Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleBRAIN

Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography

E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons and A.J. Fox
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2006, 27 (3) 632-637;
E.S. Bartlett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.D. Walters
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.P. Symons
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.J. Fox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Near-occlusion ICA stenosis with distal ICA collapse, threadlike “string sign.” CTA axial source image (A) near the skull base and coronal MPR (B) showing collapse of the right distal ICA (thin arrow) in comparison to normal caliber left distal ICA (arrowhead). These arteries are continuous from the proximal carotid bulb and are headed toward the carotid canal. Both features should be identified on MPRs with reference to the axial source images to distinguish collapsed ICAs from other vessels, especially the ascending pharyngeal artery. C, 3D-rendered (left) and oblique sagittal MPR (right) of the right carotid arteries showing the severe carotid bulb stenosis, appearing amputated on reformatted images. There is collapse of the right distal ICA (thin arrow), similar in size to the ascending pharyngeal artery on the oblique sagittal MPR (thick solid arrow). The identification of both these vessels was confirmed on the axial source images and other MPRs by identifying their origins and anatomic continuations.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Normal distal ICA. A, Axial CTA image at the level of the left distal ICA (arrow) and distal ECA (both enclosed by dashed-line box). Densely calcified styloid process is between the ICA and the ECA. B, Magnification of the distal ICA and distal ECA with diameter measurements; the distal ICA diameter (A, 0.42 cm) is substantially larger than the distal ECA diameter (B, 0.23 cm). Densely calcified styloid process is between the ICA and the ECA. C, 3D-rendered image of the left distal ICA and distal ECA, showing their normal relationship (arrow, distal ICA).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Decreased diameter of distal ICA lumen associated with near-occlusion stenosis. A, Axial CTA image at the level of the left distal ICA (arrow) and distal ECA (both enclosed by dashed-line box). B, Magnification of the distal ICA and distal ECA with diameter measurements; in this case, the distal ICA diameter (B, 0.26 cm) is smaller than the distal ECA diameter (A, 0.32 cm). C, 3D-rendered image of the left distal ICA and distal ECA, showing the decreased distal ICA (arrow, distal ICA), secondary to near-occlusion ICA stenosis in this case. Distal ICA reduction that is near equal in diameter to distal ECA is substantially decreased from expected normal as shown in Fig 2). The maximum left ICA bulb stenosis measured 0.07 cm, shown on 3D-rendered image as an amputated segment. Calcification surrounds segments of the left carotid bifurcation.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    ROC curves depicting the performance of each model in identifying near-occlusion stenosis. The model is more accurate the further the curve lies above the reference line (greatest area under the ROC curve). A, Ratio of the distal ICA lumen to the contralateral distal ICA lumen (dICA:dICA*, solid line), the most accurate model to identify near-occlusion stenosis. B, Distal ICA lumen (dICA, dotted line) is the second most accurate model. C, Ratio of the distal ICA lumen to that of the ipsilateral ECA (ICA: ECA, dot-dashed line), is the third most accurate model. D, The ICA stenosis model (ICA, dashed line) is the least accurate to identify near-occlusion stenosis.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Validity statistics of near occlusion single-variable test models (in order of decreasing accuracy)

    SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
    dlCA:dlCA* (≤0.87), n = 21697.389.465.599.4
    dlCA (≤3.5 mm), n = 24095.289.966.798.9
    dlCA:ECA (≤1.27), n = 23190.587.361.397.6
    ICA (≤1.3 mm), n = 17990.284.162.796.7
    • Note: —dlCA:dlCA* indicates ratio of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter to that of the contralateral distal ICA; dlCA, diameter of the distal ICA; dlCA:ECA, ratio of the distal ICA diameter to the distal external carotid artery diameter; ICA, narrowest diameter of the ICA bulb stenosis. All diameters are expressed in millimeters. PPV indicates positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value. Values demonstrate the ability of each model to identify near occlusion stenosis, based on threshold values for each model. The threshold values were based on the model’s receiver operating characteristic curve and assigned to maximize sensitivity and specificity for each test model. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated for all data. The threshold values (in parentheses) are reported under the model title, along with the population size (n).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Validity statistics for the paired permutations of near occlusion single-variable test models (in order of decreasing accuracy)

    SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
    dlCA + dlCA:dlCA* (n = 235)91.996.081.098.4
    dlCA:dlCA* + dlCA:ECA (n = 234)89.295.478.697.9
    dlCA + dlCA:ECA (n = 239)88.195.480.497.4
    ICA + dlCA (n = 231)87.896.885.797.4
    ICA + dlCA:dlCA* (n = 225)86.896.382.597.3
    ICA + dICA:ECA (n = 229)82.996.885.096.3
    • Note:—dlCA:dlCA*, ratio of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter to that of the contralateral distal ICA; dlCA, diameter of the distal ICA; dlCA:ECA, ratio of the distal ICA diameter to the distal external carotid artery diameter; ICA, narrowest diameter of the ICA bulb stenosis. All diameters are expressed in millimeters. PPV indicates positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value. Values were obtained from contingency tables created to evaluate paired permutations of the single-variable test models. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated for all data. Population size (n) is reported for each permutation.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 3
March, 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, A.J. Fox
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2006, 27 (3) 632-637;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, A.J. Fox
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2006, 27 (3) 632-637;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Diagnosing Carotid Near-Occlusion with Phase-Contrast MRI
  • Assessment of Apparent Internal Carotid Tandem Occlusion on High-Resolution Vessel Wall Imaging: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography
  • Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 2--Prognosis and Treatment, Pathophysiology, Confusions, and Areas for Improvement
  • Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 1--Definition, Terminology, and Diagnosis
  • Multilevel Assessment of Atherosclerotic Extent Using a 40-Section Multidetector Scanner after Transient Ischemic Attack or Ischemic Stroke
  • Factors associated with early outcome in patients with large-vessel carotid strokes
  • The Relation of Carotid Calcium Volume with Carotid Artery Stenosis in Symptomatic Patients
  • Should Modeling Methodology Suppress Anatomic Excellence?
  • Window Settings for the Study of Calcified Carotid Plaques with Multidetector CT Angiography
  • Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining >=70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
  • Response to Letter by Bladin et al
  • Simplification of the Residual Lumen Geometry in Measuring Carotid Stenosis
  • Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire