Research ArticleBRAIN
Measurement of Tumor “Size” in Recurrent Malignant Glioma: 1D, 2D, or 3D?
Mary F. Dempsey, Barrie R. Condon and Donald M. Hadley
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2005, 26 (4) 770-776;
Mary F. Dempsey
Barrie R. Condon

References
- ↵Chow KL, Gobin YP, Cloughesy T, et al. Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma treated with selective intra-arterial chemotherapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:471–478
- ↵
- ↵Wood JR, Green SB, Shapiro WR. The prognostic importance of tumor size in malignant gliomas: a computed tomographic scan study by the Brain Tumor Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:338–343
- ↵Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981;47:207–214
- ↵Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1277–1280
- ↵Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–216
- ↵
- ↵Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Statist Soc B 1972;34:187–220
- ↵Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2572
- ↵Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press;2000 :272
- ↵Warren KE, Patronas N, Aikin AA, et al. Comparison of one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements of childhood brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1401–1405
- ↵Kelly PJ, Daumas-Duport C, Scheithauer BW, et al. Stereotactic histologic correlations of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-defined abnormalities in patients with glial neoplasms. Mayo Clin Proc 1987;62:450–459
- ↵Gurland J, Johnson RO. How reliable are tumor measurements? JAMA 1965;194:973–978
- Chisholm RA, Stenning S, Hawkins TD. The accuracy of volumetric measurement of high-grade gliomas. Clin Radiol 1989;40:17–21
- ↵Warr D, McKinney S, Tannock I. Influence of measurement error on response rates. Cancer Treat Rep 1985;69:1127–1132
- ↵
- ↵Fornage BD. Measuring masses on cross-sectional images. Radiology 1993;187:289
- ↵
In this issue
Advertisement
Mary F. Dempsey, Barrie R. Condon, Donald M. Hadley
Measurement of Tumor “Size” in Recurrent Malignant Glioma: 1D, 2D, or 3D?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2005, 26 (4) 770-776;
0 Responses
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Development and Evaluation of Automated Artificial Intelligence-Based Brain Tumor Response Assessment in Patients with Glioblastoma
- Development and Practical Implementation of a Deep Learning-Based Pipeline for Automated Pre- and Postoperative Glioma Segmentation
- Quantitative Delta T1 (dT1) as a Replacement for Adjudicated Central Reader Analysis of Contrast-Enhancing Tumor Burden: A Subanalysis of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6677/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0625 Multicenter Brain Tumor Trial
- Shape Features of the Lesion Habitat to Differentiate Brain Tumor Progression from Pseudoprogression on Routine Multiparametric MRI: A Multisite Study
- Current whole-body MRI applications in the neurofibromatoses: NF1, NF2, and schwannomatosis
- Semiautomated Volumetric Measurement on Postcontrast MR Imaging for Analysis of Recurrent and Residual Disease in Glioblastoma Multiforme
- Conventional MRI evaluation of gliomas
- Functional Diffusion Map As an Early Imaging Biomarker for High-Grade Glioma: Correlation With Conventional Radiologic Response and Overall Survival
- Brain Metastases: The HER2 Paradigm
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement