Angiographic and Histologic Comparison of Experimental Aneurysms Embolized with Hydrogel Filaments

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Gruber A,
   2. Killer M,
   3. Bavinzski G,
   4. et al

   . Clinical and angiographic results of endosaccular coiling treatment of giant and very large intracranial aneurysms: a 7-year, single-center experience. Neurosurgery 1999; 45: 793– 803

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM,
   4. et al

   . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366: 809– 17; discussion 803–04

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Mitchell P,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Mendelow AD,
   4. et al

   . Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial? J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 437– 42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Butteriss D,
   2. Gholkar A,
   3. Mitra D,
   4. et al

   . Single-center experience of Cerecyte coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and early follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 53– 56

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Leclerc X,
   3. Bonafe A,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix detachable coils: midterm anatomic follow-up from a prospective multicenter registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 57– 61

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Kai Y,
   2. Hamada J,
   3. Morioka M,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of the stability of small ruptured aneurysms with a small neck after embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils: correlation between coil packing ratio and coil compaction. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 785– 92; discussion 785–92

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Slob MJ,
   2. Sluzewski M,
   3. van Rooij WJ

   . The relation between packing and reopening in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study. Neuroradiology 2005; 47: 942– 45

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Cloft HJ,
   2. Kallmes DF

   . Aneurysm packing with HydroCoil embolic system versus platinum coils: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 60– 62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Gaba RC,
   2. Ansari SA,
   3. Roy SS,
   4. et al

   . Embolization of intracranial aneurysms with hydrogel-coated coils versus inert platinum coils: effects on packing density, coil length and quantity, procedure performance, cost, length of hospital stay, and durability of therapy. Stroke 2006; 37: 1443– 50

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Deshaies EM,
    2. Adamo MA,
    3. Boulos AS

    . A prospective single-center analysis of the safety and efficacy of the HydroCoil embolization system for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2007; 106: 226– 33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Constant MJ,
    2. Keeley EM,
    3. Cruise GM

    . Preparation, characterization, and evaluation of radiopaque hydrogel filaments for endovascular embolization. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 89: 306– 13
12. 12.↵
    1. Cruise GM,
    2. Shum JC,
    3. Plenk H Jr..

    Hydrogel-coated and platinum coils for intracranial aneurysm embolization compared in three experimental models using computerized angiographic and histologic morphometry. J Mater Chem 2007; 17: 3965– 73

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Tramer MR,
    2. von Elm E,
    3. Loubeyre P,
    4. et al

    . Pharmacological prevention of serious anaphylactic reactions due to iodinated contrast media: systematic review. BMJ 2006; 333: 675

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Forrest MD,
    2. O'Reilly GV

    . Production of experimental aneurysms at a surgically created arterial bifurcation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 400– 02

    FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Altes TA,
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Short JG,
    4. et al

    . 1999 ARRS Executive Council Award. Creation of saccular aneurysms in the rabbit: a model suitable for testing endovascular devices American Roentgen Ray Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 349– 54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Roy D

    . Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 1235– 45; discussion 1245–46

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Kaufmann T,
    3. Kallmes DF

    . Observer agreement in the assessment of endovascular aneurysm therapy and aneurysm recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 497– 500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Reul J,
    2. Spetzger U,
    3. Weis J,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular occlusion of experimental aneurysms with detachable coils: influence of packing density and perioperative anticoagulation. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 1160– 65; discussion 1165–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Ding YH,
    2. Dai D,
    3. Lewis DA,
    4. et al

    . Angiographic and histologic analysis of experimental aneurysms embolized with platinum coils, Matrix, and HydroCoil. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1757– 63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Fujiwara NH,
    2. Kallmes DF

    . Healing response in elastase-induced rabbit aneurysms after embolization with a new platinum coil system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1137– 44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Dai D,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Kadirvel R,
    4. et al

    . A longitudinal immunohistochemical study of the healing of experimental aneurysms after embolization with platinum coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 736– 41

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Bavinzski G,
    2. Richling B,
    3. Binder BR,
    4. et al

    . Histopathological findings in experimental aneurysms embolized with conventional and thrombogenic/antithrombolytic Guglielmi coils. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1999; 42: 167– 74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science