Intravascular Ultrasound: Principles and Cerebrovascular Applications

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Nissen SE,
   2. Tuzcu EM,
   3. Schoenhagen P,
   4. et al

   . Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1071–80

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Guedes A,
   2. Tardif JC.

   . Intravascular ultrasound assessment of atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2004; 6: 219–24

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Waller BF,
   2. Pinkerton CA,
   3. Slack JD

   . Intravascular ultrasound: a histological study of vessels during life—the new “gold standard” for vascular imaging. Circulation 1992; 85: 2305–10

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Lockwood GR,
   2. Ryan LK,
   3. Gotlieb AI,
   4. et al

   . In vitro high resolution intravascular imaging in muscular and elastic arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 153–60

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Gatzoulis L,
   2. Watson RJ,
   3. Jordan LB,
   4. et al

   . Three-dimensional forward-viewing intravascular ultrasound imaging of human arteries in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001: 27: 969–82

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Miskolczi L,
   2. Guterman LR,
   3. Flaherty JD,
   4. et al

   . Depiction of carotid plaque ulceration and other plaque-related disorders by intravascular sonography: a flow chamber study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17: 1881–90

   Abstract
7. 7.↵
   1. Diethrich EB,
   2. Irshad K,
   3. Reid DB

   . Virtual histology and color flow intravascular ultrasound in peripheral interventions. Semin Vasc Surg 2006; 19: 155–62

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Tozzi P,
   2. Mallabiabarrena I,
   3. von Segesser LK,
   4. et al

   . Intravascular ultrasound underestimates vessel dimensions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19: 501–03

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Wehman JC,
   2. Holmes DR Jr.,
   3. Hanel RA,
   4. et al

   . Intravascular ultrasound for intracranial angioplasty and stent placement: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (4 suppl 2): ONSE481–83, discussion ONSE483.

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Uren NG,
    2. Schwarzacher SP,
    3. Metz JA,
    4. et al

    . Predictors and outcomes of stent thrombosis: an intravascular ultrasound registry. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 124–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Satler LF,
    2. Hoffmann R,
    3. Lansky A,
    4. et al

    . Carotid stent-assisted angioplasty: preliminary technique, angiography, and intravascular ultrasound observations. J Invasive Cardiol 1996; 8: 23–30

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Reid DB,
    2. Diethrich EB,
    3. Marx P,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound assessment in carotid interventions. J Endovasc Surg 1996; 3: 203–10

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Clark DJ,
    2. Lessio S,
    3. O'Donoghue M,
    4. et al

    . Safety and utility of intravascular ultrasound-guided carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 6: 355–62
14. 14.↵
    1. Blessing E,
    2. Hausmann D,
    3. Sturm M,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound and stent implantation: intraobserver and interobserver variability. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 368–71

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Tobis JM,
    2. Mallery JA,
    3. Mahon D,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound imaging: a new method for guiding interventional vascular procedures. Echocardiography 1990; 7: 415–24

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Räsänen HT,
    2. Manninen HI,
    3. Vanninen RL,
    4. et al

    . Mild carotid artery atherosclerosis: assessment by 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, with reference to intravascular ultrasound imaging and contrast angiography. Stroke 1999; 30: 827–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Nishimura RA,
    2. Edwards WD,
    3. Warnes CA,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 145–54

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Manninen HI,
    2. Räsänen H,
    3. Vanninen RL,
    4. et al

    . Human carotid arteries: correlation of intravascular US with angiographic and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1998; 206: 65–74

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Irshad K,
    2. Reid DB,
    3. Miller PH,
    4. et al

    . Early clinical experience with color three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound in peripheral interventions. J Endovasc Ther 2001; 8: 329–38

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Rasheed Q,
    2. Dhawale PJ,
    3. Anderson J,
    4. et al

    . Intracoronary ultrasound-defined plaque composition: computer-aided plaque characterization and correlation with histologic samples obtained during directional coronary atherectomy. Am Heart J 1995; 129: 631–37

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Potkin BN,
    2. Bartorelli AL,
    3. Gessert JM,
    4. et al

    . Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound. Circulation 1990; 81: 1575–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Schaar JA,
    2. Mastik F,
    3. Regar E,
    4. et al

    . Current diagnostic modalities for vulnerable plaque detection. Curr Pharm Des 2007; 13: 995–1001

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Hiro T,
    2. Leung CY,
    3. Russo RJ,
    4. et al

    . Variability of a three-layered appearance in intravascular ultrasound coronary images: a comparison of morphometric measurements with four intravascular ultrasound systems. Am J Card Imaging 1996; 10: 219–27

    PubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Stary HC,
    2. Chandler AB,
    3. Dinsmore RE,
    4. et al

    . A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995; 15: 1512–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Davies MJ,
    2. Thomas A

    . Thrombosis and acute coronary-artery lesions in sudden cardiac ischemic death. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1137–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Levin DC,
    2. Fallon JT

    . Significance of the angiographic morphology of localized coronary stenoses: histopathologic correlations. Circulation 1982; 66: 316–20

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Beach KW,
    2. Hatsukami T,
    3. Detmer PR,
    4. et al

    . Carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage and stenotic velocity. Stroke 1993; 24: 314–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Fryer JA,
    2. Myers PC,
    3. Appleberg M

    . Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage: the significance of neovascularity. J Vasc Surg 1987; 6: 341–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. von Maravic C,
    2. Kessler C,
    3. von Maravic M,
    4. et al

    . Clinical relevance of intraplaque hemorrhage in the internal carotid artery. Eur J Surg 1991; 157: 185–88

    PubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Yamagishi M,
    2. Terashima M,
    3. Awano K,
    4. et al

    . Morphology of vulnerable coronary plaque: insights from follow-up of patients examined by intravascular ultrasound before an acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 106–11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Spagnoli LG,
    2. Mauriello A,
    3. Sangiorgi G,
    4. et al

    . Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. JAMA 2004; 292: 1845–52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Virmani R,
    2. Kolodgie FD,
    3. Burke AP,
    4. et al

    . Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25: 2054–61. Epub 2005 Jul 21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Kuchulakanti P,
    2. Rha SW,
    3. Cheneau E,
    4. et al

    . Identification of “vulnerable plaque” using virtual histology in angiographically benign looking lesion of proximal left anterior descending artery. Cardiovasc Radiat Med 2003; 4: 225–27

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Virmani R,
    2. Kolodgie FD,
    3. Burke AP,
    4. et al

    . Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20: 1262–75

    FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Sabetai MM,
    2. Tegos TJ,
    3. Nicolaides AN,
    4. et al

    . Hemispheric symptoms and carotid plaque echomorphology. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31 (1 pt 1): 39–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Tegos TJ,
    2. Sohail M,
    3. Sabetai MM,
    4. et al

    . Echomorphologic and histopathologic characteristics of unstable carotid plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1937–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Verheye S,
    2. De Meyer GR,
    3. Van Langenhove G,
    4. et al

    . In vivo temperature heterogeneity of atherosclerotic plaques is determined by plaque composition. Circulation 2002; 105: 1596–601

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Irshad K,
    2. Millar S,
    3. Velu R,
    4. et al

    . Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound in carotid interventions. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14: 198–207

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Naghavi M,
    2. Libby P,
    3. Falk E,
    4. et al

    . From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies. Circulation 2003; 108 (pt 1): 1664–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Virmani R,
    2. Burke AP,
    3. Kolodgie FD,
    4. et al

    . Pathology of the thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque. J Interv Cardiol 2003; 16: 267–72

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Fujii K,
    2. Kobayashi Y,
    3. Mintz GS,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound assessment of ulcerated ruptured plaques: a comparison of culprit and nonculprit lesions of patients with acute coronary syndromes and lesions in patients without acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2003; 108: 2473–78. Epub 2003 Nov 10

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Fisher CM,
    2. Ojemann R

    . A clinico-pathologic study of carotid endarterectomy plaques. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1986; 142: 573–89

    PubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Streifler JY,
    2. Eliasziw M,
    3. Fox AJ,
    4. et al

    . Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration: comparison with surgical observations in a multicenter study—North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 1994; 25: 1130–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. Fürst H,
    2. Hartl WH,
    3. Jansen I,
    4. et al

    . Color-flow Doppler sonography in the identification of ulcerative plaques in patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992; 13: 1581–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. 45.↵
    1. Kostamaa H,
    2. Donovan J,
    3. Kasaoka S,
    4. et al

    . Calcified plaque cross-sectional area in human arteries: correlation between intravascular ultrasound and undecalcified histology. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 482–88

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    1. Di Mario C,
    2. The SH,
    3. Madretsma S,
    4. et al

    . Detection and characterization of vascular lesions by intravascular ultrasound: an in vitro study correlated with histology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992; 5: 135–46

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Sechtem U,
    2. Arnold G,
    3. Keweloh T,
    4. et al

    . In vitro diagnosis of coronary plaque morphology with intravascular ultrasound: comparison with histopathologic findings [in German]. Z Kardiol 1993; 82: 618–27

    PubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Friedrich GJ,
    2. Moes NY,
    3. Mühlberger VA,
    4. et al

    . Detection of intralesional calcium by intracoronary ultrasound depends on the histologic pattern. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 435–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    1. Frimerman A,
    2. Miller HI,
    3. Hallman M,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound characterization of thrombi of different composition. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 1053–57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Lendon CL,
    2. Davies MJ,
    3. Born GV,
    4. et al

    . Atherosclerotic plaque caps are locally weakened when macrophages density is increased. Atherosclerosis 1991; 87: 87–90

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    1. Falk E

    . Stable versus unstable atherosclerosis: clinical aspects. Am Heart J 1999; 138 (5 pt 2): S421–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    1. Kimura BJ,
    2. Bhargava V,
    3. DeMaria AN

    . Value and limitations of intravascular ultrasound imaging in characterizing coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Am Heart J 1995; 130: 386–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    1. Glagov S,
    2. Weisenberg E,
    3. Zarins CK,
    4. et al

    . Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1371–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
54. 54.↵
    1. Nissen SE,
    2. Yock P

    . Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. Circulation 2001; 103: 604–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    1. Schoenhagen P,
    2. Ziada KM,
    3. Kapadia SR,
    4. et al

    . Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000; 101: 598–603

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
56. 56.↵
    1. Varnava AM,
    2. Mills PG,
    3. Davies MJ

    . Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation 2002; 105: 939–43

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
57. 57.↵
    1. Finet G,
    2. Maurincomme E,
    3. Tabib A,
    4. et al

    . Artifacts in intravascular ultrasound imaging: analyses and implications. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19: 533–47

    CrossRefPubMed
58. 58.↵
    1. Jensen LO,
    2. Thayssen P,
    3. Pedersen KE,
    4. et al

    . Regression of coronary atherosclerosis by simvastatin: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2004; 110: 265–70. Epub 2004 Jul 6

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. 59.↵
    1. Gupta R,
    2. Bhatt A,
    3. Kassab M,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound to assess extracranial vertebral artery restenosis: case report. J Neuroimaging 2008; 18: 336–39. Epub 2008 May 19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
60. 60.↵
    1. Reid DB,
    2. Douglas M,
    3. Diethrich EB

    . The clinical value of three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Endovasc Surg 1995; 2: 356–64

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
61. 61.↵
    1. White RA,
    2. Scoccianti M,
    3. Back M,
    4. et al

    . Innovations in vascular imaging: arteriography, three-dimensional CT scans, and two- and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound evaluation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 1994; 8: 285–89

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    1. Henry M

    1. Irshad K,
    2. Rahaman N,
    3. Bain D,
    4. et al

    . The role of intravascular ultrasound in carotid angioplasty and stenting. In: Henry Med. Textbook of Peripheral Vascular Interventions. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 2004
63. 63.↵
    1. Okubo M,
    2. Kawasaki M,
    3. Ishihara Y,
    4. et al

    . Tissue characterization of coronary plaques: comparison of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Circ J 2008; 72: 1631–39. Epub 2008 Aug 28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
64. 64.↵
    1. Vince DG,
    2. Davies SC

    . Peripheral application of intravascular ultrasound virtual histology. Semin Vasc Surg 2004; 17: 119–25

    CrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    1. Nair A,
    2. Kuban BD,
    3. Obuchowski N,
    4. et al

    . Assessing spectral algorithms to predict atherosclerotic plaque composition with normalized and raw intravascular ultrasound data. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 1319–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
66. 66.↵
    1. Nair A,
    2. Kuban BD,
    3. Tuzcu EM,
    4. et al

    . Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation 2002; 106: 2200–06

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
67. 67.↵
    1. Diethrich EB,
    2. Pauliina Margolis M,
    3. Reid DB,
    4. et al

    . Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of carotid artery disease: the Carotid Artery Plaque Virtual Histology Evaluation (CAPITAL) study. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14: 676–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
68. 68.↵
    1. Picano E,
    2. Landini L,
    3. Distante A,
    4. et al

    . Angle dependence of ultrasonic backscatter in arterial tissues: a study in vitro. Circulation 1985; 72: 572–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
69. 69.↵
    1. Hiro T,
    2. Leung CY,
    3. Karimi H,
    4. et al

    . Angle dependence of intravascular ultrasound imaging and its feasibility in tissue characterization of human atherosclerotic tissue. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 476–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
70. 70.↵
    1. Cachard C,
    2. Finet G,
    3. Bouakaz A,
    4. et al

    . Ultrasound contrast agent in intravascular echography: an in vitro study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 705–717

    CrossRefPubMed
71. 71.↵
    1. Lanza GM,
    2. Wallace KD,
    3. Fischer SE,
    4. et al

    . High-frequency ultrasonic detection of thrombi with a targeted contrast system. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 863–70

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
72. 72.↵
    1. Moulton KS,
    2. Vakili K,
    3. Zurakowski D,
    4. et al

    . Inhibition of plaque neovascularization reduces macrophage accumulation and progression of advanced atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 4736–41. Epub 2003 Apr 7

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
73. 73.↵
    1. Moreno PR,
    2. Purushothaman KR,
    3. Fuster V,
    4. et al

    . Plaque neovascularization is increased in ruptured atherosclerotic lesions of human aorta: implications for plaque vulnerability. Circulation 2004; 110: 2032–38. Epub 2004 Sep 27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
74. 74.↵
    1. Moreno PR,
    2. Purushothaman KR,
    3. Fuster V,
    4. et al

    . Intimomedial interface damage and adventitial inflammation is increased beneath disrupted atherosclerosis in the aorta: implications for plaque vulnerability. Circulation 2002; 105: 2504–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
75. 75.↵
    1. Pasterkamp G,
    2. Schoneveld AH,
    3. van der Wal AC,
    4. et al

    . Relation of arterial geometry to luminal narrowing and histologic markers for plaque vulnerability: the remodeling paradox. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 655–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
76. 76.↵
    1. Vavuranakis M,
    2. Papaioannou TG,
    3. Kakadiaris IA,
    4. et al

    . Detection of perivascular blood flow in vivo by contrast-enhanced intracoronary ultrasonography and image analysis: an animal study. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2007; 34: 1319–23

    CrossRefPubMed
77. 77.↵
    1. Feinstein SB

    . The powerful microbubble: from bench to bedside, from intravascular indicator to therapeutic delivery system, and beyond. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004; 287: H450–57

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
78. 78.↵
    1. Hamilton AJ,
    2. Huang SL,
    3. Warnick D,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound molecular imaging of atheroma components in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 453–60

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
79. 79.↵
    1. Vavuranakis M,
    2. Kakadiaris IA,
    3. O'Malley SM,
    4. et al

    . A new method for assessment of plaque vulnerability based on vasa vasorum imaging, by using contrast-enhanced intravascular ultrasound and differential image analysis. Int J Cardiol 2008; 130: 23–29. Epub 2008 Feb 20

    CrossRefPubMed
80. 80.↵
    1. Galili O,
    2. Herrmann J,
    3. Woodrum J,
    4. et al

    . Adventitial vasa vasorum heterogeneity among different vascular beds. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 529–35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
81. 81.↵
    1. Heistad DD,
    2. Marcus ML,
    3. Larsen GE,
    4. et al

    . Role of vasa vasorum in nourishment of the aortic wall. Am J Physiol 1981; 240: H781–87
82. 82.↵
    1. Williams JK,
    2. Armstrong ML,
    3. Heistad DD

    . Vasa vasorum in atherosclerotic coronary arteries: responses to vasoactive stimuli and regression of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 1988; 62: 515–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
83. 83.↵
    1. Tresukosol D,
    2. Wongpraparut N,
    3. Lirdvilai T

    . The value of intravascular ultrasound-facilitated internal carotid artery stenting in a patient with heavily calcified and ambiguous common carotid artery stenosis. J Invasive Cardiol 2007; 19: E203–06

    PubMed
84. 84.↵
    1. Eikelboom BC,
    2. Riles TR,
    3. Mintzer R,
    4. et al

    . Inaccuracy of angiography in the diagnosis of carotid ulceration. Stroke 1983; 14: 882–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
85. 85.↵
    1. Hermiller JB,
    2. Buller CE,
    3. Tenaglia AN,
    4. et al

    . Unrecognized left main coronary artery disease in patients undergoing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 173–76

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
86. 86.↵
    1. Weissman NJCM,
    2. Mintz GS,
    3. Laird JR Jr.,
    4. et al

    . Carotid artery intravascular ultrasound: safety and morphologic observations during carotid stenting in 102 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35 (2 supple 1): 10A
87. 87.↵
    1. Yoon WK,
    2. Kim YW,
    3. Kim SD,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasonography-guided stent angioplasty of an extracranial vertebral artery dissection. J Neurosurg 2008; 109: 1113–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
88. 88.↵
    1. Takayama K,
    2. Taoka T,
    3. Nakagawa H,
    4. et al

    . Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery stenosis using intravascular ultrasound virtual histology. Radiat Med 2007; 25: 243–46. Epub 2007 Jun 27

    CrossRefPubMed
89. 89.↵
    1. Nissen SE,
    2. Tsunoda T,
    3. Tuzcu EM,
    4. et al

    . Effect of recombinant ApoA-I Milano on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 2292–300

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
90. 90.↵
    1. Matsuzaki M,
    2. Hiramori K,
    3. Imaizumi T,
    4. et al

    . Intravascular ultrasound evaluation of coronary plaque regression by low density lipoprotein-apheresis in familial hypercholesterolemia: the Low Density Lipoprotein-Apheresis Coronary Morphology and Reserve Trial (LACMART). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 220–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
91. 91.↵
    1. Petronio AS,
    2. Amoroso G,
    3. Limbiuno U,
    4. et al

    . Simvastatin does not inhibit intimal hyperplasia and restenosis but promotes plaque regression in normocholesterolemic patients undergoing coronary stenting: a randomized study with intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J 2005; 149: 520–26

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
92. 92.↵
    1. Okazaki S,
    2. Yokoyama T,
    3. Miyauchi K,
    4. et al

    . Early statin treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: demonstration of the beneficial effect on atherosclerotic lesions by serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis during half a year after coronary event—the ESTABLISH Study. Circulation 2004; 110: 1061–68. Epub 2004 Aug 23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
93. 93.↵
    1. Sipahi I,
    2. Tuzcu EM

    . Candidate mechanisms for regression of coronary atherosclerosis with high-dose statins: insight from intravascular ultrasonography trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2008; 8: 365–371

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
94. 94.↵
    1. Nicholls SJ,
    2. Tuzcu EM,
    3. Brennan DM,
    4. et al

    . Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition, high-density lipoprotein raising, and progression of coronary atherosclerosis: insights from ILLUSTRATE (Investigation of Lipid Level Management Using Coronary Ultrasound to Assess Reduction of Atherosclerosis by CETP Inhibition and HDL Elevation). Circulation 2008; 118: 2506–14. Epub 2008 Nov 24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
95. 95.↵
    1. Davidson MH,
    2. Dembowski E

    Atherosclerosis surrogate imaging trials come of age: for better or for worse? Curr Cardiol Rep 2008; 10: 521–25

    CrossRefPubMed
96. 96.↵
    1. Thompson JB,
    2. Blaha M,
    3. Resar JR,
    4. et al

    . Strategies to reverse atherosclerosis: an imaging perspective. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2008; 10: 283–93

    CrossRefPubMed
97. 97.↵
    1. Kastelein JJ,
    2. de Groot E

    . Ultrasound imaging techniques for the evaluation of cardiovascular therapies. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 849–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
98. 98.↵
    1. Nash DT

    . Use of vascular ultrasound in clinical trials to evaluate new cardiovascular therapies. J Natl Med Assoc 2008; 100: 222–29

    PubMed
99. 99.↵
    1. Nishioka H,
    2. Shimada K,
    3. Kataoka T,
    4. et al

    . Impact of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for non-treated coronary segments. Osaka City Med J 2004; 50: 61–68

    PubMed
100. 100.↵
     1. Ibañez B,
     2. Badimon JJ,
     3. Garcia MJ

     . Diagnosis of atherosclerosis by imaging. Am J Med 2009; 122 (1 suppl): S15–25

     CrossRefPubMed
101. 101.↵
     1. Iwata A,
     2. Miura S,
     3. Imaizumi S,
     4. et al

     . Measurement of atherosclerotic plaque volume in hyperlipidemic rabbit aorta by intravascular ultrasound. J Cardiol 2007; 50: 229–34

     PubMed
102. 102.↵
     1. Arora S,
     2. Nicholls SJ

     . Atherosclerotic plaque reduction: Blood pressure, dyslipidemia, atherothrombosis. Drugs Today (Barc) 2008; 44: 711–18

     CrossRefPubMed
103. 103.↵
     1. Wierzbicki A

     . Lipid-altering therapies and the progression of atherosclerotic disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30: 155–160

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
104. 104.↵
     1. Clementi F,
     2. Di Luozzo M,
     3. Mango R,
     4. et al

     . Regression and shift in composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques by pioglitazone: insight from an intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2009; 10: 231–37

     PubMed
105. 105.↵
     1. Nissen SE,
     2. Nicholls SJ,
     3. Sipahi I,
     4. et al

     . Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial. JAMA 2006; 295: 1556–65

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
106. 106.↵
     1. Crouse JR 3rd.,
     2. Raichlen JS,
     3. Riley WA,
     4. et al

     . Effect of rosuvastatin on progression of carotid intima-media thickness in low-risk individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis: the METEOR Trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 1344–53. Epub 2007 Mar 25

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
107. 107.↵
     1. Nissen SE,
     2. Tuzcu EM,
     3. Schoenhagen P,
     4. et al

     . Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1071–80

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
108. 108.↵
     1. Nissen SE,
     2. Nicholls SJ,
     3. Wolski K,
     4. et al

     . Effect of rimonabant on progression of atherosclerosis in patients with abdominal obesity and coronary artery disease: the STRADIVARIUS randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 299: 1547–60

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
109. 109.↵
     1. Kushner P

     . Can intensive statin therapy halt the progression of atherosclerosis? Recent evidence and potential implications for patient management. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs 2007; 22: 207–213

     CrossRefPubMed
110. 110.↵
     1. Ratner RE,
     2. Cannon CP,
     3. Gerstein HC,
     4. for the APPROACH Study Group

     . Assessment on the Prevention of Progression by Rosiglitazone on Atherosclerosis in Diabetes Patients with Cardiovascular History (APPROACH): study design and baseline characteristics. Am Heart J 2008; 156: 1074–79. Epub 2008 Oct 11

     CrossRefPubMed
111. 111.↵
     1. Diethrich EB,
     2. Ndiaye M,
     3. Reid DB

     . Stenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients. J Endovasc Surg 1996; 3: 42–62

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
112. 112.↵
     1. Aviram G,
     2. Shmilovich H,
     3. Finkelstein A,
     4. et al

     . Coronary ostium-straight tube or funnel-shaped? A computerized tomographic coronary angiography study. Acute Card Care 2006; 8: 224–28

     CrossRefPubMed
113. 113.↵
     1. Chetcuti SJ,
     2. Moscucci M

     . Double-wire technique for access into a protruding aorto-ostial stent for treatment of in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 62: 214–17

     CrossRefPubMed
114. 114.↵
     1. Demer LL

     . Effect of calcification on in vivo mechanical response of rabbit arteries to balloon dilation. Circulation 1991; 83: 2083–93

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
115. 115.↵
     1. Reid DB,
     2. Irshad K,
     3. Miller S,
     4. et al

     . Endovascular significance of the external carotid artery in the treatment of cerebrovascular insufficiency. J Endovasc Ther 2004; 11: 727–33

     CrossRefPubMed
116. 116.↵
     1. Oemrawsingh PV,
     2. Mintz GS,
     3. Schalij MJ,
     4. et al

     . Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves angiographic and clinical outcome of stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses: final results of a randomized comparison with angiographic guidance (TULIP Study). Circulation 2003; 107: 62–67

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
117. 117.↵
     1. Grube E,
     2. Sievert H,
     3. Hauptmann KE,
     4. et al

     . Novel drug eluting stent system for customised treatment of coronary lesions: CUSTOM I feasibility trial 24 month results. EuroIntervention 2008; 4: 71–76

     PubMed
118. 118.↵
     1. Wehman JC,
     2. Holmes DR Jr.,
     3. Ecker RD,
     4. et al

     . Intravascular ultrasound identification of intraluminal embolic plaque material during carotid angioplasty with stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 853–57

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
119. 119.↵
     1. Meyers PM,
     2. Schumacher HC,
     3. Gray WA,
     4. et al

     . Intravascular ultrasound of symptomatic intracranial stenosis demonstrates atherosclerotic plaque with intraplaque hemorrhage: a case report. J Neuroimaging 2009; 19: 266–70. Epub 2008 Oct 24

     CrossRefPubMed
120. 120.↵
     1. Kaneda H,
     2. Ikeno F,
     3. Lyons J,
     4. et al

     . Long-term histopathologic and IVUS evaluations of a novel coiled sheet stent in porcine carotid arteries. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006; 9: 413–19
121. 121.↵
     1. Mintz GS,
     2. Popma JJ,
     3. Pichard AD,
     4. et al

     . Intravascular ultrasound predictors of restenosis after percutaneous transcatheter coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1678–87

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
122. 122.↵
     1. Clark DJ,
     2. Lessio S,
     3. O'Donoghue M,
     4. et al

     . Mechanisms and predictors of carotid artery stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 2390–96. Epub 2006 May 30

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
123. 123.↵
     1. Kasaoka S,
     2. Tobis JM,
     3. Akiyama T,
     4. et al

     . Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1630–35

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
124. 124.↵
     1. Schiele F,
     2. Meneveav N,
     3. Vuillemenot A,
     4. et al

     . Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies—with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. RESIST Study Group. REStenosis after Ivus guided STenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 320–28

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
125. 125.↵
     1. Rosenfield K,
     2. Schainfeld R,
     3. Pieczek A,
     4. et al

     . Restenosis of endovascular stents from stent compression. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 328–38

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
126. 126.↵
     1. Painter JA,
     2. Mintz GS,
     3. Wong SC,
     4. et al

     . Serial intravascular ultrasound studies fail to show evidence of chronic Palmaz-Schatz stent recoil. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 398–400

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
127. 127.↵
     1. Elson JD,
     2. Becker GJ,
     3. Wholey MH,
     4. et al

     . Vena caval and central venous stenoses: management with Palmaz balloon-expandable intraluminal stents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1991; 2: 215–23

     CrossRefPubMed
128. 128.↵
     1. Bjarnason H,
     2. Hunter DW,
     3. Crain MR,
     4. et al

     . Collapse of a Palmaz stent in the subclavian vein. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160: 1123–24

     PubMedWeb of Science
129. 129.↵
     1. Bates MC,
     2. Almehmi A

     . Carotid stenting for symptomatic radiation-induced arteritis complicated by recurrent aneurysm formation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 507–11

     CrossRefPubMed
130. 130.↵
     1. Schwarzacher SP,
     2. Metz JA,
     3. Yock PG,
     4. et al

     . Vessel tearing at the edge of intracoronary stents detected with intravascular ultrasound imaging. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 40: 152–55

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
131. 131.↵
     1. Metz JA,
     2. Mooney MR,
     3. Walter PD,
     4. et al

     . Significance of edge tears in coronary stenting: initial observations from the STRUT (Stent Treatment Region assessed by Ultrasound Tomography) registry (abstr 2606). Circulation 1995; 92 (Suppl I): I–S46
132. 132.↵
     1. Tsuura M,
     2. Terada T,
     3. Nakai K,
     4. et al

     . Endovascular stent placement for cervical internal carotid artery aneurysm causing cerebral embolism: usefulness of neuroradiological evaluation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141: 503–07

     CrossRefPubMed
133. 133.↵
     1. Manninen HI,
     2. Koivisto T,
     3. Saari T,
     4. et al

     . Dissecting aneurysms of all four cervicocranial arteries in fibromuscular dysplasia: treatment with self-expanding endovascular stents, coil embolization, and surgical ligation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18: 1216–20

     Abstract
134. 134.↵
     1. Shindo A,
     2. Kawanishi M,
     3. Masada T,
     4. et al

     . Usefulness of intravascular ultrasound in embolization of dural arteriovenous fistula: a case report [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 2003; 31: 1323–29

     PubMed
135. 135.↵
     1. Gasparis AP,
     2. Kokkosis A,
     3. Labropoulos N,
     4. et al

     . Venous outflow obstruction with retroperitoneal Kaposi's sarcoma and treatment with inferior vena cava stenting. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2009; 43: 295–300. Epub 2009 Jan 8

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
136. 136.↵
     1. Schiro BJ,
     2. Wholey MH

     . The expanding indications for virtual histology intravascular ultrasound for plaque analysis prior to carotid stenting. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2008; 49: 729–36

     PubMed
137. 137.↵
     1. Reimers B,
     2. Corvaja N,
     3. Moshiri S,
     4. et al

     . Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting. Circulation 2001; 104: 12–15

     Abstract/FREE Full Text
138. 138.↵
     1. Macdonald S,
     2. McKevitt F,
     3. Venables GS,
     4. et al

     . Neurological outcomes after carotid stenting protected with the NeuroShield filter compared to unprotected stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 777–85

     CrossRefPubMed
139. 139.↵
     1. Henry M,
     2. Polydorou A,
     3. Henry I,
     4. et al

     . Carotid angioplasty under cerebral protection with the PercuSurge GuardWire System. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 61: 293–305

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
140. 140.↵
     1. Bosiers M,
     2. Peeters P,
     3. Verbist J,
     4. et al

     . Belgian experience with FilterWire EX in the prevention of embolic events during carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2003; 10: 695–701

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
141. 141.↵
     1. Al-Mubarak N,
     2. Colombo A,
     3. Gaines PA,
     4. et al

     . Multicenter evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 841–46

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
142. 142.↵
     1. Castriota F,
     2. Cremonesi A,
     3. Manetti R,
     4. et al

     . Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 786–92

     CrossRefPubMed
143. 143.↵
     1. Parodi JC,
     2. La Mura R,
     3. Ferreira LM,
     4. et al

     . Initial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting with three different cerebral protection devices. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32: 1127–36

     CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science