Comparison of 2D Digital Subtraction Angiography and 3D Rotational Angiography in the Evaluation of Dome-to-Neck Ratio

References

1. ↵
   Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Tong FC, et al. Use of three-dimensional Guglielmi detachable coils in the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1312–14

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Kehrli P, et al. Selection of cerebral aneurysms for treatment using Guglielmi detachable coils: the preliminary University of Illinois at Chicago experience. Neurosurgery 1998;43:1281–95, discussion 1296–87

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Kehrli P, et al. Aneurysm geometry: an important criterion in selecting patients for Guglielmi detachable coiling. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1998;38 (suppl):1–20

   PubMed
4. Fernandez Zubillaga A, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, et al. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815–20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. Gonzalez N, Sedrak M, Martin N, et al. Impact of anatomic features in the endovascular embolization of 181 anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Stroke 2008;39:2776–82. Epub 2008 Jul 10

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   Kiyosue H, Tanoue S, Okahara M, et al. Anatomic features predictive of complete aneurysm occlusion can be determined with three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1206–13

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003;98:959–66

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Parlea L, Fahrig R, Holdsworth DW, et al. An analysis of the geometry of saccular intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1079–89

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   Yoon DY, Lim KJ, Choi CS, et al. Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with 16-channel multidetector row CT angiography: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:60–67

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    Erickson BJ, Ryan WJ, Gehring DG. Functional requirements of a desktop clinical image display application. J Digit Imaging 2001;14:149–52

    CrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    Regli L, Uske A, de Tribolet N. Endovascular coil placement compared with surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a consecutive series. J Neurosurg 1999;90:1025–30

    CrossRefPubMed
12. ↵
    Jayaraman MV, Mayo-Smith WW, Tung GA, et al. Detection of intracranial aneurysms: multi-detector row CT angiography compared with DSA. Radiology 2004;230:510–18

    PubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Kouskouras C, Charitanti A, Giavroglou C, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation using CTA and MRA—correlation with DSA and intraoperative findings. Neuroradiology 2004;46:842–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001;218:799–808

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1545–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, de Gast AN, et al. 3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:976–79

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    Hagen G, Lindgren PG, Jangland L, et al. Artifacts in 3D rotational angiography: an experimental study. Acta Radiol 2005;46:32–36

    CrossRefPubMed