Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleInterventional
Open Access

Comparison of 2-Year Angiographic Outcomes of Stent- and Nonstent-Assisted Coil Embolization in Unruptured Aneurysms with an Unfavorable Configuration for Coiling

G. Hwang, H. Park, J.S. Bang, S.-C. Jin, B.C. Kim, C.W. Oh, H.S. Kang, M.H. Han and O.-K. Kwon
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2011, 32 (9) 1707-1710; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2592
G. Hwang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.S. Bang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.-C. Jin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.C. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.W. Oh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.S. Kang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.H. Han
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O.-K. Kwon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stents are known to have hemodynamic and biologic effects in addition to their mechanical scaffold effect. To determine whether stents affect long-term outcomes after coiling of unruptured aneurysms, we compared angiographic outcomes at 2 years postembolization for stent- and nonstent-assisted coiled unruptured aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stent-assisted coiling was used in unruptured aneurysms unfavorable for simple coiling (neck size >4 mm and dome-to-neck ratio <1.5) in our practice. Therefore, 126 coiled unruptured aneurysms in total (40 [31.7%] stent group and 86 [68.3%] nonstent group) with these conditions were selected for this study. The nonstent group aneurysms were treated with multiple microcatheter technique (53 cases) or balloon-assisted technique (33 cases). Self-expandable stents were used for coiling in stent group aneurysms. No significant difference in aneurysmal characteristics (aneurysm type [sidewall/bifurcation], diameter, neck size, and dome-to-neck ratio) or angiographic outcome at embolization (packing attenuation, obliteration grade, and contrast filling) were observed between the 2 study groups.

RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up visits, rates of progressive occlusion (stent group, 17/40 [42.5%] versus nonstent group, 34/86 [39.5%]) and recanalization (7/40 [17.5%] versus 18/86 [21.0%]) did not show a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .895).

CONCLUSIONS: The present study did not show that additional hemodynamic and biologic effects of stents designed for neck remodeling were enough to enhance progressive occlusion and prevent the recanalization of unruptured aneurysms. Our finding suggests that stent placement provides no better long-term angiographic outcomes for unruptured aneurysms with an unfavorable configuration for coiling.

Abbreviations

DSA
digital subtraction angiography
IU
international unit
MRA
MR angiography

During the embolization of saccular aneurysms, stents are used for neck remodeling and serve as a scaffold for the coils. In addition to neck remodeling, stents are known to have additional hemodynamic1–6 and biologic effects.6–8 However, little data are available to demonstrate whether these effects influence the long-term angiographic outcomes of coiled aneurysms, especially of unruptured aneurysms unfavorable for simple coiling (wide neck [>4 mm] with a dome-to-neck ratio of <1.5), in which a stent is generally used. In our practice, we have treated such aneurysms with various endovascular methods, including the multiple microcatheter technique and balloon- and stent-assisted embolization. In this article, we compared the 2-year follow-up angiographic outcomes between stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization of unruptured aneurysms with an unfavorable configuration.

Materials and Methods

Patient Selection

Our institutional review board approved this study. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiologic data of patients with unruptured aneurysms who underwent endosaccular coil embolization between May 2003 and January 2008 at our institute. Because the thrombogenic environment could have affected initial angiographic results, unruptured aneurysms coiled at the same time as a ruptured aneurysm was treated were excluded. In addition, patients who did not undergo a conventional angiographic evaluation at 2 years after coil embolization also were excluded.

In our practice, stent-assisted coiling was used in unruptured aneurysms under the following conditions: >4 mm in neck size and a dome-to-neck ratio of <1.5. However, many aneurysms with these conditions also were coiled without stent assistance, when the aneurysm was expected to be able to contain the coil mass. In cases with a small neck (≤4 mm), surgical obliteration was used if the aneurysm was unfavorable for simple coiling and could be coiled under only stent assistance. For comparison therefore, we included unruptured aneurysms treated by nonstent-assisted coiling, which had the same conditions as those treated by stent-assisted coiling, in this study. Eventually, 126 aneurysms in total in 121 patients were included in this study (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Patient flow according to exclusion criteria for this study.

Coil Embolization Procedure

All aneurysm coilings were performed under general anesthesia by using a biplane angiographic unit (Integris Allura; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). Stent-assisted coil embolization was used in 40 (31.7%) aneurysms. In the remaining 86 (68.3%) aneurysms, a multiple microcatheter technique (53, 42.1%) or balloon-assisted coil embolization technique (33, 26.2%) was used. Technical details of aneurysm coiling and stent deployment were conventional and have been described in detail previously 9,10 All aneurysm embolizations were performed by using detachable platinum coils, which included the GDC (Boston Scientific, Fremont, California), MicroPlex (MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, California), Trufill-DCS (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida), and Axium (ev3, Irvine, California) coils. Modified coils, such as Matrix (Boston Scientific) and HydroCoil (MicroVention), were not used. The stents used for remodeling were the Neuroform (Boston Scientific; 17 cases, 42.5%) or Enterprise (Cordis; 23 cases, 57.5%) and were successfully deployed to cover the aneurysmal neck in all cases. In no case was a stent overlapping used. In every case, systemic heparinization was performed after placing a femoral introducer sheath. In accord with our embolization protocol, 3000 IUs of heparin was administered as an intravenous bolus injection, and this was followed by an additional 1000 IUs per hour. Heparin was discontinued after embolization in all patients. When stent-assisted coil embolization was planned, we prescribed antiplatelet medication (oral aspirin, 100 mg and clopidogrel, 75 mg) daily for at least 5 days before coiling. If these daily regimens were not followed, aspirin and clopidogrel were administered at loading doses of 300–500 and 300 mg, respectively. For daily antiplatelet medication after stent deployment, 2 drugs (aspirin, 100 mg and clopidogrel, 75 mg) were used for the first 3 months, and then aspirin at 100 mg was continued.

Aneurysmal Characteristics and Initial Angiographic Outcomes

The following aneurysmal characteristics were recorded; aneurysm location (Table 1), aneurysm type (sidewall, bifurcation), diameter, neck size, dome-to-neck ratio, and volume. Aneurysm obliteration grade (0, complete; 1, occlusion ≥90%; 2, occlusion 70%–89%; 3, occlusion 50%–69%; 4, occlusion 25%–49%; and 5, occlusion <25%), contrast filling within the coil mass, and packing attenuation (percentage) were checked to evaluate initial angiographic outcome.11

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Aneurysm location patterns in the stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization groups

The following formulas were used to calculate aneurysm volumes and packing densities.

Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image

Imaging Follow-Up after Coil Embolization

The imaging tools used for follow-up were skull imaging by using an angiographic unit (working, conventional frontal, and lateral projections), MRA, and DSA. Skull radiographs were taken at 3, 9, 15, and 21 months and MRA at 6, 12, and 18 months postembolization. DSA was performed at 2 years postembolization. Whenever findings were obtained that suggested recanalization on skull images or MRA images, DSA also was performed.

Follow-up DSA images were obtained in the previous working projection and in conventional frontal and lateral projections. Rotational angiography was performed to detect any change in angiographic outcome. DSA also was performed at the projections determined optimal by rotational angiography.

Evaluation of Angiographic Outcomes at 2 Years Postembolization

Changes in angiographic outcome were evaluated by DSA and were classified as follows: stable (no change in coil configuration, obliteration grade, or contrast filling), improved (progressive occlusion or involution of the neck remnant or contrast filling in aneurysm), and recanalized (aneurysm recurrence evident due to neck growth, coil compaction, coil extrusion by aneurysm degradation,12 or new sac formation).11 In addition, newly visualized or increased contrast filling inside an aneurysm also was considered to indicate recanalization. All radiologic data were reviewed by a neuroradiologist (M.H.H.), who was unaware of clinical results.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was conducted by using SPSS version 17 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables, and the χ2 or Fisher exact test were used for nominal factors. Statistical significance was accepted for P values of <0.05.

Results

Basic demographic data, aneurysmal characteristics, and initial angiographic outcomes after embolization are summarized in Table 2. No significant difference was observed between the stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Basic demographic data, aneurysmal characteristics, and initial angiographic outcomes for the stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization groups

Over 2 years after coil embolization, angiographic outcomes had changed in both groups (Table 3). Rates of angiographic improvement due to progressive occlusion (17/40 [42.5%] versus 34/86 [39.5%]) and recanalization (7/40 [17.5%] versus 18/86 [21.0%]) were slightly more favorable in the stent-assisted group than in the nonstent-assisted group. However, these changes were not found significantly different (P = .895).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Changes in angiographic outcomes in the stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization groups at 2 years postcoil embolization

Of 51 coiled unruptured aneurysms showing angiographic improvement, 46 (90.2%) were sidewall-type unruptured aneurysms. This improvement occurred even in nonstent-assisted coil embolized aneurysms and its rate was similar with that in stent-assisted coil embolized aneurysms (P = 1.000; Table 3). In contrast, recanalization frequently developed in bifurcation-type aneurysms (17/25, 68%). This recanalization rate in coiled unruptured aneurysms protected by stent was not lower than that in the nonstent-assisted group (P = 1.000).

Retreatment was performed in 7 of 25 aneurysms that showed recanalization (28%; stent-assisted, 2/7 [28.6%] versus nonstent-assisted, 5/18 [27.8%], P = 1.000). No significant long-term angiographic outcome difference was observed between stent types (Neuroform versus Enterprise) (stable, 7/17 [41.2%] versus 9/23 [39.1%]; improved, 7/17 [41.2%] versus 10/23 [43.5%]; recanalized, 3/17 [17.6%] versus 4/23 [17.4%]; P = .989).

In the initial coil embolization, thromboembolic complication occurred in 5 (4.0%) cases (stent-assisted group, 3 [7.5%] and nonstent-assisted group, 2 [2.3%]). There was no hemorrhagic complication including aneurysm rupture during the procedures. Over 2 years after coiling, no in-stent stenosis or branch vessel occlusion developed in the stent-assisted group and coil loop migration into parent artery without flow disturbance was detected in 1 (1.2%) of the nonstent-assisted group. No aneurysm bled in either group.

Discussion

Aneurysms unfavorable for simple coiling can be embolized by various methods, besides stent-assisted coiling. However, these methods are relatively complex with long procedure times. Contrarily, once a stent is deployed across the aneurysmal neck, coils can be placed within the aneurysmal sac more easily with less concern of coil migration. As well as this mechanical effect, experimental studies have demonstrated that stents have hemodynamic1–6 and biologic effects.6–8 In theory, flow diversion can cause blood to become stagnant and lead to progressive thrombosis and the promotion of endothelialization that can help the aneurysmal neck close. Accordingly, these additional effects of stents may enhance the durability of coiled aneurysms. Clinically, however, it is unclear whether these effects really improve long-term outcome, especially when one considers that the stents designed for neck modeling have large porosities. A previous observational study reported favorable progressive thrombosis and recanalization rates for aneurysms over a relatively short follow-up (average, 4.6 months) after stent-assisted embolization,13 but progressive occlusion by thrombosis also occurs even in aneurysms treated with coils only.11,14 Thus, we conducted this comparative study to determine the actual effect of a stent. In this study, we focused on unruptured aneurysms unfavorable for coiling, because this aneurysm type is generally treated by stent-assisted coil embolization.

In the present study, the following findings were notable. First, in unruptured aneurysms with an unfavorable configuration for coiling (>4 mm in neck size and a dome-to-neck ratio of <1.5), no statistically significant difference was shown in 2-year angiographic outcome between stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization. Recanalization rates in both groups were similar to long-term outcome in previous historical series.15 Second, angiographic improvement due to progressive thrombosis, which was frequently observed in sidewall-type aneurysms, was not unusual even in coiled unruptured aneurysms not covered with stent. Finally, recanalization was frequent even in coiled unruptured aneurysms protected by stent, especially bifurcation-type aneurysms. These results suggest that the hemodynamic and biologic effects of stents used during coil embolization are not enough to expect additional improvement of occlusion status and prevention of the recanalization in real patients. Therefore, even when a stent is used, compact coil packing should be used to treat unruptured saccular aneurysms to achieve best long-term outcomes.

The present study has several limitations. First, it is limited by its retrospective nature and a relatively small cohort. Second, there is a previous study that suggested that stents lead to a better long-term angiographic outcome in small aneurysms.16 In this study, we only included aneurysms >4 mm in neck size, because small unruptured aneurysms were not frequently indicated for stent-assisted coiling in our practice. Therefore, this study only represents the unruptured aneurysms with ≥4 mm in neck size and a dome-to-neck ratio of <1.5. Last, the morphology of aneurysms treated by stent-assisted coiling was not absolutely the same as that of aneurysms treated by multiple microcatheter technique or balloon-assisted coiling. Therefore, there may be hidden factors or conditions that we did not consider, though we included many known factors that may influence long-term angiographic outcomes. Consequently, nonanalyzed differences between the groups may affect results. Despite these study limitations, we think that our study is sufficient to provide the necessity for a large randomized control study. There is a report showing different results, in which stents were associated with a significant decrease of angiographic recurrence (stent-assisted group, 14.9% versus nonstent-assisted group, 33.5%).17 However, it should be considered that their recanalization rate of nonstent assisted coil embolization was higher than that in the present study (21.0%) and another study (24.3%)16 that found no statistically significant difference in recanalization rates between 2 groups. In addition, it is also of note that mean follow-up duration of the stent-assisted group (12 months; range, 1–77 months) was far shorter than that of nonstent-assisted group (22 months; range, 1–77 months). Therefore, the long-term effect of stents should be confirmed by a large randomized control study.

Conclusions

Stents commonly used for neck remodeling facilitate stable coiling and compact packing in unfavorable aneurysms. Although stents also have hemodynamic and biologic effects, we did not find that these effects were enough to enhance progressive occlusion and reduce the recanalization rate of unruptured aneurysms with an unfavorable configuration for coiling. Our study suggests that stent placement in coil embolization does not significantly improve the long-term angiographic outcome of coiled unruptured aneurysms unfavorable for simple coiling.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (grant A06-0171-B51004-06N1–00040B).

  • Disclosures: Moon Hee Han, Consultant: MicroVention Inc.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Canton G,
    2. Levy DI,
    3. Lasheras JC
    . Hemodynamic changes due to stent placement in bifurcating intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005; 103: 146–55
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Canton G,
    2. Levy DI,
    3. Lasheras JC,
    4. et al
    . Flow changes caused by the sequential placement of stents across the neck of sidewall cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005; 103: 891–902
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kim M,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Meng H,
    4. et al
    . Quantification of hemodynamic changes induced by virtual placement of multiple stents across a wide-necked basilar trunk aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2007; 61: 1305–12; discussion 1312–03
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lieber BB,
    2. Gounis MJ
    . The physics of endoluminal stenting in the treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms. Neurol Res 2002; 24 Suppl 1: S33–42
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lieber BB,
    2. Livescu V,
    3. Hopkins LN,
    4. et al
    . Particle image velocimetry assessment of stent design influence on intra-aneurysmal flow. Ann Biomed Eng 2002; 30: 768–77
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wanke I,
    2. Forsting M
    . Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 991–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Darsaut T,
    2. Salazkin I,
    3. Ogoudikpe C,
    4. et al
    . Effects of stenting the parent artery on aneurysm filling and gene expression of various potential factors involved in healing of experimental aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2006; 12: 289–302
    PubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lopes D,
    2. Sani S
    . Histological postmortem study of an internal carotid artery aneurysm treated with the Neuroform stent. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: E416; discussion E416
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Im SH,
    2. Han MH,
    3. Kwon OK,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular coil embolization of 435 small asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms: procedural morbidity and patient outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 79–84
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kwon OK,
    2. Kim SH,
    3. Kwon BJ,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysms by using two microcatheters: techniques and outcomes in 25 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 894–900
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Meyers PM,
    2. Schumacher HC,
    3. Higashida RT,
    4. et al
    . Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: E12–24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Waldron JS,
    2. Halbach VV,
    3. Lawton MT
    . Microsurgical management of incompletely coiled and recurrent aneurysms: trends, techniques, and observations on coil extrusion. Neurosurgery 2009; 64: 301–15; discussion 315–307
    PubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque FC,
    3. Deshmukh VR,
    4. et al
    . Usefulness of the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3–6-mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 1191–201; discussion 1201–02
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al
    . Follow-up of treated aneurysms: the challenge of recurrences and potential solutions. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16: 513–23, ix
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Nien YL,
    3. Duckwiler G,
    4. et al
    . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003; 98: 959–66
    PubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kim DJ,
    2. Suh SH,
    3. Lee JW,
    4. et al
    . Influences of stents on the outcome of coil embolized intracranial aneurysms: comparison between a stent-remodeled and non-remodeled treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152: 423–29
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. et al
    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010; 41: 110–15
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received December 24, 2010.
  • Accepted after revision January 31, 2011.
  • © 2011 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 9
1 Oct 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of 2-Year Angiographic Outcomes of Stent- and Nonstent-Assisted Coil Embolization in Unruptured Aneurysms with an Unfavorable Configuration for Coiling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
G. Hwang, H. Park, J.S. Bang, S.-C. Jin, B.C. Kim, C.W. Oh, H.S. Kang, M.H. Han, O.-K. Kwon
Comparison of 2-Year Angiographic Outcomes of Stent- and Nonstent-Assisted Coil Embolization in Unruptured Aneurysms with an Unfavorable Configuration for Coiling
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2011, 32 (9) 1707-1710; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2592

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Comparison of 2-Year Angiographic Outcomes of Stent- and Nonstent-Assisted Coil Embolization in Unruptured Aneurysms with an Unfavorable Configuration for Coiling
G. Hwang, H. Park, J.S. Bang, S.-C. Jin, B.C. Kim, C.W. Oh, H.S. Kang, M.H. Han, O.-K. Kwon
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2011, 32 (9) 1707-1710; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2592
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  • An update to the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization
  • Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with detachable coils: correlation between aneurysm volume, packing, and angiographic recurrence
  • The 'one and a half round microcatheterization technique' for stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysm: technical case series
  • Y stenting assisted coiling using a new low profile visible intraluminal support device for wide necked basilar tip aneurysms: a technical report
  • Does Stent-Assisted Coiling Still Have a Place in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms?
  • Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Current Status
  • Stent-Assisted Coiling of Bifurcation Aneurysms May Improve Endovascular Treatment: A Critical Evaluation in an Experimental Model
  • Review of 2 Decades of Aneurysm-Recurrence Literature, Part 1: Reducing Recurrence after Endovascular Coiling
  • Stenting for Intracranial Aneurysms: How to Paint Oneself into the Proverbial Corner
  • Crossref (54)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    B. Gregory Thompson, Robert D. Brown, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Joseph P. Broderick, Kevin M. Cockroft, E. Sander Connolly, Gary R. Duckwiler, Catherine C. Harris, Virginia J. Howard, S. Claiborne (Clay) Johnston, Philip M. Meyers, Andrew Molyneux, Christopher S. Ogilvy, Andrew J. Ringer, James Torner
    Stroke 2015 46 8
  • An update to the Raymond–Roy Occlusion Classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization
    Justin R Mascitelli, Henry Moyle, Eric K Oermann, Maritsa F Polykarpou, Aanand A Patel, Amish H Doshi, Yakov Gologorsky, Joshua B Bederson, Aman B Patel
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2015 7 7
  • The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 3-year results
    Robert F. Spetzler, Cameron G. McDougall, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Joseph M. Zabramski, Nancy K. Hills, Shahram Partovi, Peter Nakaji, Robert C. Wallace
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2013 119 1
  • Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
    Laurent Pierot, Ajay K. Wakhloo
    Stroke 2013 44 7
  • Procedural Clinical Complications, Case-Fatality Risks, and Risk Factors in Endovascular and Neurosurgical Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Annemijn M. Algra, Antti Lindgren, Mervyn D. I. Vergouwen, Jacoba P. Greving, Irene C. van der Schaaf, Tristan P. C. van Doormaal, Gabriel J. E. Rinkel
    JAMA Neurology 2019 76 3
  • Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Basilar Tip Aneurysms by Coiling With and Without Stent Assistance
    Nohra Chalouhi, Pascal Jabbour, L. Fernando Gonzalez, Aaron S. Dumont, Robert Rosenwasser, Robert M. Starke, David Gordon, Shannon Hann, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris
    Neurosurgery 2012 71 4
  • Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience
    Mariangela Piano, Luca Valvassori, Luca Quilici, Guglielmo Pero, Edoardo Boccardi
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2013 118 2
  • Review of 2 Decades of Aneurysm-Recurrence Literature, Part 1: Reducing Recurrence after Endovascular Coiling
    E. Crobeddu, G. Lanzino, D.F. Kallmes, H.J. Cloft
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2013 34 2
  • Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with detachable coils: correlation between aneurysm volume, packing, and angiographic recurrence
    Bing Leng, Yongtao Zheng, Jinma Ren, Qiang Xu, Yanlong Tian, Feng Xu
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2014 6 8
  • Balloons and Stents in the Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Vascular Anatomy Remodeled
    Michel Piotin, Raphaël Blanc
    Frontiers in Neurology 2014 5

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire