Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLetter

CT Angiography is State-of-the-Art First Vascular Imaging for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

A.J. Fox, S.P. Symons and R.I. Aviv
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2008, 29 (6) e41-e42; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1049
A.J. Fox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.P. Symons
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.I. Aviv
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The American Journal of Neuroradiology shows different attitudes to state-of-the-art imaging with CT angiography (CTA) after subarachnoid hemorrhage.1,2 Kallmes et al1 opine that CTA should not be done for subarachnoid hemorrhage, whereas Lubicz et al2 document state-of-the-art CTA imaging of aneurysms.

Kallmes et al1 enshrine selective conventional angiography (DSA), believing that DSA is still needed regardless of whether a cause for hemorrhage is shown on CTA. They imply that CTA is inadequate for needed details in the management of aneurysms. However, Lubicz et al2 and other authors3 point to a high level of accuracy of CTA in the detection of aneurysms not only for diagnosis, but also for characterization. They analyze morphologic features of the aneurysm including size, shape, neck orientation, relationship to parent vessels, and relationship to branches. These criteria are needed for management decisions and are shown on CTA despite claims by Kallmes et al1 that these features are obtainable only on DSA.

Kallmes et al1 describe DSA as having “near perfect accuracy and mortality rate of 0.06%.”1 It is unusual to refer to DSA mortality risks because ischemia is most concerning, especially permanent stroke initiated by DSA. Multiple series show low risks in expert angiography practices.4,5 DSA complication rates in general clinical practice are not reported, yet it is suspected that permanent risks for stroke with DSA are higher for those authors who are not publishing their stroke rates. Unpublished information known from discussions with angiographic teams includes too many obvious “strokes on the table” during DSA, more than 1 a month. These occurrences have been unheard of for many years by experts.

Recent literature pays little attention to the variance of serious complications from DSA and to safeguards incorporated into basic angiographic technique, including use of experienced scrub assistants and liberal use of heparin in infusion flush, even for patients with hemorrhage. Routine safeguards used by experts are seldom described in detail in publications of endovascular advances. It is as if every angiographer is presumed safe so that there is no discussion, regardless of whether optimal safeguards are used. There are no standardized precautions; yet, every consent for undergoing DSA stresses the risk for stroke.

CTA has no risk for stroke. It is acquired from approximately 5 to 20 seconds of scanning. It uses less contrast than a full “4-vessel” angiogram. DSA has a sterile setup, requires arterial access, and consists of selective catheter manipulations. 3D neuroangiography was an advance in the 1990s because development produced CTA from angiographic C-arm DSA.6 DSA with 3D is CTA acquired differently.

CTA from a CT gantry provides angiographic images of all arteries, whereas DSA with 3D gives CTA-type images for each selective, full DSA needing multiple catheterizations for 30 to 60 minutes. Kallmes et al1 point out resolution data, with a difference in spatial resolution between 0.35 and 0.5 mm for CTA without the risk for stroke and 0.2 and 0.3 mm1 for 3D conventional angiography with a risk for stroke. Some vessels are more difficult to catheterize, especially for tortuous arches, with increasing stroke risk, increasing difficulty of catheterization, and prolonged procedure time.4,5 As neuroradiologists become more and more facile in handling hundreds of CTA images to show and characterize aneurysms,2,3 fewer and fewer DSA examinations are being performed. Cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage without a cause shown on quality CTA become candidates for DSA, to search for early venous drainage of a possible dural arteriovenous fistula with pial venous drainage.

Risks of missing tiny aneurysms hidden by other vessels occur as a combination of reader inexperience, failure to invoke enough angles of view, and failure to fill particular vessels with contrast regardless of DSA or CTA. DSA has a greater risk of incomplete filling of aneurysms7 because contrast perfuses only 1 vessel at a time, and there could be contrast dilution or layering with slow filling. Both CTA and DSA with 3D need postprocessing, but CTA source images with a CT gantry are fine axial pictures that are diagnostic with high resolution on their own. Source images for DSA with 3D are multiple-angled views of angiographic projections with limited gain to view all directly; their purpose is to create 3D image volumes. For efficient viewing in addition to source images, CTA is viewed with sections of multiple maximum intensity projections from multiple angles and sometimes rendered images from 3D volumes. DSA with 3D commonly uses rendered images as primary 3D images. Rendering smoothes vessel edges to produce nice pictures at a cost of losing fine-edge details; this loss is the same for rendering regardless of whether CTA or DSA examination is performed.

Many neuroradiologists are now expert in precise CTA,2,3 practicing with goals to duplicate or surpass the positive aspects of DSA. The conclusion by Kallmes et al1 that CTA cannot be done for acute ruptured aneurysms seems applicable only for those who are expert in DSA but not in CTA advances. Perhaps the conclusion of Kallmes et al1 could be revised to read that, “Those who are not expert in CTA and do not work to a goal of CTA ‘near perfection’ should continue to rely on conventional angiography.” Similarly appropriate is that those who are expert in CTA and who no longer perform enough DSA examinations should not do DSA as if it were a near-perfect, low-risk procedure because risks may be far higher than those of the reported stroke rates. DSA examination for pure diagnostic purposes is less frequent with decreasing skills; a comparison today might be to pneumoencephalography, which is no longer done, is not needed, without safe skills.

Yet DSA remains the basis of endovascular treatments, which are now able to be more focused, less time consuming, and with other potential benefits if CTA is done first for hemorrhage. Patients can now come to the interventional suite with the diagnosis, and details of the aneurysm from CTA can be already available2,3 from just a few seconds of scanning. When a CTA examination is done first, a full “4-vessel” DSA need not be conducted blinded to the ruptured aneurysm. CTA is an important advance in neurovascular imaging and management, including acutely ruptured aneurysms. These conclusions are opinions based on extended experience with DSA for decades and with CTA examination performed with goals to both match and surpass the value of DSA. The published conclusion of Kallmes et al1 that CTA examination should not be performed for ruptured aneurysms is inappropriate today, except perhaps for those who are not expert with CTA advances.

References

  1. ↵
    Kallmes DF, Layton K, Marx WF, et al. Death by nondiagnosis: why emergent CT angiography should not be done for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1837–38
    FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Lubicz B, Levrier M, Francois O, et al. Sixty-four-row multisectional CT angiography for detection and evaluation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: interobserver and intertechnique reproducibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol28:1949–55
  3. ↵
    Agid R, Lee SK, Willinsky RA, et al. Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: using 64-slice multidetector CT angiography to “triage” patients’ treatment. Neuroradiology 2006;48:787–94
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, et al. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 1987;18:997–1004
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Fahrig R, Fox AJ, Lownie S, et al. Use of a C-arm system to generate true three-dimensional computed rotational angiograms: preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1507–14
    Abstract
  7. ↵
    Jou LD, Mohammed A, Lee DH, et al. 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography may underestimate intracranial aneurysms: filling from two basilar aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1690–92
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 6
June 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CT Angiography is State-of-the-Art First Vascular Imaging for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CT Angiography is State-of-the-Art First Vascular Imaging for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
A.J. Fox, S.P. Symons, R.I. Aviv
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2008, 29 (6) e41-e42; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1049

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
CT Angiography is State-of-the-Art First Vascular Imaging for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
A.J. Fox, S.P. Symons, R.I. Aviv
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2008, 29 (6) e41-e42; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1049
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Digital subtraction cerebral angiography after negative computed tomography angiography findings in non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Diagnostic Impact of Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography for Patients with Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
  • Cerebral Angiography for Evaluation of Patients with CT Angiogram-Negative Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An 11-Year Experience
  • Diagnostic yield of delayed neurovascular imaging in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, negative initial CT and catheter angiograms, and a negative 7 day repeat catheter angiogram
  • Use of CT Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients with Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm: Evaluation of a Large Multihospital Data Base
  • Cerebral Angiography: Not Yet Ready to Join the Dinosaurs
  • Diagnostic Yield of Catheter Angiography in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Negative Initial Noninvasive Neurovascular Examinations
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fair Performance of CT in Diagnosing Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Reply:
  • Regarding “Altered Blood Flow in the Ophthalmic and Internal Carotid Arteries in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Measured Using Noncontrast MR Angiography at 7T”
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire