Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

Research ArticleBrainE
Open Access

Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging

X.Z. Chen, X.M. Yin, L. Ai, Q. Chen, S.W. Li and J.P. Dai
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2012, 33 (10) 1907-1912; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3106
X.Z. Chen
aFrom the Department of Neuroimaging (X.Z.C., L.A., S.W.L., J.P.D.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X.M. Yin
bRadiology Department (X.M.Y.), China Coal General Hospital, Beijing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Ai
aFrom the Department of Neuroimaging (X.Z.C., L.A., S.W.L., J.P.D.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Q. Chen
cDepartment of Neuroimaging (Q.C.), Beijing Neurosurgical Institute Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.W. Li
aFrom the Department of Neuroimaging (X.Z.C., L.A., S.W.L., J.P.D.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.P. Dai
aFrom the Department of Neuroimaging (X.Z.C., L.A., S.W.L., J.P.D.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The differentiation between cerebral GBM and solitary MET is clinically important and may be radiologically challenging. Our hypothesis is that routine MR imaging with qualitative and quantitative analysis is helpful for this differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five GBM and 21 solitary metastases were retrospectively identified, with their preoperative routine MR imaging analyzed. According to the comparison of the area of peritumoral T2 prolongation with that of the lesion, the tumors were classified into grade I (prolongation area ≤ tumor area) and grade II (prolongation area > tumor area). The signal intensities of peritumoral T2 prolongation were measured on T2WI and normalized to the values of the contralateral normal regions by calculating the ratios. The ratio (nSI) of both types of tumors was compared in grade I, grade II, and in tumors without grading. The best cutoff values to optimize the sensitivity and specificity were determined for optimal differentiation.

RESULTS: The nSI of GBM was significantly higher than that of MET without T2 prolongation grading (P < .001), resulting in AUC = 0.725. The difference was significant (P = .014) in grade I tumors (GBM, 38; MET, 9), with AUC = 0.741, and in grade II tumors (GBM, 7; MET, 12), with AUC = 0.869 (P = .017). Both types of tumors showed a different propensity in T2 prolongation grading (χ2 = 12.079, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Combined with qualitative and quantitative analysis of peritumoral T2 prolongation, routine MR imaging can help in the differentiation between brain GBM and solitary MET.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AUC
area under the ROC curve
GBM
glioblastoma multiforme
MET
metastasis
nSI
normalized signal intensity
ROC
receiver operating characteristic
WHO
World Health Organization
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 10
1 Nov 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
X.Z. Chen, X.M. Yin, L. Ai, Q. Chen, S.W. Li, J.P. Dai
Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2012, 33 (10) 1907-1912; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3106

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging
X.Z. Chen, X.M. Yin, L. Ai, Q. Chen, S.W. Li, J.P. Dai
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2012, 33 (10) 1907-1912; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3106
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development and Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Model to Distinguish Glioblastoma from Solitary Brain Metastasis Using Conventional MR Images
  • Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Differentiating Glioblastomas from Brain Metastases
  • Crossref (32)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Differentiation of glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases using radiomic machine-learning classifiers
    Zenghui Qian, Yiming Li, Yongzhi Wang, Lianwang Li, Runting Li, Kai Wang, Shaowu Li, Ke Tang, Chuanbao Zhang, Xing Fan, Baoshi Chen, Wenbin Li
    Cancer Letters 2019 451
  • Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Differentiating Glioblastomas from Brain Metastases
    S. Wang, S. J. Kim, H. Poptani, J. H. Woo, S. Mohan, R. Jin, M. R. Voluck, D. M. O'Rourke, R. L. Wolf, E. R. Melhem, S. Kim
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 5
  • Diffusion-weighted MRI characteristics of the cerebral metastasis to brain boundary predicts patient outcomes
    Rasheed Zakaria, Kumar Das, Mark Radon, Maneesh Bhojak, Philip R Rudland, Vanessa Sluming, Michael D Jenkinson
    BMC Medical Imaging 2014 14 1
  • Gradient of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Peritumoral Edema Helps in Differentiation of Glioblastoma From Solitary Metastatic Lesions
    Pierre Lemercier, Silvia Paz Maya, James T. Patrie, Lucía Flors, Carlos Leiva-Salinas
    American Journal of Roentgenology 2014 203 1
  • Differentiation of supratentorial single brain metastasis and glioblastoma by using peri-enhancing oedema region–derived radiomic features and multiple classifiers
    Fei Dong, Qian Li, Biao Jiang, Xiuliang Zhu, Qiang Zeng, Peiyu Huang, Shujun Chen, Minming Zhang
    European Radiology 2020 30 5
  • Development and Validation of a Deep Learning–Based Model to Distinguish Glioblastoma from Solitary Brain Metastasis Using Conventional MR Images
    I. Shin, H. Kim, S.S. Ahn, B. Sohn, S. Bae, J.E. Park, H.S. Kim, S.-K. Lee
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2021 42 5
  • Discrimination between glioblastoma multiforme and solitary metastasis using morphological features derived from thep:qtensor decomposition of diffusion tensor imaging
    Guang Yang, Timothy L. Jones, Thomas R. Barrick, Franklyn A. Howe
    NMR in Biomedicine 2014 27 9
  • Morphometric model for discrimination between glioblastoma multiforme and solitary metastasis using three‐dimensional shape analysis
    Guang Yang, Timothy L. Jones, Franklyn A. Howe, Thomas R. Barrick
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2016 75 6
  • Differentiation of Brain Abscesses from Glioblastomas and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparisons of Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging before and after Mathematic Contrast Leakage Correction
    Cheng Hong Toh, Kuo-Chen Wei, Chen-Nen Chang, Shu-Hang Ng, Ho-Fai Wong, Ching-Po Lin, Jon Sherman
    PLoS ONE 2014 9 10
  • Analysis of fractional anisotropy facilitates differentiation of glioblastoma and brain metastases in a clinical setting
    Stefanie Bette, Thomas Huber, Benedikt Wiestler, Tobias Boeckh-Behrens, Jens Gempt, Florian Ringel, Bernhard Meyer, Claus Zimmer, Jan S. Kirschke
    European Journal of Radiology 2016 85 12

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire