Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Case ReportInterventional

Temporary Endovascular Bypass: A Novel Treatment for Acute Stroke

E.F. Hauck, J. Mocco, K.V. Snyder and E.I. Levy
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2009, 30 (8) 1532-1533; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1536
E.F. Hauck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Mocco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.V. Snyder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.I. Levy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Intracranial stent placement is emerging as an effective treatment for acute stroke. As a means to avoid stent-associated complications and capitalize on stent-placement-related advantages, the concept of a “temporary endovascular bypass” (TEB) for stroke therapy was recently reported. In this technique, a stent is temporarily deployed for instant recanalization. Once sufficient flow is established to maintain vessel patency, the stent is recaptured and withdrawn. We report a second case to further characterize the merits of TEB.

Stenting is emerging as a promising treatment option for acute cerebral ischemia.1–4 The main advantage of stenting for acute stroke is rapid recanalization with high technical success rates.3,4 To capitalize on the advantages of stenting for acute stroke but avoid long-term complications, the “temporary endovascular bypass” (TEB) technique, recently described by Kelly et al,2 represents an interesting alternative to permanent device implantation. A stent is deployed and then recaptured after successful vessel recanalization has been achieved. To further characterize the merits of TEB, a second case is reported here.

Case Report

A 41-year-old man presented with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 19 nine hours after stroke onset. Diagnostic arteriography confirmed vertebrobasilar occlusion (Fig 1A). After access was obtained and intravenous heparin given (activated clotting time, 268 seconds), we prepared for TEB as the primary recanalization strategy.2 The lesion was crossed with a Synchro 0.014-inch microguidewire (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) and a Prowler Select Plus microcatheter (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Fla). A long 4.5 × 37 mm Enterprise stent (Cordis) was partially deployed, spanning the entire occluded segment in the vertebrobasilar system. Partial unsheathing of the stent “propped” open the distal vertebral artery (VA) and the proximal basilar artery. Using the stent as a buttress device, we reconstituted and maintained sufficient flow (Fig 1B). The stent was recaptured and withdrawn 18 minutes later. Poststent arteriography (Fig 1C) demonstrated moderate residual stenosis. The patient then improved immediately (NIHSS score, 8). However, on postoperative day 2, the patient developed lethargy secondary to a cerebellar infarct. He then underwent ventriculostomy and surgical posterior fossa decompression. The patient continued to recover following surgery (NIHSS score of 2, thirty days postoperatively). Conventional angiography demonstrated patency of the vertebrobasilar system without change 8 weeks post-TEB.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A, Right vertebrobasilar arteriogram, dual-injection technique. Right VA occlusion distal to the posterior inferior cerebellar artery origin. A large vertebrobasilar thrombus is outlined by the dotted lines. B, Right VA angiogram, close-up view. The 4.5 × 37 mm Enterprise stent (Cordis) is partially unsheathed. Close inspection of the image reveals 3 small dots marking the distal end of the stent (arrow). The proximal end is still within its sheath, allowing recapture. Recanalization is already successful but has not yet reached its full extent. C, Right VA angiogram, 10 minutes after B was obtained. The stent is still partially deployed. Recanalization continues to improve (relative to A). After this run, the stent was recaptured and withdrawn.

Discussion

TEB appears to be a promising new technique to treat acute stroke. Technically, TEB is straightforward and restores flow immediately. The bypass can be left in place as long as needed or converted to a permanently implanted stent by completing the unsheathing maneuver. The stent recapture eliminates long-term stent-associated complications, such as in-stent stenosis and the need for aggressive antiplatelet therapy.

Intracranial Stent Placement for Acute Stroke

Recently, a few centers have begun to explore intracranial stent placement for acute stroke treatment.1–4 Zaidat et al4 reported their experience with acute stroke by using Neuroform and Wingspan stents (Boston Scientific). Stroke-related mortality occurred in 3 patients (33%). Survivors had modified Rankin Scale scores ≤2. Follow-up angiography showed no in-stent stenosis. Levy et al3 reported their initial series of 19 lesions treated mainly with the Neuroform stent. Stent deployment at the target occlusion site (technical success) was achieved in all cases. Recanalization was successful in 79%. According to these first reports3,4 and our current experience, the main advantage of intracranial stent placement for acute stroke is the immediate recanalization with a high technical success rate. The TEB technique builds on this success.

In-Stent Stenosis after Target Vessel Revascularization

Initial results for stent placement of chronic intracranial stenosis were promising.5,6 However, disappointingly high rates of recurrent stenosis have been described for midterm results.7,8 On the basis of the Wingspan experience, in-stent stenosis rates are fairly significant (25%–29.7%).9,10 Although most patients with in-stent stenosis remain asymptomatic, it can cause neurologic symptoms and may require target-vessel recanalization.9,11 In the setting of acute stroke, Zaidat et al4 reported 1 case (11%) of immediate in-stent restenosis. The risk of in-stent stenosis may be higher in the setting of symptomatic intracranial stenosis or acute stroke compared with the natural history of intracranial stents placed for aneurysm treatment.12 As a practical concept, TEB avoids stent-associated risks altogether because the device is removed.

Risk of Hemorrhagic Complications in the Setting of Acute Stroke

The need for aggressive antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy associated with intracranial stent placement1–4,10,13–16 is a second major disadvantage if stent placement is used as a treatment technique in the setting of acute stroke. Patients treated for the prevention of recurrent stroke with either warfarin or aspirin face a hemorrhagic complication rate of 2.22 per 100 patient-years versus 1.49 per 100 patient-years.17 With dual antiplatelet therapy or antiplatelets plus anticoagulation, the risk is increased.18–21 Zaidat et al4 reported an 11% hemorrhage rate associated with stent placement for acute stroke. Levy et al3 also reported lethal hemorrhage as a complication in 11% of patients treated with stent placement for acute stroke. With TEB, the need for aggressive (dual) antiplatelet therapy is eliminated with recapture of the stent. Therefore, the risk of bleeding postoperatively might be decreased and emergent neurosurgical procedures, if indicated, might be safer.

Conclusions

TEB represents a novel interventional treatment option for acute stroke. The temporary use is technically feasible and takes advantage of the high success rate of intracranial stent placement for recanalization. Dual antiplatelet therapy postintervention is unnecessary, and the problem of in-stent stenosis is eliminated.

Acknowledgment

We thank Paul H. Dressel for assistance with preparation of the illustrations and Debra J. Zimmer for editorial assistance.

Footnotes

  • Dr. Levy receives research grant support, other research support (devices), and honoraria from Boston Scientific; has an ownership interest in Intratech Medical and Micrus Endovascular; serves as a consultant to Cordis Neurovascular, Micrus Endovascular, ev3, and TheraSyn Sensors; and receives fees for carotid stent training from Abbott Vascular and ev3. Dr. Mocco has received a research grant from the Brain Aneurysm Foundation and a previous, one-time honorarium from Cordis.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chiam PT,
    2. Samuelson RM,
    3. Mocco J,
    4. et al
    . Navigability trumps all: stenting of acute middle cerebral artery occlusions with a new self-expandable stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1956– 58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kelly ME,
    2. Furlan AJ,
    3. Fiorella D
    . Recanalization of an acute middle cerebral artery occlusion using a self-expanding, reconstrainable, intracranial microstent as a temporary endovascular bypass. Stroke 2008; 39: 1770– 73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Levy EI,
    2. Mehta R,
    3. Gupta R,
    4. et al
    . Self-expanding stents for recanalization of acute cerebrovascular occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 816– 22
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Wolfe T,
    3. Hussain SI,
    4. et al
    . Interventional acute ischemic stroke therapy with intracranial self-expanding stent. Stroke 2008; 39: 2392– 95
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Woo HH
    . Emerging endovascular therapies for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke 2007; 38: 2391– 96
    FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Henkes H,
    2. Miloslavski E,
    3. Lowens S,
    4. et al
    . Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses with balloon dilatation and self-expanding stent deployment (WingSpan). Neuroradiology 2005; 47: 222– 28
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Albuquerque FC,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Turk AS,
    4. et al
    . Angiographic patterns of Wingspan in-stent restenosis. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 23– 28
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. et al
    . Influence of patient age and stenosis location on Wingspan in-stent restenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 23– 27. Epub 2007 Nov 7
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Levy EI,
    2. Turk AS,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. et al
    . Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management. Neurosurgery 2007; 61: 644– 51
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Klucznik R,
    3. Alexander MJ,
    4. et al
    . The NIH registry on use of the Wingspan stent for symptomatic 70–99% intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology 2008; 70: 1518– 24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fiorella DJ,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Turk AS,
    4. et al
    . Target lesion revascularization after Wingspan: assessment of safety and durability. Stroke 2009; 40: 106– 10. Epub 2008 Oct 16
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque FC,
    3. Woo H,
    4. et al
    . Neuroform in-stent stenosis: incidence, natural history, and treatment strategies. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: 34– 42
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bose A,
    2. Hartmann M,
    3. Henkes H,
    4. et al
    . A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study. Stroke 2007; 38: 1531– 37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Turk AS,
    4. et al
    . US multicenter experience with the Wingspan stent system for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease: periprocedural results. Stroke 2007; 38: 881– 87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hähnel S,
    2. Ringleb P,
    3. Hartmann M
    . Treatment of intracranial stenoses using the Neuroform stent system: initial experience in five cases. Neuroradiology 2006; 48: 479– 85
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kurre W,
    2. Berkefeld J,
    3. Sitzer M,
    4. et al
    . Treatment of symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenoses with the balloon-expandable Pharos stent: initial experience. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 701– 08
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mohr JP,
    2. Thompson JL,
    3. Lazar RM,
    4. et al
    . A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1444– 51
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Flaherty ML,
    2. Tao H,
    3. Haverbusch M,
    4. et al
    . Warfarin use leads to larger intracerebral hematomas. Neurology 2008; 71: 1084– 89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kjaer J,
    2. Larsen CH,
    3. Poulsen TS,
    4. et al
    . Bleeding complications after treatment with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid after acute coronary syndrome [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 2006; 168: 3209– 14
    PubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Reaume KT,
    2. Regal RE,
    3. Dorsch MP
    . Indications for dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel: evidence-based recommendations for use. Ann Pharmacother 2008; 42: 550– 57
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Sullivan J,
    2. Amarshi N
    . Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008; 65: 1134– 43
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received December 18, 2008.
  • Accepted after revision December 31, 2008.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 8
1 Sep 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Temporary Endovascular Bypass: A Novel Treatment for Acute Stroke
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
E.F. Hauck, J. Mocco, K.V. Snyder, E.I. Levy
Temporary Endovascular Bypass: A Novel Treatment for Acute Stroke
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2009, 30 (8) 1532-1533; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1536

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Temporary Endovascular Bypass: A Novel Treatment for Acute Stroke
E.F. Hauck, J. Mocco, K.V. Snyder, E.I. Levy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2009, 30 (8) 1532-1533; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1536
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Brief History of Endovascular Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
  • Primary stenting for acute ischemic stroke using the Enterprise vascular reconstruction device: early results
  • Stenting in acute stroke: point
  • Impact of intracranial self-expanding stents in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: efficacy and limitations
  • Impact of Retrievable Stents on Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
  • Stent-assisted basilar reconstruction for a traumatic vertebral dissection with a large basilar artery thrombosis
  • In Vivo Evaluation of the First Dedicated Combined Flow-Restoration and Mechanical Thrombectomy Device in a Swine Model of Acute Vessel Occlusion
  • Crossref (31)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • First Food and Drug Administration-Approved Prospective Trial of Primary Intracranial Stenting for Acute Stroke
    Elad I. Levy, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Annemarie Crumlish, Kenneth V. Snyder, Erik F. Hauck, David J. Fiorella, L. Nelson Hopkins, J Mocco
    Stroke 2009 40 11
  • Neurothrombectomy Devices for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: State of the Evidence
    William L. Baker, Jennifer A. Colby, Vanita Tongbram, Ripple Talati, Isaac E. Silverman, C. Michael White, Jeffrey Kluger, Craig I. Coleman
    Annals of Internal Medicine 2011 154 4
  • In Vivo Evaluation of the First Dedicated Combined Flow-Restoration and Mechanical Thrombectomy Device in a Swine Model of Acute Vessel Occlusion
    P. Mordasini, N. Frabetti, J. Gralla, G. Schroth, U. Fischer, M. Arnold, C. Brekenfeld
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2011 32 2
  • Impact of Retrievable Stents on Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
    C. Brekenfeld, G. Schroth, P. Mordasini, U. Fischer, M.-L. Mono, A. Weck, M. Arnold, M. El-Koussy, J. Gralla
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2011 32 7
  • Reperfusion for acute ischemic stroke: arterial revascularization and collateral therapeutics
    David S Liebeskind
    Current Opinion in Neurology 2010 23 1
  • Brief History of Endovascular Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
    Wade S. Smith, Antony J. Furlan
    Stroke 2016 47 2
  • Mechanical Thrombectomy Compared to Local-Intraarterial Thrombolysis in Carotid T and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions
    M. Möhlenbruch, M. Seifert, T. Okulla, U. Wüllner, D. R. Hadizadeh, M. Nelles, S. Greschus, K. Wilhelm, H. H. Schild, T. Klockgether, H. Urbach
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2012 22 2
  • Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion: Where We Are and What Comes Next?
    Mohammad Shafie, Wengui Yu
    Translational Stroke Research 2021 12 3
  • Recanalization with stent-based mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation major ischemic stroke
    José E. Cohen, John M. Gomori, Ronen R. Leker, Samuel Moscovici, Fernando Ramirez-deNoriega, Eyal Itshayek
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2012 19 1
  • Primary stenting for acute ischemic stroke using the Enterprise vascular reconstruction device: early results
    Travis M Dumont, Sabareesh K Natarajan, Jorge L Eller, J Mocco, William H Kelly, Kenneth V Snyder, L Nelson Hopkins, Adnan H Siddiqui, Elad I Levy
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2014 6 5

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire