Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
OtherEDITORIAL

On-Line Self-Archiving of Articles: Are We Ready?

M. Castillo
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2008, 29 (7) 1227; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1177
M. Castillo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

As I have written in an earlier editorial, scientific articles are stored and accessed by people, readers, and researchers in several ways.1 The most popular article repositories in the United States are the Websites of individual scientific journals (eg, www.ajnr.org) or the government-sponsored PubMed. Universities such as Harvard are creating repositories of their own, too. Investigators strive to maximize access to their work because funding and salaries are dependent on its impact. Recently, a different way to archive one's work has become available (and encouraged by some institutions): self-archiving.2

Self-archiving Websites are open access (OA), self-administered, and may contain any type of publications: from prepublished to peer-reviewed articles with URLs (uniform resource locators) and DOIs (digital object identifiers). The idea of these self-archives is that they supplement the expensive access offered by commercial publishers. Self-archives are not intended to take the place of peer-reviewed repositories, though there is evidence that OA articles are quoted anywhere from 25% to 250% more than non-OA publications.2 The Registry of Open Access Registries (ROAR; www.roar.eprints.org) lists 228 sites in the United States; 110 in the United Kingdom; and lesser numbers in Germany, Brazil, Japan, Canada, and France. The ROAR Website allows searches by countries, content type, system software, and name. To build an independent electronic self-archive, a software program is needed and one can be found, free, on the Web (www.eprints.org). This program allows for incorporation of literature, scientific data, and multimedia into individual Websites and contains other powerful features such as the ability to interface with reference managers, Google Scholar, Web 2.0, and RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feeds. Two universities (Cornell and Southampton) contributed with the International Digital Libraries Research Program to fund OpCit (the Open Citation Project; http://opcit.eprints/org). Together, they developed Citebase search, a utility that searches OA sources and is thought to be better than Google Scholar. OpCit also developed other tools including user interfaces of archives (GNU Eprints), a cited papers locator (Paracite), and user-based evaluations of OA sites.

Are individual article repositories of equal quality to those offered by peer-reviewed publications? The answer is no. Less than 60% of authors replace prepublished articles with their peer-reviewed equivalents.3 Some prepublished articles are only updated by accepted abstracts on these Websites, leaving the rest of the articles without formal support. What is true is that as time goes by, incremental and cumulative numbers of prepublished papers have their journal reference entries added, and that approximately 34% of articles initially loaded into OA sites have been peer reviewed.4 The number of hits a paper receives (ie, the number of times someone looks at it) is proportional to the number of deposits, meaning that papers found in more than 1 repository will be accessed and cited more often.5 The number of citations an OA paper receives is maximal during the first 3 years that follow its appearance, and most citations are received by papers that have been published in prestigious journals, stressing the importance of peer review.6 Regardless of authors’ impact factors, all authors prefer to cite articles with a high, rather than a low, impact factor.7 ArXiv is an OA on-line repository that contains nearly a half million e-prints in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, and statistics (http://arxiv.org). Most authors who use this service deposit their prepublished papers there as long as they believe that these are of high quality. The effects of limiting OA for 6 to 12 months (as the American Journal of Neuroradiology [AJNR] does) have not been determined. If one looks at the papers deposited in arXiv, it is true that once the authors are permitted to post them there, the number of citations they receive increases.

Despite all of these apparent advantages, only 15% of researchers self-archive in Web-based OA initiatives.8 The major US institutions to offer OA include Case Western Reserve University, Cornell University, the University of California, the University of Kansas, the National Institutes of Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Harvard University. As we migrate into OA systems, university and promotion committees will grow less dependent on the impact factor and will have to learn to use other metrics including download counts, citation growth, and decay rates, which are more difficult to understand and compare. Citebase search, which I have mentioned earlier, is an upcoming device that may provide useful information regarding these metrics (http://citebase.eprints.org).

I do not know of any neuroradiologists who have their own article repository. With our busy clinical practices and administrative responsibilities, I am not sure that many of us are in a position to create and maintain such an endeavor. I believe that AJNR on-line is an excellent repository of articles as its statistics for 2007 show: nearly 400,000 hits to our Website homepage, nearly a half million searches, and 3.5 million articles viewed! As a journal and a scientific society, we will be obligated to look at innovative financial models that will allow us to become better aligned with the OA movement. Meanwhile, our contributing authors can be assured that their articles are getting a wide audience, and our readers can be assured that they are reading high-quality, peer-reviewed literature.

References

  1. ↵
    Castillo M. Benefits and dangers of university-sponsored open-access systems. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:617–18
    FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Harnad S. Self-archiving, metrics, and mandates. Sci Editor 2008;31:57–59
  3. ↵
    Brody T. What proportion of preprints are replaced by peer reviewed reprints? Available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/tdb198/opcit/q3/. Accessed April 22,2008
  4. ↵
    Brody T. What proportion of papers are submitted to the archive only after peer review? Available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/tdb198/opcit/q4/. Accessed April 22,2008
  5. ↵
    Impact assessment. Available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/tdb198/opcit/impact/. Accessed April 22,2008
  6. ↵
    Citation analysis. Available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/tdb198/opcit/citations/. Accessed April 22,2008
  7. ↵
    Moed HF. The effect of open access on citation impact: an analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol doi: 10.1002/asi.20663
    CrossRef
  8. ↵
    Available at: http://eprintsorg/openaccess/self-faq/#32-worries. Accessed April 22,2008
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 7
August 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
On-Line Self-Archiving of Articles: Are We Ready?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
On-Line Self-Archiving of Articles: Are We Ready?
M. Castillo
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2008, 29 (7) 1227; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1177

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
On-Line Self-Archiving of Articles: Are We Ready?
M. Castillo
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2008, 29 (7) 1227; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1177
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The No Surprises Act: What Neuroradiologists Should Know
  • Call to Action: Women in Neuroradiology’s Group (WINNERS)—Is There a Need?
  • The Z-Shift: A Need for Quality Management System Level Testing and Standardization in Neuroimaging Pipelines
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire