Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL

Endovascular Treatment of Intracerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Procedural Safety, Complications, and Results Evaluated by MR Imaging, Including Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging

M. Cronqvist, R. Wirestam, B. Ramgren, L. Brandt, B. Romner, O. Nilsson, H. Säveland, S. Holtås and E.-M. Larsson
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2006, 27 (1) 162-176;
M. Cronqvist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Wirestam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Ramgren
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Brandt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Romner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Nilsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Säveland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Holtås
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.-M. Larsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    MR imaging examinations during the study. MTT indicates mean transit time; rCBF/CBV, regional cerebral blood flow/volume; Vt, venous thrombosis; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage. *All 3 examinations in one patient. **Included in the 22 postprocedural MRI with new MR lesions. The 10 follow-up examinations are not included in this figure.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Parieto-occipital AVM before and after treatment.

    A and B, Left internal carotid artery (ICA) angiograms in frontal and lateral projections demonstrating a parieto-occipital high-flow AVM with multiple feeders and cortical veins draining to the superior sagittal sinus (pre-embolization).

    C and D, Axial rCBFs illustrating the increased perfusion in the AVM nidus (arrow) as well as in the widespread distribution of the cortical draining veins before treatment.

    E and F, Almost corresponding rCBFs made after 2 uneventful sessions of embolization. The images show a decrease in AVM nidus size and rCBF in the area of the previously enlarged and draining veins. The patient was then sent for subsequent radiation therapy.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Patient with a small temporal AVM.

    A and B, Frontal projections of internal carotid angiogram done before and after an uneventful embolization. One of 2 draining veins is patent after the treatment.

    C and D, Illustrate the cast of glue on unsubtracted DSA and on coronal MR (2D FLASH, performed 26 hours after treatment). The susceptibility artifacts caused by the glue are well illustrated but an associated hematoma could not be definitely defined.

    E–G, Axial MR (T2-weighted, DWI b 1000, and ADC maps) performed after treatment show a vasogenic edema in the surroundings of the AVM nidus (arrowhead).

    H, Axial CT, performed 2 days later in conjunction with sudden onset of minor symptoms, shows a small hematoma in the area of previous edema. The AVM showed a complete and spontaneous occlusion at follow-up.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Parietal high-flow AVM with deep and bilateral cortical drainage.

    A–D, Frontal left internal carotid angiogram, early and late phase, before and after the second embolization. Patent venous drainage is seen after the treatment.

    E–L, Axial MR (E–H, T1-weighted, and I–L, DWI [b 1000]) immediately posttreatment, at 23 days, 35 days after treatment, and before a third treatment, 3 months later. The images illustrate the development of venous thrombosis 3 weeks after treatment in the deep and contralateral cortical veins with a complete resolution at follow-up.

    M–U, rCBF (M–O) and rCBV (P–R) with the corresponding MTT (S–U): unchanged PI images after treatment (left column) are followed by a dramatic increase in MTT (severe drop in rCBF with a mild rCBV increase) 3 weeks later (middle column). A slow but almost total normalization of PI pattern was seen 9 days later (ie, after hypervolemic hemodilution) (right column). The patient was left with no symptoms.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Occipital AVM before and after treatment.

    A, Frontal right vertebral angiogram demonstrates a small, high-flow, parieto-occipital AVM with an enlarged feeder supplying 2 intranidal fistulas (arrows) before embolization.

    B and C, Same projection after partial embolization. Glue can be seen at the site of the fistulas, and the venous drainage remained patent.

    D, DSA, performed 6 weeks later (same projection) in conjunction with and before an additional embolization. A spontaneous occlusion of the feeder supplying the fistula is noted with a partial reduction of the nidus. The vein is still patent but reduced in size.

    E–P, Axial T2-weighted, DWI, ADC maps, and rCBF done after the first embolization (E–H), before (I–L), and after (M–P) the second treatment. A vasogenic edema (black arrow) evolved in between the treatments, because of a spontaneous thrombosis of the feeder, nidus plus draining vein (white arrow), and decreased immediately after the second embolization. A small, perinidal ischemic lesion is seen after the last treatment (arrowhead). The patient experienced minor and transient headaches in between the embolizations.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Patient with an occipital AVM. Procedure-related technical events occurred during treatment (reflux of glue and a glued catheter).

    A, Axial CT performed the day after treatment illustrates the severe artifacts caused by the glue, but no obvious ischemic lesion is noted.

    B and C, Corresponding sections on postprocedural MR-DWI/ADC demonstrate a rather large ischemic lesion (arrows) within the left thalamic nucleus (not seen on the CT image).

    D, Axial T2-weighted MR image at follow-up shows a small and permanent infarct in the posterior portion of the left thalamus (arrowhead).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    AVM description

    Patient/AVM Clinical PresentationLocation (Lobes)Extension (Parenchymal)Size (ml)Venous DrainageHigh Flow, FistulaSpetzler-Martin Grade
    Bleeding 10Frontal 3Cortical 5<6 6Cortical (c) 149I 4
    Temporal 4WM 56–10 2    Single 4II 5
        ICH 6Parietal 4Mixed (C+WM) 9>10–20 8    Multiple 10III 6
        IVH 1Occipital 2Intraventr. 1>20 5Deep (D) 2IV 6
        EDH 1Mixed* 5Dural 1Mixed (C+D) 5V 0
        SAH 2Cerebellar 2
    Epilepsy 6Dural 1(venous ectasia 9/21 (±f.stenos))
    Incidental finding 5
    212121/2121219/2121
    • Note:—

    • Mixed* indicates extending into more than one lobe; WM, white matter; Mixed (c+wm), located cortical and in the white matter (deep location); Intraventr, intraventricular location; Mixed (c+d), mixed cortical and deep venous drainage; F.stenos, functional stenosis; Spetzler-Martin grades I–V (according to size, location, and venous drainage).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    AVM treatment; number of endovascular procedures and occlusion rate/patient

    Size (ml)No. of ProceduresOcclusion Rate and Patients
    <66–1011–20>20
    Endovascular proc./AVM
        161310
        213110
        42216
        616
        818
        No. of patients628521/50
    Occlusion rate %/AVM
        1006118
        85–991427
        70–84235
        55–6911
        <55
        No. of patients628521/21
    • Note:—Proc. indicates procedure; AVM, arteriovenous malformation.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Procedural adverse events (technical events)

    Type of EventPatientsNo. of EventsComment
    Extravasation34*During contrast injection (3)
    During catheterization (1)
    Adverse migration of glue (including reflux)3 (1**)3During embolizations
    Emboli11Transient
    Glued catheter1**1Intentionally left behind
    Total79
    • Note:—

    • 4* indicates 2/4 extravasations took place in the same patient but in 2 separate procedures;

    • 1** , one patient had both glue migration and a glued catheter.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    New lesions on MRI/DWI posttreatment and in between treatments (type of lesion, number, size, and location)

    PosttreatmentBetween post- and next pretreatment MRI
    NumberLocationSizeNumberNumberLocationTotal lesions
    Ischemic (i)23 (6 - ai)4 C<471PN24
    1 SC4–107
    3 BGL11–205
    9 PN>204
    1 WM
    5 C-bell
    Venous88 PN<4513*9 C21
    Thrombosis/clots (vt)4–1033 deep.v
    1 PN
    Uncertain44 PN<434
    (i or vt)4–101
    ICH41 PN<10126
    1 C10–202
    1 SC>201
    1 BGL
    Vasogenic edema4 (→2 ICH)(<102)1**PN/SC5
    (10–202)
    Total4317 (4 patients)60/60
    • Note:—ICH indicates intracerebral hematoma; ai, lesions related to catheterization during the diagnostic part of the procedure; C, cortical; SC, subcortical; BGL, basal ganglia; PN, perinidal (close to the nidus); WM, white matter; C-bell, cerebellar hemisphere; Deep, deep veins.

    • * Progressive venous thrombosis >2 weeks after treatment.

    • ** Developed vasogenic edema because of combined thrombosis of a feeding artery, the nidus, and vein (represented as 1/13 vt above).

    • View popup
    Table 5:

    Signs and symptoms, clinical course, and final outcome

    Signs and Symptoms0–5 Days after Each EmbolizationNew Symptoms Occurring after Discharge/between EmbolizationsAt Last Evaluation***Outcome (Related to Embolization)
    TransientReducedUnchangedWorse
    Hemiparesis2 (1*)1**211 mRS 2 (**)
    Paresthesis11*2
    Dysphasia and/or dysarthria/dyscalcyli2 (1*)2
    Hemianopsia2 (1*)1211 mRS 2
    Dipoplia2 (1*)2
    Seventh nerve palsy1 (1*)1*2
    Allodynia111 mRS 1
    Miscellaneous224
        Headache1* (ev)1
        Dyscoordination1
        Confusion1*
    Total12 (7 patients)7 (4 patients)1633
    • Note:—

    • 1* indicates that one patient in the category had combined symptoms and is included in the other subgroups (hemiparesis plus N VII palsy in one, hemianopsia plus diplopia plus confusion in a second, dysphasia and headache in a third, and parestesis plus N VII palsy in a fourth patient);

    • ** , patient with ICH 2 months after second embolization (uncertain if related to treatment);

    • *** , evaluation within 12 months after complete occlusion (8 patients) or before radiotherapy (13 patients); mRS, modified Rankin scale; 1, minor symptoms; 2, some restriction in lifestyle.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 1
January, 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endovascular Treatment of Intracerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Procedural Safety, Complications, and Results Evaluated by MR Imaging, Including Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M. Cronqvist, R. Wirestam, B. Ramgren, L. Brandt, B. Romner, O. Nilsson, H. Säveland, S. Holtås, E.-M. Larsson
Endovascular Treatment of Intracerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Procedural Safety, Complications, and Results Evaluated by MR Imaging, Including Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2006, 27 (1) 162-176;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Endovascular Treatment of Intracerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Procedural Safety, Complications, and Results Evaluated by MR Imaging, Including Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging
M. Cronqvist, R. Wirestam, B. Ramgren, L. Brandt, B. Romner, O. Nilsson, H. Säveland, S. Holtås, E.-M. Larsson
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2006, 27 (1) 162-176;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Selection of Patients for Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations by the Transvenous Approach: Relationship with Venous Anatomy and Risk of Hemorrhagic Complications
  • Complications of Endovascular Treatments for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Nationwide Surveillance
  • Neurological outcomes and cure rates of embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations with n-butyl cyanoacrylate or Onyx: a meta-analysis
  • Hemorrhagic Complications after Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
  • A Translational Paradigm for the Preclinical Evaluation of the Stroke Neuroprotectant Tat-NR2B9c in Gyrencephalic Nonhuman Primates
  • Microsurgical retrieval of an endovascular microcatheter trapped during Onyx embolization of a cerebral arteriovenous malformation
  • Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Treatment Using a Combination of Onyx and a New Detachable Tip Microcatheter, SONIC: Short-Term Results
  • Territorial and Microvascular Perfusion Impairment in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire