Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleBRAIN

Efficacy and Sensitivity of Axial Scans and Different Reconstruction Methods in the Study of the Ulcerated Carotid Plaque Using Multidetector-Row CT Angiography: Comparison with Surgical Results

L. Saba, G. Caddeo, R. Sanfilippo, R. Montisci and G. Mallarini
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2007, 28 (4) 716-723;
L. Saba
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Caddeo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Sanfilippo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Montisci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Mallarini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A 71-year-old man with persistent monocular visual loss. VR (A, B), MIP (C), and axial scans (D) show a severe and irregular ulcerated plaque of the internal carotid artery (ICA). In the left ICA, proximal to the point of maximum stenosis (60% NASCET), is clearly depicted an ulceration of 2 mm (red arrows). In the VR images, A is set without contrast media histogram and B is set with contrast media histogram. In C, there is visible hook morphology (ICA, blue arrow).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A 65-year-old woman with TIA. Ulcerated plaque of the left internal carotid artery (ICA); the typical button-of-shirt morphology is visible. Axial scan (A) illustrates ulcerations in a mixed plaque and displays a dissectionlike aspect. VR (B, C) clearly depicts the ulceration. Gross anatomic inspection confirms the presence of the ulcer (D). In this patient, the plaque is heavily calcified proximally and is not calcified at the location of the ulcer. This ulcer is distal to the point of maximum stenosis located in the bifurcation (80% NASCET), and could also have been a pseudoaneurysm from carotid dissection, but the surgical specimen confirmed the presence of ulceration. Note the big plaque calcification located in the bulbus/bifurcation (yellow arrows, ulceration; blue arrows, maximum stenosis point; green arrow, ICA; blue arrowhead, calcified plaque). The external carotid artery ostium is not visible because the cut plane passed through it.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    A 78-year-old man with TIA. Ulcerated plaque of the left CCA. Axial scan (A) shows ulcerations in a calcified plaque; the atheromatous plaque involved the common carotid artery, the carotid bifurcation, and internal carotid artery origin. This ulcer is proximal to the point of maximum stenosis (90% NASCET). The ulceration was easily detected using VR technique with 1 histogram (B) and 2 histograms (C, D). Ulceration was less clearly visible using MIP and MPR reconstruction (E, F). Note: B is an internal visual, where the lumen is cut to clarify the ulcers. (red arrow in axial image and yellow arrows in VR, MIP, and MPR images, ulceration; green arrows, ICA; blue arrows, CCA)

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Graph shows the sensitivity of SSD, MPR, MIP, VR, axial, and axial + VR. Mean values (▪) and 95% confidence intervals (error bars) are indicated

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Graph shows the specificity of SSD, MPR, MIP, VR, axial, and axial + VR. Mean values (▪) and 95% confidence intervals (error bars) are indicated

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Graph shows sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of SSD, MPR, MIP, VR, axial, and axial + VR.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Performances of axial scan and postprocessing techniques

    Method of Evaluation% Sensitivity (CI)% Specificity (CI)% PPV (CI)% NPV (CI)
    Axial scan90.9 (81.1–100.7)94.7 (89.7–99.8)88.2 (77.4–99.1)96.0 (91.6–100.4)
    MIP78.8 (64.8–92.7)92.1 (86.0–98.2)81.3 (67.7–94.8)90.9 (84.5–97.3)
    MPR75.8 (61.1–90.4)90.8 (84.3–97.3)78.1 (63.8–92.4)89.6 (82.8–96.4)
    SSD39.4 (22.7–56.1)88.2 (80.9–95.4)59.1 (38.5–79.6)77 (68.2–85.9)
    VR87.9 (76.7–99)97.4 (93.8–101)93.5 (84.9–102.2)94.9 (90–99.8)
    VR + axial scan93.9 (85.8–102.1)98.7 (96.1–101.2)93.5 (84.9–102.2)97.4 (93.8–101)
    • Note:—CI indicates confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; MIP, maximum intensity projection; MPR, multiplanar reconstruction; SSD, shaded surface display; VR, volume rendering.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Correlation between stenosis degree and plaque ulceration

    Stenosis Degree (NASCET)Patients with Plaque UlcerationPatients without Ulceration% with Plaque Ulceration
    50–69 %1614.29
    70–84 %82623.54
    85–99 %224632.35
    • Note:—NASCET indicates North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Correlation between plaque type and ulceration

    Plaque TypePatients with Plaque UlcerationPatients without Ulceration% with Plaque Ulceration
    Fatty191654.3
    Mixed83419.1
    Calcified42812.5
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 4
April 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy and Sensitivity of Axial Scans and Different Reconstruction Methods in the Study of the Ulcerated Carotid Plaque Using Multidetector-Row CT Angiography: Comparison with Surgical Results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
L. Saba, G. Caddeo, R. Sanfilippo, R. Montisci, G. Mallarini
Efficacy and Sensitivity of Axial Scans and Different Reconstruction Methods in the Study of the Ulcerated Carotid Plaque Using Multidetector-Row CT Angiography: Comparison with Surgical Results
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2007, 28 (4) 716-723;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Efficacy and Sensitivity of Axial Scans and Different Reconstruction Methods in the Study of the Ulcerated Carotid Plaque Using Multidetector-Row CT Angiography: Comparison with Surgical Results
L. Saba, G. Caddeo, R. Sanfilippo, R. Montisci, G. Mallarini
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2007, 28 (4) 716-723;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Carotid Vessel Wall Imaging on CTA
  • Carotid Artery Wall Imaging: Perspective and Guidelines from the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Imaging Carotid Atherosclerosis Plaque Ulceration: Comparison of Advanced Imaging Modalities and Recent Developments
  • Intraplaque Hemorrhage and the Plaque Surface in Carotid Atherosclerosis: The Plaque At RISK Study (PARISK)
  • CTA for Screening of Complicated Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque--American Heart Association Type VI Lesions as Defined by MRI
  • Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured Using CT: Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement Analysis
  • Vascular Wall Imaging of Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaques: Current State of the Art and Potential Future of Endovascular Optical Coherence Tomography
  • Association Between Carotid Artery Plaque Ulceration and Plaque Composition Evaluated With Multidetector CT Angiography
  • Characterization of Carotid Plaque Hemorrhage: A CT Angiography and MR Intraplaque Hemorrhage Study
  • Atherosclerotic Plaque Ulceration in the Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Is Associated With Nonlacunar Ischemic Stroke
  • Assessment of Intracranial Arterial Stenosis with Multidetector Row CT Angiography: A Postprocessing Techniques Comparison
  • Window Settings for the Study of Calcified Carotid Plaques with Multidetector CT Angiography
  • Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining >=70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
  • Atherosclerotic Plaque Surface Morphology in the Carotid Bifurcation Assessed With Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire