection technique can be broken down into four components: distal embolization of glue, chemical toxicity, hemorrhage risks from direct puncture, and procedural risks of general anesthesia. None of these complications were encountered in this small series. The risk for distal glue embolization is real. Casasco et al (4) reported a large series of 65 hypervascular head and neck tumors, including 22 paragangliomas, treated with direct intratumoral injection of cyanoacrylate. They observed distal ischemic complications in two patients with juvenile angiofibromas. Glue was inadvertently injected retrograde into a distal internal carotid artery branch, ultimately occluding the distal middle cerebral artery in one patient and the ophthalmic artery in another. They emphasized the careful inspection of direct injections of contrast medium in multiple planes before the injection of glue, as well as the use of more concentrated glue suspensions (50% N-butyl −2-cyanoacrylate [NBCA]) to achieve more rapid polymerization. This second recommendation runs counter to the recommendations of the present series (20% NBCA plus an additive to extend polymerization time). The risk for distal embolization will be greatest for skull base tumors.

None of the limited data to date have described chemical toxicity of NBCA on cranial nerves or other intracranial or intralabyrnthine structures. This remains a possibility, however, particularly in skull base tumors in contact with these structures. Similarly, hemorrhagic complications in the soft tissues of the neck or within the cranial vault were not observed here, but could certainly occur. Preprocedural arrangements for possible emergent surgical care would be reasonable, until more experience is gained.

Finally, the need for general anesthesia adds an invasive procedure to the care of these patients, in addition to the inherent risks of general anesthesia. For example, a balloon occlusion test or simply diagnostic angiography may be necessary before determining whether percutaneous injection under general anesthesia is necessary or feasible. In contrast, transarterial embolization can be performed at the time of the diagnostic angiography or following the balloon occlusion test.

The final and most important issue is that of effectiveness. While transarterial embolization has become widely accepted as a preoperative adjunct to reduce blood loss with resection, there is no level-one evidence to support this practice. The best data are from a nonrandomized single center case series (5). Whether the risks of direct tumoral injection are outweighed by the benefits of the procedure remains to be established. To study this in the most rigorous manner, an accurate and precise measurement of residual tumor vascularity needs to be developed. Postcontrast volumetric CT or MR studies could provide this information. Postprocedural CT findings were obtained in the present series but their results are not presented. The relationship between the degree of devascularization, objectively measured, and operative blood loss could be investigated. Given the infrequency of these lesions, a randomized study would be difficult to perform.

In summary, this method has potential and should be considered for the management of selected patients with head and neck paragangliomas and other hypervascular tumors. There are several risks specific to this technique, and whether these risks are worth it remains to be determined.

References

  1. ↵
    Abud DG, Mounayer C, Benndorf G, Piotin M, Spelle L, Moret J. Intratumoral injection of cyanoacrylate glue in head and neck paragangliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25
  2. ↵
    Casasco A, Herbreteau D, Houdart E, George B, Tran Ba Huy P, Deffresne D, Merland JJ. Devascularization of craniofacial tumors by percutaneous tumor puncture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1233–1239
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Pierot L, Boulin A, Castaings L, Chabolle F, Moret J. Embolization by direct puncture of hypervascularized orl tumors. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1994;111:403–409
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Casasco A, Houdart E, Biondi A, Jhaveri HS, Herbreteau D, Aymard A, Merland JJ. Major complications of percutaneous embolization of skull-base tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:179–181
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Tikkakoski T, Luotonen J, Leinonen S, Siniluoto T, Heikkila O, Paivansalo M, Hyrynkangas K. Preoperative embolization in the management of neck paragangliomas. Laryngoscope 1997;107:821–826
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 9
1 Oct 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct Puncture Embolization for Paragangliomas: Promising Results but Preliminary Data
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Direct Puncture Embolization for Paragangliomas: Promising Results but Preliminary Data
Colin P. Derdeyn, John Gail Neely
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2004, 25 (9) 1453-1454;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Direct Puncture Embolization for Paragangliomas: Promising Results but Preliminary Data
Colin P. Derdeyn, John Gail Neely
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2004, 25 (9) 1453-1454;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Integrated cone-beam CT and fluoroscopic navigation in treatment of head and neck vascular malformations and tumors
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The No Surprises Act: What Neuroradiologists Should Know
  • Call to Action: Women in Neuroradiology’s Group (WINNERS)—Is There a Need?
  • The Z-Shift: A Need for Quality Management System Level Testing and Standardization in Neuroimaging Pipelines
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire