Aneurysm Rupture Following Treatment with Flow-Diverting Stents: Computational Hemodynamics Analysis of Treatment

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lylyk P,
   2. Ferrario A,
   3. Pasbon B,
   4. et al

   . Buenos Aires experience with the Neuroform self-expanding stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005;102:235–41

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Lövblad KO,
   2. Yilmaz H,
   3. Chouiter A,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial aneurysm stenting: follow-up with MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:418–22

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Szikora I,
   2. Berentei Z,
   3. Kulcsar Z,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with parent vessel reconstruction using balloon and self-expandable stents. Acta Neurichir 2006;148:711–23 discussion 723. Epub 2006 May 17

   CrossRef
4. 4.↵
   1. Lylyk P,
   2. Miranda C,
   3. Ceratto R,
   4. et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Szikora I,
   2. Berentei Z,
   3. Kulcsar Z,
   4. et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 Epub 2010 Feb 11

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Castro MA,
   3. Appanaboyina S,
   4. et al

   . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Kallmes DF,
   2. Ding YH,
   3. Dai D,
   4. et al

   . A new endoluminal, flow disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Mut F,
   2. Appanaboyina S,
   3. Cebral JR

   . Simulation of stent deployment in patient-specific cerebral aneurysm models for their hemodynamics analysis. In: Proceedings of the Summer Bioengineering Conference of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Marco Island Florida June 25–29 2008
9. 9.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Löhner R.

   . Efficient simulation of blood flow past complex endovascular devices using an adaptive embedding technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:468–77

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Appanaboyina S,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Löhner R,
    4. et al

    . Computational fluid dynamics of stented intracranial aneurysms using adaptive embedded unstructured grids. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 2008;57:457–93
11. 11.↵
    1. Kundu PK,
    2. Cohen IM.

    . Fluid Mechanics. New York: Academic Press (Elsevier); 2004
12. 12.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Castro MA,
    3. Putman CM,
    4. et al

    . Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2008;29:585–94

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Taylor CA,
    2. Hughes TJR,
    3. Zarins CK.

    . Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 1998;158:155–96

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Mut F,
    2. Aubry R,
    3. Löhner R,
    4. et al

    . Fast numerical solutions in patient-specific simulations of arterial models. Int J Num Meth Biomed Eng 2010;26:73–85

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    1. Lieber BB,
    2. Stancampiano AP,
    3. Wakhloo AK.

    . Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting: influence of stent porosity. Ann Biomed Eng 1997;25:460–69

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Pergolizzi R,
    3. Putman CM

    . Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: qualitative comparison with cerebral angiography. Acad Radiol 2007;14:804–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science