Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLetter

T2* Signal Hyperintensity in Subacute Cerebral Vein Thrombosis

F. Bonneville
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2009, 30 (10) E145-E146; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1769
F. Bonneville
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We read with great interest the article by Boukobza et al1 reporting the usefulness of the T2 gradient-echo (T2*) sequence in making the diagnosis of isolated cortical vein thrombosis. In substance, the authors claim that magnetic susceptibility effect (MSE) is always visible, regardless of the age of the thrombi in the veins. Therefore, after reading this article, one can understand that cerebral vein thrombosis always appears with abnormal low signal intensity on T2* sequences. Although there is no doubt in our minds that T2* sequences and MSE are fundamental at the early stage of cerebral vein thrombosis, they seem less useful during the subacute stage. In fact, in agreement with the authors' Fig 5 follow-up, this sign appears at least tricky and can be misinterpreted. The legends and arrows in Fig 5 can even be controversial because the authors described the thrombosed vein at the surface of the cortex as hypointense on T2*. On the contrary, one can see this cord sign as hyperintense on all sequences, including the T2* image. Indeed, T1-, T2-, and T2* images demonstrate identical findings: a thrombosed vein with central high signal intensity (partially veiled by the tip of the arrow on T2*) separated from the cortical surface by a thin hypointense line without evident MSE (indicated by the arrow on the T2* image but visible as well on the T1- and T2-weighted images).

However, signal-intensity heterogeneity and dark contour are frequently observed on normal venous structures on T2* images2 and can even be seen in the normal superior sagittal sinus of the authors' Fig 5 follow-up. Therefore, for daily practice and didactic purposes, we would have recommended that the authors warn radiologists not to rely on this T2* hypointensity at the subacute stage, and they should inform radiologists that due to extracellular methemoglobin,2,3 venous thrombosis becomes obviously hyperintense on all sequences, including T2* images.2 This is of major importance because although this hyperintense subacute thrombosis is easily diagnosed by a bright signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences, it can be missed on the T2* sequence because it may mimic normal circulating veins, which may appear with such a signal intensity on this sequence.

For reinforcement, we illustrate here the case of a 34-year-old woman with headache and demonstrative evolution of MR signal intensities of cerebral venous thrombosis. Initial MR imaging performed 2 days after neurologic symptom onset revealed thrombosed superior sagittal sinus and cortical veins diagnosed only by means of MSE on the T2* image (Fig 1). Follow-up MR imaging performed exactly 7 days after the first examination (Fig 2) demonstrates how the T2* sequence becomes almost useless compared with spin-echo sequences that demonstrate abnormal high signal intensities within the thrombosed venous structures.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Acute thrombosis of the superior sagittal sinus and cortical veins in a 34-year-old woman with 2 days of lasting headaches and left hemiparesis. A, Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image. B, Axial T2* image. The thrombosis maybe missed on spin-echo sequences because it appears with T1 isointensity (not shown) and T2 FLAIR hypointensity, signal intensities close to normal circulating venous structures. On the other hand, the T2* image obviously demonstrates abnormal magnetic susceptibility effect (MSE) in the thrombosed venous structures and in the right transcerebral veins.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Follow-up MR image obtained after 7 days of heparin administration. A and B, Axial FLAIR (A) and axial T2* image (B) at the same level as in Fig 1. The superior sagittal sinus, which is still thrombosed, now appears with T1- (not shown), T2-, and T2* signal-intensity hyperintensities and lacks MSE. Note the right caudate lesion, appearing with T2 hyperintensity as initially observed on Fig 1.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Boukobza M,
    2. Crassard I,
    3. Bousser MG,
    4. et al
    . MR imaging features of isolated cortical vein thrombosis: diagnosis and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:344–48
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Leach JL,
    2. Strub WM,
    3. Gaskill-Shipley MF
    . Cerebral venous thrombus signal intensity and susceptibility effect on gradient recalled-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:940–45
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Atlas SW,
    2. Mark AS,
    3. Grossman RI,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial hemorrhage: gradient echo MR imaging at 1.5 T—comparison with spin-echo imaging and clinical applications. Radiology 1988;168:803–07
    PubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 10
1 Nov 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
T2* Signal Hyperintensity in Subacute Cerebral Vein Thrombosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
T2* Signal Hyperintensity in Subacute Cerebral Vein Thrombosis
F. Bonneville
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2009, 30 (10) E145-E146; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1769

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
T2* Signal Hyperintensity in Subacute Cerebral Vein Thrombosis
F. Bonneville
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2009, 30 (10) E145-E146; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1769
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fair Performance of CT in Diagnosing Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Reply:
  • Regarding “Altered Blood Flow in the Ophthalmic and Internal Carotid Arteries in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Measured Using Noncontrast MR Angiography at 7T”
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire